Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130088
|
| Title: | 企業社會責任與財務績效之連結-以創新為干擾變項
The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibilities and Financial Performance: The Moderating Effect of Innovation |
| Authors: | 盧亞聖
Lu, Ya-Sheng |
| Contributors: | 鄭至甫
Zheng, Zhi-Fu
盧亞聖
Lu, Ya-Sheng |
| Keywords: | 企業社會責任
財務績效
創新
Corporate social responsibility
Financial performance
Innovation |
| Date: | 2019 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-06-02 11:14:27 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著企業的營運活動高度國際化，企業於世界各地皆造成程度不一的衝擊， 社會因而要求企業對於自身的生產活動所造成的環境破壞、社會衝擊進行處理， 因此，企業社會責任的概念開始廣為受到社會的重視，相關的組織也隨之應運而 生。
長期以來，學術領域中針對企業社會責任的定義以及和企業財務績效間的連 結一直未有定論，不同的學者試圖透過各種的理論與研究以釐清兩者間的關聯; 然而，即便已受到廣泛的研究，針對社會責任對於企業的影響仍就保持兩派的看 法，時至今日，企業社會責任已然演化成為一項策略性的行為，而非單純的公益 活動，同時，創新亦是企業執行組織策略的一項重要手段，因此，許多企業透過 創新的方式實現自身的社會責任，進而幫助企業處於一個競爭上的優勢，因此， 本研究將以創新作為干擾變項，探討其對於企業社會責任與財務績效間的影響。
本研究以全球前五百大企業作為研究樣本，同時採用環境、社會以及公司治 理等三大原則作為企業社會責任的評判標準，藉以細緻地判別企業於不同的社會 責任對於財務績效之影響，同時加入創新做為干擾變項。研究結果發現，企業的 社會行為對於財務績效而言呈現負向關聯，但公司治理行為卻呈現正向關聯;此 外，在創新的影響下，企業的社會行為反倒顯示對於財務具有正向幫助，故以此 而言，企業創新的社會行為能夠更好地與利害關係人維持緊密關係，並且協助企 業的財務績效。
With the high internationalization of the operation activities of enterprises, enterprises in all parts of the world have caused varying degrees of impact. The community starts require enterprises responsible for environmental damage and social impact caused by their own production activities. Therefore, the concept of corporate social responsibility began to be widely valued by the world.
For a long time, the definition of corporate social responsibility in the academic field and the link between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance have been inconclusive. Different scholars have tried to clarify the relationship through various theories and studies, but even though they have been extensively studied, the impact of social responsibility on enterprises remains unknown. Nowadays, corporate social responsibility has evolved into a strategic behavior. Many enterprises achieve their own social responsibility through innovative ways, but also make enterprises gain a competitive advantage. Therefore, this study will take innovation as a moderator variable to explore its impact on corporate social responsibility and financial performance.
This study takes the top 500 enterprises in the world as a research sample, and adopts the principles of environment, society and corporate governance as the evaluation criteria of corporate social responsibility. In order to carefully understand the impact of different social responsibilities on financial performance, this study takes innovation as a moderator variable. The results show that the social behavior of enterprises is negatively correlated with the financial performance, but the corporate governance behavior is positively correlated. Nevertheless, the social behavior of enterprises shows positive help to financial performance under the influence of innovation. Therefore, the innovative social behavior of enterprise can better maintain close relationship with the stakeholders and enhance the financial performance of the enterprise. |
| Reference: | 英文參考文獻
Akpinar, A., Jiang, Y., Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Berrone, P., & Walls, J. L. (2008). Strategic use of CSR as a signal for good management. Available at SSRN 1134505.
Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31-35.
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability.
Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794-816.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488- 506.
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325-1343.
Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435-455.
Brown, J. A., & Forster, W. R. (2013). CSR and stakeholder theory: A tale of Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 301-312.
Buchholz, R. A. (1977). ALTERNATIVE TO SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY. MSU Business Topics, 25(3), 12-16.
Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495-502.
Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 972-992.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Chaney, P. K., Devinney, T. M., & Winer, R. S. (1991). The impact of new product introductions on the market value of firms. Journal of Business, 573-610.
Chen, H.-T., & Rossi, P. H. (1983). Evaluating with sense: The theory-driven approach. Evaluation Review, 7(3), 283-302.
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197-218.
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92- 117.
Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70-76.
Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322.
Development, C. f. E. (1971). Social responsibilities of business corporations: The Committee.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118-141.
Eells, R. S. F., & Walton, C. C. (1961). Conceptual foundations of business: an outline of major ideas sustaining business enterprise in the Western World: RD Irwin.
Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35-51.
Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758-781.
Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Barnett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 85-106.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach: Cambridge university press.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom: With the assistance of Rose D. Friedman: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-178): Springer.
Gallego-Alvarez, I., Manuel Prado-Lorenzo, J., & García-Sánchez, I.-M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: a resource-based theory. Management Decision, 49(10), 1709-1727.
Hamel, G. (2001). Leading the revolution: An interview with Gary Hamel. Strategy & Leadership, 29(1), 4-10.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
Hasseldine, J., Salama, A. I., & Toms, J. S. (2005). Quantity versus quality: the impact of environmental disclosures on the reputations of UK Plcs. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 231-248.
Hawkins, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: balancing tomorrow`s sustainability and today`s profitability: Springer.
Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility: New Zealand Business Roundtable.
Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., & Dunfee, T. W. (2002). The next wave of corporate community involvement: Corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 44(2), 110-125.
Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781-789.
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594-610.
Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243-262.
Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
Jayachandran, S., Kalaignanam, K., & Eilert, M. (2013). Product and environmental social performance: Varying effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(10), 1255-1264.
Kang, C., Germann, F., & Grewal, R. (2016). Washing away your sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility, and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 59-79.
Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers` attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 203-217.
Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2014). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513-540.
Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595-632.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18.
Mansfield, E., Rapoport, J., Romeo, A., Wagner, S., & Beardsley, G. (1977). Social and private rates of return from industrial innovations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), 221-240.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Molecke, G., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 550-568.
Ozar, D. T. (1979). The moral responsibility of corporations. Ethical Issues in Business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Papasolomou-Doukakis, I., Krambia-Kapardis, M., & Katsioloudes, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: the way forward? Maybe not! A preliminary study in Cyprus. European Business Review, 17(3), 263-279.
Porter, M. E. (1997). Competitive strategy. Measuring business excellence, 1(2), 12-17.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Roche, C. J. (1999). Impact assessment for development agencies: Learning to value change: Oxfam.
Rothenberg, S., & Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2007). Determinants of environmental innovation adoption in the printing industry: the importance of task environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(1), 39-49.
Rourke, B. (2014). Philanthropy and the Limits of Accountability. In: Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement (PACE) and the Charles F. Kettering ....
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341-350.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2017). Theory of economic development: Routledge.
Simmons, J. (2004). Managing in the post-managerialist era: Towards socially
responsible corporate governance. Management Decision, 42(3/4), 601-611.
Sorescu, A. B., & Spanjol, J. (2008). Innovation`s effect on firm value and risk: Insights from consumer packaged goods. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 114-132.
Spicer, B. H. (1978). Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study. Accounting Review, 94-111.
Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: a theoretical exploration of business–society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263-281.
Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274-1303.
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
Vance, S. C. (1975). Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks. Management review, 64(8), 19-24.
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.
68
中文參考文獻
王言, 張阜民, 呂芝倚, & 柯俊禎. (2016). 探討企業社會責任執行與公司營運績 效之相關研究-以資訊通訊產業 (ICT) 為例. 財金論文叢刊, (25), 62-80.
方妙玲. (2008). 高階主管薪資與財務績效及社會績效之關聯性: 代理理論及利 害關係人理論觀點. 企業管理學報(77), 47-80.
池祥萱, 繆文娟, & 莊瀅臻. (2014). 企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙 面刃嗎? 來自全球 500 大公司的證據. 管理學報, 31(1), 1-19.
李建瑩, & 林麗嬌. (2009). 企業社會責任表現與財務績效關聯性研究-以本國金 融業為例. 管理學術研討會, 666-683.
陳振遠, 王健聰, & 洪世偉. (2017). 公司治理對於企業社會責任, 公司價值之影 響. 中山管理評論, 25(1), 135-176.
黃營杉, & 齊德彰. (2005). 企業倫理, 社會責任與慈善公益作為之研究-以台灣 高科技電子產業為例. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 65- 82.
廖婉鈞, 林月雲, & 虞邦祥. (2009). 知覺組織利害關係人重要程度與組織績效之 關係: 企業責任作為之中介效果. 管理學報, 26(2), 213-232.
網路資料
游昊耘，不可小覷 千禧世代引領全球企業 CSR 風潮，2018 年 7 月，網址: https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/12117/3267532
劉世慶，【專欄】劉世慶:台灣 CSR 報告書突破 500 大關 近五成有第三方認 證，2018 年 3 月，網址:https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/40291
林宜諄，討好環境，也要討好消費者，2005 年 3 月，網址: https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=10097 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
106364132 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106364132 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000438 |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 413201.pdf | | 1644Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
