English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46287489      Online Users : 754
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125998


    Title: 影響建商推案意願之因素探討
    The Study on the Determinants of New Construction Projects for Developers
    Authors: 方高震
    Fang, Kao Chen
    Contributors: 林左裕
    方高震
    Fang, Kao Chen
    Keywords: 方高震
    土地開發
    建商推案
    層級分析法
    市場供需
    專家深度訪談
    總體經濟
    都市計畫
    財政政策
    稅制
    專家問卷調查
    影響建商推案意願
    量化分析
    決策行為
    決策判斷
    購屋
    量化分析
    房地產
    不動產
    危老重建
    都市更新
    長照政策
    馬歇爾經濟學理論
    社會住宅
    AHP
    Thomas L. Satty
    developers
    New Construction Projects
    Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Economic Market
    Policy
    Construction Management
    Products
    Quantitative Analysis
    Expert Questionnaires
    Questionnaire Survey
    Construction Projects
    Development
    Decision making
    Home buyers
    Expert Choice 2000
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-09-06 09:38:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 從2004~2018年國際間以至國內政經變遷,對照國泰房地產指數彙整後的全國推案總件數和總戶數,可以發現重大的經濟變化或政策施行會明顯地影響房地產市場走向,因此,本研究想藉由瞭解影響建商推案的動機,進而推導出建商推案之決策面可能依據,並經由專家問卷的實證分析後,取得各階層的影響因素相對權重,並由相對權重的高低順序排列,得知影響因素之重要性,目的在於反應房地產市場中建商的實際操作面,以提供政府部門研擬住宅相關政策之參考依據,並給予建商推案競爭力思考之可能策略。
    本研究採用層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process簡稱AHP)作為研究方法,首先擬定專家深度訪談,對象則是十位非特定建商,訪談內容則是包含國內外政經情勢、房地產的相關法令、房地產的趨勢走向、經營管理的策略等。在深度訪談之後,根據AHP研究方法架構,將影響建商推案意願之因素,依層級架構歸納出四個主要評估面向及其下階層十六個影響因素,而四個主要評估面向分別為總體經濟市場面、政策面、建商經營管理面,以及產品面。接續將前述影響因素設計為專家問卷,彙整問卷調查結果,並運用軟體Expert Choice 2000版做量化分析,最後求得各影響因素佔整體權重比例,而以影響因素權重比例之優先順序作為提供建商推案之參考依據。
    在實證結果分析中,影響建商推案意願之第二階層評估面向權值當中,各為總體經濟市場面26.10%、政策面32.40%、建商經營管理面14.50%及產品面27.10%,權重值前三高者依順序為政策面、產品面及總體經濟市場面。另外,在第三階層十六個評估因素中來檢視建商推案意願,其權重值超過10%者,前三項依高低各為市場供需12.10%、都市計畫11.30%及財政政策10.60%。市場供需在問卷實證結果中則顯示是影響建商推案意願最重要評估因素。
    結論中針對政府與建商的角色,以實證結果中市場供需、都市計畫及財政政策前三個重要評估因素,分別提出相關建議。因為房地產供過於求,首先,政策面上建議鼓勵建商餘屋轉型成立安養機構,再者,配合社會住包租代管政策,鼓勵租賃管理業者承租建商餘屋、協助建商出租或建商自行出租,專供出租予較低收入家庭或就業就學有居住需求者。在消極面則是建議政府以課徵空屋稅或囤房稅抑制建商餘屋或民眾囤房。最後,房地產長期健全發展及防災觀念建立在都市計畫基礎,若能為有效的運用社會資源,落實居住正義,以及降低空屋率,也避免建商承擔巨額的財務壓力,如此房地產市場應能長期穩定發展。
    The international and domestic political and economic changes from 2004 to 2018, compared with the total number of national proposal and households after the completion of the Cathay Real Estate Index, we found that significant economic changes or policy implementation will obviously affect the trend of the real estate market. This study discusses the motives of developers to push cases, and derive the possible basis for the decision-making of them. After the empirical analysis of the expert questionnaire, the influencing factors of each class are obtained, then study what the sequence of the importance of the influencing factors. The purpose is to reflect the actual operation of the developers in the real estate market, to provide reference for government departments to develop residential-related policies, and to give the builder a possible strategy for thinking about the competitiveness of the project.
    This research adopts the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). At first, it conducts in-depth interviews with experts. The target is ten non-specific builders. The interview includes domestic and foreign political and economic situations, real estate related decrees and trends, strategies for business management, etc., then according to the AHP research method structure, the factors which affecting developer to construct will be summarized. Based on the hierarchical structure, the four main evaluations and the following 16 factors are summarized. The four main assessments are the overall economic market, policy, construction management, and product. The above-mentioned influencing factors are designed as expert questionnaires, and the results of the questionnaire survey are collected. The software Expert Choice 2000 is used for quantitative analysis. Finally, the priority of the influencing factors is used as the builders’ basis of thinking.
    In the analysis of the empirical results, the second class assessment affects the willingness of the construction project is oriented toward the weight, which is the overall economic market 26.10%, the policy 32.40%, the management of the business 14.50% and the product 27.10%. The top three highest values are in terms of policy, product, and overall economic market. Besides, using 16 assessment factors in the third class to examine the willingness of the builders to push the case. If the weight value exceeds 10%, the first three items are the market supply and demand 12.10%, the urban plan 11.30% and the fiscal policy 10.60%. The market supply and demand are shown in the empirical results of the questionnaire as the most important evaluation factor.
    In the conclusion, in view of the roles of the government and the builders, the relevant recommendations are put forward according to the three important evaluation factors of market supply and demand, urban planning and fiscal policy in empirical results. Because of the oversupply of real estate, first of all, it encourages builders to transform their spare houses to support institutions in the view of the policy. Moreover, it will cooperate with the social housing and rental management policy to encourage the rental management operators to lease the remaining housing estates, assist the construction company to tenant or rent their own, for rent to lower-income families or persons being employed or still studying with residential needs. On the negative side, it is suggested that the government should levy on an empty house or hoarding to curb the construction of surplus houses or people`s hoarding. Finally, the long-term sound development of real estate and the concept of disaster prevention are based on the urban planning. If we can effectively use social resources, implement housing justice, and reduce the vacancy rate, but also to avoid builders bear huge financial pressure, so that the real estate market should be long-term stable development.
    Reference: 中文參考文獻
    李世雄(2018),影響都市更新事業實施之關鍵因素分析-以臺北市中正區某整建住宅都更案為例,國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文,台北。
    林左裕(2008),美國次級房貸風暴對臺灣金融資產證券化及投資者之啟示,住宅學報,第17卷第1期,頁111-123。
    林左裕、程于芳(2014),影響不動產市場之從眾行為與總體經濟因素之研究,應用經濟論叢,第95期,頁61-99。
    林左裕(2014),不動產投資管理,五版,智勝文化事業公司,台北。
    林秋瑾、王健安、張金鶚(1997),房地產景氣與總體經濟景氣於時間上領先、同時、落後關係之探討,國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,第7卷第1期,頁35-56。
    林恩從、林秋瑾、張金鶚(1997),台灣房地產景氣與金融變數長期關係之研究,中國財務學刊,第4卷第4期,頁75-91。
    花敬群、張金鶚(1999),住宅空間次市場價格比例與市場規模之關係,都市與計劃,第26卷第1期,頁79-94。
    高慈敏(2014),經濟波動與房地產交易之價量關係:搜索模型之應用,住宅學報,第23卷第2期,頁21-56。
    章定?(2005),上市櫃建設公司土地投資與開發策略對經營績效影響之探討,住宅學報,第14卷第1期,頁41-65。
    張金鶚、楊宗憲、洪御仁(2008)中古屋及預售屋房價指數之建立、評估與整合-台北市之實證分析,住宅學報,第17卷第2期,頁13-34。
    張金鶚、高國峰、林秋瑾(2001),台北市合理房價-需求面分析,住宅學報,第10卷,第1期,頁51-66。
    梁仁旭(2003),不確定市場下以地價稅調節土地利用之研究,都市與計劃,第30卷第2期,頁145-155。
    梁仁旭(2007),不動產開發選擇權時間價值比之實證分析,都市與計劃,第34卷第1期,頁1-12。
    許書銘、林師模(2007),兩岸經貿互動對我國總體經濟與產業發展之影響分析,臺灣管理學刊,第7卷第2期,頁123-144。
    康榮寶(2007),美國次級房貸風暴對世界及兩岸經濟之影響,展望與探索,第5卷第9期,頁1-10。
    彭建文、盧建霖(2014),預售制度下建商銷售時機選擇之實證分析,都市與計劃,第41卷第3期,頁287-304。
    彭建文、張金鶚、林恩從(1998),房地產景氣對生產時間落差之影響,經濟論文叢刊,第26卷第4期,頁409-429。
    彭建文、張金鶚(2000),總體經濟對房地產景氣影響之研究,國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,第10卷第3期,頁330-343。
    彭建文、盧建霖(2014),預售制度下建商銷售時機選擇之實證分析,都市與計劃,第41卷第3期,頁287-304。
    Roulac S. E. (1997,彭建文譯),不動產市景氣循環、轉變力量與結構變遷,住宅學報,第6期,頁71-88。
    曾明宗、林左裕(2016),影響金融業辦理逆向抵押貸款因素之研究,土地問題研究季刊,第16卷第2期,頁2- 26。
    楊宗憲(2003),住宅市場之產品定位分析-建商推案行為之研究,住宅學報,第12卷第2期,頁123-139。
    榮泰生(2011),EXPERT CHOICE 在分析層級程序法(AHP)之應用,五南圖書出版公司,台北。
    蔡曜如(2003),我國房地產市場之發展、影響暨政府因應對策,中央銀行季刊,第25卷第4期,頁31-64。
    鄧振源、曾國雄(1989),層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與運用(上),中國統計學報,第27卷第6期,頁13707-13724。
    鄧振源、曾國雄(1989),層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與運用(下),中國統計學報,第27卷第7期,頁13767-13786。
    賴碧瑩(2003),從經濟結構變遷探討房地產市場與總體經濟之關連性,中華民國住宅學會第12屆年會論文集,頁45-62。




    外文參考文獻
    Bulan, L., Mayer, C.J. & Somerville, C.T.(2009), Irreversible Investment, Real Options, and Competition: Evidence from Real Estate Development, Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 237-251.
    Chan, S.H., Fang, F. & Yang, J.(2008), Presales, Financing Constraints, and Developers` Production Decisions, Journal of Real Estate Research , Vol. 30, No.3, pp. 345-376.
    Edelstein, R., Liu, P. & Wu, F.(2012), The Market for Real Estate Presales: A Theoretical Approach, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 45, Issue 1, pp. 30-48.
    Habito, C.F., Santos, M.O. & Victorio, A.G.(2010), A Game-Theoretic Approach to Hedonic Housing Prices, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp.1541-1544.
    Hewlett C.A. (1999), Strategic Planning for Real Estate Companies, Journal of Property Management, Vol. 64, Issue 1.
    Case K.E. & Shiller R.J. (1988), The Behavior of Home Buyers in Boom and Post-Boom Markets, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 2748 (Also Reprint No. r1238).
    Lai, R.N., Wang, K. & Zhou, Y. (2004), Sale before Completion of Development: Pricing and Strategy, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 32, No. 2., pp. 329-357.
    Leung, B., Hui, E. & Seabrooke, B.(2007), Pricing of Presale Properties with Asymmetric Information Problems , Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 139-152.
    Saaty, T.L.(2008), Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Journal Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1., pp. 83-98.
    Wu, M.C., Lin, I.C., Huang, Y.T. & Rong, C. (2015), Forecasting Prices of Presale Houses: A Real Option Approcach, Romanian Journal of Economics Forecasting, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 143-158.
    Yiu, C.Y., Man, K.F. & Wong, S.K. (2008), Trading Volume and Price Dispersion in Housing Markets, Journal of Property Research, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 203-219.


    網頁參考文獻
    1. 內政部不動產資訊平臺https://pip.moi.gov.tw/V2/Default.aspx
    2. 法務部全國法規資料庫https://law.moj.gov.tw/
    3. 臺北市政府都市發展局http://www.udd.gov.taipei/pages/services_list.aspx?Wcode=8&Node=27&Index=2
    4. 國泰房地產指數http://www.cathay-red.com.tw/about_house.asp
    5. 立法院法律系統https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lglawkm
    6. 中華民國國家發展委員會https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Default.aspx
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系碩士在職專班
    103923010
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103923010
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201901119
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    301001.pdf2273KbAdobe PDF2334View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback