政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/120904

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/120904

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 112721/143689 (78%)
造访人次 : 49615226 在线人数 : 686

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/120904

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120904

题名:	產品類型、業者回應負評對於消費者態度及網路評論有用性評估之影響 The Impacts of Product Types and Responses to Negative Reviews on Consumers’ Attitudes
作者:	王羿婷 Wang, Yi-Ting
贡献者:	邱奕嘉 Chiu, Yi-Chia 王羿婷 Wang, Yi-Ting
关键词:	網路評論態度有用性負評回應產品類型 Online review Attitude Usefulness Response to negative review Product type
日期:	2018
上传时间:	2018-11-09 15:54:57 (UTC+8)
摘要:	網路的發展，加速了資訊的流通，網路評論成為重要地口耳相傳方式，而這些網路評論也顯著影響消費者的購買決策，不只消費者依賴網路評論，業者也越來越關心這些網路上的留言或是意見。本研究欲探討不同的產品類型，以及業者針對負評做出回應，對於消費者態度的影響以及評論有用性評估是否產生差異。實驗為2X2因子設計，分別為產品類型(實用型、享樂型) X業者回應負評(有回應、沒有回應)，共四種版本，透過網路問卷填答得到評量結果，研究結果顯示，消費者閱讀不同類型的產品評論後，對於實用型及享樂型產品的感受沒有明顯差異。然而，對於享樂型產品的行為趨勢，較實用型產品正向，也就是說消費者閱讀完評論後更願意消費享樂型產品，或是推薦親友。而消費者對於評論有用性的評估，不會因為產品類型(實用型、享樂型)的不同而有差異，也不會因為業者是否針對負評做出回應而影響有用性的評估。然而當消費者看到業者針對負評做出回應，並不會因此而提升對於該產品(實用型與享樂型產品)的感受及行為。 The development of internet sped up the circulation of information. Online product review became the important way of word of mouth (WOM). However, this kind of online reviews affect consumer’s purchase decision significantly. Not only the consumers rely on online reviews, firms are also turning their attention toward reviews and opinions on the Internet. This study examined the effect of different product type and whether firm responds to negative reviews on received review helpfulness. This study based on 2X2 factorial experiment: product type (Utilitarian/ Hedonic product) X whether the firm responds to negative reviews (Yes/ No). Four versions of surveys were created and I collected the data through online questionnaires. The results indicate, there’s no significant difference in terms of feeling after consumers read utilitarian and hedonic product reviews. However, the effect on consumer’s behavior of hedonic product is more positive than utilitarian product. It means consumers of hedonic product is more likely to purchase or recommend the product to their family or friends after they read online reviews. Speak of examining the helpfulness of online review, there’s no difference between utilitarian and hedonic product. Whether the firm responds to negative reviews doesn’t affect the helpfulness evaluation of consumers, moreover, it doesn’t increase their feeling and behavior toward the product either (both utilitarian & hedonic product).
參考文獻:	Tancer, B. (2016). 客評經濟的力量：購買者評論&開箱文票房下的市場「電商化」遊戲規則 (黃書儀譯)。台北：大寫出版社 (原著出版年：2014) 邱志聖 (2015)。行銷研究：實務與理論應用。台北：智勝出版社 Arndt, J. (1967). “Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product.” Journal of Marketing Research 4(3): 291-295. Ahluwalia, R. & Z. Gurhan-Canli (2000). “The Effects of Extensions on the Family Brand Name: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective.” Journal of Consumer Research 27(3): 371-381. Ahluwalia, R. & Shiv, B. (1997). The Effects of Negative Information in the Political and Marketing Arenas: Exceptions to the Negativity Effect. Advances in Consumer Research 24: 222. Adaval R. (2001). “Sometimes It Just Feels Right: The Differential Weighting of Affect-Consistent and Affect Inconsistent Product Information.” Journal of Consumer Research 28(1): 1-17. Brown, J., Broderick, A. J., & Lee, N., 2007. “Word of Mouth Communication within Online Communities: Conceptualizing the Online Social Network. ” Journal of Interactive Marketing 21(3): 2-20. Batra, R & Ahtola, O.T (1991). “Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes.” Marketing Letters 2(2): 159-170. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1981). Social psychology: Understanding human interaction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Chen, Y. & Xie, J. (2008). “Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as A New Element of Marketing Communication Mix.” Management Science 54(3): 477-491. Chen, Y & Xie, J (2008). “Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix.” MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 54(3): 477-491. Chevalier, J. A. & Mayzlin, D. (2006). “The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews.” Journal of Marketing Research 43(8): 345-354. Chiou, J. & Cheng, C. (2003). “SHOULD A COMPANY HAVE MESSAGE BOARDS ON ITS WEB SITES? ” Journal of Interactive Marketing (John Wiley & Sons) 17(3): 50-61. Cao, Q., Duan & W. Gan, Q.(2011). “Exploring determinants of voting for the helpfulness of online user reviews: A text mining approach.” Decision Support Systems 50(2): 511-521. Connors, L., Mudambi, S.M., & Schuff, D. (2011). “Is it the Review or the Reviewer? A Multi-Method Approach to Determine the Antecedents of Online Review Helpfulness. ” Published in 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Dwayne D. Gremler, Kevin P. Gwinner, & Stephen W. Brown, (2001) . “Generating positive word‐of‐mouth communication through customer‐employee relationships.” International Journal of Service Industry Management 12(1): 44-59. D.S. Sundaram, Kaushik Mitra, and Cynthia Webster (1998) . “Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis.” Consumer Research 25: 527-531. Duan, W., Bin, G., & Andrew B.W. (2008).“Do online reviews matter? — An empirical investigation of panel data.” Decision Support Systems 45(4): 1007-1016. Dhar, R. & Wertenbroch, K. (2000).“Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods.” Journal of Marketing Research 37(1): 60-71. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL, US: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). “Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets.” Information Systems Research 19(3): 291-313. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2013). “Trusting expert-versus user-generated ratings online: the role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics.” Computers in Human Behavior 29(4): 1626-1634. Forman, C., Ghose, A., Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). “Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets.” Inf. Syst. Res. 19: 291-313. Fishbein, M.A. & Ajzen, I. (1975). “Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research.” MA: Addison-Wesley. Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J.(2006). “eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty.” Journal of Business Research 59(4): 449-456. Ghose, A. & Ipeirotis, P. (2011). “Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 23(10): 1498-1512. Gelb, B. D. & S. Sundaram. (2002). “Adapting to word of mouse.” Business Horizons 45(4): 21-25. Greenwald, A. G. (1982). “Is anyone in charge? Personalysis versus the principle of personal unity.” Psychological perspectives on the self (1): 151- 181. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). “Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing. 18(1): 38-52. Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J (1991).“Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information of Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective.” Journal of Consumer Research 17(4): 454-462. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods, and Propositions.” Journal of Marketing 46(3): 92–101. Insko, C. A. & Schopler, J. (1967). “Triadic consistency. A statement of affective cognitive-conative consistency.” Psychological Review 74: 361-376. Jillian C. Sweeney, Geoffrey N. Soutar, & Tim Mazzarol. “The Differences Between Positive And Negative Word-Of-Mouth –Emotion As A Differentiator? ” ANZMAC 2005 Conference: Consumer Behaviour. Jacqueline J.B. & Reingen. P.H. (1987). “Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(12): 350-362. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). “Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication.” New York, US: Free Press. Korfiatis, N., García-Bariocanal, E., & SáNchez-Alonso, S.(2012). “Evaluating Content Quality and Helpfulness of Online Product Reviews: The Interplay of Review Helpfulness vs. Review Content.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 11: 205-217. Kuan, K.K., Hui, K.L., Prasarnphanich, P., Lai, H.Y. (2015). “What makes a review voted? An empirical investigation of review voting in online review systems.” Journal of the Association of Information Systems 16(1): 48-71. Kelleher. T. (2009). “Conversational Voice, Communicated Commitment, and Public Relations Outcomes in Interactive Online Communication.” Journal of communication 59(1): 172-188. Kutner, B., Wilkins, C., & Yarrow, P. R. (1952). “Verbal attitudes and overt behavior involving racial prejudice.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47(3): 649–652. Kunin, Theodore. (1998). “The construction of a new type of attitude measure.” Personnel Psychology 51: 823-824. Lee, S. (2009). “How do online reviews affect purchasing intention.” African Journal of Business Management 3(10): 576-581. Lu, J., Liu, Z., & Fang, Z. (2016). “Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me.” Judgment and Decision Making 11(4): 332–341. Lee, Y. L. & Song, S. (2010). “An empirical investigation of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational motive and corporate response strategy.” Computers in Human Behavior: 26(5) 1073-1080. LaPiere, R.T. (1934). “Attitudes v’s actions.” Social Forces 13: 230-237. Mohr, L. A., Webb, DJ., & Harris,KE. (2001).“Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 35(1): 45-72. Mudambi, S.M. & Schuff, D. (2010). “What Makes a Helpful Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com.” MIS Quarterly 34(1): 185-200. Neil A. Granitz & James C. Ward (1996). “Virtual Community: a Sociocognitive Analysis.” Advances in Consumer Research 23: 161-166. Okada, E.M (2005). “Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods.” Journal of Marketing Research 42(1): 43-53. Otterbacher, J. (2009). “Helpfulness` in online communities: a measure of message quality.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems:955-964. Park, D.H., Jumin, Lee., & Ingoo, H. (2007). “The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 11(4): 125-148. Park, C.W. & Moon, B. J. (2003). “The Relationship between Product Involvement and Product Knowledge: Moderating Roles of Product Type and Product Knowledge Type. ” Psychology & Marketing 20(11): 977-997. Pan, Y. & Zhang, J. Q. (2011), "Born Unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Reviews.” Journal of Retailing 87(4): 598-612. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). “Servqual: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.” Journal of Retailing, 64(1): 12-37. Petty, Richard E. & John T. Cacioppo (1979). “Issue Involvement Can Increase or Decrease Persuasion by Enhancing Message-Relevant Cognitive Responses.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (10): 1915–1926. Rex, B. & Nigel, H. (1997). “Advertising on the Web: is Tiiere Response before Ciicii-Througii?” Journal of Advertising Research. Mrch‧April: 33-45. Reichheld, F. & W. Earl, S. (1990). “Quality Comes to Services” Harvard Business Review 68(5): 105-111. Rosenberg, M. J. & Hovland, C. I. (1960). “Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitude.” In M. J. Rosenberg, C. I. Hovland, W. J. McGuire, R. P. Abelson, & J. W. Brehm (Eds.), Attitude organization and change. An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp.1-14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Shiv, B. & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). “Heart and Mind in Conflict: the Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making.” Journal of Consumer Research 26(3): 278-292. Sparks, B. A., Perkins, H. E., & Buckley, R. (2013). “ Online travel reviews as persuasive communication: the effects of content type, source, and certification logos on consumer behavior.” Tourism Management 39(12): 1-9. Sparks, B.A., So, K. F., Bradley, G.L. (2016). “Responding to negative online reviews: The effects of hotel responses on customer inferences of trust and concern.” Tourism Management 53(4): 74-85. Strahilevitz, M., & Meyers, J. G. (1998). “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell.” Journal of Consumer Research 24(3):434-446. Timothy D, W., Dana S, D., Dolores, K., & Douglas J, L. (1989). “Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: the Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why we Feel the Way we Do.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 22: 287-343. Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). “Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing.” Journal of Marketing 62(2): 60-76. Voss, K.J. & Morel, A. (2003). “Bidirectional reflectance function for oceanic waters with varying chlorophyll concentrations: Measurements versus predictions.” Limnol. Oceanogr 50(2): 698-705. Fang, W., Milena M, H., & Norm, A. (2000). “A relationship-building model for the Web retail marketplace.” Internet Research 10(5): 374-384. Wetzer, I.M., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). “Never eat in that restaurant, I did! Exploring why people engage in negative word‐of‐mouth communication.” Psychology & Marketing 24(8): 661-680. Wilson, W. R., & Peterson, R. A. (1989). “Some limits on the potency of word-of-mouth information.” Advances in Consumer Research 16(1): 3-29. Woods, W.A. (1996). “Psychological Dimensions of Consumer Decision.”　Journal of Marketing 24(8): 15-19. Wertenbroch, K. & Dhar, R. (2000). “Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods.” Journal of Marketing Research 37(1): 60-71. Willemsen,L.M., Neijens, P.C., Bronner. F., & Ridder, J.A. (2011). “Highly Recommended!” The Content Characteristics and Perceived Usefulness of Online Consumer Reviews.” Computer mediated communication 17(1): 19-38. Zheng, Y. & Kivetz, R. (2009). “The Differential Promotion Effectiveness on Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Products.” Advances in Consumer Research 36: 565-565.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所 1043641191
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1043641191
数据类型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/THE.NCCU.TIIPM.030.2018.F08
显示于类别:	[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

没有与此文件相关的档案.

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈