政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130498
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109951/140887 (78%)
造访人次 : 46275058      在线人数 : 1240
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130498


    题名: 品牌危機形式對不同品牌架構下的個別品牌評價之影響：東西方文化的干擾效果
    The Impacts of Brand Crisis on Brand Evaluation in Different Brand Architectures: The Moderating Roles of Eastern and Western Culture
    作者: 許元碩
    Hsu, Yuan-Shuo
    贡献者: 邱志聖
    Chiou, Jyh-Shen
    許元碩
    Hsu, Yuan-Shuo
    关键词: 品牌危機
    品牌架構
    東西方文化
    品牌評價
    Brand crisis
    Brand architecture
    Cultural difference
    Brand evaluation
    日期: 2020
    上传时间: 2020-07-01 13:32:40 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近年來，品牌相關危機的事件層出不窮，引發學者探討品牌危機背後的複雜原因，以及如何影響到消費者對於品牌的想法也是在品牌管理中值得相當關注的議題。
    首先從文獻探討中推論出不同品牌架構的公司在發生不同品牌危機種類時，可能對消費者產生的影響有差異。此外，因為東西方人的思考模式有所不同，因此值得探討東西方文化差異與品牌架構及品牌危機種類之間的交互作用關係，並分析在不同情況發生下，消費者是否會對公司的想法不盡相同。
    本研究主要分析品牌架構(家族品牌、品牌家族)、品牌危機形式(品牌價值觀危機、產品表現危機)、與東西方文化(東方、西方)的三因子實驗，共分八組，並探討三個控制之間的交互作用是否會對消費者的品牌評價造成差異性。
    本研究結果發現，相對於發生品牌產品表現危機，當家族品牌內某一品牌發生的品牌危機是品牌價值觀危機時，會對集團內其他品牌造成較不好的評價；而當品牌家族內某一品牌不論發生品牌價值觀危機或產品表現危機時，消費者對集團內其他品牌的評價會造成沒有顯著差異的影響。
    在西方文化中，當集團內某一品牌不論發生品牌價值觀危機或產品表現危機時，會對集團內其他品牌的評價造成沒有顯著差異的影響；在東方文化中，當集團內某一品牌發生的負面危機屬於產品表現危機時，消費者對於集團內其他品牌的評價會顯著高於當集團內發生的是品牌價值觀危機。
    在西方文化中，當品牌架構屬於品牌家族，而這個品牌家族的集團內某一品牌發生負面危機時，消費者對該集團內其他品牌的評價會顯著高於當品牌架構屬於家族品牌；在東方文化中，當品牌架構無論屬於家族品牌或品牌家族，而這個集團內某一品牌發生負面危機時，消費者對該集團內其他品牌的評價會造成沒有顯著差異的影響。
    Nowadays, brand related crisis has kept happening, causing scholars analyzing the complicated reason behind it. It is also an important issue to know how brand crisis affects consumer’s evaluation of the brand.
    It is inferred from the literature discussion that companies with different brand architecture may have different impact on consumers when different types of brand crisis occur. In addition, because the thinking style of Eastern and Western people are different, it is worth exploring the interaction between Eastern and Western culture differences and brand structure and brand crisis types by analyzing how consumer will think about the company in different situation.
    This research analyzes the three-factor experiment of brand structure (brand house, house of brands), brand crisis (brand value crisis, product performance crisis), and cultural difference (Eastern and Western) to look over whether the interaction between these three control variables will cause differences in consumer brand evaluation.
    The results of this study show that comparing with product performance crisis, when a branded house company occur brand value crisis, it will cause a more negative evaluation. In addition, in Eastern culture, when a brand in a company occurs product performance crisis, consumers` evaluation of other brands in the company will be significantly higher than when a brand value crisis happens. Moreover, in Western culture, when a company’s brand architecture belongs to house of brands and when a certain brand in this company has a negative crisis, consumers will rate other brands in this company significantly higher than when the brand architecture belongs to a brand house.
    參考文獻: 英文部分
    Aaker, D. A., & Joachimsthaler, E. (2000). The brand relationship spectrum: The key to the brand architecture challenge. California management review, 42(4), 8-23.
    Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of marketing research, 37(2), 203-214.
    Balmer, J. M., & Greyser, S. A. (2009). Corporate brand reputation and brand crisis management. Management Decision.
    Betancourt, H., & López, S. R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American psychologist, 48(6), 629.
    Bever, T. G. (1975). Cerebral asymmetries in humans are due to the differentiation of two incompatible processes: Holistic and analytic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 263(1), 251-262.
    Brislin, R. W. (1983). Cross-cultural research in psychology. Annual review of psychology, 34(1), 363-400.
    Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
    Chiu, L. H. (1972). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International journal of psychology, 7(4), 235-242.
    Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 691-705.
    Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
    Dahlen, M., & Lange, F. (2006). A disaster is contagious: How a brand in crisis affects other brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(4), 388-397.
    Dawar, N., & Lei, J. (2009). Brand crises: The roles of brand familiarity and crisis relevance in determining the impact on brand evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 509-516.
    Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of marketing research, 37(2), 215-226.
    Devlin, J. (2003). Brand architecture in services: The example of retail financial services. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(9-10), 1043-1065.
    Dutta, S., & Pullig, C. (2011). Effectiveness of corporate responses to brand crises: The role of crisis type and response strategies. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1281-1287.
    Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2008). Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1640), 1279-1285.
    Forbes, G., Zhang, X., Doroszewicz, K., & Haas, K. (2009). Relationships between individualism–collectivism, gender, and direct or indirect aggression: A study in China, Poland, and the US. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 35(1), 24-30.
    Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15-41.
    Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of international business studies, 14(2), 75-89.
    Huber, F., Vollhardt, K., Matthes, I., & Vogel, J. (2010). Brand misconduct: Consequences on consumer–brand relationships. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1113-1120.
    Jahoda, G. (1984). Do we need a concept of culture?. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(2), 139-151.
    Ji, L. J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(5), 943.
    Keesing, R. M. (1974). Theories of culture. Annual review of anthropology, 3(1), 73-97.
    Kim, J., Kim, H. J., & Cameron, G. T. (2009). Making nice may not matter: The interplay of crisis type, response type and crisis issue on perceived organizational responsibility. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 86-88.
    Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers` attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. International Journal of research in Marketing, 21(3), 203-217.
    Locke, R., Kochan, T., Romis, M., & Qin, F. (2007). Beyond corporate codes of conduct: Work organization and labour standards at Nike`s suppliers. International Labour Review, 146(1‐2), 21-40.
    Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing research, 27(3), 361-367.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224.
    Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(5), 922.
    Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(5), 922.
    Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. Review of personality and social psychology, 3, 121-144.
    Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and the physical environment: Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science, 17(2), 113-119.
    Monga, A. B., & John, D. R. (2008). When does negative brand publicity hurt? The moderating influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(4), 320-332.
    Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11163-11170.
    Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(10), 467-473.
    Petromilli, M., Morrison, D., & Million, M. (2002). Brand architecture: Building brand portfolio value. Strategy & leadership.
    Pullig, C., Netemeyer, R. G., & Biswas, A. (2006). Attitude basis, certainty, and challenge alignment: A case of negative brand publicity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 528-542.
    Rhee, E., Uleman, J. S., & Lee, H. K. (1996). Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 1037.
    Rohner, R. P. (1984). Toward a conception of culture for cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-cultural psychology, 15(2), 111-138.
    Schiffman, L., & Kanuk, L. (2014). Consumer Behavior, Global Edition: Global Edition. Pearson Higher Ed.
    Shulruf, B., Hattie, J., & Dixon, R. (2007). Development of a new measurement tool for individualism and collectivism. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25(4), 385-401.
    Siomkos, G. J. (1999). On achieving exoneration after a product safety industrial crisis. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.
    Siomkos, G. J., & Kurzbard, G. (1994). The hidden crisis in product‐harm crisis management. European journal of marketing.
    Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2001). The role of national culture in international marketing research. International Marketing Review.
    Triandis, H. C. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-cultural research, 27(3-4), 155-180.
    Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism, Boulder, Colorado. Westview Press. Triandis, HC, & Gelfand, MJ (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118-128.
    Triandis, H. C. (Ed.). (1981). Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology: Triandis, HC and Heron, A., editors. Developmental psychology (Vol. 4). Allyn & Bacon.
    Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(1), 118.
    Van Gelder, S. (2005). Global brand strategy: Unlocking branding potential across countries, cultures & markets. Kogan Page Publishers.
    Wally Olins. (1978). The corporate personality: An inquiry into the nature of corporate identity. Design Council.
    Wang, L., Wang, S., Keller, L. R., & Li, J. (2016). Thinking styles affect reactions to brand crisis apologies. European Journal of Marketing.
    Witkin, H. A., & Berry, J. W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross‐cultural perspective. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1975(1), i-100.
    Xu Qingrui and Xu Decai, (2004), Sustainable development system dynamics simulation and policy suggestion of Hangzhou city, p83-88, Techno-economics and management research, No3,(Shanghai, China).
    Yannopoulou, N., Koronis, E., & Elliott, R. (2011). Media amplification of a brand crisis and its affect on brand trust. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(5-6), 530-546.

    中文部分
    邱志聖. (2011). 行銷研究 實務與理論應用. 四版. 台北市：智勝文化.
    邱志聖. (2017). 品牌策略與管理. 台北市：智勝文化.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    107351030
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107351030
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000528
    显示于类别:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    103001.pdf3781KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈