政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/118557
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109948/140897 (78%)
造访人次 : 46093232      在线人数 : 1083
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118557


    题名: 最適出口稅與民營化政策—考慮競爭模式內生化情況
    Optimal export tax and privatization in endogenous competition modes
    作者: 沈忠慈
    贡献者: 翁堃嵐
    沈忠慈
    关键词: 民營化程度
    混合雙占
    出口稅
    數量競爭
    價格競爭
    Privatization
    Export taxes
    Price and quantity contracts
    Mixed oligopoly
    日期: 2018
    上传时间: 2018-07-10 15:36:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文主要探討在雙占混合競爭市場下，民營化程度與最適出口稅及社會福祉之關聯性。研究結果顯示在不考慮內生化競爭模型情況下，兩家廠商選擇Cournot 數量競爭策略或Bertrand價格競爭時，民營化程度之變動與最適出口稅及社會福祉不具關聯性，但競爭程度與最適出口稅與社會福祉具關聯性。接著考慮內生化競爭模型情況下，當兩私營廠商做競爭時，採取Cournot 數量競爭策略會達到市場均衡；當一家公營廠商與一家私營廠商做競爭時，市場均衡可能為Cournot 數量競爭策略或Bertrand價格競爭策略亦或是一家廠商採取價格競爭另一家廠商採取數量競爭策略。比較四種競爭均衡下之社會福祉後，發現Cournot 數量競爭均衡下社會福祉最大。最後考慮部分民營化程度之情況，研究顯示無論民營化程度如何變動，政府皆可透過調整出口稅以達到最適出口稅下之社會福祉。
    This paper investigates the effect of privatization on welfare or the optimal export taxes policy in differentiated mixed oligopoly. The main findings of our paper is as follows:(1) If the two firms take the same competition, i.e., Cournot or Bertrand competition, and the degree of privatization has no effect on welfare or the optimal export taxes. (2) We analyze the strategic variables are determined endogenously. If degree of privatization , two private firms will take Cournot competition strategy；If degree of privatization , two firms will take q-q competition strategy or p-p competition strategy or q-p competition strategy or p-q competition strategy. In this case, social welfare is higher if the state-own firm and private firm choose quantity contract. Finally, when the equilibrium under Cournot competition in a mixed duopoly with partial privatization, Government how adjust export tax to maximize social welfare.
    參考文獻: 邱俊榮與黃鴻(2006)，〈公營廠商民營化的最適釋股比例分析〉，《經濟論文叢刊》，34(2)，246-259。
    林瑞益與孫嘉宏(2017)，〈整合型市場之下的混合雙占-價格與數量競爭〉，《經濟研究》，53(2)，261-294。
    翁永和，羅鈺珊與劉碧珍(2006)，〈市場結構與最適民營化政策〉，《經濟論文》，31(2)，149-169。
    Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C. and M.B. Garzón. (2003), “International Trade and Strategic Privatization,” Review of Development Economics, 9. 502-513.
    Boyer,M and M.Moreaux. (1987) , “On Stackelberg Equilibria with Differentiated Products:the Critical Role of the Strategy Space,” Journal of Industrial Economics,36,217-230.
    Chang, W.W. (2005), “Optimal Trade and Privatization Policies in an International Duopoly with Cost Asymmetry,” Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 14, 19-42.
    Chang, R.Y., H Hwang ,and C.H Peng. (2017), “Endogenous Competition Modes, Privatization, and Welfare,” Working paper.
    Dixit, A. K (1979), “A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers,” Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 20–32
    Defraja,G and F, Delbono. (1989), “Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly,” Oxford Economic Papers, 41,302-311.
    Defraja, G and F, Delbono. (1990), “Game-Theoretic Models of Mixed Oligopoly,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 4,1-17
    Fujiwara, K. (2007), “Partial Privatization in a Differentiated Mixed Oligopoly,” Journal of Economics, 99,51-65.
    Haraguchi, J. and T. Matsumura (2016), “Cournot-Bertrand Comparison in a Mixed Oligopoly,” Journal of Economics, 117, 117–136.
    Kenneth. G and M. La Manna (1996), “Mixed Duopoly, Inefficiency, and Public Ownership,” Review of Industrial Organization, 11,853-860.
    Klemperer, P. (1986), “Price Competition vs. Quantity Competition: The Role of Uncertainty,” Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 618-638.
    Lambertini. (2000), “Extended Games Played by Managerial Firms,” The Journal of the Japanese Economic Association， 51，274-283.
    Long, Ngo and S, Frank. (2008) , “How Does State Ownership Affect Optimal Export Taxes ? ,” Economics Bulletin, 37, 1-7.
    Matsumura, Toshihiro. (1998), “Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly, ” Journal of Public Economics, 70,473-483.
    Matsumura, T and A, Ogawa. (2012), “Price Versus Quantity in a Mixed Duopoly, ” Economics Letters, 116,174-177.
    Marcella Scrimitore. (2013), “Price or Quantity？ The Strategic Choice of Subsidized Firms in a Mixed Duopoly” Economics Letters,118,337-341
    Myles,G. (2002), “Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firms` Moves: An Irrelevance Result for the General Case,” Economics Bulletin ,12,1-6
    Pal, D. (1998), “Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Oligopoly,” Economics Letters ,61,181-185.
    Poyago-Theotoky, J. (2007), “Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization, and the Order of Firm’s Moves an Irrelevance Result,” Economics Bulletin, 12, 1-5.
    Scrimitore, M. (2012), “Private and Social Gains in Delegation and Sequential Games with Heterogeneous Firms,” Manchester School, 81, 493-517.
    Singh, N. and X Vives. (1984), “Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly,” Rand Journal of Economics, 15(4), 1-10.
    Reisinger, M. and L. Ressner (2009), “The Choice of Prices versus Quantities under Uncertainty,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18:4, 1155-1177.
    Tomaru, Y. (2006), “Mixed Oligopoly, Partial Privatization and Subsidization,” Economics Bulletin, 12, 1-6.
    Tomaru, Y., and M. Saito. (2010), “Mixed Duopoly, Privatization and Subsidization in an Endgenous Timing Framework,” Manchester School, 78, 111-134.
    White, M.D. (1996), “Mixed Duopoly, Privatization and Subsidization,” Economics Letters, 53, 189-195.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    105255009
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105255009
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.PF.001.2018.F07
    显示于类别:[財政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    500901.pdf1261KbAdobe PDF214检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈