政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/116603

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 110941/141868 (78%)
Visitors : 47540130 Online Users : 629

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 > Item 140.119/116603

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116603

Title:	From Local to Global Coherence: The Development of Moral Thinking 從局部統合到整體統合的發展──以道德思考為例
Authors:	林慧慈林文瑛王震武 Lin, Huitzu Lin, Wenying Wang, Jennwu
Contributors:	心理博七
Keywords:	矛盾;局部統合;道德思考;認知發展;整體統合 cognitive development;contradiction;global coherence;local coherence;moral thinking
Date:	2017-03
Issue Date:	2018-03-28 17:22:48 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	Piaget 主張，解決認知衝突，達成內在認知與現實的均衡，是促進認知發展的主要機制，因此，其理論顯然蘊含著，認知發展是解決認知矛盾，朝向認知統合發展的基本假設。同樣的，Kohlberg的道德發展理論，從情境利我取向到普世正義原則的發展，也意味著從特定情境的局部統合到整體統合之發展趨勢。據此，本研究想要探討道德思考的統合（coherence）程度是否會隨著年齡而越來越整體統合（global coherence），以驗證Piaget 與Kohlberg 理論背後的基本假設。本研究以兩個研究測試此假設，方法是編製有關偷竊、作弊、欺騙、守信主題的四個道德情境故事，針對故事主角的行為，提供兩個彼此矛盾的道德評價，要求參與者分別評估對這兩個矛盾說法的贊成程度。研究一以小學二年級、三年級及六年級學生作為參與者，研究二則以小學六年級、高中生、大學生到大學以上的學生作為參與者。兩個研究分別發展出具有年齡合宜性的實驗材料。參與者對於兩個矛盾說法若呈正相關，代表思考越局部統合，會同時接受兩個矛盾的說法，若呈負相關，代表思考越整體統合，對矛盾說法會接受其一，拒絕其一。研究結果支持Piaget 與Kohlberg 的發展假設，在多數的情況底下，道德思考隨年齡增加而越趨整體統合，但是由於「守信行為」情境在兩個研究中均為唯一的例外，因此思考統合性的領域特定性顯然是必須更進一步加以釐清的因素。 The implicit assumption of Piaget`s and Kohlberg`s cognitive developmental theory is the development of cognitive coherence (equilibrium between internal cognitive structure and external environmental world) via resolution of cognitive conflict. The present study aims to investigate whether the global coherence of moral thinking develops by age. The researchers utilized four moral scenarios to evaluate the participants` responses to two contradicting arguments regarding behaviors of stealing, lying, cheating in an exam, and breaking a promise. The degree of coherence was evaluated by the correlation of the two responses. Since assessment materials should be developed differently for younger children and older subject, the researchers designed two separate studies for different age groups: Study 1 for elementary school children, and Study 2 for older subjects. Study 1 results showed that sixth graders` moral judgment was more coherent than third graders` except for the ＂Breading Promise＂ scenario. Study 2 showed that college students` moral judgment was more coherent than sixth graders` except for the ＂Breaking Promise＂ scenario, as well. Taking both Study 1 and Study 2 into account, coherence of moral thinking increases by age which supports Piaget and Kohlberg`s theoretical hypothesis.
Relation:	教育心理學報, Vol.48, No.3, pp.329-349
Data Type:	article
DOI 連結:	http://dx.doi.org/10.6251%2fBEP.20160128
DOI:	10.6251/BEP.20160128
Appears in Collections:	[心理學系] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
415679.pdf		449Kb	Adobe PDF2	322	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback