政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/116627
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 112881/143847 (78%)
造訪人次 : 50298419      線上人數 : 607
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/116627


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116627


    題名: Accessibility, Reasonable Accommodation and Non-Discrimination Principle: A Legal Review of Consistence between the CRPD and Equal Treatment Regulations in the Constitution and the Rights Protection Act for Persons with Disabilities in Taiwan
    無障礙/可及性、合理調整與平等不歧視原則：從身心障礙者權利公約檢視我國憲法及身心障礙者權利保障法之平等原則內涵
    作者: 孫迺翊
    貢獻者: 法律系
    關鍵詞: 身心障礙者權利公約;平等原則;不歧視;無障礙／可及性;合理調整;優惠性差別待遇
    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities/CRPD;equal treatment;non-discrimination;barrier-free/accessibility;reasonable accommodation;affirmative action
    日期: 2016-11
    上傳時間: 2018-03-29 16:19:33 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 長久以來，我國身心障礙者權益保障法及相關法令政策只有禁止歧視，優惠性差別待遇及社會給付，缺乏對身心障礙者「平等參與社會」的想像，即便憲法增修條文強調國家應協助身心障礙者自立發展，也從未以「人權」的觀點來理解此項憲法委託，因此無論是個案適性協助或是無障礙環境，在法律規範上及法律解釋上仍停留在國家立法與行政裁量，現有法令亦未正視身心障礙者於私法關係中遭遇的障礙與歧視。本文探討身心障礙者權利公約的平等內涵與我國法律體系中的平等有何不同，並探討如何透過立法政策與合公約意旨的法律解釋方式，將該公約強調的事實上平等落實到我國法律體系。
    The Rights Protection Act for Persons with Disabilities and the concerning regulations and policies in Taiwan have long focused merely on non-discrimination, affirmative actions and social benefits. The right of persons with disabilities to equal participate in the society has never been taken seriously in law systems. Even according to the amendment article of the constitution in Taiwan, the state is obligated to realize the independent life of persons with disabilities, this norm has never been understood as their human rights. Accordingly the measures of accessibility in general and reasonable accommodations in individual cases which make the independence and autonomy of persons with disabilities possible fall into governmental discretions; also the discrimination and exclusion against persons with disabilities in private law have been insufficiently handled. This article aims to demonstrate the different models of equal principle, the de facto equality of CRPD on the one hand and the equality before law of the Article 7 of the Constitution in Taiwan on the other hand. This article is further conducted to analyze how to implement the model of de facto equality into the law systems in Taiwan by law reforms and legal interpretation in conformity with CRPD.
    關聯: 臺大法學論叢, 45卷S期, pp.1163-1228
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2016.45.SP.02
    DOI: 10.6199/NTULJ.2016.45.SP.02
    顯示於類別:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    1163-1228.pdf1068KbAdobe PDF2508檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋