English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46215338      Online Users : 1011
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/127720


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127720


    Title: 金融科技監理與我國金融監理沙盒制度之檢視
    FinTech Regulation and A Review of Taiwan`s Financial Regulatory Sandbox Framewor
    Authors: 臧正運
    Tsang, Cheng-Yun
    彭金隆
    Peng, Jin-Lung
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 金融科技 ; 金融科技監理;   金融監理沙盒; 金融科技創新實驗   
    FinTech; FinTech Regulation; Financial Regulatory Sandbox; FinTech Innovative Experimentation
    Date: 2019-10
    Issue Date: 2019-12-04 14:52:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 研究目的：本文旨在研究金融科技發展之特徵、風險以及國際上的主要監理策略，聚焦於英國、新加坡及澳洲等三國之監理沙盒制度設計，離析出較具共通性之本質要素，再據以檢視我國之金融科技發展與創新實驗條例之內容，最後歸結出我國金融監理沙盒制度的發展建議。研究設計／方法：比較法制分析方法。研究結果：本文歸結出我國金融監理沙盒制度在五大面向的發展建議：監理機關與業者間的協作機制、降低法規與監理標準不確定性安排、實驗完成後的落地機制、降低市場進入障礙與兼顧實驗參與者保障之安排，以及相關配套措施的建置及落實。研究限制／啟發：各國的監理沙盒機制近年持續發展與演化中，囿於研究時間與資源的限制，本論文無法針對世界各國沙盒制度的最新發展進行系統性的比較，只能選擇最具代表性的三個國家加以分析及深入探討。理論／實務／社會意涵：本文的主要社會意涵在於提出我國監理沙盒及金融科技監理之制度面與實務面運作的反思與調適建議，並提供策略面的分析框架供產官學各界作為未來政策制定與實踐之對話基礎。創見／價值：本文主要價值在於從策略角度分析國際上金融監理沙盒制度的本質要素，並與我國之制度進行對照。
    Purpose -This article aims to analyze the main characteristics and risks of FinTech development and the regulatory strategies employed by world`s regulators to respond to those risks. It also studies the legal construct of the UK, Singapore, and Australia`s FinTech regulatory sandbox regimes and identifies their common elements. Design/methodology/approach - Comparative legal and regulatory study Findings - This article examines whether the design of Taiwan`s Financial Regulatory Sandbox Regime is in line with core elements of global regulatory sandbox regimes and concludes five dimensions for future reforms: mechanisms for regulator-industry collaboration, arrangements for reducing uncertainty over the applicable laws and regulatory standards, design of the post-experiment regime, arrangements for reducing entry barriers to the market while protecting the interests of participants in sandbox experiments, and mechanisms for supporting and facilitating FinTech innovations. Research limitations/implications - The world`s regulatory sandbox regimes have been rapidly evolving for the past few years, and therefore due to the time and resource limit, this research can only chose the sandbox regimes from three most representative countries instead of conducting a systemic study of each country`s sandbox regime. Practical implications/Social implications -The social implications of this article lie in its reflections on Taiwan`s FinTech regulation, the regulatory sandbox regime and the analytical framework it proposes, to foster strategic thinking, build up foundations for constant dialogue among the industry, policymakers and academics. Originality/value - The core value of this article lies in its identification of the core elements of the regulatory sandbox regime from a strategic perspective and then based on which policymakers and regulators in Taiwan can fine-tune the country`s sandbox regime.
    Relation: 管理評論, Vol.38, No.4 15-31
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6656/MR.201910_38(4).CNI015
    DOI: 10.6656/MR.201910_38(4).CNI015
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2411View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback