English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 95906/126496 (76%)
Visitors : 31696411      Online Users : 518
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/119689
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119689

    Title: Do both SOX 404 and AS 5 reduce ICFR disclosure errors?
    Authors: 邱献良
    Chiu, Hsian-Lian
    Chou, Ling-Tai Lynette
    Contributors: 會計系
    Keywords: SOX 404;AS5;ICFR-disclosure errors;quality of internal control disclosure;internal control audit
    沙賓法404 條;審計準則第5 號;內部控制揭露錯誤;內部控制揭露品質;內部控制查核
    Date: 2018-04
    Issue Date: 2018-08-28 14:28:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of both SOX 404 and AS5 on ICFR-disclosure errors. We follow the rationale and method developed by Knechel and Vanstraelen (2007) and regard restatement companies (nonrestatement companies) as those with weak (effective) internal controls and greater (lower) likelihood to receive adverse ICFR opinions. We presume that deterioration in ICFR-disclosure quality is shown by an increase in the likelihood of Type II errors (a restatement company fails to conclude that its internal control system is ineffective for the restated period) or an increase in the likelihood of Type I errors (a nonrestatement company concludes that its internal control system is ineffective for the nonrestatement period). Our evidence indicates that the enactment of SOX 404 reduces the Type II errors of ICFR disclosures, without the side effect of increasing Type I errors. In addition, we find that even though the more flexible and less prescriptive AS5 can enhance the efficiency of ICFR audits by reducing Type I errors, it inadvertently lowers public ICFR-disclosure quality, measured as increased Type II errors.
    本研究旨在研究沙賓法404條及審計準則第5號對於內部控制揭露錯誤的影響。本研究參考Knechel and Vanstraelen (2007)的方法,將重編公司視為內部控制較不健全之公司,這些公司理應較可能會收到內部控制否定意見,反之亦然。本研究假定若重編公司報導內部控制系統為有效,此時意味犯型二錯誤的機率較高;若非重編公司報導公司內部控制系統為無效,此時意味犯型一錯誤的機率較高。型二及型一錯誤皆代表內部控制品質降低。本研究發現實施沙賓法404條後可以使型二錯誤發生機率降低,並不會使型一錯誤發生機率增加。此外本研究也發現較具彈性的審計準則第5號可以使型一錯誤發生機率降低,有助提高查核內部控制之效率。但審計準則第5號卻會使得型二錯誤發生機率增加,損及內部控制揭露品質。
    Relation: NTU Management Review, Vol.28, No.1, pp.255-286
    臺大管理論叢, 28卷1期 , P255 - 286
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6226/NTUMR.201804_28(1).0007
    DOI: 10.6226/NTUMR.201804_28(1).0007
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    255-286.pdf1363KbAdobe PDF213View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback