English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49511260      Online Users : 842
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115751


    Title: 「夾心餅乾」的修煉史 ─大臺北地區警察心理壓力模型建構
    A qualitative research on Stress : The Process Model of Policemen in General Taipei
    Authors: 劉婷安胥
    Liu, Tinganxu
    Contributors: 黃東益
    Huang, Tong-Yi
    劉婷安胥
    Liu, Tinganxu
    Keywords: 大臺北地區警察
    派出所所長
    性別差異
    壓力機制
    工作特點
    Policeman in Taipei
    Police inspectors
    Gender differences
    Stress mechanism working conditions
    Working traits
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-02-02 11:29:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自針對心理壓力的研究盛行以來,心理壓力和工作績效的關係得到了學界諸多領域的關注。警察是高壓群體,在量化和質化研究的雙重驗證下,得到了學界一致性的認同。而警察的壓力所影響的並不僅只是其個人工作績效,更關乎整個社會的治安狀況。此外,對於壓力而言,局限於測量警察族群的壓力,對於解決問題本身沒有根本性作用。基於以上原因,本研究專注於警察高壓的原因及形成機制。根據非正式預訪談得知所長是警察生涯中壓力最為突出的一個階段,故本研究將目標鎖定在警察階段的所長族群。為了挖掘所長高壓原因及其形成機制,本研究透過質化深入訪談的研究方法,深入訪談了大臺北地區7位男性派出所所長和3位女性所長。經過紮根理論的研究流程和資料分析法,結果發現所長階段的壓力較為嚴重的原因主要在於其特殊的工作特點,以及家庭和工作的難以平衡;就其工作特點而言,包括:壓力多元化、工作時間過長、體力硬線要求高、休假異常、績效結構欠佳、公務冗雜和媒體壓迫。也正是因為工作特點而使得其較難在工作與家庭之間取得平衡。對於女性而言,刻板印象和社會期待均使其在警察工作中處於劣勢,但優秀的表現也會獲得更多的讚賞,與期望破壞理論(Expectancy Violation Theory)一致;而男性也恰正是因為刻板要求和社會期待使得其肩負著和女性警察機制不同但是程度相當的心理壓力。總體而言,警察體制內受到詬病的是績效考核方式,績效結構不合理並且指標沒有上限,專案頻繁,儘管不同來源的所長最終都將自我調整心態到了無可奈何的接受狀態。也正是這一結果,證明目前警察體系內協助警察舒緩壓力的管道較為匱乏,亟需改善和解決。
    The influence by stress on performance is one of the popular research issues. Former qualitative and quantitative researches proved that policeman is one of jobs with high working stress. Stress on policeman not only affect their own working performance but also societal safety. Only measurement of stress cannot make policeman perform better. Thus, this study focuses on causes and mechanism of policeman’s stress. Police inspectors in local police stations are with extremely high working stress according to informal interviews. This study interviewed three female and seven male police inspectors from Taipei City, New Taipei City and Keelung in Taiwan. After data analysis with Grounded Theory, this study concludes that special working conditions and unbalance between family and work are the main sources of stress on policemen. This job is stressful with several traits including multi-faced stress, overtime work schedule, exhausting physical energy, irregular days-off, unreasonable performance evaluation structure, complicated working issues and bothering media. It is these working conditions that make policemen stressful and difficult to make balance between work and family. Furthermore, stereotypes and social desirability burden female policemen. However, consistent with Expectancy Violation Theory, female policemen would also gain more recognition and compliment when they perform positively; Male policemen are required to take over more work for female policemen because of social desirability. In general, the biggest source of stress for policemen in Taiwan is the unreasonable performance evaluation system. It comes out as taking it without other alternatives for most policemen no matter where they were trained before. There has not been effective assistance for policemen within police system in Taiwan.
    Reference: 參考文獻
    王正廷 (2004)。大臺北市交通警察人員工作壓力的正面效應與工作績效關係之研究。 國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    尤正廷 (2006)。 刑事警察人員工作壓力、社會支持及工作滿意關係之研究—以南區、東區為例。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所博碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
    王守玉, Windsor, C., & Yates, P. (2012)。簡介紮根理論研究法. Introduction to Grounded Theory。護理雜誌,59(1), 91 – 95。
    王婉玲(2006)。 國中輔導人員角色壓力, 輔導自我效能與職業倦怠之關係研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文,未出版,臺北。
    王銘傑 (2004)。內部行銷、工作壓力、工作士氣、工作滿足與工作績效關係之研究 — 以台灣省各縣市警察局為例。南華大學管理科碩士所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
    毛國楠(1996)。國中教師的樂觀信念, 自我效能, 對壓力的認知評估, 因應方式與工作調適及身心健康的關係。教育心理學報,(28),177 – 193。
    邱朋潭 (2008)。台南市警察人員休閒參與與休閒阻礙因素之研究。臺東大學進修部暑期體育碩士班學位論文,未出版,臺東。
    李新民(2009)。幼兒教師的心理資本及其與工作表現的潛在關聯。幼兒保育學刊,8(7)1 – 22。
    邱顯仁,朱寶青,游婷熙 (2003)。非營利組織與其志工溝通品質影響因素之研究-以紮根理論分析。目錄,12(2), 55 - 71。
    邱懷萱,李麗日(2012)。 教師工作壓力與自我效能感之相關研究—以苗栗縣國民小學教師為例。區域與社會發展研究,(3),193 - 244。
    余民寧,陳柏霖,& 湯雅芬(2012)。 大學生心理資本量表編製及其相關因素之研究。Journal of Educational, 8(4), 19 - 52。

    吳昇忠 (2008)。臺東縣警察人員自覺健康狀況、健康促進生活型態、工作壓力之研究。臺東太學進修部運動休閒管理碩(假日)學位論文,未出版,臺東。
    吳鈞裕 (2013)。臺北市政府警察局派出所所長工作壓力與工作績效關係之研究。 國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    吳銜禎 (2011)。警察主管工作壓力與生活適應之研究。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    洪志成,楊家瑜 (2013)。 教育行政領域應用紮根理論研究方法之分析。教育研究學報,47(2), 1-20。
    胡陽年 (2009)。基層警察人員工作壓力與組織承諾關係之研究—以台東警察局所屬分駐派所為例。臺東大學進修部公共事務碩(假日)學位論文,未出版,台東。
    陳春希,湯雅云,何秉真,& 鄭晉昌 (2007)。工作壓力, 人格特質與工作投入對警察人員的組織公民行為之研究。圖立政治大學公共行政學報, 12(25),67-93。
    陳富美(2005)。親職效能感,教養行為與孩子生活適應之關係研究。輔導與諮商學報, 27(1), 47-64。
    陳昺麟(2010)。社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例之介紹.。勤益學報,(19),327-342。
    高懿楷 (2005)。基隆市基層警察人員休閒參與現況和休閒阻礙之研究。大葉大學休閒事業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
    許仁宗 (2009)。大臺北市基層員警工作壓力與組織承諾之研究。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學生學位論文,未出版,臺北。
    曾芳代,胡均立,& 陳韻宇(2011)。 人力資本或是信心資產? 自我效能對大學畢業生的學習經驗與就業力間之中介效果。長庚人文社會學報,4(2),335-356。
    康世鑫 & 朱寶清(2004)。警察人員工作關係管理之研究。大葉大學工業關係研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
    萬文隆 (2004)。 深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊,37 (4),17-23。
    程文宏 (2009)。國道公路警察人員工作壓力與工作滿足關係之研究。國立政治大學行政個管理碩士學程學位論文,未出版,臺北。
    潘金葉 (2007)。所長領導風格與基層員警工作投入之研究 — 以臺北市政府警察局派出所為例。國立政治大學公共行政學碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    劉炯炫 (2010)。外勤女警勤務適應之研究—以大臺北市中正第二分局為例。大臺北大學犯罪學研究所學位論文,未出版,臺北。
    劉榮哲 (2003)。女警工作壓力、社會支持與工作滿意關係之研究。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所博碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
    劉誌雄 (2005)。警察工作壓力與家庭生活關係之探討—以基隆市警察局為例。 國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    賴志成 (2010)。臺東縣警察局分駐 (派出) 所所長工作壓力與工作滿意關係之研究。臺東大學進修部公共事務碩 (假日) 學位論文,未出版,台東。
    闕可欣 (1998)。某都會地區警察工作壓力源及憂鬱情緒之探討。高雄醫學大學護理學系研究所學位論文,未出版,高雄。
    賽明成 & 陳建維(2010)。 紮根理論與質性研究: 調和觀點。問題與研究, 49(1)1-28。
    蘇美卿 (2004)。基層員警工作壓力、因對策略與健康狀況關係之研究—以高雄市警警察為例。高雄醫美大學行為科學研究所學位論文,未出版,高雄。
    鄭麗玉(2007)。 認知心理學: 理論與應用(修訂第三版)。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    英文文獻
    Anderson, C. (1976). Coping behaviors as intervening mechanisms in the inverted - U stress - performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 462-469.
    Anderson, G. S., Litzenberger, R., & Plecas, D. (2002). Physical evidence of police officer stress. Policing: an international journal of police strategies & management, 25(2), 399-420.
    Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta‐analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human resource development quarterly, 22(2), 127-152.
    Baglioni, A. J., Cooper, C. L., & Hingley, P. (1990). Job stress, mental health and job satisfaction among UK senior nurses. Stress Medicine, 6(1), 9-20.
    Banks, M. H., Clegg, C. W., Jackson, P. R., Kemp, N. J., Stafford, E. M., & Wall, T. D. (1980). The use of the General Health Questionnaire as an indicator of mental health in occupational studies. Journal of occupational psychology, 53(3), 187-194.
    Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1-2), 30-48.
    Cohen, S. (1980). Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 82-108.
    Deschamps, F., Paganon – Badinier, I., Marchand, A. C., & Merle, C. (2003). Sources and assessment of occupational stress in the police. Journal of occupational health, 45(6), 358-364.
    Evers, A., Frese, M., & Cooper, C. L. (2000). Revisions and further developments of the Occupational Stress Indicator: LISREL results from four Dutch studies. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(2), 221-240.
    Fang, X., Singh, S., & Ahluwalia, R. (2007). An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect. Journal of consumer research, 34(1), 97-103.
    Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 889-898.
    Hart, P. M., Wearing, A. J., & Headey, B. (1995). Police stress and well‐being: Integrating personality, coping and daily work experiences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68(2), 133-156.
    Holi, M. M., Marttunen, M., & Aalberg, V. (2003). Comparison of the GHQ - 36, the GHQ - 12 and the SCL - 90 as psychiatric screening instruments in the Finnish population. Nordic journal of psychiatry, 57(3), 233-238.
    Jamal, M. (1984). Job stress and job performance controversy: An empirical assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 44, 601-619.
    Jones, E. E. (1986). Interpreting interpersonal behavior: The effects of expectancies. Science, 234, 41-47.
    Keijsers, G., Schaufeli, W., Le Blanc, P., Zwerts, C., & Miranda, D. (1995). Performance and burnout in intensive care units. Work and Stress, 9, 513-527.
    Lazarus, R. S., Deese, J., & Osler, S. F. (1952). The effects of psychological stress upon performance. Psychological bulletin, 49(4), 293-295.
    Leveck, M., & Jones, C. (1996). The nursing practice environment, staff retention, and quality of care. Research in Nursing and Health, 19, 331-343.
    López, M. P. S., & Dresch, V. (2008). The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability, external validity and factor structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema, 20(4), 839-843.
    Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: toward a micro‐intervention. Journal of organizational behavior, 27(3), 387-393.
    Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel psychology, 60(3), 541-572.
    Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Li, W. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance. Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 249-271.
    Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: Beyond human and social capital. Business horizons, 47(1), 45-50.
    Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford: Oxford University Press,3-4.
    Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 143-160.
    Mackie, M. (1973). Arriving at “truth” by definition: The case of stereotype inaccuracy. Social Problems, 431-447.
    Miller, D. T., & Turnbull, W. (1986). Expectancies and interpersonal processes. Annual review of psychology, 37(1), 233-256.
    Montazeri, A., Harirchi, A. M., Shariati, M., Garmaroudi, G., Ebadi, M., & Fateh, A. (2003). The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health and quality of life outcomes, 1(1), 66-70.
    Pevalin, D. J. (2000). Multiple applications of the GHQ - 12 in a general population sample: an investigation of long-term retest effects. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 35(11), 508-512.
    Raeda Fawzi Abualrub (2004). Job Stress, Job Performance, and Social Support Among Hospital Nurses. Health Policy and Systems, 36(1), 73-78.
    Risen, Jane, Gilovich, Thomas (2007). “Informal Logical Fallacies”, in Sternberg, Robert J.; Roediger III, Henry L.; Halpern, Diane F., Critical Thinking in Psychology, Cambridge University Press,110-130.
    Schuman, H., & Harding, J. (1964). Prejudice and the norm of rationality. Sociometry, 353-371.
    Secord, P. F., Backman, C. W., & Eachus, H. T. (1964). Effects of imbalance in the self-concept on the perception of persons. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68(4), 442-446.
    Vinacke, W. E. (1957). Stereotypes as social concepts. The journal of social Psychology, 46(2), 229-243.
    Williams, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1998). Measuring occupational stress: development of the pressure management indicator. Journal of occupational health psychology, 3(4), 306-321.
    Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 9(2p2), 1-27.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    公共行政學系
    104256040
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1042560402
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    040201.pdf2069KbAdobe PDF225View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback