English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 96163/126772 (76%)
Visitors : 32209859      Online Users : 360
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 資訊科學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/122169
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122169

    Title: A microgenetic analysis of classroom discussion practices: How literacy processes intermingle in the negotiation of meaning in an online discussion
    Authors: 江玥慧
    Chiang, Yueh-hui Vanessa
    Vogler, Jane S.;Schallert, Diane L.;Park, Yangjoo;Song, Kwangok;Chiang, Yueh-hui Vanessa;Jordan, Michelle E.;Lee, SoonAh;Cheng, An-Chih Janne;Lee, Ji-Eun;Park, Jeong-bin;Sanders, Anke J. Z.
    Contributors: 資科系
    Keywords: comprehension processes;discussion;online reading and writing;qualitative (general);adults
    Date: 2013-09
    Issue Date: 2019-01-25 12:41:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Unlike previous research on computer-mediated discussions that has focused analysis on the final conversation as a completed product, this study was focused on the process by which the conversation was created. Using screen-capturing software, the on-screen actions of the nine participants in an online classroom discussion were recorded and analyzed for evidence of reading, writing, and thinking processes. Retrospective interviews were conducted with three of the student participants for additional insights into these processes. A triangulation of data sources revealed participants engaged in at least three distinct patterns of reading, writing, and thinking, with some participants fluidly moving between these patterns throughout the conversation. The three patterns were described as follows: (a) a methodical reading of most messages, and composing of responses occurring as the reader/writer thinks of it; (b) a coordination of reading, thinking, and writing, with careful revisiting of messages already read and deliberate crafting of responses; and (c) a complex orchestration of processes, with several reading resources consulted in addition to the conversation’s unfolding messages as well as composing processes that were interleaved with thinking and reading. This study provides clear evidence that the experiences of individuals in the same online conversation can vary considerably even as they contribute to a co-constructed publicly shared conversation.
    Relation: Journal of Literacy Research, Volume: 45 issue: 3, pp.211-239
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1086296X13499846
    DOI: 10.1177/1086296X13499846
    Appears in Collections:[資訊科學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    211.pdf647KbAdobe PDF159View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback