English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109953/140903 (78%)
Visitors : 46054700      Online Users : 1024
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119680


    Title: Measurement of Political Knowledge and Guessing in Multiple-Choice Items: An Application of Survey Experiment
    政治知識測量與選擇題猜答行為：調查實驗法的應用
    Authors: 潘心儀
    Pan, Sin-Yi
    蔡宗漢
    Tsai, Tsung-han
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: blind guessing;political knowledge;survey experiment;informed guessing;multiple-choice item
    盲目猜答;政治知識;調查實驗;憑據猜答;選擇題;盲目猜答;政治知識;調查實驗;憑據猜答;選擇題
    Date: 2018-02
    Issue Date: 2018-08-28 14:27:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: For the measurement of political knowledge, researchers may prefer open-ended items to multiple-choice questions because they are concerned about blind guessing which leads to the overestimation of knowledge levels. In this research note, we distinguish informed guessing (i.e., guessing the correct answer based on partial knowledge) from blind guessing (i.e., guessing the correct answer randomly). We focus on college students and conduct a survey experiment with the techniques of confidence ratings. The results show that informed guessing is more common than blind guessing. We also show that, based on the results of our survey experiment, using multiple-choice items and the information on choice-options can appropriately reflect respondents’ knowledge levels
    國內多數的調查研究者在使用選擇題型做為測量政治知識的工具時，存在受訪者因猜對答案而高估其知識程度的疑慮。本文認為，選擇題的猜答行為包含憑據猜答與盲目猜答，前者猜對反映受訪者的部分知識，而後者猜對則是機率。倘若受訪者多為憑據猜答，則無須過度擔憂高估知識程度的問題。本文以大學生為研究對象，以心理情境題組直接詢問受訪者的猜答行為，以探究其究竟是憑據猜答或盲目猜答。此外，本文應用調查實驗法蒐集受訪者在相同題目但同時有開放題型與選擇題型的回應，並以此回應推論受訪者的政治知識程度。本文同時提出以選擇題選項做為輔助資訊以推論受訪者的知識程度，並與心理情境資訊進行比較。分析結果顯示，受訪者猜對多屬於憑據猜答，而以選擇題選項做為輔助資訊能適當地推論知識程度。本研究結果可做為調查研究者使用選擇題測量政治知識的參考與依據。
    Relation: 民主與治理, Vol.5, No.1, 1-27
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/2311505X2018020501001
    DOI: 10.3966/2311505X2018020501001
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-27.pdf1931KbAdobe PDF2264View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback