English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46304089      Online Users : 1754
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130645


    Title: 從歐盟一般資料保護規則及電子隱私規則草案探討我國個人資料保護法之修正
    A discussion about Personal Data Protection Act Amendment comparing to EU General Data Protection Regulation and e-Privacy Regulation Draft
    Authors: 賴奕霖
    Lai, Yi-Lin
    Contributors: 馮震宇
    Feng, Jen-Yu
    賴奕霖
    Lai, Yi-Lin
    Keywords: 歐盟一般資料保護規則
    電子隱私規則草案
    個人資料保護法
    適足性認定
    General Data Protection Regulation
    e-Privacy Regulation Draft
    Personal Data Protection Act
    Adequacy Decision
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-07-01 14:01:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 為了因應資訊時代的來臨,防範資料主體因為資訊科技快速發展導致個人資料被濫用,進一步提升資料主體資料自主權與控制權,使之更為完善,歐盟在2016年通過歐盟一般資料保護規則,取代1995年個人資料保護指令。為了積極因應歐盟一般資料保護規則於2018年5月生效後帶來的衝擊,及全面提升個人資料保護的國際趨勢,許多國家紛紛修訂國內的個人資料保護相關法令。在歐盟一般資料保護規則施行後不久,歐盟又再提出電子隱私規則草案,對於電子傳輸、通訊的個人資料提供更完整的保護。對於臺灣而言,在面臨國際上個人資料保護全面提升的趨勢,應重新檢視國內個人資料保護法並適當地予以修訂。
    本論文在第二章首先探討英國、美國、日本國內個人資料保護相關法規的修訂,藉由比較法的方式,探討外國法令的修正方向與具體上對於臺灣的啟示。接著在第三章針對歐盟一般資料保護規則主要內容予以介紹與分析,並比較歐盟個人資料保護指令與歐盟一般資料保護規則,了解兩部法規前後主要的差異,以提供我國個人資料保護法具體的修正方向。第四章以法國國家資訊自由委員會對於Google的裁罰,說明GDPR對於企業可能造成的衝擊。第五章將簡要介紹電子隱私規則草案,說明該法規之立法目的、主要內容以及相關處罰之規定,隨後於第六章檢視我國個人資料保護法既有的缺失,並建議若要取得歐盟一般資料保護規則適足性認定,我國個人資料保護法應修正之方向。本論文建議,若想達成獲得歐盟個資保護「適足性認定」的目標,臺灣除了針對GDPR相關規定的重點和特色予以徹底掌握之外,應該理解各國如何因應歐盟GDPR所帶來的衝擊,觀察其對於國際規範趨勢的影響後,以提供資料主體與企業更佳的保護,並對於臺灣既有的個人資料保護法制與實務進一步重新思考。
    In order to cope with the coming of information age, prevent data subjects from personal data abusing due to the rapid development of of technology, and further improve the autonomy and control of data subjects, the European Union (EU) adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in 2016, replacing Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC). In response to the impact of GDPR came into force in May 2018, many countries have revised their domestic personal data protection regulation or rules. Shortly after GDPR came into force, the EU introduced another personal data protection bill – e-Privacy Regulation to provide a more complete protection for electronically transmitted personal data. In responding to the global trend of enhancing personal data protection comprehensively, Taiwan should review and revise its Personal Data Protection Act thoroughly.
    The thesis first discussed the personal data protection regulation revised in the Britain, the US, and Japan. By means of comparative law, this thesis explained the amendment of laws in those foreign countries and how could the amendment enlighten Taiwan. In Chapter three, the thesis will introduce and analyze the main content of GDPR, and compare Directive 95/46/EC and GDPR to provide a more specific direction for amendment of Personal Data Protection Act in the future. To illustrate the impact of GDPR on enterprises, the thesis takes the event of The Commission nationale de l`informatique et des libertés (CNIL) fining Google for example. Then in chapter five, the thesis will briefly introduce the e-Privacy Regulation bill, including the purose of the bill, the main content and the penalties of violating the regulation. At last, the thesis will examine the existing shortcomings of Personal Protection Act of Taiwan, and how Personal Data Protection Act of Taiwan should be amended to obtain an adequacy decision after GDPR entered into force. This thesis suggested that in order to get the adequacy decision, Taiwan shall familiarize with GDPR’s features and main issues, understand how other countries respond to the subsequent impact, observe its influence on international regulatory trend and amend the Personal Data Protection Act so that the Act could not only offer data subjects but the enterprises in Taiwan a better protection but help Taiwan to consider its current legislation and practice once again.
    Reference: 中文部分
    專書
    王澤鑑(2012),民法概要,臺北:三民。
    黃清德 (2011),科技定位追蹤監視與基本人權保障,臺北:元照。
    張陳弘、莊植寧(2019),新時代之個人資料保護法制:歐盟GDPR與臺灣個人資料保護法的比較說明,臺北:新學林
    劉佐國、李世德(2015),個人資料保護法釋義與實務:如何面臨個資保護的新時代,2版,臺北:碁峰
    蕭家捷、賴文智(2013),個人資料保護法Q&A,臺北:元照。

    期刊
    尤重道(2017),個人資料保護之概念與蒐集處理利用暨違法責任(上),全國律師,21卷7期,頁85-94。
    尤重道(2017),個人資料保護之概念與蒐集處理利用暨違法責任(下),全國律師,21卷8期,頁71-89。
    江庭瑀(2017),簡介英國新資料保護法草案,經貿法訊,221期,頁11-19。
    林思惟(2016),歐盟新規:個人資料保護規則-數位防護的新縱深,金融聯合徵信,29期,頁14-22。
    林玫君(2017),論個人資料保護法之「當事人同意」,東海大學法學研究,51期,頁121-170。
    馮震宇(2018),GDPR加碼ePR,物聯網產業恐斷線,能力雜誌,頁106-113。
    翁清坤(2010),論個人資料保護標準之全球化,東吳法律學報,22卷1期,頁1-60。
    郭戎晉(2016),日本個人資料保護法修正重點與去識別化推動剖析,科技法律透析,28卷6期,頁43-52
    徐仕瑋(2014),個資法所保護個人資料之範圍界定--評臺灣臺北地方法院一○三年度北小字第一三六○號小額民事判決,月旦裁判時報,30期,頁123-138。
    張志偉(2018),歐盟資料保護基本規則導論,月旦司律評,創刊號,頁164-172。
    張安潔、劉瑋佳(2018),初探GDPR 兒童同意權規範之遵循問題,經貿法訊,242期,頁5-17。
    簡毓寧、張馨芸、王世明(2019),我國面對GDPR個資保護浪潮之因應與挑戰:日本經驗之借鏡,經濟前瞻,186期,頁53-56。
    劉靜怡(2010),不算進步的立法:「個人資料保護法」初步評析,月旦法學雜誌,183期,頁147-164。
    劉靜怡(2019),淺談GDPR的國際衝擊及其可能因應之道,月旦法學雜誌,286期,頁5-31。
    劉佐國(2005),我國個人資料隱私權益之保護—論「電腦處理個人資料保護法」之立法與修法過程,律師雜誌,307期,頁42-51。

    研究計畫
    鍾瑞蘭、徐吉志、李世德,2017年,考察日本因應大數據(Big Data)時代之個人資料保護法制及實務運作情形,法務研究計畫與成果。
    林淑英,2018年,參加歐盟執委會「國家專家專業訓練計畫」(National Experts in Professional Training, NEPT)資通訊網絡暨科技總署(Directorate-General Communications Networks, Content and Technology, DG CONNECT)出國報告。

    博碩士學位論文
    李振瑋(2008),英國資料保護法中資料所有人的權利-以揭露請求權為中心,元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文。
    李嘉至(2018),個人資料保護專責機關之研究,東吳大學法學院法律學研究所碩士論文。
    黃子宴(2018),個人資料的識別與去識別-以歐盟、英國法為例,中原大學財經法律研究所碩士論文。

    網路文獻資料
    于國欽,陳美伶:GDPR適足性認定協商 9月再談,中時電子報,2019年6月17日,https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20190617003738-260410?chdtv
    中央社,台歐 GDPR 技術性諮商漸入深水區,歐盟關注 2 重點,科技新報,2019年6月18日,https://technews.tw/2019/06/18/taiwan-eu-gdpr
    朱泓任,Facebook個資事件大彙整 完整始末懶人包,新頭殼,2018年3月28日,https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2018-03-28/118934
    吳柏凭,歐盟GDPR保護適足性審核與因應作為,資策會科技法律研究所,2018年04月10日,https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=66&tp=3&i=158&d=8017&lv2=158
    李永然、田欣永,企業如何因應「個人資料保護法」之實施,2013年10月7日,http://www.law119.com.tw/newdesign/comptaipei/personview.asp?kname=%A7%F5%A5%C3%B5M&ktop=%A5%F8%B7%7E%A6p%A6%F3%A6%5D%C0%B3%A1m%AD%D3%A4H%B8%EA&idno=6562&keywords
    高敬原,沒有人是局外人!史上最嚴個資法衝擊全球,帶你搞懂什麼是GDPR,數位時代,2018年5月25日,https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/49249/gdpr-general-data-protection-regulation-eu-。
    黃彥棻,歐洲最嚴個資法GDPR終於來了,全球企業準備好了嗎?,iThome,2018年5月25日,https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/123433
    黃敬哲,台灣獲准加入 CBPR,挑戰設立問責機構,科技新報,2018年12月12日,https://technews.tw/2018/12/12/taiwan-is-allowed-to-join-cbpr-and-challenge-the-establishment-of-an-accountability-agency/
    黃彥鈞,劍橋分析個資外洩醜聞,Facebook遭英國開罰,科技新報,2018年07月12日,http://technews.tw/2018/07/12/facebook-cambridge-analytica-uk-fine/。
    黃亦筠,加州也祭出最嚴隱私法,科技巨頭為什麼聞之色變?,天下雜誌,662期,2018年12月3日,https://www.cw.com.tw/article/articleLogin.action?id=5093158#_=_(最後瀏覽日:2019年5月16日)。
    曾更瑩,歐盟GDPR被遺忘權 不堪的過往能從搜尋引擎移除嗎,ETtoday新聞雲,2018年6月27日,https://www.ettoday.net/news/20180627/1199729.htm#ixzz5totpz4DT
    陳瑞霖,賽門鐵克 2019《網路安全威脅報告》揭示表單劫持成駭客愛用手法,加密勒索事件減少但企業比重增加,科技新報,2019年3月12日,https://technews.tw/2019/03/12/symantec-istr-report-says-form-hijacking-is-a-favorite-for-hackers-and-ransomware-attacks-is-decreang-but-attck-on-enterprize-percent-is-higher/
    詹孟倫,當個人資料「殘留」在虛擬空間,會有甚麼風險?,關鍵評論,2019年2月25日,https://hk.thenewslens.com/article/114397。
    翁書婷,白話GDPR:三個面向完全解析,數位時代,2018年8月3日,https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/50110/gdpr-overall。
    楊晨欣,法國用GDPR甩了Google一個巴掌:隱私政策被判違法遭罰5千萬歐元,數位時代,2019年1月22日,https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/52030/google-fined-50million-euro-for-violating-gdpr。
    韓瑋倫,有哪些資料是受到特別保護的特種個人資料?應如何合法運用這些資料?,法律百科,2019年10月25日,https://www.legis-pedia.com/article/crime-penalty/632
    你的「同意」不是你的同意 – 從Google的GDPR鉅額裁罰案看「強迫同意」,普華商務法律事務所,2019年2月23日,https://www.pwc.tw/zh/services/legal/point-view/legal-clouds/legal-clouds-1902.html。
    Facebook 從第三方 App 蒐個資,非用戶也難逃魔掌,科技新報,2019年2月23日,https://technews.tw/2019/02/23/you-give-apps-sensitive-personal-information-then-they-tell-facebook/

    英文部分
    期刊論文
    Alo, Edward R. 2014. EU Privacy Protection: A Step towards Global Privacy. Michigan State International Law Review 22: 1095-1148.
    Alsenoy, Brendan Van. 2016. Liability under EU Data Protection Law: From Directive 95/46 to the General Data Protection Regulation. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law 7: 270-288.
    Barnes, Morey Elizabeth. 2006. Falling Short of the Mark: The United States Response to the European Union`s Data Privacy Directive. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 27: 171-198.
    Bignami, Francesca. 2007. Privacy and Law Enforcement in the European Union: The Data Retention. Chicago Journal of International Law 8:233-255.
    Emily Pehrsson. 2018. European Union Law Working Papers: The Meaning of the GDPR Article 22. Transatlantic Technology Law Forum Paper 1-31.
    Hoofnagle, Chris Jay, Bart van der Sloot & Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen. 2019. The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it means. Information & Communications Technology Law 28: 65-98.
    Kelly, Michael J. & Satolam, David. 2017. The Right to Be Forgotten, Illinois Law Review 2017: 1-64.
    Lee, Edward. 2015. The Right to Be Forgotten v. Free Speech. A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 12: 1-22.
    Mantelero, Alessandro. 2013. The EU Proposal for a General Data Protection Regulation and the Roots of the “Right to be Forgotten”. Computer Law and Security Review 29: 229-235.
    Naranjo, Diego. 2017. E-Privacy Regulation: Good Intentions but a Lot of Work to Do. 3 European Data Protection Law Review 3: 152-154.
    PaulDe Hert, Vagelis Papakonstantinou, Gianclaudio Malgieri, Ignacio Sanchez, Laurent Beslay. 2018. The right to data portability in the GDPR: Towards user-centric interoperability of digital services. Computer Law & Security Review 34: 193-203
    Reding, Viviane. 2012. The European data protection framework for the twenty-first century. International Data Privacy Law 2:119-129.
    Voss, W. Gregory. 2017. First the GDPR, Now the Proposed ePrivacy Regulation. Journal of Internet Law 21:3-11.

    網路資料
    Aaron Mamiit, Google Deleted Only 43 Percent of 2.4 Million `Right To Be Forgotten` Requests, Tech Times (Feb. 28, 2018), https://www.techtimes.com/articles/222046/20180228/google-deleted-only-43-percent-of-2-4-million-right-to-be-forgotten-requests.htm.
    Adam Satariano, Google Is Fined $57 Million Under Europe’s Data Privacy Law, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/21/technology/google-europe-gdpr-fine.html.
    Alice O`Donovan, CNIL vs. Google: 10 lessons from the largest data protection fine ever issued, McGuireWoods (Jan 30, 2019), https://www.passwordprotectedlaw.com/2019/01/cnil-vs-google-largest-fine/
    Carole Cadwalladr & Emma Graham-Harrison, Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach, The Guardian (March. 17, 2018), https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
    CCPA and GDPR Comparison Chart, Thomson Reuters, https://www.bakerlaw.com/webfiles/Privacy/2018/Articles/CCPA-GDPR-Chart.pdf
    Charles Arthur, Explaining the `right to be forgotten` – the newest cultural shibboleth, The Guardian (May 14, 2014), https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/14/explainer-right-to-be-forgotten-the-newest-cultural-shibboleth
    Dan Simmons, 5 Countries with GDPR-like Data Privacy Laws, Conforte Insights (Jan. 4, 2019), https://insights.comforte.com/5-countries-with-gdpr-like-data-privacy-laws.
    Data masking: Anonymisation or pseudonymisation?, PrivSec. Report (Nov. 11, 2017), https://gdpr.report/news/2017/11/07/data-masking-anonymisation-pseudonymisation/.
    David Meyer, In the Wake of GDPR, Will the U.S. Embrace Data Privacy?, Fortune (Nov. 29, 2018), http://fortune.com/2018/11/29/federal-data-privacy-law/.
    David Meyer, Twitter Under Formal Investigation for How It Tracks Users in the GDPR Era, Fortune ( Oct 12, 2018), https://fortune.com/2018/10/12/twitter-gdpr-investigation-tco-tracking/
    Deloitte GDPR Benchmarking Survey: The time is now, Deloitte, https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/risk/articles/deloitte-gdpr-benchmarking-survey-the-time-is-now.html
    Digging Into the New ePrivacy Regulation: Balancing Privacy and Progress, TrendMicro (June 27, 2018), https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/us/security/news/online-privacy/digging-into-the-new-eprivacy-regulation-balancing-privacy-and-progress
    Elif Kaya, How can I transfer personal data across EEA borders under the GDPR?, Privacy Perfect (Oct. 8, 2018), https://www.privacyperfect.com/en/blog/transfer-personal-data-eea-borders.
    Eline Chivot & Daniel Castro, What the Evidence Shows About the Impact of the GDPR After One Year, Center for Data Innovation (June 17, 2019), https://www.datainnovation.org/2019/06/what-the-evidence-shows-about-the-impact-of-the-gdpr-after-one-year/
    European Commission - Fact Sheet: Digital Single Market – Communication on Exchanging and Protecting Personal Data in a Globalised World Questions and Answers, European Commission (Jan. 10, 2017), http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-15_en.htm.
    Finn Taylor, 4 steps to making your website GDPR compliant, Liquid Light (May 17, 2018), https://www.liquidlight.co.uk/blog/4-steps-to-making-your-website-gdpr-compliant/
    First overview on the implementation of the GDPR and the roles and means of the national supervisory authorities, European Data Protection Board, https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/files/file1/19_2019_edpb_written_report_to_libe_en.pdf
    Four key lessons when facing data class actions in Europe, Hogan Lovells, https://www.hlmediacomms.com/2018/08/10/four-key-lessons-when-facing-data-class-actions-in-europe/
    Francis Aldhouse, The UK Government publishes the Data Protection Bill, Bird & Bird LLP (Sep. 20, 2017), https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2017/uk/uk-government-publishes-data-protection-bill.
    GDPR EU.org, Right of Access, https://www.gdpreu.org/the-regulation/list-of-data-rights/right-of-access/
    GDPR: The Most Frequently Asked Questions: Is a Service Provider’s Privacy Shield Certification Good Enough?, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Feb. 6, 2018), https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/thought-leadership/gdpr-the-most-frequently-asked-questions-is-a-service-provider-s.html.
    Harvard Law Review Cyberlaw/Internet, Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (December 10, 2014), 128 HARV. L. ReV. 735, 739-740, https://harvardlawreview.org/2014/12/google-spain-sl-v-agencia-espanola-de-proteccion-de-datos/ (last visited July 15, 2019).
    Here are the scandals and other incidents that have sent Facebook’s share price tanking in 2018, CNBC (Nov. 20, 2018), https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/20/facebooks-scandals-in-2018-effect-on-stock.html.
    Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), An overview of the Data Protection Act 2018 38, available at https://ico.org.uk/media/2614158/ico-introduction-to-the-data-protection-bill.pdf
    Jeewon Kim Serrato & Daniel Rosenzweig, GDPR, CCPA and beyond: Changes in data privacy laws and enforcement risks to monitor in 2019, Data Protection Report (Feb. 27, 2019), https://www.dataprotectionreport.com/2019/02/gdpr-ccpa-and-beyond-changes-in-data-privacy-laws-and-enforcement-risks-to-monitor-in-2019/.
    Jennifer Lund, What is GDPR and How Does It Impact Your Business?, Super Office (July 10, 2019), https://www.superoffice.com/blog/gdpr/.
    Jia, Jian and Jin, Ginger Zhe and Wagman, Liad, The Short-Run Effects of GDPR on Technology Venture Investment, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3278912 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3278912
    Jon Porter, Google fined €50 million for GDPR violation in France, The Verge (Jan 21, 2019), https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/21/18191591/google-gdpr-fine-50-million-euros-data-consent-cnil
    Lindsey O`Donnell, Zuckerberg Breaks Silence: ‘We Made Mistakes’ Regarding Cambridge Analytica Debacle, ThreatPost (March 21, 2018), https://threatpost.com/zuckerberg-breaks-silence-we-made-mistakes-regarding-cambridge-analytica-debacle/130620/
    Luca Bolognini, Luca Bolognini & Giovanni Crea, ePrivacy Regulation legal principles and impacts on the digital economy (March 21, 2018), https://www.istitutoitalianoprivacy.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/ePrivacy_IIP_paper_2018_ENG.pdf.
    Lydia F de la Torre, Case study: Google’s €50 million GDPR fine, Medium (May 20, 2019), https://medium.com/golden-data/case-study-googles-50-milliion-gdpr-fine-5e43946793c2.
    Martin F.R., India’s Data Protection Bill Will Now Be Tabled In June, Analytics India Magazine (Jan. 4, 2019), https://www.analyticsindiamag.com/indias-data-protection-bill-in-june/.
    Martin Sloan, Google’s €50m GDPR fine – what are the practical lessons?, Brodies (Jan 23, 2019), https://brodies.com/blog/ip-technology/googles-e50m-gdpr-fine-what-are-the-practical-lessons/
    Maximizing the value of your data privacy investments: Data Privacy Benchmark Study, Cisco, https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/doing_business/trust-center/docs/dpbs-2019.pdf
    Mayes, Tessa, We have no right to be forgotten online, The Guardian (March 18, 2011), https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/libertycentral/2011/mar/18/forgotten-online-european-union-law-internet
    Natalie Bannerman, EU to resume OTT ePrivacy regulation talks, Capacity (Dec. 9, 2019), https://www.capacitymedia.com/articles/3824645/eu-to-resume-ott-eprivacy-regulation-talks.
    Online Privacy Law: Germany, Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/law/help/online-privacy-law/2012/germany.php#_ftn22
    Rosen, Jeffrey, The Right to Be Forgotten, Stanford Law Review (Feb. 13, 2012), https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox-the-right-to-be-forgotten/
    Russell Brandom, Facebook and Google hit with $8.8 billion in lawsuits on day one of GDPR, The Verge (May 25, 2018), https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/25/17393766/facebook-google-gdpr-lawsuit-max-schrems-europe;
    Scott Ikeda, Google to Pay Record €50 Million GDPR Fines as CNIL Draws Lines in the Sand, CPO Magazine (Jan 30, 2019), https://www.cpomagazine.com/data-protection/google-to-pay-record-e50-million-gdpr-fines-as-cnil-draws-lines-in-the-sand/
    Spencer Persson, Jeewon Kim Serrato, Steve Roosa, Arleen Fernandez, and Anna Rudawski, California passes major legislation, expanding consumer privacy rights and legal exposure for US and global companies, Data Protection Report (June. 29, 2018), https://www.dataprotectionreport.com/2018/06/california-passes-major-privacy-legislation-expanding-consumer-privacy-rights/
    The European Commission is the EU’s executive arm, European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/index_en
    Transfers of personal data to third countries or international organisations, Data Protection Commission, https://www.dataprotection.ie/en/organisations/international-transfers
    Wilson C. Freeman, California Dreamin’ of Privacy Regulation: The California Consumer Privacy Act and Congress, Congressional Research Service (Nov. 1, 2018), https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/LSB10213.pdf

    日文部分
    網路資料
    個人情報保護委員会,個人情報の保護に関する基本方針,https://www.ppc.go.jp/files/pdf/changepoint.pdf
    個人情報保護委員会,個人情報保護委員会の国際的な取組について,https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/keizaisaisei/miraitoshikaigi/4th_sangyokakumei_dai2/siryou3.pdf
    個人情報保護委員会,個人情報保護法の成立及び改正に関する主な経緯,https://www.ppc.go.jp/files/pdf/personal_development.pdf
    個人情報保護委員会,個人情報保護委員会熊澤委員と欧州委員会ヨウロバー委員との会談,2018年5月31日,https://www.ppc.go.jp/enforcement/cooperation/cooperation/300531/
    個人情報保護委員会,EU 域内から十分性認可により移転を受けた個人データの取扱いに関するガイドラインの方向性について,https://www.ppc.go.jp/files/pdf/300209_siryou1.pdf
    世界最先端 IT 国家創造宣言について, https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/it2/pdf/it_kokkasouzousengen.pdf
    前田篤穂,個人データ保護の「十分性認可」取得の好機に-日EU首脳が共同声明-,JETRO,2017年07月07日,https://www.jetro.go.jp/biznews/2017/07/845f14ec50674c94.html
    伊藤真弥,改正個人情報保護法とは?改正ポイントと対応方法を総解説,The Finance,2017年4月28日,https://thefinance.jp/law/170428
    「改正個人情報保護法」5月30日より全面施行、変更点・注意点などポイントを解説,Digital Arts,2017年3月22日,https://www.daj.jp/news/170322_01/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    106364210
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106364210
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000503
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    421001.pdf2204KbAdobe PDF2365View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback