政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124443
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109927/140876 (78%)
造访人次 : 45974868      在线人数 : 978
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124443


    题名: 公開收購下之資訊使用與內線交易──以開發金控併金鼎證券案為例
    Insider Trading in Case of Tender Offers: A Lesson form the CDF-TISC Dispute
    作者: 朱德芳
    贡献者: 法學評論
    关键词: 內線交易;公開收購;先購後併;大量持股之申報義務;共同取得;共同公開收購;企業併購法第27條第10項
    Insider Trading;Tender Offer;Stakebuilding;Person Acting in Concern;Consortium Offers;Joint Offerors;Article 27(10) of Business Mergers and Acquisitions Act
    日期: 2018-06
    上传时间: 2019-07-24 16:04:04 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 公開收購之發布往往牽動目標公司股價之漲跌，獲悉消息並在消息公開前買賣目標公司股份者，經常獲利甚鉅。本文藉由已經三審定讞的開發金控併購金鼎證券一案，探討公開收購人資訊使用與內線交易的相關問題，包括公開收購人在公開收購消息公開前，依照自己的規劃與資訊，買進目標公司股票，是否成立內線交易？公開收購人能否將未公開之消息，傳遞給他人，使他人在消息公開前買進目標公司股票？他人能否與公開收購人共同取得目標公司股份，或共組聯盟進行布局？又二○一六年修正的企業併購法第27條第10項明文規定，為併購目的，得以不公開方式先行單獨或與他人共同取得任一公開發行公司已發行股份總數10%以下的股份。此新增條文與內線交易之關係為何？本文從內線交易的規範理論出發，分析比較美國、歐盟、英國與香港等法域之規範，並評析開發金控併金鼎證券案以及企業併購法之相關規定。
    This paper analyses the insider trading in the context of tender offers, mainly focusing on the following questions: Can the tender offeror acquire shares of the target (i.e. stakebuilding/toe acquisition) before announcing the tender offer on the basis of its own tender offer intention? Can any other person acquire shares of the target? Persons in concert or consortium? The new Business Mergers and Acquisitions Act has taken effect on January 8, 2016, and Article 27 (10) provides any person can alone or with others acquire 10% or less shares of a publicly traded company for the purpose of the merger and acquisition. Will the new provision become a safe harbor for insider trading? By analyzing the theory of insider trading, regulations and laws of the United States, EU, UK and Hong Kong, this paper provides suggestions on how the current laws apply on the balance of maintaining the market integrity and facilitating M&A transactions.
    關聯: 法學評論, 153, 193-251
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/ 10.3966/102398202018060153004
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202018060153004
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    67.pdf621KbAdobe PDF2238检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈