English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109953/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46223472      Online Users : 647
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/124653
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124653


    Title: 高階經理人績效目標之期中衡量對棘輪現象的影響
    The impact of interim bonus targets on ratcheting
    Authors: 劉玉筑
    Liu, Yu-Zhu
    Contributors: 梁嘉紋
    劉玉筑
    Liu, Yu-Zhu
    Keywords: 棘輪現象
    績效目標設定
    季度績效目標
    半年度績效目標
    CEO獎酬
    Ratcheting
    Target revision
    Quarterly bonus
    Semi-annual bonus
    CEO compensation
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-08-07 15:52:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去許多研究皆探討高階經理人年度績效目標中的棘輪現象,但是少有文獻有針對高階經理人季度績效目標或半年度的績效目標做出相關討論。本研究以S&P 1500公司中CEO的季度或半年度績效目標做為樣本進行分析。實證結果發現,CEO季度或半年度的績效目標呈現兩種模式的棘輪現象。薪酬委員會於修訂CEO目標時,會同時將上季(半年)與去年同季(半年)的績效表現納入考量之中。除此之外,CEO季度或半年度績效目標棘輪的程度,會受到公司的季節性與其CEO是否接近退休年齡所影響。總括而言,本研究首次提供了關於高階經理人季度或半年度績效目標棘輪的實證證據。
    Research in ratcheting has focused on executives’ annual performance targets. However, little research examine ratcheting in targets that measured quarterly or semi-annually. Using performance target data from CEOs with quarterly or semi-annual bonus plans in S&P 1500 firms, I find that CEOs’ performance information from the last quarter (or half-a-year) and from the same quarter (or half-a-year) last year are both incorporated in their target revision. Furthermore, the extent of target ratcheting varies with the degree of firms’ seasonality and CEO horizon. Overall, this study provides the first empirical evidence of ratcheting in quarterly and semi-annual targets.
    Reference: Anderson, S. W., H. C. Dekker, and K. L. Sedatole. 2010. An empirical examination of goals and performance-to-goal following the introduction of an incentive bonus plan with participative goal setting. Management Science 56 (1): 90–109.
    Aranda, C., J. Arellano, and A. Davila. 2014. Ratcheting and the role of relative target setting. The Accounting Review 89 (July): 1197–226.
    Bol, J. C., T. M. Keune, E. M. Matsumura, and J. Y. Shin. 2010. Supervisor discretion in target setting: An empirical investigation. The Accounting Review 85 (November): 1861–86.
    Bol, J. C., and J. Lill. 2015. Performance target revisions in incentive contracts: Do information and trust reduce ratcheting and the ratchet effect? The Accounting Review 90 (September): 1755–78.
    Bouwens, J., and P. Kroos. 2011. Target ratcheting and effort reduction. Journal of Accounting and Economics 51 (February): 171-85.
    Casas-Arce, P., Holzhacker, M., Mahlendorf, M. D., and Matějka, M. 2018 Relative Performance Evaluation and the Ratchet Effect. Contemporary Accounting Research 35 (Winter) : 1702–1731.
    Cheng, S. J. 2004. R&D expenditure and CEO compensation. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 305–28.
    Dekker, H. C., T. Groot, and M. Schoute. 2012. Determining performance targets. Behavioral Research in Accounting 24 (July): 21–46.
    Huson, M. R., Tian, Y., Wiedman, C. I., & Wier, H. A. 2012. Compensation committees’ treatment of earnings components in CEOs’ terminal years. The Accounting Review 87 (1): 231–259.
    Indjejikian, R. J., and D. Nanda. 2002. Executive target bonuses and what they imply about performance standards. The Accounting Review 77 (October): 793–819.
    Indjejikian, R. J., M. Matějka, K. A. Merchant, and W. A. Van der Stede. 2014a. Earnings targets and annual bonus incentives. The Accounting Review 89 (February): 1227–58.
    Indjejikian, R. J., M. Matějka, and J. D. Schloetzer. 2014b. Target ratcheting and incentives: Theory, evidence, and new opportunities. The Accounting Review 89 (4): 1259–67.
    Jensen, M., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98 (April): 225-264.
    Kalyta, P. 2009. Accounting discretion, horizon problem, and CEO retirement benefits. The Accounting Review 84 (5): 1553–73.
    Kim S, Shin J. 2017. Executive bonus target ratcheting: Evidence from the new executive compensation disclosure rules. Contemporary Accounting Research 34 (December): 1843-1879.
    Kwon, S., S. Choi, S. Kim, and J. Shin. 2018. The Use of External Performance Expectations in the Target Setting of Executive Annual Bonus Contracts. Working paper, Seoul National University.
    Leone, A. J., and S. Rock. 2002. Empirical tests of budget ratcheting and its effect on managers’ discretionary accrual choices. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (February): 43-67.
    Matsunaga S, Park C (2001) The effect of missing a quarterly earnings benchmark on the CEO’s annual bonus. Accounting Review 76(3):313-332.
    Merchant, K. A., and W. A. Van der Stede. 2012. Management Control Systems: Performance measurement, Evaluation and Incentives. 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Murphy, K. 2001. Performance standards in incentive contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (December): 245-78.
    Salamon, G. L. & Stober, T. L. 1994. Cross-quarter differences in stock price responses to earnings announcements: Fourth-quarter and seasonality influences. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (Fall): 297–330
    Smith, C, and R. Watts. 1982. Incentive and tax effects of executive compensation plans. Australian Journal of Management 1 (2): 139-157.
    Taylor, L. A. 2013. CEO wage dynamics: Estimates from a learning model. Journal of Financial Economics 108 (1): 79–98.
    Weitzman, M. L. 1980. The ‘ratchet principle’ and performance incentives. The Bell Journal of Economics 11 (Spring): 302-8.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    106353004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106353004
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900364
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    300401.pdf1251KbAdobe PDF234View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback