Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128977
|
| Title: | 論閉環供應鏈權利人售後市場控制之研究
A study of the right holders control in the closed loop supply chain |
| Authors: | 柯至恩
Ko, Chih-En |
| Contributors: | 馮震宇
Jerry G. Fong
柯至恩
Ko, Chih-En |
| Keywords: | 閉環供應鏈
售後市場
修理權
專利耗盡
Closed-loop Supply Chain
Aftermarket
Repair Act
Patent Exhaustion |
| Date: | 2019 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-03-02 11:35:14 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 閉環供應鏈係2004年左右被提出的一個供應鏈概念，不同於傳統供應鏈的從製造到銷售的正向物流，閉環供應鏈尚且結合了一個逆向物流，即回收、再製造與再處理、並再次售出到售後市場。觀察閉環供應鏈中售後市場之狀況，一般可分為獨立之第三方再製造商之再處理或由授權代工製造之廠商進行回收再處理，在售後市場中兩者呈現對立競爭之關係。
閉環供應鏈中原製造商長期透過專利訴訟以企圖在售後市場取得優勢，本文透過回顧美國法院有關閉環供應鏈售後市場涉及專利之實務判決，可發現因為專利耗盡原則抗辯之存在，使得原製造商及授權代工之再處理商在在售後市場之競爭力逐漸削弱。2017年美國最高法院判決之Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Intern., Inc.案更是對售後市場產生劇烈影響，使得原製造商無法再透過售後限制及地區限制之方式限制專利權之耗盡而控制售後市場。
本文藉由判決個案分析閉環供應鏈之原製造商及獨立第三方再處理商在售後市場之過去於售後市場之專利侵權判決，並分析Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Intern., Inc.案對售後市場之影響，此外並一併探討有關閉環供應鏈中設計專利、著作權法及營業秘密法之問題，並兼論修理權發展與再製造過程豁免科技保護措施破壞之議題，並提出未來再處理商與獨立第三方再製造商在售後市場中因應判決立場改變及其他智慧財產權發展因應之可行建議。
The closed-loop supply chain is a concept which has been proposed in 2004. Different from the traditional supply chain of the positive logistic, a closed-loop supply chain includes a reverse logistic, which is recycling, remanufacturing, reprocessing, and reselling to the aftermarket. Observing the aftermarket in closed-loop supply chain, it is supported by independent third-party remanufacture and authorized original equipment manufacturer, and these two parties would compete with each other.
In the closed-loop supply chain, taking a patent legal action against the third party over the patent issue takes the manufacturer and the original equipment manufacturer a very good advantage. Based on the study of patent cases about the closed-loop supply chain and, we can conclude that the manufacturer and the original equipment manufacturer seem to weaken their competitiveness in the aftermarket. In 2017, Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Intern., Inc. is a decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States, which causes a severe impact in the aftermarket that the manufacturer cannot rely on the post-sale restriction to prevent the patent exhaustion.
The main purpose of this article is to advise the member in the aftermarket of the closed-loop supply chain by analyzing the patent exhaustion issue about manufacturer and independent third party manufacturer in the closed loops supply chain and also study on the related intellectual property, including the copyright, technological protection measure and right to repair act in the US. |
| Reference: | 中文部分
書籍
王玉燕，2010，閉環供應鏈的協調激勵機制研究，中國大陸：中國財政經濟出版社。
何應欽，2013，供應鏈設計與管理，台北：華泰文化。
陳兵兵，2007，SCM供應鏈管理─策略、技術與實務，台北：五南出版社。
張有恆，2014，現代物流管理：物流與供應鏈整合，台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
遲嘯川、趙錫如，2001，辭海，台北：華文網股份有限公司。
劉國讚，2014年，專利法理論與實用(三版)，台北：元照出版社。
期刊論文
沈宗倫，2007年，由對價平衡觀點論智慧財產耗盡原則之適用─以平行輸入為中心，國立中正大學集刊，23期，頁24。
吳佳穎，2006年，從美國種子專利侵權判決看其專利權利耗盡原則的適用，智慧財產月刊，92期，頁109。
胡心蘭，權利耗盡不耗盡─簡析數位著作次級市場之建構，智慧財產權月刊， 209期，頁57
范曉玲，2008年，專利權耗盡：談美國聯邦最高法院Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.乙案，萬國法律，162期，頁76-84。
徐銘夆，歐盟共同體設計維修免責條款之實踐與探討─以英國BMW v. R&M案為中心，智慧財產月刊 104.08 v.200
黃本立，2008年，從AT&T判決看專利法治外法權—美國專利法第271條（f）項，智慧財產權月刊，112期，頁52-66。
鄭本榮、楊超、楊珺，2017，專利保護下雙管道閉環供應鏈的定價與協調決策，系統工程學報，32(1)，頁103-113。
博碩士學位論文
何信義(2013)，從修理與再製案件看專利權耗盡原則與默示授權。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所。
網際網路
吳采葳，美國國會圖書館發布例外規則，將10項科技使用行為合法化，上網日期2019年8月27日，檢自：https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=64&tp=0&i=72&d=7074
馮震宇，水貨解禁消費者的大勝利 美國政策大轉彎台灣的對應之道，能力雜誌，上網日期2019年8月9日，檢自： http://www.dgnet.com.tw/articleview.php?article_id=19912&issue_id=3912
黃于珊，台美司法實務對於方法專利權利耗盡之新見解，上網日期2019年8月9日，檢自： http://www.saint-island.com.tw/TW/Knowledge/Knowledge_Info.aspx?IT=Know_0_1&CID=443&ID=998
楊智傑，美國專利耗盡原則的最新見解：聯邦巡迴法院Lexmark v. Impression案全院判決，北美智權報，上網日期2019年3月31日，檢自：http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Infringement_Case/IPNC_161102_0502.htm
楊智傑，美國2017年PARTS法案推動汽車外觀設計專利維修免責條款，北美智權報，上網日期：2019年10月8日，檢自：http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Laws/IPNC_180516_0201.htm#1
搖籃到搖籃設計概念，Retrieved Apr.27 2019, from http://www.c2cplatform.tw/c2c.php?Key=1
睿信致成顧問有限公司，全球汽車零部件再製造產業與市場概述，上網日期2019年7月7日，檢自：http://www.acgmc.com/Content/201711087431.html
科技產業資訊室：專利權耗盡原則：美最高法院大幅放寬適用範圍(Impression Products v. Lexmark) ，上網日期2019年4月26日，檢自：http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=13459
歐盟執委會撤回設計指令之「維修免責」修正提案研析報告，智慧財產局撰報，上網日期2019年12月3日，檢自：http://www.ieatpe.org.tw/upload/10300149811.pdf
法院判決
臺灣臺北地方法院94年度智字第27號判決
臺灣高等法院97年度智上更(一)字第6號判決
智慧財產法院98年度民專上更(二)字第2號判決
最高法院99年度台上字第1467號判決
智慧財產法院101年度民專訴字第73號判決
智慧財產法院106年度民專訴字第34號判決
英文部分
書籍
Stock J.R Reverse logistics(1992): Concil of logistics management, Oak Brook, IL,
期刊論文
Boynton, A., & Zmud, A., An Assestment of Critical Success Factors, (1984) Sloan Management Review. 25(4), 17-27.
R. Canan Savaskan, Shantanu Bhattacharya, Luk N. Van Wassenhove, (2004) Closed loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing, Management Science, V50, p.239-240
Grinvald, Leah Chan and Tur-Sinai, Ofer, Intellectual Property Law and the Right to Repair (2019). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 88, Forthcoming; Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 19-4. From SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3317623 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3317623
REPAIR.ORG, LEGISLATIVE TEMPLATE, at Sec. 3(a), (b), https://repair.org/s/Rightto-repair-Model-state-law-7-24-18.docx
Martin Christopher(1992), Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service(2e), Pearson Education Limited.1-33, 147-249
Chen, F., & Samroengraja, R. (2000), The stationary beer game. Production and Operations Management, 9(1), 19-30
Christopher Heath, Anselm Kamperman Sanders(eds) (2009), Spares, Repairs, and Intellectual Property Rights: IEEM International Intellectual Property Programmes, Kluwer Law International
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S., (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management science, 43(4), 546-558.
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K. & Mead, M., The Case Study Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369-386(1987).
Hartwell, I. & Marco, J. Jnl Remanufacture (2016) 6: 3., from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13243-016-0025-z
Barker, T. J., & Zabinsky, Z. B. (2008) Reverse logistics network design: a conceptual framework for decision making.International, Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(4), 250-260.
DeLacey, B. J., & Leonard, D. A., (2002) Case study on technology and distance in education at the Harvard Business School. Educational Technology & Society, 5(2), 13-28.
Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., & Kannan, D. (2015) Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 603-626
Yin, R. K. (1994), Case study research: Design and methods, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Van Horn, R. L. (1973), Empirical studies of management information systems, ACM SIGMIS Database, 5(2-4), 172-180.
Beamon, B. M., (1999) Measuring supply chain performance. International journal of operations & production management, 19(3), 275-292.
Mineko Mohri, Maintenance (2010), Replacement and Recycling-Patentees’ Rights in the Aftermarkets Germany, the U.S and Japan.40.41 Herbert Utz Verlag.
John W Osborne(2004), A Coherent View of Patent Exhaustion: A Standard Based on Patentable Distinctiveness, 20 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 643, 646–47
Olsen, J.P. (1983), Organized Democracy. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Martin, P., Guide Jr, V. D. R., & Craighead, C. W. (2010) Supply chain sourcing in remanufacturing operations: an empirical investigation of remake versus buy. Decision Sciences, 41(2), 301-324
David A.P. Paterson, Winifred L. Ijomah, James F.C. Windmill, (2017), End of Life decision tool with emphasis on remanufacturing, Journal od Cleaner Production 148 ,653-664
Kling, R., & Iacono, S. (1984), Computing as an occasion for social control. Journal of Social Issues, 40(3), 77-96.
Setaputra, R., & Mukhopadhyay, S. K. (2010) A framework for research in reverse logistics. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 7(1), 19-55.
Guy A. Rub, (2015),The first-sale doctrine under United States copyright law, while not identical to patent exhaustion, relies on similar theoretical principles., Rebalancing Copyright Exhaustion, 64 EMORY L.J. 751.
Guide Jr, V. D. R. and Van Wassenhove (2009)—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research. Operations Research 57(1), 10-18
Khor, K. S., & Udin, Z. M. (2012), Impact of reverse logistics product disposition towards business performance in Malaysian E&E companies. Journal of Supply Chain and Customer Relationship Management, 2012, 1-19.
Robert J. Schmidt, (2019), Not Your Grandparents` Intellectual Property: How Rightsholders Are Using License Agreements to Avoid Exhaustion and Ensure Their Products Stay Out of the Secondary Market, 63 St. Louis U. L.J. 525, 529
William R. Thornewell (2006), Patent Infringement Prevention and The Advancement of technology: Application of 35 U.S.C § 271(f) to software and “Virtual Components, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 2815, 2817
Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001) Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business logistics, 22(2), 1-25.
Hoshino T., Yura K. and Hitomi K.,（1995）“Optimization analysis for recycle-oriented
manufacturing systems.” International Journal of Production Research, 33, 2069-2078.
Melo, M. T., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-Da-Gama, F., (2009) Facility location and supply chain management–A review. European journal of operational research, 196(2), 401-412
Forrester, J. W. (1958), Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers, Harvard Business Review, 38, 37-66.
網路資料
R. Canan Savaskan, Shantanu Bhattacharya, Luk N. Van Wassenhove, Retrieved Dec. 4 2019, Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing, from: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186
Assure Strategy, Circular Advantage, Retrieved July 11 2019, from: https://www.accenture.com/t20150523T053139__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Strategy_6/Accenture-Circular-Advantage-Innovative-Business-Models-Technologies-Value-Growth.pdf
Remanufactured Goods, An Overview of the U.S. and Global Industries, Market ,and Trade, Retrieved 14 July 2019 from: https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4356.pdf
Remanufacturing Market Study for Horzon 2020, grant agreement No 645984, November 2015, Retrieved 11 Auf 2019, from: https://www.remanufacturing.eu/assets/pdfs/remanufacturing-market-study.pdf
McKinsey & Company, The Changing aftermarket game- and how automotive suppliers can benefit Van Wassenhove, (2004) Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing arising opportunities, Retrieved 11 Aug. 2019, from: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Automotive%20and%20Assembly/Our%20Insights/The%20changing%20aftermarket%20game%20and%20how%20automotive%20suppliers%20can%20benefit%20from%20arising%20opportunities/The-changing-aftermarket-game.ashx
Kalverkamp, Matthias; Raabe, Thorsten, Automotive Remanufacturing in the Circular Economy in Europe: Marketing System Challenges, Journal of Micromarketing (online first) pp.23-28 Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. , Retrieved 27 Apr. 2019, from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146717739066
Centre for Remanufacturing & Reuse, Remanufacture of medical imaging devices, Retrieved 27 Apr. 2019, from http://www.remanufacturing.org.uk/pdf/story/1p89.pdf
APRA Europe, Remanufacturing Terminology, Remanufacturing Term Guideline (2012), Retrieved 4 Dec. 2019 from: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5a4bc7898&appId=PPGMS
Triple Win: The Economic, Social and Environmental Case for Remanufacturing, The Economic (2014),Retrieved 4 Dec. 2019, from: https://www.policyconnect.org.uk/apsrg/research/report-triple-win-social-economic-and-environmental-case-remanufacturing
Federal Vehicle Repair Cost Savings Act of 2015, Retrieved 4 Dec. 2019, from: https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ65/PLAW-114publ65.pdf
Remanufacturing Market Study, European Remanufacturing Network(2015),Retrieved 20 July 2019, from: https://www.remanufacturing.eu/assets/pdfs/remanufacturing-market-study.pdf
Communication form the Commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy, Retrieved 4 Dec. 2019, from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614
Workshop Report Promoting Remanufacturing, Refurbishment, Repair, and Direct Reuse (2017),p.5, Retrieved Retrieved 4 Dec. 2019 from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/international_issues/pdf/7_8_february_2017/workshop_report_Brussels_7_8_02_2017.pdf
APRA Europe and ReMaTec (RAI Amsterdam),Three Key Aftermarket rends that challenge warehouse distributors and wholesales, Retrieved 4 Dec. 2019, from: https://cdn.ymaws.com/apra.org/resource/resmgr/news/rematec_three_key_trends.pdf
Michaels, A. C., Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: A Glib Rebuke of the Federal Circuit. The George Washington Law Review On the Docket (2017). Retrieved 4 Dec. 2019, from: http://www.gwlr.org/impression-products-v-lexmark/
Gegorgy M. Luck, The Implied License: an Evolving Defense to Patent Infringement 16 IPL Newsl. 3 (1997-1998),Retrieved 12 July 2019, form: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/iprolane16&div=5&id=&page=
Anirut Somboon, Patent Exhaustion in Cases of Recycling and Repair of Goods, A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment if the requirements for the degree of master of laws, p.13, Retrieved 4 Dec. 2019,from: http://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac.th/thesis/2015/TU_2015_5601040016_4664_2895.pdf
All-Party Parliamentary sustainable resource group, Triple Win: The Social, Economic and Environment case for Remanufacturing, Retrieved: 26 July 2019, from: https://www.policyconnect.org.uk/apsrg/sites/site_apsrg/files/report/535/fieldreportdownload/triplewin-thesocialeconomicandenvironmentalcaseforremanufacturing.pdf
Pauliina Sutinen, Post-sale retrictions in patnet and trademark licensing agreement: Validity and compliance with competition law, Faculty of Law Lund University (2018), from: http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8944198&fileOId=8944203
Amici Curiae of Imaging Supplies Coalition in support of respondent Lexmark international, Inc., Retrieved 1 July 2019, from: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/15-1189_bsac_Imaging_Supplies_Coalition.pdf
Amici Curiae of Medical Device Manufacturers Association in Support of Respondent, Retrieved 1 July 2019, from: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/15-1189_amicus_resp_medical_device_mfrs_association.pdf
Amici Curiae of Auto Care Association and international Imaging Technology Council in Support of the Petitioner, Retrieved 1 July 2019, from: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/15-1189-Auto-Care-and-IITC-Amici-Brief.pdf (last visited at: 2019/7/1)
Amici Cuiae of the Association of Medical Device Reprocessors in Support of Petitioner, Retrieved 1 July 2019, from: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/15-1189_amicus_pet_AMDR.pdf (last visited at: 2019/7/6)
What does the Impression Products v. Lexmark decision mean for drug companies? 5 takeaways, Retrieved 26 Apr.2019, from: https://www.limegreenipnews.com/2017/09/u-s-what-does-the-impression-products-v-lexmark-decision-mean-for-drug-companies-5-takeways/
Supreme Court OKs Discounted Resale Of `Gray Market` Goods, Retrieved 1 Aug. 2019, from: https://perma.cc/5VS6-LUSN
US Supreme Court rules for World Wide Patent Exhaustion, Retrieved 8 Aug. 2019 from : https://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/us-supreme-court-rules-for-world-wide-patent-exhaustion/
Lexmark and the future of sales, Retrieved 16 July 2019, from: http://www.theendofownership.com/blog/2017/6/1/thoughts-on-impression-products-v-lexmark
Worldwide patent licenses after Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. Retrieved 16 July 2019, from: https://www.gundersen-law.com/post/2017-06-08-worldwide-patent-licenses-after-lexmark
Gus Iversen, Editor in Chief, Philips acquires AGITO Medical to ramp up multi-vendor service capabilities, Retrieved 1 Sep. 2019, from: https://www.dotmed.com/news/story/41615
Remanufacture of Medical Imaging Devices, Retrieved 26 Apr, 2019, from : http://www.remanufacturing.org.uk/pdf/story/1p89.pdf
D. Brian Kacedon & Kevin D. Rodkey, The Aftermath of Impression Products v. Lexmark, Retrieved 27 Apr 2019, from: https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/the-aftermath-of-impression-products-v-lexmark.html
D. Brian Kacedon & Kevin D. Rodkey, The Aftermath of Impression Products v. Lexmark, Retrieved 27 Apr 2019, from: https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/the-aftermath-of-impression-products-v-lexmark.html
Repair Association, Retrieved 8 Oct. 2019, from: https://repair.org/association
Haim Gartecberg, New copyright exemption let you legally repair your phone or jailbreak voice assistance, Retrieved 5 Dec. 2019 from: https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2018/10/25/18024332/us-copyright-office-right-to-repair-dcma-exemptions
Elliot Williams ,DMCA Review: Big win for right to repair, zero for right to tinker, Retrieved 27 Aug 2019, from: https://hackaday.com/2018/10/26/dmca-review-big-win-for-right-to-repair-zero-for-right-to-tinker/#comments
Right to repair association,Retrieved 31 Aug 2019, from: https://repair.org/legislation
Robert Sauer, M.S,Working Definition, Retrieved 5 Dec 2019 from: http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171115051236/https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/UCM529024.pdf
Refurbishing, Reconditioning, Rebuilding, Remaketing, Remanufacturing, and Servicing of Medical Devices Performed by Third-Party Entities and Original Equipment Manufacturers; Request for Comments, Retrieved 5 Dec 2019, from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/03/04/2016-04700/refurbishing-reconditioning-rebuilding-remarketing-remanufacturing-and-servicing-of-medical-devices
FDA Report on the Quality and Effectiveness of Servicing of Medical Devices(May 2018), Retrieved 21 July 2019, from: https://www.fda.gov/media/113431/download
Benjamin M. Zegarelli, Aaron L. Josephson, Observations from FDA’s Public Workshop on Medical Device Servicing and Remanufacturing, Retrieved 29 Aug. 2019 from https://www.mintz.com/insights-center/viewpoints/2791/2018-12-observations-fdas-public-workshop-medical-device-servicing
判決
1.Adams v. Burke,84 U.S.453, 456 (1873)
2.Anton Inc. v. PAG,Ltd.,329 F.sd 1343,49 (2003)
3.Am. Cotton Tie Co. v. Simmons, 106 U.S. 89, 93 (1882).
4.Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., 377 U.S. 476, 479–80, 84 S. Ct. 1526, 1528, 12 L. Ed. 2d 457 (1964)
5.Bandag, Inc. v. Al Bolser`s Tire Stores, Inc., 750 F.2d 903, 924–26 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
6.Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp., 77 F.3d 1381 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
7.Dana Corp. v. Am. Precision Co., 827 F.2d 755, 756–57 (Fed. Cir. 1987)
8.Fuji Photo Film Co. v. Jazz Photo Corp., 394 F.3d 1368 (Fed.Cir.2005).
9. Fromberg, Inc. v. Gross Mfg. Co., 328 F.2d 803, 804–05 (9th Cir. 1964)
10.Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Repeat-O-Type Stencil Mfg. Corp., 123 F.3d 1445, 1446–47 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
11.Impression Prod., Inc. v. Lexmark Int`l, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1523, 198 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2017)
12.Illinois Tool Works Inc v Independent Ink, Inc, 547 US 28, 42-43 (2006)
13.Intel Corp. v. ULSI Sys. Tech., Inc., 995 F.2d 1566, 1567 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
14.Kendall Co. v. Progressive Med. Tech., Inc., 85 F.3d 1570, 1571 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
15.Met-Coil Sys, Corp. v. Korner Unlimited, Inc,.803 F.2d 684,686
16.Mitchell v. Hawley, 83 U.S.544, 548 (1872)
17.Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700, 701–02 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
18.Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 553 U.S. 617, 625–28, 128 S. Ct. 2109, 2115–17, 170 L. Ed. 2d 996 (2008)
19.Sage Prod., Inc. v. Devon Indus., Inc., 126 F.3d 1420, 1421–22 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
20.Surfco Hawaii v. Fin Control Sys. Pty, Ltd., 264 F.3d 1062 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
21.United States v. Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241, 243–44, 62 S. Ct. 1088, 1090, 86 L. Ed. 1408 (1942)
22.Wilson v. Simpson, 50 U.S. 109, 111–13, 13 L. Ed. 66 (1850)
23.Wiber-Ellies Co. v. Kuther, 377 U.S.422,424(1964) |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
104364209 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104364209 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000279 |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 420901.pdf | 1821Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 235 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
