政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/129233
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 110944/141864 (78%)
造访人次 : 48049018      在线人数 : 850
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129233


    题名: 創業板對於企業成長資源配置效率之比較研究
    Comparative Analysis of Growth Enterprise Market’s Efficiency of Allocating Capital
    作者: 鄭佑宣
    Cheng, Yu-Hsuan
    贡献者: 鄭至甫
    Jeng, Jyh-Fu
    鄭佑宣
    Cheng, Yu-Hsuan
    关键词: 創業板市場
    興櫃市場
    資源配置效率
    新創公司
    資本市場分層
    Resource allocation efficiency
    GEM
    Startup
    Emerging stock market
    Capital market stratification
    日期: 2019
    上传时间: 2020-04-06 14:48:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 對於新創事業體來說獲取資源是重要的成長動力，本論文研究以相對主板市場(Main Board)寬鬆的標準允許公司上市，針對新創企業、中小企業所設置的創業板市場（Second Board Market），以Jeffrey Wurgler(2000)所提出的資源配置效率模型作為衡量創業板市場的資源配置效率，探討營業收入成長、獲利成長、研發資源投入與市場成交金額的變化關係。
    本論文以台灣興櫃市場作為研究對象，目的在於探討台灣興櫃市場對市場上公司的資源配置效率，加上香港創業板以及韓國KOSDAQ市場作為對比研究，並對比不同時間區段、產業分類、市場之間的資源配置效率差異，解釋可能造成資源配置效率差異的原因與不同創業板市場間的特徵差異。
    根據本研究的實證結果，一、營收成長資源配置效率以半年度最高，顯示以半年來觀察中小新創事業體有更顯著結果，而整年度獲利呈現更明顯的配置效率，但增加投入創新資源的資源配置效率不明顯。
    二、產業方面，在三個市場高科技產業與傳統產業都有呈現出顯著正效率配置結果，並沒有呈現高科技產業吸引更多資源投入的狀況。
    三、市場中具顯著正效率配置結果來說台灣相較平均分佈在數個產業上，香港較平均配置資源在各產業，而韓國最為集中，對比之下我國興櫃市場資源配置效率在產業上較香港高，但分佈較不平均，相較韓國有更多元的資源配置在不同產業，屬於著重多個產業並行的發展形式。
    For new ventures, access to resources is an important growth driver. This paper studies the company`s listing on the basis of the loose standard of the Main Board, and sets up the GEM for new ventures and SMEs (Second Board Market). Using the resource allocation efficiency model proposed by Jeffrey Wurgler (2000) to measure the resource allocation efficiency of the GEM market, and to explore the relationship between operating income growth, profit growth, R&D expense and market turnover.
    This thesis takes emerging stock market of Taiwan as the research object. The purpose of this paper is to explore the resource allocation efficiency of the company in the market in emerging stock market, compared to Hong Kong GEM and the Korean KOSDAQ market as a comparative study, and compare different time segments, industry classifications.
    The difference in resource allocation efficiency between markets explains the differences between the reasons that may cause differences in resource allocation efficiency and the characteristics of different GEM markets.
    According to the empirical results of this study, first, the efficiency of resource allocation per half year of revenue growth is higher than per year, and the efficiency of resource allocation for net profit growth is higher throughout the year. However, investing in innovative resources is not obvious. Second, there are no differences between high-tech and traditional industries since some of them both demonstrate high efficiency in allocating resources. Third, GEM allocates resources more evenly in various industries. Emerging stock market distribute severally in different industries, and South KOSDAQ is the most concentrated. In contrast, the resource allocation efficiency of Emerging stock market is higher in some industries than in GEM, and the distribution is relatively uneven. Compared with KOSDAQ, there are more diverse resources allocated in different industries. The result demonstrate different type of allocating resources in each market.
    參考文獻: 千敏、焦琳曉、王婧瑋。(2018)。創業板上市公司股權特徵與成長性關係分析。時代金融 2018 年第 02 期下旬刊，153-154 。(簡體中文文獻)
    方中秀。(2012)。無形資產的信息披露與市場檢驗——基于深圳創業板上市公司數據汪海。中國工業經濟2012年08期，135-147。(簡體中文文獻)
    方軍雄。(2006)。市場化進程與資本配置效率的改善。經濟研究2006年第5期，50-61。(簡體中文文獻)
    米運生、李永杰。(2006)。中國資本配置效率的區域差異：基於面板數據的分析。河南金融管理干部學院學報，2006第三期，45-51。(簡體中文文獻)
    李錦旋、尹宗成。(2015)。中國高技術資本配置效率影響因素分析——基於行業特徵視角。廣西財經學院學報2015年8月第248期卷第4期，17-21。 (簡體中文文獻)
    李學峰、朱虹、文茜。(2012)。創業板市場運行績效綜合評價基于ANP的國際比較研究。Journal of Yunnan Finance & Economics University第27卷第5期，50-56。 (簡體中文文獻)
    沈中華。(2011)，各國創新板之特色及可提供之加值服務。證券櫃檯主題報導，2011年4月，32-51。
    張立。(2013)。台灣地區多層次股票市場資源配置效率比較研究。台灣研究集刊2013年第1期，47-55。(簡體中文文獻)
    楊芳、邱達毅、黃光曉。(2018)。大陸新三板市場與台灣興櫃市場資本配置效率比較研究。台灣研究集刊2018年第2期，36-44。(簡體中文文獻)
    梁鵬、陳勇軍。(2011)。日本創業板市場發展動態與特色研究—以 Jasdaq 為例，證券市場導報。(簡體中文文獻)
    曹壽民、紀信義、劉正良。(2007)。股市對創新活動的評價是否具有效率性？從研發效率與內部人交易論析。會計評論 45期，27 – 55。
    陳聰。(2018)。資本市場對科技企業技術創新的影響研究。經濟研究導刊2018年第 34 期，6-10。(簡體中文文獻)
    陳建男、朱文儀。(2012)。大型集團企業之成員競爭優勢：資源、控制與內部市場。中山管理評論2012 年九月號第二十卷第三期，775-809。
    鄒建中。(2008)。臺灣與中國大陸多層次資本市場之比較探析。朝陽學報第十三期，109-128。
    戴淑庚。(2004)。台灣二板市場與香港創業板市場比較研究。台灣研究經濟，2004年第5期，39-45。(簡體中文文獻)

    Allen, F.& D. Gale.(1999).Diversity of Opinion and Financing of New Technologies. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 8, 68-89.
    Allen, F.(1993). Stock Markets and Resource Allocation. Capital Markets and Financial Intermediation. Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, 81-107.
    Aidin Salamzadeh & Hiroko Kawamorita Kesim. (2015). Startup Companies: Life Cycle and Challenges. 4th International Conference on Employment, Education and Entrepreneurship (EEE), Belgrade, Serbia, 2015
    Ball, R& Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 159-178.
    Bennett, P.& Wei, L. (2006). Market structure, fragmentation, and market quality. J. Financ. Mark. 9, 49–78.
    Bronwyn H, Hall. (1999). Innovation and Market Value.NBER Working PaperNo.6984, February.
    Chen & Ting Yang.(2013). An Empirical Study of China’s Second Board. International Journal of Economics and Finance; Vol. 5, No. 2.
    Dennis Y. ,Chung and KarelHrazdil. (2010). Liquidity and market efficiency: Analysis of NASDAQ firms. Global Finance JournalVolume 21, Issue 3, 262-274.
    Eugene F. Fama. (1969). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance,Vol. 25, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Finance Association New York, N.Y. December, 28-30 , pp. 383-417.
    Goldsmith, Raymond W. (1969). Financial Structure and Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Haifeng Guo & Hung-Gay & Fung.(2011). Growth Enterprise Board Initial Public Offerings: Characteristics. Volatility and the Initial-day Performance China & World Economy ,Vol. 19, No. 1,106-121.
    Hertor Almeida & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2005). The Effect of External Finance on the Equilibrium Allocation of Capital. Journal of FinancialEconomics ,75.
    John A, Doukas & Hafiz Hoque. (2016). Why firms favour the AIM when they can list on main market?. Journal of International Money and Finance 60,378–404.
    Jeffrey Wurgler.(2000). Financial Markets and the Allocation of Capital. Journal of Financial Economics,187-214.
    Jong-Ho Park & Ki Beom Binh & Kyong Shik Eom. (2016). The effect of listing switches from a growth market to a main board: An alternative perspective. Emerging Markets Review 29, 246–273.
    Jenkinson, T., Ramadorai, T., (2013). Does one size fit all? The consequences of switching markets with different regulatory standards. Eur. Finan. Manage. 19, 852–886.
    Kee-Heon Cho & Chang-Ryong Ko. (2015). Comparison of the Valuation of Technology Firms in KOSPI and KOSDAQ. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy 4.1, 35-54.
    Luca Berchicci. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy
    Volume 42, Issue 1, 117-127.
    Marc R.Reinganum. (1990). Market microstructure and asset pricing: An empirical investigation of NYSE and NASDAQ securities. Journal of Financial Economics Volume 28, Issues 1–2, 127-147.
    Mckinnon, Ronald I. (1973). Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    Paulo MaçãsNunes & Zélia Serrasqueiro & JoãoLeitão. (2012). Is there a linear relationship between R&D intensity and growth? Empirical evidence of non-high-tech vs. high-tech SMEs. Research Policy,Volume 41, Issue 1, 36-53
    Rajan, R.& Zingales, L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review 88, 559-586.
    Renhui Fu& Arthur Kraft & HuaiZhang.(2012). Financial reporting frequency, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity. Journal of Accounting and Economics,Volume 54, Issues 2–3, 132-149.
    Richard J Gentry & Wei Shen.(2012). The impacts of performance relative to analyst forecasts and analyst coverage on firm R&D intensity. Research Notes and Commentaries, Volume34, Issue1,121-130.
    Silvio Vismara & Stefano Paleari & Jay R. Ritter. (2012). Europe`s Second Markets for Small Companies,European. Financial Management, Vol. 18, Issue 3, 352-388
    Susanne Espenlaub & Arif Khurshed & Abdul Mohamed. (2007). Is AIM A Casino?
    A study of the survival of new listings on the UK Alternative Investment Market (AIM), Manchester Business School.
    SimiKediaa Venkatesh & Panchapagesanb. (2011). Why do only some Nasdaq firms switch to the NYSE? Evidence from corporate transactions. Journal of Financial MarketsVolume 14, Issue 1, 109-126.
    Tobin, J.(1969). A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1 , 15–29.
    TimLoughran. (1993). NYSE vs NASDAQ returns: Market microstructure or the poor performance of initial public offerings?. Journal of Financial EconomicsVolume 33, Issue 2, 241-260.
    Ulf Nielsson. (2013). Do less regulated markets attract lower quality firms? Evidence from the London AIM market. Journal of Financial Intermediation,, vol. 22, issue 3, 335-352.
    網站
    1.JPX日本交易所集團https://www.jpx.co.jp/chinese/ (擷取日期6/23/2019)
    2.美國NASDAQ交易所https://new.nasdaq.com/(擷取日期6/23/2019)
    3.中華民國櫃檯買賣中心https://www.tpex.org.tw/web/(擷取日期6/23/2019)
    4.台灣證券交易所https://www.twse.com.tw/zh/(擷取日期6/23/2019)
    5.英國倫敦證券交易所https://www.londonstockexchange.com/home/homepage.htm(擷取日期6/23/2019)
    6.韓國證券交易所http://www.krx.co.kr/main/main.jsp(擷取日期6/23/2019)
    7.香港證券交易所https://www.hkex.com.hk/?sc_lang=zh-HK(擷取日期6/23/2019)
    8.中國深圳交易所http://www.szse.cn/(擷取日期6/23/2019)
    9.新加坡證券交易所https://www2.sgx.com/(擷取日期6/23/2019
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    106364114
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106364114
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000384
    显示于类别:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    411401.pdf1974KbAdobe PDF254检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈