English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141854 (78%)
Visitors : 47762008      Online Users : 653
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/118777
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118777


    Title: 薪資報酬委員會中獨立董事之組成比例對於盈餘管理之影響
    Authors: 吳冠興
    Contributors: 郭弘卿
    吳冠興
    Keywords: 薪酬委員會
    獨立董事
    盈餘管理
    Compensation committee
    Independent director
    Earnings management
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-07-20 17:39:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國證券交易法於二○一○年新增第十四條之六,規範上市及上櫃公司應設置薪資報酬委員會(下稱「薪酬委員會」),以健全董事、監察人與經理人薪資報酬制度,並進一步強化公司治理。有別於他國之規範,我國薪酬委員會之成員不一定為獨立董事,論者質疑薪酬委員如非獨立董事,對於公司平時之運作疏於了解之情況下,恐難知曉董事及經理人之實質貢獻,進而妥適判斷其薪酬之合理性。再者,公司之薪資報酬制度若以會計盈餘作為衡量指標時,將有可能使董事及經理人為了個人利益,透過盈餘管理提升經營績效,以獲得較高之薪酬,而忽略公司長期目標。有鑑於此,本研究欲探討薪酬委員會中獨立董事之組成比例與盈餘管理之關聯性,實證結果發現上市公司薪酬委員會獨立董事佔比越高,越能抑制盈餘管理。
    Article 14-6 of the amendment of Securities and Exchange Act of Taiwan, which was newly added in 2010, requires listed and OTC companies to establish compensation committees. However, Article 14-6 does not require that all members of compensation committee to be independent directors, which is different from some other countries. For the non-independent director members sitting in the compensation committee, it is criticized by some scholars that the performance of directors and managerial officers is hard to be evaluated by them, who have no knowledge of the operation of the company. Moreover, earnings-based compensation system may induce directors and managerial officers to adopt earnings management methodology for their own interest other than the long-term interest of the company. Accordingly, this study is to discuss the connection between the proportion of independent directors in the compensation committee and earnings management. The results suggest that companies with more independent directors in compensation committees are less likely to manipulate earnings.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    王文宇,2012,論大型企業之公司治理法制,月旦法學雜誌,第200期(1月):282-301。
    王志誠,2005,我國公司治理之實務發展及研討—以並列制經營機關之改革為中心,現代公司法制之新課題:賴英照大法官六秩華誕祝賀論文集,元照出版有限公司。
    何曜琛,2005,談美國沙賓法案之重要規範—兼述我國證券交易法之相關修正,現代公司法制之新課題:賴英照大法官六秩華誕祝賀論文集,元照出版有限公司。
    林仁光,2006,公開發行公司內部監控機制之變革—兼論二○○五年證券交易法修正重點,月旦法學雜誌,第130期(3月):172-186。
    林郁馨,2014,公開發行公司經營者薪酬決定機制之實證分析—兼論薪資報酬委員會新制,中研院法學期刊,第14期(3月):245-317。
    林國全,2001,監察人修正方向之檢討—以日本法修正經驗為借鏡,月旦法學雜誌,第73期(6月):47-59。
    林國全,2012,從強制設置薪酬委員會談起,月旦法學雜誌,第202期(3月):22-37。
    洪令家,2016,薪酬報酬制度改革的觀察,台灣法學雜誌,第300期(7月):31-42。
    洪秀芬,2016,德國股份公司單軌制及雙軌制之建構,月旦法學雜誌,第258期(10月):20-38。
    張心悌,2014,薪資報酬委員會獨立性與專業性之再思考,月旦法學雜誌,第233期(10月):115-135。
    郭大維,2011,論董事報酬決定機制之建構—從最高法院九十八年度台上字第九三五號民事判決談起,月旦法學雜誌,第198期(11月):191-212。
    陳俊仁,2009,超越興利防弊功能之迷思—獨立董事與審計委員會地位之再建構,月旦法學雜誌,第172期(9月):75-93。
    陳俊仁,2012,公司治理與董監事暨經理人薪資報酬決定權—薪資報酬委員會制度規範之商榷,月旦法學雜誌,第207期(8月):38-51。
    曾宛如,2013,證券交易法之現狀與未來—期許建構體系完善的證券法規,月旦法學雜誌第217期(6月):93-107。
    曾宛如,2016,員工酬勞之新制—公司法第235條之1之解析,月旦法學教室第159期(1月):50-55。
    劉連煜,2009,獨立董事是少數股東之守護神?—台灣上市上櫃公司獨立董事制度之檢討與建議,月旦民商法雜誌,第26期(12月):23-49。
    劉連煜,2011,肥貓與薪酬委員會,台灣法學雜誌,第185期(10月):137-141。
    劉連煜,2014,新證券交易法實例研習,作者自版。
    蔡昌憲,2012,評我國強制設置薪酬委員會之立法政策-從經濟分析及美國金融改革法談起,中研院法學期刊,第11期(9月):249-340。
    賴英照,2011,股市遊戲規則—最新證券交易法解析,作者自版。
    賴英照,2012,法制的移植—從公司律到獨立董事,臺北大學法學論叢,第84期(12月):1-70。
    戴銘昇,2011,薪資報酬委員會之組織與職權—兼評我國證券交易法2010年增訂之第14條之6,證交資料,第585期(1月):31-55。
    謝易宏,2009,薪甘勤願—簡介美國「薪酬委員會」,月旦民商法雜誌,第26期(12月):144-170。
    二、英文部分
    Bartov, E. 1993. The timing of asset sales and earnings manipulation. The Accounting Review 68 (October): 840-855.
    Bruns, W. J., and K. A. Merchant. 1990. The dangerous morality of managing earnings. Management Accounting 72 (August): 22-25.
    Chung, R., M. Firth, and J.B. Kim. 2002. Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance 8 (January): 29-48.
    Cohen, D. A., and P. Zarowin. 2010. Accrual- based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (May): 2-19.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61 (July): 400-420.
    Dechow, P. M., and I.D. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 Supplement (January): 35-59.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (April): 193-225.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (September): 1-36.
    Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K. K. Nelson. 2002. The relationship between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings quality. The Accounting Review 77 Supplement (January): 71-105.
    Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40 (December): 3-73.
    Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (April): 85-107.
    Healy, P. and J. M. Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13 (December): 365-383.
    Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Autumn): 193-228.
    Kirkpatrick, G. 2009. The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis. Financial Market Trends 96 (January): 1-30.
    Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (August): 375-400.
    Menon, K., and D. D. Williams. 2004. Former audit partners and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 79 (October): 1095-1118.
    Pincus, M., and S. Rajgopal. 2002. The interaction between accrual management and hedging: Evidence from oil and gas firms. The Accounting Review 77 (January): 127-160.
    Reynolds, J. K., and J. R. Francis. 2000. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (December): 375-400.
    Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (December): 335-370.
    Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on earnings managements. Accounting Horizons 3 (December): 91-102.
    Scott,W. R. 1997. Financing Accounting Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall.
    Warfield, T. D., J. J. Wild., and K. L. Wild. 1995. Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (July): 61-91.
    Zang, A. Y. 2012. Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review 87 (March): 675-703.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    105353112
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105353112
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.ACCT.028.2018.F07
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    311201.pdf932KbAdobe PDF23View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback