English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46090985      Online Users : 1429
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125880


    Title: 美國智庫對小布希政府台海政策之影響-戰略模糊或戰略清晰
    US Think Tank influenced of Gorge Walker Bush Administration`s Cross-Strait policy: Strategic Ambiguity or Strategic Clarity
    Authors: 張正翰
    Chang, Cheng-Han
    Contributors: 黃奎博
    Huang, Kui-Bo
    張正翰
    Chang, Cheng-Han
    Keywords: 華府智庫
    戰略模糊
    戰略清晰
    小布希總統台海政策
    Think Tanks in Washington DC
    Strategic Ambiguity
    Strategic Clarity
    President George Walker Bush’s Cross-Strait policies
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-09-05 17:22:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文探討華府智庫在小布希總統執政8年期間 (2001-2008)的台海政策建議，實際與小布希政府台海政策論述之異同，以「美中軍機擦撞事件前後」、「一邊一國論」、「台灣公投入法」、「中共制定反分裂國家法」與「台灣入聯公投」等五項事件發生時期為主要研究時間，並以戰略模糊或戰略清晰政策進行區分，另外討論華府智庫的意識形態對政府外交決策理論上的影響。最後獲得華府智庫代表的意識形態，並非與提出的台海政策建議絕對相關，以及某華府智庫與小布希政府台海政策論述在不同時期仍有相近傾向，所以具有相互影響的結果。
    This paper discussed the similarities and differences of the Cross-Strait policies between the Think Tanks in Washington DC and President George Walker Bush’s administration during the eight years (2001-2008). There had five major events occur as the main research periods, including the "US-China military aircraft collision incident", " One Country on Each Side", " the Referendum Act of Taiwan", "PRC formulated Anti-Secession Law" and " Taiwanese United Nations membership referendums" then the five major events were differentiated by Strategic Ambiguity or Strategic Clarity policy. In addition, this paper also discussed the ideology of the Think Tanks in Washington DC influenced the theory of foreign policy decision-making. In conclusion, the ideology of the Think Tanks in Washington DC was not absolutely related to the Cross-Strait policy recommendations, and some of the Think Tanks in Washington DC still had similar trends toward President George Walker Bush’s government Cross-Strait policies in different periods, and there had mutually influential results.
    Reference: 中文部分

    中國外交部(2001)。錢其琛副總理與美國務卿鮑威爾會談。檢索日期：2019年6月10日。擷取: http://atcmxl.mfa.gov.cn/web/ziliao_674904/zt_674979/ywzt_675099/2355_676073/2387_676127/t11224.shtml
    公眾外交協調會(2005)。中華民國(台灣)對中國制訂「反分裂國家法」之立場。 檢索日期：2019年5月17日。擷取: https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content_M_2.aspx?n=8742DCE7A2A28761&sms=491D0E5BF5F4BC36&s=B902EB2E0B950AFD
    王海明(2018)。政治化的困境:美國保守主義智庫的興起。北京: 中信出版社。
    王鼎銘(2006)。成本效益、公民責任與政治參與：2004 年參與公民投票的分析。「公民權：台灣社會變遷基本調查」第八次研討會。(頁 2-5). 台北: 中央研究院。
    王嘉源(2018)。川普眼中最權威的「中國通」白邦瑞：大陸應邀蔡英文訪北京。檢索日期：2019年4月25日。擷取: https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20181012002461-260408?chdtv
    台獨公投法潰敗 民進黨臨陣棄權 兩岸危機暫緩解(2003)。太陽報。檢索日期：2019年6月13日。擷取: http://the-sun.on.cc/channels/news/20031128/20031128015907_0001.html
    加入UN公投提案 扁促大選時舉行(2007)。自由時報電子報。檢索日期：2019年6月15日。擷取: https://web.archive.org/web/20070814123852/http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2007/new/may/23/today-p8.htm
    朱浤源(1999)。撰寫博碩士論文實戰手冊。台北: 正中書局。
    行政院大陸委員會(2006)。有關「國家統一委員會」終止運作及「國家統一綱領」終止適用政策說帖。檢索日期：2019年6月16日 擷取: https://web.archive.org/web/20081228153532/http://www.mac.gov.tw/big5/mlpolicy/cease.htm
    吳定(2013)。公共政策。台北: 五南。.
    吳新興(1995)。整合理論與兩岸關係之研究。台北: 五南圖書出版有限公司。
    呂芳上(1991)。史丹佛大學「胡佛研究所」及其典藏的民國史料。近代中國史研究通訊，222-233。
    宋學文(1999)。「維持現狀」之決策及其發展：3 i模型的決策分析。中國大陸研究。42(11)，80-81。
    宋學文、蔡佳恬(1997)。維持現狀」之決策及其發展：（3+1）i 模型的決策分析。收於 蔡勇美、章英華，台灣的都市社會(頁 45-56)。台北: 巨流圖書。檢索日期：2018年11月15日。擷取: http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/sis/discuss/1B-4.pdf
    李本京(1987)。美國亞洲政策的制定-兼論保守主義與自由主義的歷史因素。收於 李本京，美國外交政策研究(頁160-180)。台北: 正中書局。
    林水波、張世賢(2015)。公共政策。台北: 五南。
    邵宗海(2003)。陳水扁「一邊一國」主張的分析與兩岸關係的影響。檢索日期：2019年5月11日。擷取: http://www.ntpu.edu.tw/~pa/teacher/shao/mso50B3F.pdf
    美國之音(2011)。專家﹕美對台保證與美中公報皆無法律效力。美國之音。檢索日期：2019年5月11日。擷取: https://www.voacantonese.com/a/article-201111019-s-tc-dctaiwan-six-assurances-legal-132992228/935013.html
    美國在臺協會(1972)。中華人民共和國和美利堅合眾國聯合公報 – 1972。檢索日期：2019年2月10日。擷取: https://www.ait.org.tw/zhtw/our-relationship-zh/policy-history-zh/key-u-s-foreign-policy-documents-region-zh/u-s-prc-joint-communique-1972-zh/
    美國在臺協會(1979)。臺灣關係法。檢索日期：2019年2月11日。擷取: https://www.ait.org.tw/zhtw/our-relationship-zh/policy-history-zh/key-u-s-foreign-policy-documents-region-zh/taiwan-relations-act-zh/
    郝望(2005)。台海兩岸綜合實力對比及預測。台北: 秀威出版。
    張亞中、孫國祥(1999)。美國的中國政策-圍堵、交往、戰略夥伴。台北: 生智。
    張慶勳(2010)。論文寫作手冊。台北市: 心理出版社。
    曹郁芬(2007)。台灣入聯公投 美高調反對。自由時報。檢索日期：2019年5月22日。擷取: https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/150954
    郭壽旺(2006)。華府智庫對美國台海兩岸政策制定之影響-對李登輝總統九五年訪美案例之研究。台北: 秀威資訊科技。
    陳文賢(1997)。美國與中共戰略互動下的台灣安全：一九七０年代以來的觀察。問題與研究，36(6)，7。
    彭懷恩(1983)。精英民主理論評介。台北: 正中。
    彭懷恩(2003)。政治新論。台北: 風雲論壇。
    楊永明(1998)。從戰略模糊到三不政策：美國對台政策的轉變。理論與政策，12(4)，87-105。檢索日期：2018年12月10日。擷取: http://club.ntu.edu.tw/~yang/Paper-Three-Noes.htm
    楊念祖(2003)。美國台海政策已愈趨清晰。台灣蘋果日報。檢索日期：2019年5月11日。擷取: https://tw.news.appledaily.com/international/daily/20031211/560840
    鄒景雯(2001)。李登輝執政告白實錄。印刻出版社: 台北。
    熊玠 (2005)。大陸制訂《反分裂國家法》之意義與玄機。海峽評論。檢索日期：2019年6月14日。擷取: https://www.haixia-info.com/articles/4183.html
    劉永祥(2018)。美中兩強競爭下 台灣須提高警覺。中國時報。檢索日期： 2018年11月12日 擷取: http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20161218000276-260118
    劉屏(2018)。台海現狀究竟為何？ 美國說了算。聯合新聞網。檢索日期：2018年11月12日。擷取: https://udn.com/news/story/11226/2538539
    蔡明彥(2005)。布希外交決策與行政部門角色—以國務院、五角大廈與國安會為例。台灣國際研究季刊，1(3)，1-17.
    閻學通、陳寒溪 (譯) (2003)。爭論中的國際關係理論。(原作者:Dougherty James E. & PfaltzgraffRobert L.Jr.)。北京: 世界知識出版社。(原著出版年:1971)。
    總統府新聞(2007)。總統致函聯合國潘基文秘書長正式提出以台灣名義申請加入聯合國。檢索日期：2019年5月21日。擷取: https://www.president.gov.tw/NEWS/11464
    關中(2005)。意識形態和美國外交政策。台北: 台灣商務印書館。

    英文部分

    Abelson, D. E. (1996). American Think Tanks and Their Role in US Foreign Policy . New York: St. Martin`s Press.
    Abelson, D. E., & Carberry, C. M. (1998). Following Suit or Falling Behind? A Comparative Analysis of Think Tanks in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Political , p. 530.
    Abelson, D. E. (2002). Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. Montreal : McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    Abelson, D. E. (2006). A Capitol Idea: Think Tanks and US Foreign Policy. Montreal: McGill-Queen`s University Press..
    AEI. (2019). Foreign and Defense Policy Studies. Retrieved 6 5, 2019, from Library of Congress Web Archives Collection: http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20111109142856/http://www.aei.org/aei-website/managed-content/site-pages/about/foreign-and-defense-policy-studies.html
    AIT. (2001). Opening Statement, Confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Retrieved 6 10, 2019, from U.S. International Engagement: A Time of Great Opportunity Statements by Secretary of State Colin Powell on Key Foreign Policy Issues: https://web-archive-2017.ait.org.tw/en/officialtext-bg0104.html
    American Enterprise Institute. (2019). AEI`s Organization and Purposes. Retrieved 4 20, 2019, from American Enterprise Institute.: https://web.archive.org/web/20090212000018/http://www.aei.org/about/
    Bader, J. (2004). Path to Peace in the Taiwan Strait is Well-Tread. Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from Center for American Progress: https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/news/2004/05/20/808/path-to-peace-in-the-taiwan-strait-is-well-tread/
    BandowDoug. (2015). GOP’s Foreign Policy Goes from Bad to Ugly as Marco Rubio Pushes Intervention for Fun and Profit. Retrieved 6 24, 2019, from: Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/dougbandow/2015/08/12/gops-foreign-policy-goes-from-bad-to-ugly-as-marco-rubio-pushes-intervention-for-fun-and-profit/#dabbd5e364e6
    BBC. (2001). Chinese jet `snapped in two`. Retrieved from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1275404.stm
    BBCNEWS. (2001). Russians to fly out spy plane. Retrieved 6 11, 2019, from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1380725.stm
    Bereuter, D. K. (2001). Perspectives on US National Interests in Asia. Retrieved 5 29, 2019, from The Heritage Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/perspectives-us-national-interests-asia
    Blumenthal, D., & Schmitt, G. J. (2006). A Strange Calculus. Retrieved 6 4, 2019, from Wall Street Journal Asia: http://www.aei.org/publication/a-strange-calculus/
    Boucher, R. (2005). Daily Press Briefing. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from U.S. Department of State: https://web.archive.org/web/20050316032754/http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2005/43149.htm
    Brookes, P. (2003). The Challenges and Imperatives in Taiwan`s Defense. Retrieved 6 1, 2019, from The Heritage Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/the-challenges-and-imperatives-taiwans-defense
    Brookings. (2010). About Brookings. Retrieved 4 25, 2019, from Brookings: https://web.archive.org/web/20100430053631/http://www.brookings.edu/about.aspx
    Brookings. (2019a). Brookings Institution History. Retrieved from Brookings: https://web.archive.org/web/20100213071830/http://www.brookings.edu/about/History.aspx
    Brookings. (2019b). Brookings Institution Press. Retrieved from Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/press/books.aspx/
    Brown, D. G. (2003). Illusions, Misperceptions, and Political Spin in Taipei. PacNet, 50. Retrieved 5 16, 2019, from https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac_0350.pdf
    Burles, M., & Shulsky, A. N. (2000). Patters in China’s Use of Force : Evidence from History and Doctrinal Writings. Santa Monica, California: Rand. Retrieved 10 15, 2018, from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a374437.pdf
    Burt, S. (1997). Ferment at Brookings(Brookings Institution). National Journal(29), p. 2080.
    Bush, G. W. (1999). A Distinctively American Internationalism. Retrieved 6 10, 2019, from A Speech at Simi Valley California: www.georgewbush.com/News/Speeches/111999_intl.html
    Bush, G. W. (2001). Remarks and a Question-and-Answer Session With the American Society of Newspaper Editors. Retrieved 6 11, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-and-question-and-answer-session-with-the-american-society-newspaper-editors-3
    Bush, G. W. (2001). Remarks at the White House Correspondents` Association Dinner. Retrieved 6 11, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-the-white-house-correspondents-association-dinner-17
    Bush, G. W. (2001). Remarks in a Telephone Conversation With New York City Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani and New York Governor George E. Pataki and an Exchange With Reporters. Retrieved 6 12, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-telephone-conversation-with-new-york-city-mayor-rudolph-w-giuliani-and-new-york
    Bush, G. W. (2001). Remarks on the Observance of National Park Week and National Volunteer Week and an Exchange With Reporters. Retrieved from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-the-observance-national-park-week-and-national-volunteer-week-and-exchange-with
    Bush, G. W. (2001). Remarks Prior to Discussions With Vice Premier Qian Qichen of China and an Exchange With Reporters. Retrieved 6 10, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-prior-discussions-with-vice-premier-qian-qichen-china-and-exchange-with-reporters
    Bush, G. W. (2001). Statement on Renewal of Normal Trade Relations Status for China. Retrieved 6 11, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-renewal-normal-trade-relations-status-for-china
    Bush, G. W. (2001). Statement on the Ministerial Decision To Admit the People`s Republic of China and Taiwan Into the World Trade Organization. Retrieved 6 12, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-the-ministerial-decision-admit-the-peoples-republic-china-and-taiwan-into-the
    Bush, G. W. (2001). The President`s News Conference With President Jiang Zemin of China in Shanghai, China. Retrieved 6 12, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-president-jiang-zemin-china-shanghai-china
    Bush, G. W. (2002). The President`s News Conference With President Jiang Zemin of China in Crawford, Texas. Retrieved 6 12, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-president-jiang-zemin-china-crawford-texas
    Bush, G. W. (2003). Remarks Following Discussions With Premier Wen Jiabao of China and an Exchange With Reporters. Retrieved 6 13, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-following-discussions-with-premier-wen-jiabao-china-and-exchange-with-reporters
    Bush, G. W. (2003). Statement on Signing Legislation Concerning Participation of Taiwan in the World Health Organization. Retrieved 6 13, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-signing-legislation-concerning-participation-taiwan-the-world-health
    Bush, G. W. (2004). Remarks in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-lancaster-pennsylvania
    Bush, G. W. (2004). Statement on Signing Legislation Supporting the Participation of Taiwan in the World Health Organization. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-signing-legislation-supporting-the-participation-taiwan-the-world-health
    Bush, G. W. (2004a). Remarks in a Discussion in Richland Center, Wisconsin. Retrieved from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-discussion-richland-center-wisconsin
    Bush, G. W. (2004b). Presidential Debate in Coral Gables, Florida. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/presidential-debate-coral-gables-florida
    Bush, G. W. (2005). Interview With Phoenix Television of Hong Kong. Retrieved 6 16, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/interview-with-phoenix-television-hong-kong
    Bush, G. W. (2005). Remarks at the American Society of Newspaper Editors Convention and a Question-and-Answer Session. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-the-american-society-newspaper-editors-convention-and-question-and-answer-session
    Bush, G. W. (2005). Remarks in Kyoto. Retrieved 6 16, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-kyoto
    Bush, G. W. (2005). The President`s News Conference. Retrieved 6 15, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1088
    Bush, G. W. (2005). The President`s News Conference With Secretary General Jakob Gijsbert "Jaap" de Hoop Scheffer of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Brussels. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-secretary-general-jakob-gijsbert-jaap-de-hoop-scheffer
    Bush, G. W. (2006). Remarks Following a Meeting With President Hu Jintao of China and an Exchange With Reporters. Retrieved 6 16, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-following-meeting-with-president-hu-jintao-china-and-exchange-with-reporters
    Bush, G. W. (2007). Remarks to the Democracy and Security Conference in Prague. Retrieved 6 19, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-the-democracy-and-security-conference-prague
    Bush, R. C. (2002). The United States, China, Taiwan, and the Future of East Asia. Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from Brookings On the Record: https://www.brookings.edu/on-the-record/the-united-states-china-taiwan-and-the-future-of-east-asia/
    Bush, R. C. (2002a). China’s Leadership Transition: Implications for Cross-Strait and U.S.-China Relations. Retrieved 5 11, 2019, from Brookings On The Record: https://www.brookings.edu/on-the-record/chinas-leadership-transition-implications-for-cross-strait-and-u-s-china-relations/
    Bush, R. C. (2002b). American Ambiguity on Taiwan’s Sovereignty Increases the Island’s Safety. Retrieved from Brookings Opinion: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/american-ambiguity-on-taiwans-sovereignty-increases-the-islands-safety/
    Bush, R. C. (2003). The United States and Taiwan. Retrieved 5 11, 2019, from The Brookings Institution Record: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/20030905.pdf
    Bush, R. C. (2006). Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Brookings Institution Press, 264.
    Bush, R. C. (2007). U.S.-Taiwan Relations: What’s the Problem? Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from Brookings on the record: https://www.brookings.edu/on-the-record/u-s-taiwan-relations-whats-the-problem/
    Bush, R. C. (2013). Thought on Think Tanks and Their Role in Modern Society. Washington DC: The Bookings Institution.
    Bush, R. C. (2017). A One-China Policy Primer. Washington DC: Center for East Asia Policy Studies.
    Bush, R., & Rigger, S. (2019). The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of US-China Relations. Retrieved 4 16, 2019, from Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-taiwan-issue-and-the-normalization-of-us-china-relations/
    BushC.Richard. (2005). Taiwan Should Exercise Restraint in Reacting to the Challenge of China`s Anti-Secession Law. Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from Pacific Forum CSIS: https://www.pacforum.org/analysis/pacnet-14-taiwan-should-exercise-restraint-reacting-challenge-chinas-anti-secession-law
    Cahill Che, E. (2001). China/Taiwan "Strategic Ambiguity" Survey Results. Honolulu: PacNet. Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0127.pdf
    Campbell , K. M., & Mitchel, D. J. (2001). Crisis in the Taiwan Strait? Foreign Affairs, 80, pp. 14-25. Retrieved 5 8, 2019, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2001-07-01/crisis-taiwan-strait
    Carlucci, F., Hunter, R., & Khalilzad, Z. ( 2000). Taking Charge: A Bipartisan Report to the President Elect on Foreign Policy and National Security . Santa Monica: Rand corporation.
    Carnegie. (2019, 5 9). Support Carnegie. Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/about/development
    Carnegie. (2019). The Goble Think Tank. Retrieved 5 1, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/about/?lang=en
    Carpenter, G. T. (2006). Is Taiwan Finally Getting Serious about Defense? Retrieved 5 28, 2019, from Cato At Liberty: https://www.cato.org/blog/taiwan-finally-getting-serious-about-defense
    Carpenter, T. (2006). What Strategic Ambiguity? Retrieved 10 15, 2018, from The Cato Institute: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/what-strategic-ambiguity
    Carpenter, T. G. (2000). Increase Arms Sales to Taiwan. Retrieved 6 6, 2019, from Cato Institute Commentary: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/increase-arms-sales-taiwan
    Carpenter, T. G. (2001). A Source of Needless Tensions in U.S.-China Relations. Retrieved 5 28, 2019, from Cato Institute Commentary: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/source-needless-tensions-uschina-relations
    Carpenter, T. G. (2001). Prospects for the Taiwan Security Enhancement. Retrieved 5 26, 2019, from Cato Institute Commentary: https://www.cato.org/commentary/prospects-taiwan-security-enhancement
    Carpenter, T. G. (2004). President Bush’s Muddled Policy on Taiwan. Retrieved 5 26, 2019, from Cato Institute Foreign Policy Briefing NO. 82: https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/fpb82.pdf
    Carpenter, T. G. (2006). Is Taiwan Finally Getting Serious about Defense? Retrieved from Cato At Liberty: https://www.cato.org/blog/taiwan-finally-getting-serious-about-defense
    Carpenter, T. G. (2006). The Bush Administration Snubs Taiwan. Retrieved 5 26, 2019, from Cato Institute Commentary: https://www.cato.org/commentary/bush-administration-snubs-taiwan
    Carpenter, T. G. (2006). What Strategic Ambiguity? Retrieved 5 28, 2019, from Cato Institute Commentary: https://www.cato.org/commentary/what-strategic-ambiguity
    Cato, I. (2019). Cato`s mission. Retrieved 4 30, 2019, from Cato Institute: https://www.cato.org/mission
    CFR. (2019). About CFR Membership. Retrieved 5 1, 2019, from Concil Foreign Realtions: https://www.cfr.org/membership
    CFR. (2019). Think Tank. Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from Concil Foreign Relations: https://www.cfr.org/think-tank
    Cha, V. D. (2007). Winning Asia. Foreign Affairs, 86, pp. 98-113. Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from Foreign Affairs: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2002-11-01/winning-asia
    Charitynavigator. (2018). The Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from Charitynavigator: https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=3456
    Charles , P. V. (2003). Cato Handbook for Congress: Policy Recommendations for the 108th Congress. Washington, D.C.: Cato institute. Retrieved 4 30, 2019, from https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/hb108-51.pdf
    Chase, M. S. (2019). Averting a Cross-Strait Crisis-Contingency Planning Memorandum No. 34. Retrieved 5 1, 2019, from CFR: https://www.cfr.org/report/averting-cross-strait-crisis#chapter-title-0-7
    Christensen, T. J. (2000). Clarity on Taiwan: Correcting Misperceptions on Both Sides of the Strait. Washington Post, A17.
    Christensen, T. J. (2002, Autumn). The Contemporary Security Dilemma: Deterring A Taiwan Conflict. Washington Quarterly, 25(4), pp. 7-21. Retrieved 11 15, 2018, from <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/890a/a6fa22830669e7dcfe7bfb492cdee67d28b4.pdf
    CNN. (2001). Bush defers Taiwan`s request for high-tech destroyers. Retrieved 6 11, 2019, from Insidepolitics: http://edition.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/04/23/bush.taiwan.03/index.html
    CNN. (2001). China Promises Releases of U.S. Crewmembers. Retrieved 6 11, 2019, from CNN.com: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0104/11/bn.24.html
    CNN. (2001). U.S. aircraft collides with Chinese fighter, forced to land. Retrieved 6 11, 2019, from CNN.com/U.S.: https://web.archive.org/web/20081211063330/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/04/01/us.china.plane.03/
    Commissioners. (2002). 2002 Annual Report to Congerss. Retrieved 6 12, 2019, from U.S.-CHINA Economic and Security Review Commission: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/annual_reports/2002%20Annual%20Report%20to%20Congress.pdf
    Commissioners. (2004). 2004 Annunal Report to Congress. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from U.S.-CHINA Economic and Security Review Commission: https://www.uscc.gov/Annual_Reports/2004-annual-report-congress
    Condoleezza, R. (2000). Promoting the National Interest . ,Foreign Affairs, pp. 46-47.
    Condoleezza, R. (2001). Press Briefing by National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, on the APEC Meeting. Retrieved 6 12, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-briefing-national-security-advisor-condoleezza-rice-the-apec-meeting
    Condoleezza, R. (2003). Remarks by National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice in Press Availability. Retrieved 6 13, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-national-security-advisor-condoleezza-rice-press-availability
    Condoleezza, R. (2005). Press Briefing by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on the President`s Visit to China. Retrieved 6 16, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-briefing-secretary-state-condoleezza-rice-the-presidents-visit-china
    Cossa, R. A. (2001). Bush`s First 100 Days: Northeast Asia Policy Off to a Rocky Start . Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from Pacific Forum CSIS: https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0118a.pdf
    Cossa, R. A. (2003). Taiwan Referendum: Waving a Red Flag. PacNet. Retrieved 5 16, 2019, from https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac_0348.pdf
    Critchlow, D. (2007). The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Poiltical History (177-178 ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Cropsey, S. (2018). Taiwan is Key to U.S. Power in Pacific. Retrieved 4 25, 2019, from Hudson Institute: https://www.hudson.org/research/14498-taiwan-is-key-to-u-s-power-in-pacific
    CSIS. (2016). CSIS 2016 Annual Report . Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from CSIS: https://www.csis.org/features/annual-report-2016-reach
    Daalder, I. H., Lindsay, J. M., & Steinberg, J. B. (2002). The Bush National Security Strategy: An Evaluation. Retrieved 5 11, 2019, from The Brookings Institution Policy Brief: https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-bush-national-security-strategy-an-evaluation/
    Dahl, R. A. ( 2005). Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven city: Yale University Press.
    DailyTelegraph. (2001). America and China &quot;Face Common Enemy&quot;. Retrieved 6 12, 2019, from Daily Telegraph: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=1news/zppl/10/11/wisino11.xml
    DeLay, T. (2003). Free Trade with Free Taiwan. Retrieved 6 2, 2019, from AEI event on Taiwan: http://www.aei.org/publication/free-trade-with-free-taiwan/
    Dole, J. R. (2018). Center for Strategic & International Studies Statesmen Forum America and Asia: Restoring U.S. Leadership in the Pacific. Retrieved from archive.today webpage capture: https://archive.li/7MsBv#selection-213.0-213.11.
    Donly, M. (2005). Extra! Retrieved from Right, Center Think Tanks Still Most Quoted: https://fair.org/extra/right-center-think-tanks-still-most-quoted/
    Donnelly, T. (2003). Iraq Is the Central Front. Retrieved 6 2, 2019, from American Enterprise Institute: http://www.aei.org/publication/iraq-is-the-central-front/
    Donnelly, T., & Monaghan, C. (2007). Legacy Agenda, Part III The Bush Doctrine and the Rise of China. Retrieved 6 2, 2019, from American Enterprise Institute: http://www.aei.org/publication/legacy-agenda-part-iii/
    Donnelly, T., & Serchuk, V. (2005). China’s Blunder-The Anti-Secession Law and Its Implications. Retrieved 6 2, 2019, from American Enterprise Institute: http://www.aei.org/publication/chinas-blunder/
    DreyfussRobert . (2004). An Idea Factory for the Democrats. The Nation.
    Dunleavy, P., & O`Leary, B. (1987). Theories of the state : the politics of liberal democracy. New York : Meredith Press .
    Dye, T. R. (1978). Oligarchic Tendencies in National Policy Making: The Role of Private Policy Planning Organizations. Journal of Politics(40), pp. 309-331.
    Easterbook, G. (1986). Idea Move Nations. The Atlantic, 1(257), p. 69.
    Easterbrook, G. (1986). Idea Move Nations. The Atlantic, 1(257), p. 72.
    Easton, D. (1968). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Behavioral Science, 13(2), pp. 147-149. Retrieved 11 5, 2018, from http://huso.stpi.narl.org.tw.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/husoc/husokm?0001B86800080601000000000006046000000000000000000^A22^510647~~68@@
    EdPilkington. (2006). Left builds power base in the blogosphere. Retrieved 12 5, 2018, from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/16/usa.topstories3
    Edwards, L. (2013). Leading the Way: The Story of Edwin Feulner and Heritage Fundation. New York: Crown Forum.
    Eisenhower, D. D. (1963). The White House Years: Mandate for Change 1953-1956. New York: Doubleday.
    Eland, I. ( 2003). Is Chinese Military Modernization a Threat to the United States? Retrieved 5 26, 2019, from Cato Institute Policy Analysis NO. 465: https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/is-chinese-military-modernization-threat-united-states
    Evan, F. A. (2001, Summer). China`s challenge to Pax Americana. Washington Quarterly, 24(3), pp. 31-43.
    EzraKlein. (2012). Why Do the Kochs Want to Kill Cato Institute? Retrieved 10 5, 2018, from Bloomberg L.P.: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2012-03-08/why-do-the-kochs-want-to-kill-the-cato-institute-ezra-klein
    Fei, J. (2003). The Wen Jiabao Visit: Key Issues for the US and China. Retrieved 5 17, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment For International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2003/12/08/wen-jiabao-visit-key-issues-for-us-and-china-pub-1419
    Feldman, H. (2001). A Primer on U.S. Policy Toward the &quot;One-China&quot; Issue: Questions and Answers. Retrieved 5 29, 2019, from The Hertige Foundation Report Aisa: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/primer-us-policy-toward-the-one-china-issue-questions-and-answers#pgfId-1115635
    Feldman, H. (2007). President Reagan`s Six Assurances to Taiwan and Their Meaning Today. Retrieved 6 1, 2019, from The Heritage Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/president-reagans-six-assurances-taiwan-and-their-meaning-today
    Fishbein, R., & Weinstein, K. (2004). The Triangular Relationship: The United States, Taiwan and China. In T. P. Recording (Ed.). (pp. 4-7). Washington, DC : Hudson Institute & Formosa Foundation . Retrieved 6 6, 2019
    Forum, P. (2019). Publications. Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from Pacific Forum: https://www.pacforum.org/programs/pacific-forum/publications
    Forum, P. (2019). The History of the Pacific Forum. Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from Pacific Forum: https://www.pacforum.org/history-pacific-forum
    Foundation, T. H. (2001). 2001 Annual Report. Washington DC: The Heritage Foundation.
    Freeman , C. W., & Roy, S. J. (2003). Explaining the Turnaround in the US-China Relationship. (M. Swaine, Interviewer) Retrieved 5 17, 2019, from https://carnegieendowment.org/2003/04/11/explaining-turnaround-in-us-china-relationship-event-597
    Gedda, G. (2001). Powell Says China Differences Narrowed. Retrieved 6 11, 2019, from The Washington Post: www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64719-2001Jul28.html
    Gerhard, P. , & Woolley, J. T. (2004). Statement by the Press Secretary on Taiwan Elections. Retrieved 6 13, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-the-press-secretary-taiwan-elections
    Gill , B., & O’Hanlon, M. E. (2002). China and Taiwan: An Offer Washington Ought to Consider. Retrieved 5 14, 2019, from Brookings Opinion: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/china-and-taiwan-an-offer-washington-ought-to-consider/
    Gill, B. (2000a). Hearing on Chinese Military Power. Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from Brookings Testimony: https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/hearing-on-chinese-military-power/
    Gill, B. (2001b). Arms Sales to Taiwan: The Annual Dilemma. Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from Brookings Opinion: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/arms-sales-to-taiwan-the-annual-dilemma/
    Gill, B. (2001). Flare-Up with China. Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from brookings Opionin: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/flare-up-with-china/
    Glaser , B. S. (2001). Mid-Air Collision Cripples Sino-U.S. Relations. Comparative Connections, 3(2). Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from http://cc.pacforum.org/2001/07/mid-air-collision-cripples-sino-u-s-relations/
    Glaser, B. S. (2004). Washington’s Hands-On Approach to Managing CrossStrait Tension. Retrieved 6 6, 2019, from Pacific Forum CSIS: https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0421.pdf
    Glaser, B. S. (2007). PacNet. Retrieved 5 22, 2019, from Pacific Forum CSIS: https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0728b.pdf
    Glosserman, B. (2005). Cross-Strait Confidence Building Measures. Retrieved 5 18, 2019, from Issues & Insights: https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/issuesinsights_v05n02.pdf
    Gomez, E. (2016). A Costly Commitment: Options for the Future of the U.S.-Taiwan Defense Relationship. Retrieved 4 30, 2019, from Cato Institute: https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/costly-commitment-options-future-us-taiwan-defense-relationship#cite-106
    GovernmentInformationOffice. (2008). Government Information Office March 22, 2008 Presidential Election and Referendums – PRESS KIT. Retrieved 5 22, 2019, from WayBack machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20110606073434/http://www.gio.gov.tw/elect2008/kit_06.htm
    Graham, A. (1986). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In F. S. Lane, Current issues in public administration (pp. 184-200). New York: : St. Martin’s Press.
    Green, M. (2005). Press Briefing on the President`s Meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao by Mike Green, Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and Senior Director for Asian Affairs. Retrieved 6 15, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-briefing-the-presidents-meeting-with-chinese-president-hu-jintao-mike-green-special
    Green, M. (2005a). Press Briefing with Mr. Michael Green, Senior Director at the National Security Council for Asian Affairs, on the President`s Bilateral with Prime Minister Koizumi. Retrieved 6 15, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-briefing-with-mr-michael-green-senior-director-the-national-security-council-for
    Green, M. (2005b). Press Briefing on the President`s Visit to China by Mike Green, Special Assistant to the President for NSA and Faryar Shirzad, Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy NSA for International Economic Affairs. Retrieved 6 16, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-briefing-the-presidents-visit-china-mike-green-special-assistant-the-president-for
    GreenMark, & JolinMichele. (2009). The Change For America: A Progressive Blueprint for the 44th President. New York: Perseus Books Group.
    Griffin , C., & Pantucci, R. (2007). A Treacherous Triangle?: China and the Transatlantic Alliance. SAIS Review, XXVII(1). Retrieved 6 4, 2019, from SAIS Review vol. XXVII no. 1: http://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/20070410_ATreacherousTriangle.pdf
    Griffin, C. (2008). Boom and Bust. Retrieved 6 4, 2019, from Armed Forces Journal: http://www.aei.org/publication/boom-and-bust/
    Griswold, D. T. (2005, Spring). Faith, Commerce, and Freedom. Cato’s Letter, 3(2). Retrieved 4 30, 2019, from https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/catosletterv3n2.pdf
    Groseglose , T., & Milyo, J. (2005). A MEASURE OF MEDIA BIAS. The Quarterly Journal of Economics(4), pp. 1991-1236. Retrieved 4 26, 2019, from https://web.archive.org/web/20110608074559/http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/groseclose/pdfs/MediaBias.pdf
    Hachigian, N., Schiffer, M., & Chen, W. (2008). A Global Imperative: A Progressive Approach to U.S.-China Relations in the 21st Century. Retrieved 4 27, 2019, from Center For American progress: https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2008/08/13/4817/a-global-imperative/
    Hagel, C. (2004). A Republican Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs, 83, pp. 64-76. Retrieved 5 17, 2019, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2004-07-01/republican-foreign-policy
    HarnedW.Joseph. (1964). ATLANTIC ASSEMBLY—A GENESIS. Journal of Common Market Studies, 3(2), 183-189.
    Heer, P. J. (2000). If It Works, Don`t Fix It. Retrieved 5 8, 2019, from Foreign Affairs: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2000-03-01/if-it-works-dont-fix-it
    Helms, J. (2001). A Compassionate Conservative Foreign Policy. Retrieved 6 2, 2019, from AEI Newsletter: http://www.aei.org/publication/a-compassionate-conservative-foreign-policy/
    Higgott , R., & Stone, D. (1994). “The Limits of Influence: Foreign Policy Think Tanks in Britain and the USA. Review of International Studies, 1(20), pp. 17 –24.
    Hollings, R. L. (1993). Nonprofit Public Policy Research Organizations: A Source Book on Think Tanks in Government. In J. S. Bowman, Organizations and Interest Groups (p. XV). New York: Garland Publishing.
    Holsti, K. J. (1988). A Pioneer in International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Analysis, History of International Order, and Security Studies. Springer International Publishing.
    Hoover, I. (2019). Poilcy Review. Retrieved from Hoover Institute: https://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review
    Horowitz, J. (2011). Think-tank post puts spotlight on veteran Democratic operative Neera Tanden. Retrieved 4 27, 2019, from Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house/think-tank-post-puts-spotlight-on-veteran-democratic-operative-neera-tanden/2011/11/01/gIQAn6fpjM_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.28371e00c148
    Huang, C.-L. (2007). United Nations for Taiwan? How will China and the U.S. React? Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from Brookings OP-ED: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/united-nations-for-taiwan-how-will-china-and-the-u-s-react/
    Hudson, I. (2019). Topic&Policy Center. Retrieved from Hudson Institute: https://www.hudson.org/
    Hunter, R. E. (2000). Think Tanks: Helping to Shape U.S. Foreign and Security Policy. U.S. Foreign policy agenda Vol.5 an electronic journal of the U.S. department of state, pp. 33-36. Retrieved from https://www.americancorner.org.tw/zh/ejournal-pdf/201101-the-making-of-us-foreign-policy.pdf
    Hunter, R. E. (2000). Think Tanks: Helping to Shape U.S. Foreign and Security Policy. U.S. Foreign policy agenda Vol.5 an electronic journal of the U.S. department of state, pp. 33-36. Retrieved from https://www.americancorner.org.tw/zh/ejournal-pdf/201101-the-making-of-us-foreign-policy.pdf
    Huntington, S. P. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 5 1, 2019, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1993-06-01/clash-civilizations
    Kagan, R. (2001). China`s Game of Chicken. Retrieved 6 6, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2001/03/12/china-s-game-of-chicken-pub-642
    Kagan, R. (2001). National Humiliation. Retrieved 6 6, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2001/04/09/national-humiliation-pub-664
    Kagan, R., & Kristol, W. (2001). The `Adults` Make a Mess. Retrieved 6 6, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2001/05/14/adults-make-mess-pub-698
    Kan , S. A. (2014, December). U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues. Congressional Research Service, 4-5. Retrieved 6 20, 2018, from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41952.pdf
    Kastner, S. L. (2006). Ambiguity, Economic Interdependence, and the U.S. Strategic Dilemma in the Taiwan Strait. Journal of Contemporary China, 15(49), pp. 651-669.
    Kates, B. (2001). New York Daily NEWs. Retrieved 6 10, 2019, from U.S. Blames China`s HOT-DOGGING Pilots Harassment in midair seen as cause of crash: https://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/u-s-blames-china-hot-dogging-pilots-harassment-midair-crash-article-1.915724
    Keefer, E. C., & Phillips , S. E. (2018). Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976, Volume XVII, China, 1969–1972. Retrieved from Office of The Historian: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v17
    Kennan, G. (1947). The Sources of Soviet Conduct. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/1947-07-01/sources-soviet-conduct
    Kurlantzick, J. (2008). Broken Promises. Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2008/05/12/broken-promises-pub-20115
    Kurtz, H. (1982). Meese Helps Group to Raise Funds. Washington Post, p. A2.
    Kurtzleben, D. (2011). Think Tank Employees Tend to Support Democrats. Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from U.S.NEWS: https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/03/03/think-tank-employees-tend-to-support-democrats
    Lampton, D. M. (2007). The Faces of Chinese Power. Foreign Affairs, 86(1), pp. 115-127. Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2007-01-01/faces-chinese-power
    LandersK.Robert. (1986). Think Tanks: The New Partisans? Editoral Reaearch Reports 1.
    LeeB.Thomas. (1985). Conservatism, Liberalism, and U.S. Pacific Policy, &quot; Ideology and Practice: The Reservation of U.S. Foreign Policy. Taipei: Tamkang University.
    Lieberthal, K. G. (2001). U.S. Policy Toward China. Retrieved 5 4, 2019, from Brookings Policy Brief Series: https://www.brookings.edu/research/u-s-policy-toward-china/
    Lieberthal, K. G. (2005). Preventing a War Over Taiwan. Retrieved 5 21, 2019, from Brookings Article: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/preventing-a-war-over-taiwan/
    Lilley, J. R. (2001). Beijing’s Risky Game. Retrieved 6 2, 2019, from AEI Newsweek: http://www.aei.org/publication/beijings-risky-game/
    Lobe, J. (2005). POLITICS-US: Realists Rule? Retrieved 5 1, 2019, from Press Service News Agency: http://www.ipsnews.net/2005/08/politics-us-realists-rule/
    Logan, J. (2005). Taiwan’s Turn. Retrieved 4 30, 2019, from Cato Institute Commentary: https://www.cato.org/commentary/taiwans-turn
    Logan, J. (2005). Taiwan’s Turn. Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from Cato Institute Commentary: https://www.cato.org/commentary/taiwans-turn
    McBride, S. (1980). Hoover Institution: Leaning to the right. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 4 26, 2019, from https://www.csmonitor.com/1980/0327/032756.html
    McClellanScott, & BoucherRichard. (2005). Whitehouse. Retrieved 11 5, 2018, from Whitehouse: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050308-15.html
    McDevitt, M. (2005). Tackle the real Taiwan problem in Sino-U.S. relations. PacNet(38A). Retrieved 5 18, 2019, from https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0538a38b.pdf
    McGann , J. G. (2019). 2018 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Scholarly Commons. Retrieved 3 25, 2019, from https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&=&context=think_tanks&=&sei-redir=1&referer=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.bing.com%252Fsearch%253Fq%253Dglobal%252Bgo%252Bto%252Bthink%252Btank%252Bindex%252Breport%2526form%253DEDGEAR%2526qs%2
    McGann, J. G. (2007). Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the United States: Academics, Advisors and Advocates. New York : Routledge.
    McGannG. James . (1994). The Competition for Dollars, Scholars and Influence. University Press of America.
    McGannG.James. (2005). Think Tanks and Policy Advice in The US. Retrieved 10 5, 2018, from Foreign Policy Research Institute: https://www.kas.de/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=720e9151-74aa-8525-7ff8-ffcacde0cc5c&groupId=252038
    McManus F.John. (2009). Letting the CFR Cat Out of the Bag. Retrieved 11 6, 2018, from John Birch Society: https://web.archive.org/web/20100115022131/http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5121-letting-the-cfr-cat-out-of-the-bag
    Medvetz, T. (2012). Think Tanks in America. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
    Montaperto , R., & Glosserman, B. (2002, 8 15). Chen`s &quot;Slip&quot; Puts Spotlight on the U.S. PacNet (31C). Retrieved 5 14, 2019, from Pacific Forum CSIS: https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0231c%255B1%255D.pdf
    Mufson, S. (2001). President Pledges Defense on Taiwan: Policy Unchanged White House Says “The End of Strategic Ambiguity,”. Retrieved 6 15, 2018, from New Taiwan Ilha Formosa: http://www.taiwandc.org/washt2001-04.htm.
    Myers, R. H. (2000). The Divided China Problem: Conflict Avoidance and Resolution. Retrieved 6 6, 2019, from Hoover Institution: https://www.hoover.org/research/divided-china-problem-conflict-avoidance-and-resolution
    Newsom, D. D. (1996). The Public Dimension of Foreign Policy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Niou, E. M., & Benson, B. V. (2000). Comprehending Strategic Ambiguity: US Security Commitment to Taiwan. Retrieved 12 11, 2018, from ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228929066_Comprehending_Strategic_Ambiguity_US_Security_Commitment_to_Taiwan
    Nye, J. (1998). A Taiwan Deal. Washington Post, 4.
    Nye, J. S. (2008). U.S.-China Relations: Dealing with the Taiwan Issue. Retrieved 5 23, 2019, from Pacific Forum CSIS: https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0810.pdf
    O’Hanlon, M. E. (2000). CAN CHINA CONQUER TAIWAN? Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/can-china-conquer-taiwan/
    O’Hanlon, M. E. (2001). A Need for Ambiguity. Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from Brookings Opinion: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/a-need-for-ambiguity/
    O’Hanlon, M. E. (2001). The Right Arms for Taiwan. Retrieved 5 9, 2019, from Brookings Opinion: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-right-arms-for-taiwan/
    OpenSecret.org. (2019). Brookings Institution: Total Contributions. Retrieved 4 26, 2019, from OpenSecret.org: https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/totals.php?id=D000032148&cycle=2018
    Paal, D. H., & Bader, J. (2008). Georgia`s Lessons for Taiwan. Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2008/09/02/georgia-s-lessons-for-taiwan-pub-20442
    PaalH.Douglas, & BaderJeffrey. (2008). Georgia`s Lessons for Taiwan. Retrieved 11 5, 2018, from The Far Eastern Economic Review: https://carnegieendowment.org/2008/09/02/georgia-s-lessons-for-taiwan-pub-20442
    Pan, Z. (2003). U.S. Taiwan Poilcy of Strategic Ambiguity: A Dilemma of Deterrence. Journal of Contemporary China, 12(35), p. 389.
    Patricia, L. (1987). A guide to America`s think tanks; powerhouses of policy. Town & Country(141), 99.
    Pei, M. (2005). A Fresh Approach on China. Retrieved from Carnegie Endowmen for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2005/09/09/fresh-approach-on-china-pub-17435
    Pei, M., & Swaine, M. D. (2003). Where Taiwan Support Stops. Retrieved 6 6, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2003/12/07/where-taiwan-support-stops-pub-1417
    Peters , G., & Woolley, J. T. (2003). Background Briefing on President`s Meeting with Chinese Premier Wen. Retrieved from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/background-briefing-presidents-meeting-with-chinese-premier-wen
    Peters , G., & Woolley, J. T. (2004). Remarks Following Discussions With President Hu Jintao of China in Santiago, Chile. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-following-discussions-with-president-hu-jintao-china-santiago-chile
    Peters , G., & Woolley, J. T. (2004). Statement by the Press Secretary on S. 2092. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-the-press-secretary-s-2092
    Peters , G., & Woolley, J. T. (2005). Remarks Prior to Discussions With President Hu Jintao of China in New York City. Retrieved 6 15, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-prior-discussions-with-president-hu-jintao-china-new-york-city
    Peters , G., & Woolley,, J. T. (2003). Background Press Briefing by a Senior Administration Official on the President`s Meeting with Chinese President Hu. Retrieved 6 13, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/background-press-briefing-senior-administration-official-the-presidents-meeting-with
    Peters, G., & Woolley, J. T. (2003). Remarks Following Discussions With President Hu Jintao of China in Bangkok. Retrieved 6 13, 2019, from https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-following-discussions-with-president-hu-jintao-china-bangkok
    Peters, G., & Woolley, J. T. (2004). Statement by the Press Secretary: Chen Shui-bian`s Inaugural Address. Retrieved 6 14, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-the-press-secretary-chen-shui-bians-inaugural-address
    Peters, G., & Woolley, J. T. (2007). Remarks Following a Meeting With President Hu Jintao of China in Sydney. Retrieved 6 16, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-following-meeting-with-president-hu-jintao-china-sydney
    Pickett, N. (1993). A History of Hudson Institute. Indianapolis: Hudson Institute. Retrieved 4 24, 2019, from https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1585745/foundations00006.pdf
    Project, T. A. (2000). Republican Party Platform of 2000. Retrieved from The American Presidency Project: www.presidency.ucsb.edu/showplatforms.php?platindex=R2000
    PrueherW. Joseph . (2001). Letter from Ambassador Prueher to Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Tang. Retrieved 11 6, 2018, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/letter-from-ambassador-prueher-chinese-minister-foreign-affairs-tang
    Pye, L. W. (2005). Dangerous Strait: The U.S.-Taiwan-China Crisis. (N. B. Tucker, Ed.) Retrieved 5 21, 2019, from Capsule Review: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2005-09-01/dangerous-strait-us-taiwan-china-crisis
    Rankin, K. L. (1964). China Assignment. Washington DC: University of Washington Press.
    Remarks. (2017). Remarks by the Vice President to the Hudson Institute’s Herman Kahn Award Dinner. Retrieved from The White House: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-vice-president-hudson-institutes-herman-kahn-award-dinner/
    Revenue, D. o. (2019). Tax-Exempt Status for Your Organization. IRS Publication 557, pp. 21-28.
    Ricci, D. M. (1993). The transformation of American politics : the new Washington and the rise of think tanks. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Ricci, D. M. (1993). The Transformation of American Politics: The New Washington and the Rise of Think Tanks. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Rich, A. (2006). War of Ideas: Why Mainstream and Liberal Foundations and the Think Tanks they Support are Losing in the War of Ideas in American Politics. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 23-24.
    Robinson, Jr., R. W., & D’Amato, C. (2004). The Taiwan Relation Act: The Next Twenty-Five Years. (B. CCTV-4, Interviewer) Retrieved 7 12, 2018, from U.S.-China economic and security review commission: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Joint%20Statement%20of%20Robinson%20and%20Damato%202004%20Taiwan.pdf
    Robinson, D. (2005). US House Criticizes China Bill on Taiwan Secession. Washington D.C.: Capitol Hill. Retrieved 5 17, 2019, from https://web.archive.org/web/20050402022813/http://voanews.com/english/2005-03-16-voa60.cfm
    Romberg, A. D. (2007). PacNet. Retrieved 5 22, 2019, from Pacific Forum CSIS: https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0745.pdf
    Ross, R. S. (2006). Taiwan`s Fading Independence Movement. Retrieved 5 21, 2019, from Foreign Affairs Essay: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2006-03-01/taiwans-fading-independence-movement
    Rundell, S. (2018). Taiwan epicentre of geopolitical risk. Retrieved 4 27, 2019, from FIS Stanford: https://www.top1000funds.com/2018/10/taiwan-epicentre-of-geopolitical-risk/
    Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition model of policy change and the role of policy orientated learning therein. Policy Sciences, pp. 129-168.
    SayersNicola . (2010). A Guide to Scenario Planning in Higher Education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
    Schmitt, G. J. (2007). A Club Taiwan Can’t Join. Retrieved 6 2, 2019, from The Weekly Standard: http://www.aei.org/publication/a-club-taiwan-cant-join/
    Schneider, W. (2001). Bush Wins &quot;Let’s Make a Deal&quot;. Retrieved 6 2, 2019, from National Journal: http://www.aei.org/publication/bush-wins-lets-make-a-deal/
    Schriver, R. (2007). Pro-Taiwan (But Not Anti-China). Retrieved 5 22, 2019, from Pacific Forum CSIS: https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0728.pdf
    Scott, K. C. (2004). What Beijing Must Do. Retrieved 5 14, 2019, from Brookings Opinion: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/what-beijing-must-do/
    Shambaugh , D., & Xinbo, W. (2005). Sino-American Bridges Need to be Repaired. Retrieved 5 21, 2019, from Brookings OP-ED: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/sino-american-bridges-need-to-be-repaired/
    Shambaugh, D. (2001). Facing Reality in China Policy. Foreign Affairs, 80, pp. 50-64. Retrieved 5 8, 2019, from Foreign Affairs: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2001-01-01/facing-reality-china-policy
    Shambaugh, D. (2001). The Taiwan Prescription Is Deterrence Without Provocation. Retrieved 5 8, 2019, from Brookings Opinion: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-taiwan-prescription-is-deterrence-without-provocation/
    Shirzad , F., & Wilder, D. (2006). Press Briefing by Deputy National Security Advisor Faryar Shirzad and National Security Council Acting Senior Director Dennis Wilder on the President`s Meetings with President Hu of the People`s Republic of China. Retrieved 6 16, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-briefing-deputy-national-security-advisor-faryar-shirzad-and-national-security
    SIM, A. (1996). Baker supports US policy of strategic ambiguity on Taiwan. The Straits Times, 2. Retrieved 6 15, 2018, from http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Search?ST=1&AT=search&k=Baker%20supports%20US%20policy%20of%20strategic%20ambiguity%20on%20Taiwan
    Smith, J. (1991). The Idea Brokers: Think Tank and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York: The Free Press.
    Smith, J. A. (1991). The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York: Free Press.
    Smith, J. A. (1991). The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York: The Free Press.
    Smith, S. (1996). International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Sneider, D. (2003). Bush’s Cozying Up to China: A U.S. Betrayal of Commitment to Democracy? PacNet(51A). Retrieved 5 14, 2019, from https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac_0351and51a.pdf
    Sprinz, D. F., & Wolinsky Nahmias, Y. (2003). Models Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. Political Science and Politics, 36, pp. 373-378.
    Stefancic, J., & Delgado, R. (1996). No Mercy: How Conservative Think Tank and Foundattions Changes America`s Social Agenda. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    Stone, D. L. (2007). Garbage Cans, Recycling Bins or Think Tanks? Three Myths about Policy Institutes. Retrieved 11 22, 2018, from ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248978413_Introduction_to_the_Symposium_The_Changing_Think_Tank_Landscape
    StoneS.Diane, MaxwellS., & KeatingM. (2001). Bridging Research and Policy. Retrieved 11 5, 2018, from An International Workshop: Funded by the UK Department of International Development: www.gdnet.org/pdf/BridgingYoung.pdf.
    Strobel, W. P. (2000). The Media: Influencing Foreign Policy in the Information Age. U.S. Foreign policy agenda Vol.5 an electronic journal of the U.S. department of state, pp. 37-39. Retrieved from https://www.americancorner.org.tw/zh/ejournal-pdf/201101-the-making-of-us-foreign-policy.pdf.
    Strong, M. (2018). China should give Taiwan more international space: ex-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Retrieved 4 27, 2019, from Taiwan News: https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3549218
    Sutter , R. (2005). Effective U.S. diplomacy insures stability in Taiwan. PacNet. Retrieved 5 17, 2019, from https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0524.pdf
    Sutter, R. (2004). Bush’s Korea Policy Gravitates Toward China. Will Taiwan Policy Follow? PacNet. Retrieved 5 16, 2019, from https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0413.pdf
    Sutter, R. G. (1978). China-Watch Toward Sino-American Reconciliation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Swaine, M. D. (2002). Bush Has a Tiger by the Tail With His China Policy. Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2002/06/17/bush-has-tiger-by-tail-with-his-china-policy-pub-1012
    Swaine, M. D. (2004). March 2004 Presidential and December 2004 Legislative Elections in Taiwan. Retrieved 5 17, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2004/04/26/march-2004-presidential-and-december-2004-legislative-elections-in-taiwan-pub-1514
    Swaine, M. D. (2004). The Taiwan Relations Act: The Next 25 Year. Retrieved 6 6, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2004/04/23/taiwan-relations-act-next-25-year-pub-1511
    Swaine, M. D. (2004). Trouble in Taiwan. Foreign Affairs, 83, pp. 39-49. Retrieved 5 16, 2019, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2004-03-01/trouble-taiwan
    Swaine, M., & Pei, M. (2002). Rebalancing United States-China Relations. Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment Policy Brief: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Policybrief13.pdf
    Tell, D. (2000). Engagement Threatens Taiwan. Weekly Standard, 5(25). Retrieved from http: //www.weeklystandard.com/magazine/mag_5_25_00/arch_toc_5_25_00. html
    Tellis, A. J. (2008). Bush Should Keep His Word on Taiwan. Retrieved 5 10, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2008/07/19/bush-should-keep-his-word-on-taiwan-pub-20312
    Tellis, A. J. (2008). Bush Should Keep His Word on Taiwan. Retrieved 5 24, 2019, from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2008/07/19/bush-should-keep-his-word-on-taiwan-pub-20312
    Tkacik, J. (2001). BG1517es: President Bush`s Trip to Asia: Promoting Security,Prosperity, and Peace. Retrieved 5 29, 2019, from The Hertige Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/bg1517es-president-bushs-trip-asia-promoting-securityprosperity-and-peace
    Tkacik, J. (2004). Taiwan`s Missile Referendum. Retrieved 6 1, 2019, from The Heritage Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/taiwans-missile-referendum
    Tkacik, J. (2005). America`s &quot;China Policy&quot; Is in Urgent Need of Definition. Retrieved 6 1, 2019, from The Heritage Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/americas-china-policy-urgent-need-definition
    Tkacik, J. (2007). Dealing with Taiwan`s Referendum on the United Nations. Retrieved 6 1, 2019, from The Heritage Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/dealing-taiwans-referendum-the-united-nations
    Truman, D. B. (1971). The governmental process: political interests and public opinion. New York: Knopf.
    TrumanB.David. (1951). The Governmental Process: Political Interest and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    TTCSP. (2019). TTCSP GLOBAL GO TO THINK TANK INDEX REPORTS. Retrieved 4 24, 2019, from TTCSP: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/
    Tucker, N. (1998). China-Taiwan: US Debates and Policy Choices. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 40(4), pp. 150-167. Retrieved 11 12, 2018, from Survival: : https://www-tandfonline-com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/doi/abs/10.1080/713869434
    Tucker, N. (2005). Strategic Ambiguity or Strategic Clarity？. In N. Tucker (Ed.), Dangerous Strait：The U.S.-Taiwan-China Crisis (pp. 186-211). New York: Columbia University Press.
    Wallace, K. (2001). Bush pledges whatever it takes to defend Taiwan. Retrieved 6 11, 2019, from CNN White House Correspondent: http://edition.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/04/24/bush.taiwan.abc/
    Wang, J. (2005). China`s Search for Stability With America. Retrieved 5 21, 2019, from Foreign Affairs Essay: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2005-09-01/chinas-search-stability-america
    Weaver, K. R. (1989). The Changing World of Think Tanks. PS: Political Science & Politics(22), p. 567.
    Weaver, K. R. (1989). The Changing World of Think Tanks. PS: Political Science & Politics(22), pp. 563-567. Retrieved from http://medientheorie.com/doc/weaver_changing_worlds_of_think_tanks.pdf
    Weaver, K. R. (1989). The Changing World of Think Tanks. PS: Political Science & Politics, 3 (22), p. 571. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/419623?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
    Weaver, K. R., & McGann, J. (2000). Think Tanks & Civil Societies- Catalysts for Ideas and Action. New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher.
    Weaver, K. R., & McGann, J. G. (2000). In Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action. In K. R. Weaver, & J. G. McGann, Think Tanks and Civil Societies in a Time of Change (p. 8). New Brunswick: NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    WhiteHouse. (2003). President Bush and Premier Wen Jiabo Remarks to the Press. Retrieved from White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/12/20031209-2.html
    Wiarda, H. J. (1990). Foreign Policy without Illusion：How Foreign Policy -Making Works and Fails to Work in the United States. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.
    Wilder, D. (2007). Press Briefing on the President`s Trip to Australia and the APEC Summit by Senior Administration Officials. Retrieved 6 16, 2019, from The American Presidency Project: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-briefing-the-presidents-trip-australia-and-the-apec-summit-senior-administration
    Wortzel, L. (2001). How to Respond to China`s Coercive Behavior. Retrieved 5 29, 2019, from The Heritage Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/how-respond-chinas-coercive-behavior
    Wortzel, L. (2001). The President`s Policy Challenges in Asia. Retrieved 5 29, 2019, from The Heritage Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/the-presidents-policy-challenges-asia
    Wortzel, L. (2002). The Political-Military Dimension of U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan. Retrieved 6 1, 2019, from The Heritage Foundation Report Asia: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/the-political-military-dimension-us-policy-toward-taiwan
    Yang , A. (2004). Taiwan’s Communication Problem. PacNet. Retrieved 5 19, 2019, from https://www.pacforum.org/sites/default/files/tmp/pac0406.pdf
    Yates, S. (2000). China’s Taiwan White Paper Power Play. 656. DC: The Heritage Foundation Executive.
    Yuan, P. (2004). The Taiwan Issue in The Context of New Sino – U.S. Strategic Cooperation. Retrieved 6 6, 2019, from The Brookings Institution Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/yuan2004.pdf
    Zahn, N. (2012). The Washington Roundtable for the Asia-Pacific Press (WRAPP). Retrieved 4 20, 2019, from The Hertiage Foundation Leadership for America: https://web.archive.org/web/20121003040555/http://www.heritage.org/about/press/the-washington-roundtable-for-the-asia-pacific-press-wrapp
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班
    106922015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106922015
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900914
    Appears in Collections:[戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    201501.pdf17328KbAdobe PDF2176View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback