English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46236594      Online Users : 953
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/121842


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121842


    Title: 無償通行權之特定繼受
    Succession Referring to Gratuitous Right of Way
    Authors: 陳洸岳
    Chen, Guang-Yueh
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 無償通行權;特定繼受人;袋地;相鄰關係;物之負擔;Gratuitous Right of Way;Succession;Surrounded Land;Neighboring Land;Material Burden
    Date: 2017-06
    Issue Date: 2019-01-10 15:44:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: It is an important but rarely discussed issue whether the gratuitous right of way, which based on Civil Code section 789, has binding force for the succeeded parties. By analyzing domestic views, it is found that affirmative opinions are predominant. However, in Japan, which has the same provision, various compromise suggestions had been presented. Considering the reasonableness of those suggestions, the balance with other mechanisms concerning neighboring land and the characteristic of material burden, the gratuitous right of way will be lapsed, if it has not been openly, notoriously revealed. Yet while re-judging the right of way for the surrounded land, particularly the necessity to pass through former surrounding land still is important to consider the details between original parties.
    民法第789 條之無償通行權的法律關係是否拘束特定繼受人，為一重要但較欠缺探討的課題。本文分析國內實務及學說見解，確認整體傾向於採當然拘束特定繼受人為前提；但經比較與我國有相同規定之日本法的發展，得知無論是以當然拘束或當然不拘束為前提，均兼採各種考量而有互相趨近之傾向。經此比較，本文認為，鑑於與其他相鄰關係之均衡及物之負擔的特性，無償通行權如欠缺適當顯現通行關係存在之狀態，則應失其效力，但在重新決定袋地之通行權時，過往造成袋地之經過應為判斷是否仍可通行原圍繞地之重要考量。
    Relation: 法令月刊, Vol.68, No.6, pp.56-71
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6509/TLM.2017.6806.03
    DOI: 10.6509/TLM.2017.6806.03
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2240View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback