English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111200/142120 (78%)
Visitors : 48097587      Online Users : 597
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/115930


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115930


    Title: The Principle of Information Self-Determination in the Era of Big Data and IoT
    大數據與物聯網時代的個人資料自主權
    Authors: 劉定基
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 大數據;物聯網;個人資料自主;個人資料保護;個人資料保護命令;新個人資料保護原則
    Big Data;Internet of Things;Information Self-Determination;Personal Data Protection;General Data Protection Regulation;New Data Protection Principles
    Date: 2017-01
    Issue Date: 2018-02-08 16:16:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著大數據分析與物聯網的興起，如何在各項資料蒐集時確實對當事人進行告知，並取得有意義的同意，實有相當難度，更直接挑戰了既有建立在「告知、同意」基礎上的個人資料自主控制機制。針對此一問題，國際上有主張應繼續維持現行個人資料保護的基本架構，並強化當事人自主；也有認為應另覓嶄新的資訊隱私保護途徑。站在這樣分歧的十字路口上，我國個人資料保護法未來該走向何方？值得探究。本文首先將從個人資料自主概念的發展及現今所遭遇的困境談起；其次介紹上述兩種不同的個人資料保護法制修正典範；最後提出本文的觀察與分析，作為臺灣未來在憲法或法律層次回應的參考。
    With the rise of big data analytics and “Internet of Things (IoT),” it becomes more and more difficult to inform data subjects and obtain meaningful consent before collecting their data; it therefore, challenges the well-established concept of information self-determination, which is built on the basis of informed consent. To address this problem, two different approaches have been proposed internationally. One argues that we should reinforce information self-determination and keep the present personal data protection framework. The other advocates for a brand new use-based way to protect information privacy. As we face these two distinct paradigms, which one should our Personal Information Protection Act follow. This article starts with an overview of the development of information self-determination and the challenges it currently faces. The article then introduces the above-mentioned two data protection paradigms. At the end, this article will analyze the pros and cons of these two approaches, and provide suggestions as to how we could respond, both at the statutory and constitutional levels, to the data protection issues in the era of big data and IoT.
    Relation: 憲政時代, Vol.42, No.4, pp.265-308
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2544View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback