English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46299030      Online Users : 1504
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129235


    Title: 中央銀行發行法定數位通貨之研究評估
    Evaluating the Issuance of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)
    Authors: 袁子琁
    Yuan, Zih-Shiuan
    Contributors: 吳豐祥
    黃敬群
    臧正運
    Wu, Feng-Shang
    Huang, Ching-Chun
    Cheng, Tsang-Yun
    袁子琁
    Yuan, Zih-Shiuan
    Keywords: 中央銀行數位通貨
    科技評估
    分散式帳本技術
    臺灣 CBDC
    數位貨幣
    Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)
    Technology Assessment (TA)
    Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLTs)
    Taiwan CBDC
    e-money
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-04-06 14:48:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 數位化的風行不僅帶來典範轉移、重新塑造可獲利之商業模型，亦促使新型態貨幣發行。在加密貨幣及電子支付蔚為風潮之際，既存秩序與規範均面臨嚴峻挑戰，而各國中央銀行及國際金融監理機構為確保金融穩定（Financial Stability）與普惠金融（Financial Inclusion），紛紛投入新興金融科技（Fintech）研究，其中「中央銀行數位通貨（CBDC）」發行之討論備受矚目。在釐清定義及可能發行形式後，學界開始探索發行中央銀行數位通貨對總經平衡（Equilibrium）、貨幣政策及整體金融體系影響層面及其程度，此外，亦有不少報告圍繞在技術規範如何對應現有法規之討論。然而，目前多數研究仍排除外界參與，將範疇限縮在金融生態系內部。因此，本研究借用科技評估（TA）的學理並結合金融特性提出一個整合性的架構，試圖將發行 CBDC 之可能面向納入考量，透過一系列關鍵參與者的訪談提供包括央行的政策制定者相關建議。

    本研究採用質性研究取向，受訪人分別來自國內學術界、本土技術供應商、外商銀行臺灣分行，以及金融監管者：幾位任職歐洲央行（ECB）並實際參與 Stella 專案的小組成員暨組長。本研究所得到的初步結論包括：(1) 「科技不確定性」及「評估及執行之複雜度」是目前發行 CBDC 面臨的主要困難；(2) 發行 CBDC 所涉及面向可以 EPSILON 架構分析之，包括經濟（總經、個經、金融體系）、政治、社會、國際關係（包括國際貨幣體系及國際政治）、法律、組織、及其他（例如：環境、倫理）；(3) 從政策制定者觀點來說，較合適的發行路徑可能是先「從已知的（如：批發型 CBDC）著手，再進行延伸（如：零售型 CBDC）」。藉由循序漸進評估規劃，相關當局得以先透過階段性經驗累積必要知識（Know-hows），進而探索可能發展方向及制定適當政策。
    Digitalization is shifting paradigms, reshaping the understanding of profitable business models and propelling a new form of currency. The existing orders and regulations are facing challenges with the emergence of cryptocurrency and electronic payments. In order to ensure financial stability and inclusion, central banks and other international regulators are compelled to embark on the exploration of novel financial technologies (Fintech) -- such as the issuance of central bank digital currency (CBDC). After clarifying the definition and possible forms of a CBDC, current research concentrates on potential impacts on economic equilibrium, monetary policy, and financial system; otherwise, related explorations are peripheral to technical requirements with legally-compliant basis when it comes to issuing a CBDC. However, most of the discussions focus on financial ecosystem and exclude the opinions from outsiders. Therefore, the research framework, based on the technology assessment (TA) concept but adjust to the characteristics of Fintech, intends to evaluate as diverse aspects of issuing a CBDC as possible, and provide some insights for policy makers such as a central bank according to the results of multiple interviews with key stakeholders.

    This study follows the notion of qualitative research methods. Six interviewees were selected from domestic academics, local technical providers with international business and multinational banking Taiwan branch, but the only oddity took place when it comes to the monetary regulator: Team members of Project Stella at ECB accepted interview invitations to share their opinions on the five-year CBDC developments from the European perspective. The key findings of this research include: (i) “Technological uncertainties” as well as the “complexities of evaluation and implementation” deem likely to present challenges in CBDC issuance; (ii) The aspects of issuing a CBDC may encompass an EPSILON framework, which includes economics (macroeconomics, microeconomics, and financial system), politics, society, international relations (international monetary system and international politics), laws, organizations and others hereto aforementioned (environment and ethics); (iii) For policymakers, a better pathway would be: Begin with a known way, such as wholesale applications, and gradually extend to retail scenarios. With incremental adoption, the authorities will have capacity of exploring possible pathways as well as planning appropriate policies based on the previous experiences.
    Reference: Paper or Reports

    1. A Rip, H van den Belt. (1986). Constructive Technology Assessment: Influencing Technological Development? Journal fur Entwicklungs-Politik, 3, 24-40.
    2. Asian Institute of International Financial Law. (2015). Regulating FinTech Innovation: A Balancing Act. https://www.law.hku.hk/aiifl/regulating-fintech-innovation-a-balancing-act-1-april-1230-130-pm/
    3. Berentsen, A. (1998). Monetary Policy Implications of Digital Money. Kyklos, Vol. 51, 89-117.
    4. BIS. (2017). Central Bank Cryptocurrencies: BIS Quarterly Review. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1709f.pdf
    5. BIS. (2019). Proceeding with Caution – a Survey on Central Bank Digital Currency. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap101.pdf
    6. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2020). The Digitalization of Payments and Currency: Some Issues for Consideration. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/files/brainard20200205a.pdf
    7. BoC. (2016). Central Bank Digital Currencies: A Framework for Assessing Why and How.
    8. BoC. (2017). Central Bank Digital Currency: Motivations and Implications. Retrieved from https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/sdp2017-16.pdf
    9. BoC. (2019). A Framework for Analyzing Monetary Policy in an Economy with E-money. Retrieved from https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/swp2019-1.pdf
    10. BoE. (2014). Innovations in Payment Technologies and the Emergence of Digital Currencies, Quarterly Bulletin 2014 Q3. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2499397
    11. BoE. (2014). The Economics of Digital Currencies: Quarterly Bulletin 2014 Q3. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2499418
    12. BoE. (2016). Central Bank Digital Currency: the End of Monetary Policy as We Know it? Retrieved from https://bankunderground.co.uk/2016/07/25/central-bank-digital-currency-the-end-of-monetary-policy-as-we-know-it/
    13. BoE. (2016). The Macroeconomics of Central Bank Issued Digital Currencies.
    14. BoF Economics Review. (2017). Central Bank Digital Currency. Retrieved from https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/bitstream/handle/123456789/14952/BoFER_5_2017.pdf
    15. BoJ. (2018). Securities Settlement System: Delivery-versus-Payment in a Distributed Ledger Environment. Retrieved from https://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2018/data/rel180327a1.pdf
    16. Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures Markets Committee. (2018). Central Bank Digital Currencies. https://www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d174.pdf
    17. Cryptopolitan. (2020). US Federal Reserve Governor Sees Potential in CBDC. Retrieved from https://www.cryptopolitan.com/us-federal-reserve-governor-potential-cbdc/ (February 25 2020)
    18. Curtiss, P., Kreider, J., Cohen, D.(1999). A Methodology for Technical and Financial Assessment of Distributed Generation in the US. Retrieved from https://www.osti.gov/biblio/20030590
    19. David C. Chou and Amy Y. Chou. (2000). The E-Commerce Revolution: A Guide to the Internet Revolution in Banking. Information Systems Management, 47-53.
    20. David Chaum, Amos Fiat, Moni Naor. (1988). Untraceable Electronic Cash. Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptography, 319-327.
    21. Dickson, D. (1974). Alternative Technology and the Politics of Technical Change, New York: University Books.
    22. Dylander, B. (1980). Technology Assessment - As Science and as a Tool for Policy. Acta Sociologica, Vol. 23, No. 4, Technology and Society, 217-237.
    23. ECB. (2017). Payment Systems: Liquidity Saving Mechanisms in a Distributed Ledger Environment. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecb.stella_project_report_september_2017.pdf
    24. ECB. (2017). The Use of Cash by Households in the Euro Area. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op201.en.pdf
    25. ECB. (2019). Synchronized Cross-border Payments. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/intro/publications/pdf/ecb.miptopical190604.en.pdf
    26. ECCB. (2017). Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Strategy Plan. 2017-2021.
    27. Edward Nelson, Jason J. Buol. (2004). Budget Deficits and Interest Rates: What Is the Link?
    28. ESRC STEPS Centre. (2011). New Models of Technology Assessment for Development.
    29. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Central Bank Digital Currency on Private Banks.
    30. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2018). Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies and Central Banks. Retrieved from https://www.stlouisfed.org/~/media/files/pdfs/dwtf/blockchain_082918.pdf?la=en
    31. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2018). The Case for Central Bank Electronic Money and the Non-case for Central Bank Cryptocurrencies.
    32. Ferrari, B. (2016). FinTech Impact on Retail Banking – From a Universal Banking Model to Banking Verticalization.
    33. Flohr, U. (1996). Electronic money. Byte, Volume 21, Issue 6, 74-84. https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=169679
    34. FinanceAsia. (2015). Asian regulators seek fintech balance. Retrieved from https://www.financeasia.com/article/asian-regulators-seek-fintech-balance/401588
    35. Fireeye. (2018). Threat Research M-Trends. https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2018/04/m-trends-2018.html
    36. Forbes. (2015). Americans Trust Tech Firms More Than Banks For Finance. Last retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2015/06/24/americans-trust-tech-firms-more-than-banks-for-finance-infographic/#33fa36814e94 (March 16 2020))
    37. Goulet, D. (1994). Participatory Technology Assessment: Institutions and methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 45, Issue 1, 47-61.
    38. Guston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-time Technology Assessment. Technology in Society, Volume 24, Issues 1–2, 93-109.
    39. Hochstein, M. (2015). Fintech (the word, that is) Evolves.
    40. IDB. (2016). Digital Central Bank Money and the Unbundling of the Banking Function.
    41. IMF. (2018). Casting Light on Central Bank Digital Currencies.
    42. IMF. (2019). Central Bank Digital Currencies, and Cross-Border Payments: A New Look at the International Monetary System.
    43. IMF. (2019). Perspective on Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Retrieved from https://www.coinisseur.com/imf-perspective-on-central-bank-digital-currency-cbdc/
    44. IMF. (2019). The Rise of Digital Money.
    45. Inmaculada de Melo-Martín. (1998). Making babies : biomedical technologies, reproductive ethics, and public policy.
    46. Johan, Arie. (1996). The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.
    47. Martin J. Bailey. (1971). The 1971 Report of the President`s Council of Economic Advisers: Inflation and Recession. The American Economic Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, p517-521. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811845?seq=1
    48. MAS, BoC (2019). Jasper–Ubin Design Paper Enabling Cross-Border High Value Transfer Using Distributed Ledger Technologies. Retrieved from https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/Jasper-Ubin-Design-Paper.pdf?la=en&hash=EF5857437C4857373A9287CD86F56D0E7C46E7FF
    49. Matsui, A. (1998). Strong Currency and Weak Currency. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Volume 12, Issue 4, 305-333.
    50. Michael D. Bordo, Andrew T. Levin (2017). Central Bank Digital Currency and the Future of Monetary Policy. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w23711.pdf
    51. Nelkin, D., and M. Pollak. (1979). Public participation in technological decisions: Reality or grand illusion? Technology Review: 9, 55-64.
    52. Oberdiek, H. (1986). Technology: Autonomous Or Neutral, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    53. Patrick Schueffel (2016). Taming the Beast: A Scientific Definition of Fintech. Journal of Innovation Management.
    54. Porter, Rossini, Carpenter, Roper, Larson, Tiller, & J.s. (1980). Guidebook for Technology Assessment and Impact Analysis.
    55. Rikbank. (2018). Payment Patterns in Sweden 2018. Retrieved from https://www.riksbank.se/globalassets/media/statistik/betalningsstatistik/2018/payments-patterns-in-sweden-2018.pdf
    56. Riksbank. (2018). The e-krona and the Macroeconomy. Retrieved from https://www.riksbank.se/globalassets/media/rapporter/pov/engelska/2018/economic-review-3-2018.pdf#page=79
    57. Ruud Smits, Jos Leyten, Pim Den Hertog. (1995). Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: New concepts, new goals, new infrastructures. Policy Sciences, 28, 271-299.
    58. SARB. (2018). Project Khokha: Exploring the Use of Distributed Ledger Technology for Interbank Payments Settlement in South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.resbank.co.za/Lists/News%20and%20Publications/Attachments/8491/SARB_ProjectKhokha%2020180605.pdf
    59. Satoshi Nakamoto. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
    60. Sid L. Huff and Malcolm C. Munro (1985). Information Technology Assessment and Adoption: A Field Study. MIS Quarterly Vol. 9, No. 4, 327-340. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249233
    61. Simon Joss (1998). Danish Consensus Conferences as a Model of Participatory Technology Assessment: An Impact Study of Consensus Conferences on Danish Parliament and Danish public Debate. Science and Public Policy, Volume 25, Issue 1, 2–22.
    62. Stephen Williamson (2019). Central Bank Digital Currency: Welfare and Policy Implications, University of Western Ontario. Retrieved from https://economicdynamics.org/meetpapers/2019/paper_386.pdf
    63. Teknologistyrelsen. (1980). Teknologivurdering i Danmark - betænkning afgivet af et udvalg under Teknologirådet, København: Teknologistyrelsen.
    64. The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA). (2019). Understanding Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC). Retrieved from https://www.actuaries.org.uk/system/files/field/document/Understanding%20CBDCs%20Final%20-%20disc.pdf
    65. Toth, F.L. (1988). Policy exercises, procedures, and implementation. Simulation and Games 19 (3), 256-276
    66. Winner, L. (1988). The Whale and the Reactor, A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    67. World Bank. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution.
    68. World Economic Forum. (2019). Central Bank/Macroeconomics CBDC and DLT Research List. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c8iGtoG7BkPr-iufnIPELEWvtZiNtouOyJp2IYjhAEY/edit#
    69. World Economic Forum. (2019). Central Banks and Distributed Ledger Technology: How are Central Banks Exploring Blockchain Today?
    70. Zhang, T., Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank Conference, IMF. (2018). Digitization of Money and Finance: Challenges and Opportunities. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2018/05/08/sp050818-digitization-of-money-and-finance-challenges-and-opportunities
    71. 金融監督管理委員會（2019），〈我國對證券型代幣發行、交易及平台監理之規劃方向〉。
    72. 智研諮詢集團（2016），《2016-2022 年中國流通中貨幣（M0）行業研究及發展趨勢研究報告》，Retrieved from https://www.chyxx.com/research/201607/431680.html
    73. 資策會產業情報研究所（MIC）（2017），〈行動支付消費者調查〉，Retrieved from https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=457
    74. 《2016年移動支付用戶調研報告（2016）》，Retrieved from www.100ec.cn/detail--6374109.html

    Newspaper

    1. Big Data Finance（2020），〈中國央行的金融科技 2019 盤點：基本完成央行數位貨幣（CBDC）頂層設計、行業標準制定等工作〉。Last retrieved from https://bigdatafinance.tw/index.php/blockchain/1448-2019-cbdc (February 25 2020)
    2. Boxming. (2020). DCEP: China’s National Digital Currency Overview. Last retrieved from https://boxmining.com/dcep/ (February 13 2020)
    3. CNBC. (2019). Hackers Steal Over $40 Million Worth of Bitcoin from one of the World’s Largest Cryptocurrency Exchanges. Last retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/08/binance-bitcoin-hack-over-40-million-of-cryptocurrency-stolen.html (February 25 2020)
    4. Coinformation. (2019). Facebook’s Libra Faces Antitrust Scrutiny From EU. Last retrieved from: https://coinfomania.com/facebook-libra-eu-antitrust-scrutiny/ (February 13th, 2020)
    5. Coinformation. (2019). Facebook’s Libra Faces Antitrust Scrutiny From EU. Last retrieved from https://coinfomania.com/facebook-libra-eu-antitrust-scrutiny/ (February 13 2020)
    6. Crypto Economy. (2019). Virgil Griffith Arrested Accused of Assisting North Korea for Use of Cryptocurrencies to Evade US Sanctions. Last retrieved from https://crypto-economy.com/us-crypto-expert-virgil-griffith-arrested-accused-of-assisting-north-korea-for-use-of-cryptocurrencies-to-evade-us-sanctions/ (February 15 2020)
    7. Inside （2019），〈電子支付、電子票證將整併，悠遊卡未來也能電子轉帳了〉。Last retrieved from: https://www.inside.com.tw/article/17166-easycard-can-also-electronically-transfer-money-in-the-future (February 25 2020)
    8. Ledger Insights. (2019). How China’s Central Bank Digital Currency will Help Renminbi to Challenge Dollar. Last retrieved from: https://www.ledgerinsights.com/china-central-bank-digital-currency-cbdc-renminbi-dollar/ (February 15 2020)
    9. Marc Hochstein. (2015). Fintech (the word, that is) evolves. Last retrieved from https://www.americanbanker.com/opinion/fintech-the-word-that-is-evolves (February 16 2020)
    10. MAS. (2019). MAS Helps Develop Blockchain-based Prototype for Multi-Currency Payments. Last retrieved from https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/media-releases/2019/mas-helps-develop-blockchain-based-prototype-for-multi-currency-payments (February 16 2020)
    11. Taipei Times. (2019). FSC to allow three new fintech experiments: Koo. Last retrieved from: www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2019/08/01/2003719687 (February 16 2020)
    12. The Guardian. (2019). France to block Facebook`s Libra cryptocurrency in Europe. Last retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/12/france-block-development-facebook-libra-cryptocurrency (February 13 2020)
    13. 聯合報（2020），〈數位貨幣成全球主要央行顯學 歐日等6央行首開會研究〉。Last retrieved from https://udn.com/news/story/7239/4343047 (February 25 2020)

    Others

    1. EU GDPR Official Website: https://gdpr-info.eu
    2. Facebook Libra: https://developers.libra.org/docs/libra-open-source-paper
    3. Financial Service Commission: https://fsc.go.kr/eng/new_about/whatwedo.jsp?menu=01
    4. Health Technology Assessment by the European Commission: https://ec.europa.eu/health/technology_assessment/overview_en
    5. IMF eLibrary. (1958). The Growth of Financial Intermediaries as a Factor in the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy. Last retrieved from https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/IMF024/15716-9781451968651/15716-9781451968651/15716-9781451968651_A003.xml?language=en (February 3 2020)
    6. Investopedia. (2019). Commercial Bank. Last retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/commercialbank.asp (February 3 2020)
    7. Investopedia. (2019). Exchange. Last retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/exchange.asp (February 3 2020)
    8. Jennifer Pak. (2019). ‘Going cashless in Shanghai.’ Last retrieved from https://www.marketplace.org/2019/01/15/world/going-cashless-shanghai/ (February 19 2020)
    9. Libra Website: https://libra.org/en-US/
    10. Office of Technology Assessment Act (1972). https://ota.fas.org/technology_assessment_and_congress/otaact/.
    11. Open Banking Website: https://www.openbanking.org.uk/
    12. Project e-krona by Sweden: https://www.riksbank.se/en-gb/payments--cash/e-krona/
    13. The US Securities and Exchange Commission defined ‘Settling Securities Transactions’ as T+2. Last retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answerstplus3htm.html (February 3 2020)
    14. TIPS: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/target/tips/html/index.en.html
    15. 科技金融前沿：Libra 與數字貨幣， https://m.igetget.com/share/course/pay/detail?id=mlEA1baQN7WKeRBsZyV8L9OgkryvYw
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    107364104
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107364104
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000382
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    410401.pdf2891KbAdobe PDF2262View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback