English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50907643      Online Users : 635
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129848


    Title: 我國會計師因財報不實對第三人民事責任之法律實證分析
    An Empirical Legal Research on Auditor`s Civil Liability to the Third Party for Financial Statement Fraud in Taiwan
    Authors: 陳俊元
    Chun Yuan, Chen
    Contributors: 風管系
    Keywords: 會計師民事責任;財報不實;利益第三人;因果關係;密切關係原則;實證研究;侵權法第二整編;比例責任;責任限制;強制責任保險
    Auditor`s Civil Liability;Financial Statement Fraud;Interested Third Party;Causation;Privity Rule;Empirical Research;Restatement of the Law (2d) of Torts;Proportional Liability;Cap of Liability;Compulsory Liability Insurance
    Date: 2019-12
    Issue Date: 2020-05-26 13:37:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨在以比較法與實證分析，重新檢視我國會計師關於財報不實之訴訟風險，並分析相關法制之妥適性，以提出對我國法之建議。本文主張，會計師之民事訴訟風險，應為會計師民事責任改革與額外保護之重要考量。而會計師之訴訟風險，可能受政策選擇之影響，此可從立法規範與司法行為兩方面來觀察。就前者而言，本文由我國之規範與發展談起，探究得向會計師求償之利益第三人範圍為何。並藉由比較法之分析，發現會計師責任逐漸限縮之趨勢，再以我國實證研究加以驗證。就司法行為而言，本文針對歷來我國之判決進行了實證分析。結果顯示，在第三人向會計師求償之案件中，會計師仍占有顯著優勢。就結論而言，本研究發現目前會計師訴訟風險之有限性，故對賦予會計師責任額外優惠保護之立法設計，亦應值得再思。
    This research aims to reexamine the civil liability risk of auditors and propriety of relevant legislature, in comparative law and empirical approaches, with the recommendations to Taiwanese law. It is argued that the liability risk should be clarified before the revolution of liability regime and extra protection mechanisms. The liability risk of auditors, which may be influenced by policy consideration, is explored from the perspective of legislation and judicial behavior. For the former, the analysis begins at the discussion of Taiwanese law, and followed by the analysis concerning the scope of interested party. Through comparative law analysis, it is found that the liability of auditor has been narrowed down in recent years. And this study verifies this theory with Taiwanese data. For judicial behavior, the study empirically examines relevant cases in Taiwan. The results show that auditors are still dominant in litigations. In conclusion, it is found that the current limited liability risk of auditors in Taiwan, and reconsiderations are required for extra pro-auditor protections and legislature.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, No.159, pp.215-299
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202019120159004
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202019120159004
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系] 期刊論文
    [政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2327View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback