Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125922
|
| Title: | 技術者轉念：探索自動化科技應用創新的機會識別
Technologists’ Mind-shift: Exploring Opportunity Recognition in the Innovation of Automation Technology Applications |
| Authors: | 劉怡均
Liu, Yi-Chun |
| Contributors: | 蕭瑞麟
Hsaio, Ruey-Lin
劉怡均
Liu, Yi-Chun |
| Keywords: | 領域知識
技術仲介
先導知識
機會識別
一源多用
domain knowledge
technical broker
prior knowledge
opportunity identification
one resource multiple use |
| Date: | 2019 |
| Issue Date: | 2019-09-05 17:30:18 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在現今許多產業都面臨到激烈的競爭，在競爭激烈中該如何識別對的機會。既然在原有產業中面臨到激烈的競爭，那就不應該在這片紅海市場繼續發展，於是企業就會開始尋找到自己的藍海。藍海也就是尚未面臨到激烈競爭的地方，那麼原有產業就必須跨域到新的領域當中做開拓。對於新的行業做跨域創新時，並非是以強行進入的方式而是要對新的領域展開調查。在調查時也不是胡亂地探索，應該要針對新領域當中的領域知識（Domain knowledge）調查。並且開拓的同時並須謹慎小心的調查新領域中最重要的領域知識。當對領域知識做完整的瞭解，再利用先導知識去理解新的領域當中應該是哪些隱含創業信號。本研究著重分析在如果領域知識結合技術知識的過程中，當從領域知識去了解技術如何重新再應用時，會看到技術不只是單純的組合而是會看到先導知識不只會幫助創新者能夠看見機會的信號，也可能造成認知轉換，而引發技術產生仲介的組合，進而找到創新的機會。透過調查領域知識，能讓技術者從新思考創新的機會點在哪？為技術找到一源多用的同時，也幫助企業藍海發展。
關鍵字：領域知識、技術仲介、先導知識、機會識別、一源多用
Abstract: In today`s many industries, competition is very fierce. As such, how it is possible to identify the opportunities for innovation. Since there is fierce competition in the original industry, it should not continue to develop in this Red Sea market. It should start to find its own blue ocean. Blue Ocean is also a place that has not yet faced fierce competition, so the old industry must be developed across new industries. When doing cross-domain innovation in new industries, it is not forced to enter but to investigate new areas. It is not a random exploration during the investigation, and it should be investigated against the domain knowledge in the new field. And at the same time, we must carefully investigate the most important areas of knowledge in the new field. At the same time, we must carefully investigate the most important areas of knowledge in the new field. When you have a complete understanding of domain knowledge, use the lead knowledge to understand what implicit entrepreneurial signals should be in the new field. This study focuses on the analysis of how to appropriate technology from domain knowledge in the process of combining domain knowledge with technical knowledge. It will be seen that technology is not just a combination but will see that lead knowledge will not only help innovation. The ability to see the signal of opportunity is possible to induce cognitive conversion, and trigger the combination of technology to create an intermediary, and then find opportunities for innovation. By investigating domain knowledge, where can the opportunity for technology to think new about innovation? While finding a multi-purpose technology for technology, it also helps the development of blue ocean enterprises.
Keywords: domain knowledge, technical broker, prior knowledge, opportunity identification, one resource multiple use |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
張書豪，2016，「以多重觀點探討國際間技術領域知識流動策略」，《商略學報》，第3期，第8卷，第159-176頁。
莊正民、方世杰，2001，「企業跨國技術引進模式、影響因素與學習績效關係之研究－交易成本與知識基礎理論之觀點」，《管理評論》，第1期，第20卷，第35-64頁。
陳意文、吳思華、項維欣，2010，「資源基礎觀點下之資源拼湊與價值創造：以台灣翅帆開發創新產品為例」，《科技管理學刊》，第2期，第15卷，1-20頁。
蔡敦浩、李慶芳，2006，「疆界管理：探索情境知識的本質與知識轉移」，《科技管理學刊》，第3期，第11期，第89-117頁。
蕭瑞麟，2017，《不用數字的研究：質性研究的思辨脈絡》，台北：五南學術原創專書系列。
蕭瑞麟，2018，《服務隨創：劣勢創新的邏輯思維》，台北：五南書局學術專書。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華，2017，「資源流：聯合報系複合商業模式的形成」，《組織與管理》，第1期，第10卷，第1-55頁。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、吳彥寬，2017，「逆勢拼湊：化資源制約為創新來源」，《中山管理評論》，第1期，第25卷，第219-268頁。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、蘇筠，2017，「逆強論：隨創式的資源建構過程」，《台大管理論叢》，第4期，第27卷，第43-74頁。
謝如梅、劉常勇，2009，「創新機會辨識：創業警覺能力、先前知識與資訊獲取之關聯性研究」《組織與管理》，第2期，第2卷， 第77-108頁。
英文文獻
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329-366.
Baum, J. R., & Bird, B. J. 2010. The Successful Intelligence of High-Growth Entrepreneurs: Links to New Venture Growth. Organization Science, 21(2): 397-412,587.
Boari, C., & Riboldazzi, F. 2014. How knowledge brokers emerge and evolve: The role of actors’ behaviour. Research Policy, 43(4): 683-695.
Brown, T. 2009. Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins.
Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2): 349-399.
Carlile, P. R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4): 442–455.
Corbett, A. C. 2007. Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1): 97-118.
Foldy, E. G., Goldman, L., & Ospina, S. 2008. Sensegiving and the role of cognitive shifts in the work of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19(5): 514-529.
Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. 2001. The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2): 95.
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2): 277–300.
Gassmann, O., Daiber, M., & Enkel, E. 2011. The role of intermediaries in cross-industry innovation processes. R&D Management, 41(5): 457-469.
Grégoire, D. A., Barr, P. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2010. Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organization Science, 21(2): 413-431.
Hargadon, A. 1998a. Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California Management Review, 40(3): 209-227.
Hargadon, A. 1998b. Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California Management Review.
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 716-750.
Hrebiniak, L. G., & Joyce, W. F. 1985. Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(3): 336-349.
Orlikowski, W. J. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3): 249-273.
Pawlowski, S. D., & Robey, D. 2004. Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 28(4): 645-672.
Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. 2007. Opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial capabilities and bricolage: Connecting institutional theory and entrepreneurship in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3): 313-320.
Ruckman, K. 2005. Technology sourcing through acquisitions: Evidence from the US drug industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1): 89-104.
Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448-469.
Suddaby, R., Bruton, G. D., & Si, S. X. 2015. Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1): 1-10.
Tyre, M., & Orlikowski, W. 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5(1): 98-118.
Venkatraman, N. 1994. IT-enabled business transformation: From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review, 35(2): 73-87.
von Hippel, E. 1998. Economics of product development by users: The impact of `sticky` local information. Management Science, 44(5): 629-644.
Yanow, D. 2004. Translating local knowledge at organizational peripheries. British Journal of Management, 15(1): 9-25. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
106364136 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106364136 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU201900934 |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 413601.pdf | 22745Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
