English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111299/142216 (78%)
Visitors : 48271053      Online Users : 977
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/130508
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130508


    Title: 企業年報及關鍵查核事項之可讀性與市場反應關聯性之研究
    Authors: 周昱邦
    Contributors: 張祐慈
    周昱邦
    Keywords: 可讀性
    致股東報告書
    關鍵查核事項
    市場反應
    Readability
    Letter to shareholders
    Key audit matters
    Market reaction
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-07-01 13:34:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 投資大眾往往會參考企業的會計敘述性資訊以作為投資決策之依據,例如企業年報、會計師查核報告等,但年報及查核報告之撰寫者可能會因其表達能力,抑或是企圖隱瞞負面資訊而使用較艱澀之用語,造成資訊無法正確地傳達給資訊使用者,此與會計敘述性資訊之可讀性有密切關聯。本研究旨在探討致股東報告書及關鍵查核事項之可讀性與市場反應之關聯性,本研究以2016及2017年台灣上市(櫃)及興櫃企業作為研究樣本,並以事件研究法研究於財報發布日後對於市場之反應(事件期為財報發布日前一日至財報發布日後兩日)。實證結果顯示,若致股東報告書之可讀性較佳,會顯著增加累積異常報酬率,而關鍵查核事項之可讀性則與累積異常報酬率無顯著關係;此外,若關鍵查核事項之可讀性愈佳,則會額外提升累積異常報酬率增加的幅度。
    Investors usually read companies’ narrative accounting information, such as annual reports and audit reports, which is regarded as the basis of investment. However, writers may attempt to hide negative information or are poor at expressing themselves, causing financial statement users cannot receive the correct information. It is closely related to the readability. Using a sample of published companies’ annual reports and audit reports in Taiwan between 2015 and 2016, this study investigates whether and how the readability of annual reports and audit reports affects the market reaction. The empirical results show that the readability of Letter to Shareholders is significantly positively associated with the cumulative abnormal returns; however, the readability of KAMs is not. Furthermore, I find that the readability of KAMs moderates the relationship between the readability of Letter to Shareholders and the cumulative abnormal returns.
    Reference: 王瑪如與蕭君宇,2013,彌補虧損減資、現金減資與庫藏股減資之市場宣告效果,會計評論,第57期(7月):105-135。
    王貞靜、張瑀珊與林凱薰,2012,審計品質與資訊不對稱之關聯性,中華會計學刊,第八卷第1期(1月):89-135。
    沈中華與李建然,2000,事件研究法:財務與會計實證研究必備,台北市:華泰文化。
    宋曜廷、陳茹玲、李宜憲、查日龢、曾厚強、林維駿、張道行與張國恩,2013,中文文本可讀性探討:指標選取、模型建立與效度驗證,中華心理學刊,第55卷第1期(3月):75-106。
    林孝倫與郭俐君,2016,台灣會計師更換之市場反應,當代會計,第17卷第2期(11月):235-264。
    林有志與陳筱平,2014,現金減資之宣告效果,當代會計,第12卷第1期(5月):31-56。
    荊溪昱,1995,中文國文教材的適讀性研究:適讀年級值的推估,科學教育期刊,第3卷第3期:113-127。
    莊蕎安,2016,查核報告的革命,會計研究月刊,第373期(12月):62。
    黃瓊瑤、王癸元與張鳳真,2013,企業社會責任事件宣告與股價異常報酬之研究,當代會計,第14卷第2期(11月):175-204。
    廖益興、陳彥綺與王貞靜,2010,年報資訊揭露與資訊不對稱:來自私有資訊交易之證據,經濟研究,第 47卷第 1期(1月):45-96。
    廖芝嫻與連晨帆,2015,前瞻性研究發展費用揭露的影響因素與市場反應,臺大管理論叢,第二十六卷第1期(12月):209-254。
    謝宛庭與吳清在,2010,公開募集或私募有價證券之決定因素及其市場反應,會計評論,第51期,(7月):73-106。
    謝松諱,2017,企業社會責任報告書的可讀性與資本市場效益,臺灣大學會計學研究所學位論文。
    嚴行方,2017,巴菲特教股東看年報,香港:香港財經移動出版。
    Ajina, A., M. Laouiti, and B. Msolli. 2016. Guiding through the fog: does annual report readability reveal earnings management? Research in International Business and Financial 38 (March):509-516.
    Armstrong, C. S., M. E. Barth, A. D. Jagolinzer, and E. J. Riedl. 2010. Market reaction to the adoption of IFRS in Europe. The Accounting Review 85 (January):31-61.
    Baker, M., and J. C. Stein. 2004. Market liquidity as a sentiment indicator. Journal of Financial Markets 7 (June):271-299.
    Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6 (Autumn):159-178.
    Bloomfield, R. J. 2002. The `incomplete revelation hypothesis` and financial reporting. Working Paper, Cornell University.
    Bonsall, S. B., B. P. Miller. 2017. The impact of narrative disclosure readability on bond ratings and the cost of debt capital. Review of Accounting Studies 22 (June): 608-643.
    Bonsall, S. B. IV, A. J. Leone, B. P. Miller, and K. Rennekamp. 2017.A Plain english measure of financial reporting readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics 63 (February):329-357.
    Czerney, K., J. J. Schmidt, and A. Thompson. 2017. Do investors respond to explanatory language included in unqualified audit reports? Contemporary Accounting Research 36 (June):198-229.
    Dale, E., and J. S. Chall. 1949. National council of teachers of english . The Concept of Readability 4 (January):1184-1216.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (December):183-199.
    Dittmar, A. 2000. Why do firms repurchase stock? The Journal of Business 73 (July):331-355.
    Fakhfakh, M. 2013. The readability of standardized reports by the international federation of accountants. Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research 2 (August):10-28.
    Fakhfakh, M. 2015. The readability of international illustration of auditor’s report: an advanced reflection on the compromise between normative principles and linguistic requirements. Journal of Economics, Financial an Administrative Science 20 (January):21-29.
    Fama, E. F.,and K. R. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance 47 (June):427-465.
    Fama, E. F., L. Fisher, M. C. Jensen, and R. Roll. 1969. The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International Economic Review 10 (February):1-21.
    Gutierrez, E., M. M. Meza, K. W. Tatum, and M. Vulcheva. 2018. Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the united kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies 23 (July):1543-1587.
    Heitzman, S. M., and M. Ogneva. 2019. Industry tax planning and stock returns. The Accounting Review (September):219-246.
    Ho, L. J., C. S. Liu, and R. Ramanan. 1997. Open-market stock repurchase announcements and revaluation of prior accounting information. The Accounting Review 72 (July):475-487.
    Hsien, C. C., K. W. Hui, and Y. Zhang. 2016. Analyst report readability and stock returns. Journal of Business Finance 43 (February):98-130.
    Jones, M. J., and S. Paul. 1994. Accounting narrative: a review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature 22 (March): 142-184.
    Kim, C., K. Wang, and L. Zhang. 2019. Readability of 10-K reports and stock price crash risk. Contemporary Accounting Research 36 (August):1184-1216.
    Kohler, A., N. Ratzinger, and J. Theis. 2020. The effects of key audit matters on the auditor’s report’s communicative value: experimental evidence from investment professionals and non-professional investors. Accounting in Europe (February):
    Kothari, S. P., S. Shu, and P. D. Wysocki. 2009. Do managers withhold bad news? Journal of Accounting Research 47 (March):36-72.
    Lee, Y. J. 2010. The effects of quarterly report readability on information efficiency of stock prices. Contemporary Accounting Research 29 (October):1137-1170.
    Lehavy, R., F. Li, and K. Merkley. 2011. The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earning forecasts. The Accounting Review 86 (May): 1087-1115.
    Li, F. 2008. Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 (February): 221-247.
    Li, Y., and L. Zhang. 2014. Short selling pressure, stock price behavior, and management forecast precision: evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Accounting Research 53 (November):79-117.
    Lim, E. K., K. Chalmers, and D. Hanlon. 2018. The influence of business strategy on annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 37 (February):65-81.
    Loughran, T., and B. Mcdonald. 2014. Measuring readability in financial disclosures. The Journal of Financial 69 (August): 1643-1671.
    Luo, J. H., X. Li, and H. Chen. 2018. Annual report readability and corporate agency costs. China Journal of Accounting Research 11 (September): 187-212.
    Pownall, G., C. Wasley, and G. Waymire. 1993. The stock price effects of alternative types of management earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 39 (October):896-912.
    Premuroso, R. F., T. R. Skantz, and S. Bhattacharya. 2012. Disclosure of outsourcing in the annual report: causes and market returns effects. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13 (December):382-402.
    Schroeder, N., and C. Gibson. 1990. Readability of management’s discussion and analysis. Accounting Horizons 4 (December):78-87.
    Strong, N., and M. Walker. 1993. The explanatory power of earnings for stock returns. The Accounting Review 68 (April):389-395.
    Velte, P. 2018. Does gender diversity in the audit committee influence key audit matters’ readability in the audit report? UK evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 25 (October):748-755.
    Venkatraman, N., and V. Ramanujam. 1986. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review 11 (October):801-814.
    Yekini, L. S., T. P. Wisniewski, and Y. Millo. 2016. Market reaction to the positiveness of annual report narratives. The British Accounting Review 48 (December):415-430.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    107353025
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107353025
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000560
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    302501.pdf1468KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback