English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111316/142225 (78%)
Visitors : 48392980      Online Users : 809
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115354


    Title: 專利更正法制與專利權之行使—兼論與專利舉發法制的互動與協力
    Authors: 沈宗倫
    Contributors: 法律學系
    Keywords: 專利更正;公示;申請專利範圍;專利說明書;實質變更;揭露;交易安全;專利侵害;專利異議;專利舉發
    patent amendment;public notice;claims;the patent specification;substantial revision;disclosure;transaction security;patent infringement;patent opposing system;patent revocation system
    Date: 2014
    Issue Date: 2017-12-25 14:41:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 專利一旦授予,申請專利範圍所建立的權利界限,即成為專利權之公示表徵。各國專利更正法制所面臨的問題,乃為專利更正後的交易安全保護議題。特別是我國專利法所規範之專利更正,更正內容溯自原專利申請時生效。此時,值得關注者,公眾因原專利之授予登記,業已基於信賴而本於該專利之讓與或授權以進行交易行為,包括專利技術之改良與再研發。前述信賴原專利所形成之交易秩序,是否會因專利更正的結果而受到動搖,令專利使用者擔負專利更正所致之不利益結果。另外,專利舉發制度與更正制度之協力與互動,亦為各國關注之議題。本研究擬以比較法的觀點,觀摩美國專利法與歐洲專利公約於相關議題之發展,以檢討我國專利法舉發與更正制度之交錯與互動。作為未來專利法修正與司法實務運作之參考。
    As soon as the patent was granted, its claims become the public notice of exclusive rights endowed by patent law. The issue about patent amendment concerned under the various jurisdictions is how to ensure the security of transactions following the patent amendment. The effect for patent amendment comes retroactively back to the application date of the original patent. It is the core of the patent amendment system to review whether the interests the public has enjoyed by trusting the original patent, reflected in assignment or licensing transactions, would be damaged by the amendment of the original patent. This is the first focus of this study. In addition, the interaction and synergy between the patent opposing (revocation) system are also considered in the various jurisdictions to strengthen the quality on patents granted. This study tries to review the patent revocation system under Taiwanese patent law, and propose an optimal model to incorporate the mechanism of patent amendment into the patent revocation system by referring to the related stipulation of U.S. Patent Act and the European Patent Convention, as well as the development of the related patent prosecution and judicial cases.
    Relation: 執行起迄:2014/08/01~2016/07/31
    103-2410-H-004-152-MY2
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    103-2410-H-004-152-MY2.pdf2522KbAdobe PDF2394View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback