English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46325435      Online Users : 777
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/127712


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127712


    Title: 論商業判斷法則於我國法制之適用－以企業併購為中心
    A Study on the Application of Business Judgment Rule in Taiwan-Focusing on Mergers and Acquisitions
    Authors: 周振鋒
    Chou, Cheng-Fong
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 企業併購; 利益衝突; 受任人義務; 注意義務; 忠實義務 ;商業判斷法則; 股東代表訴訟 ; 特別委員會   
    董事會係公司之權力中樞，其作為關乎公司經營成敗，故公司法要求董事對公司盡受任人義務，且違反應對公司負賠償責任。惟商業情事瞬息萬變、錯綜複雜，因而經營決定有誤在所難免，尤其併購之必要性與條件有時見仁見智，或併購後續結果未發生預期之效益時，皆可能讓股東產生董事是否盡其義務之質疑。為保障董事決定不致動輒遭股東指摘違反義務，美國判例法遂發展出商業判斷法則作為保護董事及其經營決定之制度。但我國法制並未有相似制度，不論學說或司法實務均未能形成共識。本文擬研究商業判斷法則於我國法制是否應予引進、與我國法制下是否有所衝突，以及企併法修正條文對商業判斷法則適用是否有所影響等問題。最終於文末提出淺見作為結論，盼能為我國法制尋得相對合宜之規範模式。
    Date: 2017-08
    Issue Date: 2019-12-04 14:50:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The board of directors is invested with authority to run the business of a corporation, so it members are required to owe fiduciary duty to the corporation in which they serve. However, the board decisions may turn out to be wrong in some circumstances and shareholders may bring suits against directors for wrong decisions they made. In U.S., the business judgment rule (BJR) protects decision-makers by refraining courts from reviewing the merits of decisions at issue. As Taiwan`s statutes have no similar mechanism which protects directors and their decisions, whether to use U.S.-typed BJR in litigations becomes highly controversial. This article will address some fundamental questions concerning the application of BJR in Taiwan, including whether Taiwan should apply BJR in judicial proceeding, what potential issues are in applying BJR in Taiwan legal system and under newly-amended Mergers and Acquisitions Act. This article will provide suggestions as conclusion in order for future regulation reform of better corporate governance.
    Relation: 東海法學研究, No.52, pp.145-193
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2238View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback