政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124446
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 93218/123590 (75%)
造访人次 : 27724018      在线人数 : 567
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124446


    题名: 以比較法觀點規範網路服務提供者於防制性隱私內容外流之責任與義務
    A Comparative Study on Regulating the Liabilities and the Obligations of Internet Service Provider on the Prevention of Non-Consensual Pornography
    作者: 蕭郁溏
    贡献者: 法學評論
    关键词: 復仇式色情;違反本人意願散布性隱私內容;隱私權;著作權;網路服務提供者;通知-移除程序;被遺忘權;刪除權;個人資料保護法;數位通訊傳播法草案
    Revenge Porn;Non-Consensual Pornography;Privacy Right;Copyright;Internet Service Provider;Notice-and-Takedown Procedure;The Right to be Forgotten;The Right to Erasure;Personal Information Protection Act;Bill of Digital Communication Act
    日期: 2018-09
    上传时间: 2019-07-24 16:04:45 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 「違反本人意願散布性隱私內容」之入罪化,近來已成為國際法制之改革重點。然,該如何規範網路服務提供者就此內容之責任與義務,經散布的性隱私內容該如何移除,亦是法制上的難題。被害人最在乎的往往是有否可能主張事前權利保護或事後救濟。由於美國通信端正法和網路著作權侵害責任限制法為許多國家規範網路服務提供者之參考對象,故本文以案例分析探討通信端正法之利與弊,並自隱私權觀點分析被遺忘權與刪除權,再以比較法探究「通知─移除程序」義務之規範,藉此釐清網路服務提供者之責任與義務。最後,以個人資料保護法和數位通訊傳播法草案出發,研析被遺忘權與刪除權於我國適用的可能,檢討我國法制之現況並提出立法建議。
    As we observe progresses in legal reforms, the criminalization of “Non-Consensual Pornography” has recently become one of the core issues therein. However, how the law regulates the liabilities and the obligations of Internet Service Providers on this cybercrime and the removal of non-consensual pornography are both complicated legal issues. Once a person’s sexual content is leaked, such victim would mostly be concerned about whether the participants of the content would be able to claim preemptory rights or pursue legal remedies. Considering that a lot of countries’ regulations of Internet Service Providers are based on the U.S. Communications Decency Act and Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act, this paper begins by arguing the pros and cons of the Communications Decency Act by case study; analyzes the right to be forgotten and the right to erasure, addresses “notice-and-takedown” procedure by comparative study; and clarifies the liabilities and the obligations of Internet Service Providers. Lastly, this paper starts from Personal Information Protection Act and the bill of Digital Communication Act, discusses the possibility of the application of the right to be forgotten and the right to erasure, and reflects on the status quo of Taiwan laws to put forward legislative suggestions.
    關聯: 法學評論, 154, 151-237
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/ 10.3966/102398202018090154001
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202018090154003
    显示于类别:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    70.pdf621KbAdobe PDF59检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈