English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141854 (78%)
Visitors : 47820302      Online Users : 823
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/130981
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130981


    Title: 導入工業4.0支援組織關鍵活動之促進與阻礙因素
    The Enablers and Inhibitors’ Influences of Implementing Industry 4.0 on Organizational Critical Activities
    Authors: 劉冠宏
    Liu, Kuan-Hung
    Contributors: 洪為璽
    Hung, Wei-Hsi
    劉冠宏
    Liu, Kuan-Hung
    Keywords: 組織關鍵活動
    傳統製造業
    工業4.0
    促進與阻礙因素
    紮根理論
    組織互動式鑽石模型
    Organizational Critical Activities
    Traditional Manufacturing
    Enabler and Inhibitor
    Grounded Theory
    Organizational Interaction Diamond model
    Industry 4.0
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-08-03 17:36:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 工業4.0的發展,從最初自動化設備、虛實整合系統到完整智慧工廠的概念,而近年來由於5G、物聯網、人工智慧、機器學習等技術,能夠有效對所蒐集的數據進行分析利用。目前,台灣的傳統製造業正面臨逐漸改變的產品環境,包含:個人客製化、產品的生命周期縮短、設備以及材料需要不停地做改變以及市場的競爭增加。因此,傳統產業開始以工業4.0作為改造企業的方向,以因應未來變化以及需求增加的市場。本研究針對傳統中小型金屬製造業,探討組織導入工業4.0其對組織關鍵活動的影響以及可能潛在的促進以及阻礙的導入因素,透過個案研究分析某中部傳統金屬加工業公司導入工業4.0歷程,並藉由深度訪談法蒐集內部高、中階管理人員訪談資料,最後以紮根理論進行分析歸納結果。
    本研究結果發現,個案的組織關鍵活動集中於生產製造上,較具影響的內外部因素來自與組織關鍵活動相關的問題上。在導入工業4.0上的促進與阻礙因素分為四項為規劃面、執行面、管理面、技術面:(1)規劃面需要注意企業需要有完善的流程掌控、足夠的技術人力、符合流程需求的設備系統、組織的投入、人員溝通協調,才能規劃出符合需求的設備系統;(2)執行面則須注意組織內部人員對導入推行的理解與執行動力,並配合人力教育訓練、舊有人力安排以提升人員素質減少人員抗拒,避免成效不足;(3)管理面則強調了人員的溝通以及組織關鍵活動、組織需求以及資訊科技的結合,能夠有效讓工業4.0符合組織流程;(4)技術面則強調不同的設備與系統要有不同的處理方式與人員要求。最後本研究期待研究成果能提供未來組織關鍵活動與工業4.0導入上的深入研究參考以及提供相關公司產業決策經驗參考以及分析架構。
    The development of Industry 4.0 has experienced from automated manufacturing and cyber-physic system to smart factory. In recent years, due to the development of 5G, Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, machine learning and other technologies, data can be effectively analyzed and utilized for manufacturing. Currently, the market environment of traditional manufacturing industry in Taiwan is changing. Problems like personal customization, shortened product life cycle, constant changes in equipment and materials, and market competition are also emerging. Therefore, Industry 4.0 turned out to be a solution for traditional small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to adapt to future changes and market demand.
    This study focused on traditional manufacturing SMEs and collected research data through cases studies and interviews with managers in order to explore the impacts of organizational critical activities (OCAs) after implementing Industry 4.0. Furthermore, the enabler and inhibitor factors were identified through result analysis based on grounded theory.
    The results indicated that OCAs mostly are related to manufacturing. Internal and external factors of organizations which affect the implement are mostly related to the OCAs. In terms of the factors that affect the implement of Industry 4.0, they could be categorized into four aspects: planning, execution, management and technique. (1) From the aspect of planning, organization needs to pay attention to process control, sufficient technical manpower, and equipment systems that help meet the process requirements, organizational investment, personal communication and coordination. (2) From the aspect of execution, organization can plan employee trainings to acquaint the employees’ with the knowledge and organization’s motivation of the implementation of Industry 4.0. (3) From the aspect of management, to make Industry 4.0 meet the organizational process, the organization has to combine communication, OCAs, needs and IT. (4) From the aspect of technique, different equipment and systems require different import methods and human resource. Finally, this research expects that the results can provide helpful research implications for future OCAs and the implement of Industry 4.0, as well as relevant industry decision-making experience and analysis frameworks for business companies.
    Reference: 中文部分
    王子豪(2020)。 以OCA觀點分析工業4.0組織決策之研究。逢甲大學工業工程與系統管理學系博士論文,台中市。
    李家汶(2014)。 建構組織關鍵活動與資訊科技使用模式之理想廓形: 以連鎖餐飲業為例. 中正大學資訊管理學系學位論文, 1-188。
    林昀臻(2011)。連結網站與組織關鍵活動之關鍵成功因素:以製造業為例。國立中正大學資訊管理學系暨研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
    林東清(2013)。「資訊管理:e 化企業的核心競爭能力 (五版) 」,智勝文化。
    林書凱(2014)。企業策略類型、組織關鍵活動與行動商務科技應用連結對企業績效之影響。國立中正大學資訊管理學系暨研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
    洪奇祿(2013)。探討組織關鍵活動與資訊科技能力之連結對企業績效之影響。國立中正大學資訊管理學系暨研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
    洪為璽 與 林昀臻(2011年4月)。 組織關鍵活動與網站連結關鍵因素之個案研究。 2011商管與資訊研討會, 台北大學資訊管理研究所。
    胡夢鯨(民85)。成人教育學習理論模型論成人教育專業化人才的培育。成人教育雙月刊,29,12-20。
    韋康博(2015)。工業4.0,從製造業到智造業,下一波產業革命如何天賦全世界,商周出版,12月。
    張碩毅、洪育忠、洪為璽、張益誠 與 彭添誠。(2009)。 以系統生命週期與鑽石模式探討影響企業採用行動商務關鍵成功因素之研究。 資訊管理學報, 16(3), 85-110。
    許文琇(2009)。組織關鍵活動與組織策略類型之關聯研究:以高科技產業為例。國立中正大學資訊管理所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
    曾筱淇 (2014)。 以 GAHP 探索資訊科技在組織關鍵活動的投資決策因素. 中正大學資訊管理學系學位論文, 1-177。
    賀正楚 與 潘紅玉。 (2015)。 德 國 “工 業 4.0” 與 “中 國 制 造 2025”. 長沙理工大學學報 (社會科學版), 3。
    勤業眾信(2019)。工業4.0新戰略與發展途徑,台灣,勤業眾信聯合會計師事務所。
    謝斐宇(2017)。從頭家島到隱形冠軍: 台灣中小企業的轉型,1996-2011。李宗榮、林宗弘編,《未竟的奇蹟:轉型中的台灣經濟與社會》,頁346-382,Taipei:中央研究院社會所。

    參考網站
    DIGITIMES企劃(民104年11月26日)。落實生產力4.0藉智動化推升台灣製造力。DIGITIMES。取自: https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=130&id=451554
    TechOrange (民106年1月5日)。【製造業轉型省思系列】宏遠紡織擁抱工業 4.0:生產時間省 3 倍,一年回收 3000 萬台幣。民109年4月29日,取自: https://buzzorange.com/techorange/2017/01/05/hung-yuan/
    李旭(民105年3月21日)。福斯《VW Phaeton》車系停產 德勒斯登「透明工廠」將隨之轉型。KING AUTOS。民109年4月29日,取自https://www.kingautos.net/67170
    涂翠珊 (民109年4月27日)。新5G技術助工業4.0再升級。Digitimes。民109年5月11日,取自: https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=158&cat1=20&cat2=10&id=0000583692_X5156ZTTLP5C9H1OGAMUG
    陳建鈞(民108年11月14日)。智慧造鞋卡關、結束兩間機器人工廠,Adidas升級工業4.0遇到什麼阻礙?。數位時代。民109年4月29日,取自: https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/55494/adidas-speedfactories
    勞動部統計處(民109)。檢索日期 民109年4月24日,取自: https://www.mol.gov.tw/statistics/2475/2477/3536/?Page=1&PageSize=10
    賀桂芬(民105年7月6日)。西門子 工業4.0的究極攻略:成為世界工廠的工廠。天下雜誌。民109年4月29日,取自: https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5077242&from=search
    賀桂芬, 熊毅晰(民108年1月15日)。【重磅調查】566家企業智慧製造大盤點:誰是最佳工業4.0企業?。天下雜誌。民109年4月29日,取自: https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5093664
    經濟部中小企業處(民107年3月15日)。中小企業發展面臨問題與因應對策。國家發展委員會。民109年5月17日,取自: https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvNjgxMi8yODQyOC8wNzYzZTg4MS03MzQ0LTRjNTctYjUyZC1mOThhMmI5YmY1MDYucGRm&n=5aCx5ZGK5qGIICDkuK3lsI%2FkvIHmpa3nmbzlsZXpnaLoh6jllY%2FpoYzoiIflm6Dmh4nlsI3nrZYo57aT5r%2Bf6YOoKS5wZGY%3D&icon=..pdf
    經濟部投資業務處(民109年3月26日)。回流臺商再添電腦周邊生力軍 投資臺灣三大方案達9252億元。經濟部。民109年4月29日,取自:https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=89119
    經濟部統計處查詢系統(民109)。檢索日期 民109年5月10日,取自: https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/home/Home.aspx
    嚴思涵(民104年8月31日)。 三星電子與南韓政府合資推動智慧工廠。DIGITIMES。民109年5月17日,取自: https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?id=0000441133_qu02284z2u53dz41oyg2e
    沈培華(民108年3月14日)。《科技》SEMI:風險與資安管理,成工業4.0發展挑戰。民109年7月10日,取自: https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20190314001627-260410?chdtv

    英文部分
    Ajzen, I. (1991) "The Theory of Planned Behavior", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (50)2, pp. 179-211.
    Anzul, M., Ely, M., Freidman, T., Garner, D., & McCormack-Steinmetz, A. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. London, England: Routledge.
    Baheti, R., & Gill, H. (2011). Cyber-physical systems. The impact of control technology, 12(1), 161-166.
    Baumeister, R. F., E. Bratslavsky, C. Finkenauer, and K. D. Vohs (2001) "Bad is stronger than good", Review of General Psychology, (5)4, pp. 323-370.
    Cenfetelli, R. T. (2004). Inhibitors and enablers as dual factor concepts in technology usage. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(11), 16.
    Chandler, A. D. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1962.
    Chang, L.-M., Chang, S.-I., Ho, C.-T., Yen, D. C., & Chiang, M.-C. (2011). Effects of IS characteristics on e-business success factors of small-and medium-sized enterprises. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2129-2140.
    Chen, Y. Y., & Huang, H. L. (2012). Knowledge management fit and its implications for business performance: A profile deviation analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 27, 262-270.
    Colombo, A. W., Schleuter, D., & Kircher, M. (2015). An approach to qualify human resources supporting the migration of SMEs into an Industrie4. 0-compliant company infrastructure. In IECON 2015-41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (pp. 003761-003766). IEEE.
    Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approach. London: Publications.
    Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw (1989) "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models", Management Science, (35)8 (August), pp. 982-1003.
    Denzin, N. K. (1978). Triangulation: A case for methodological evaluation and combination. Sociological methods, 339-357.
    Faller, C., & Feldmüller, D. (2015). Industry 4.0 learning factory for regional SMEs. Procedia Cirp, 32, 88-91.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.
    Gambardella, A., & Torrisi, S. (1998). Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research policy, 27(5), 445-463.
    Garcia-Sabater, J. J., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2011). Can we still talk about continuous improvement? Rethinking enablers and inhibitors for successful implementation. International Journal of Technology Management, 55(1/2), 28-42.
    Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. 1967. Weidenfield & Nicolson, London, 1-19.
    Gauch, S., & Blind, K. (2015). Technological convergence and the absorptive capacity of standardisation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 236-249.
    Hebert, J. E., & Deckro, R. F. (2011). Combining contemporary and traditional project management tools to resolve a project scheduling problem. Computers & Operations Research, 38(1), 21-32.
    Herzberg, F., G. Mausner, and B. B. Snyderman (1966) Work and the Nature of Man.Cleveland: The World Publishing Company.
    Hung, W. H. (2006). Supporting organizational critical activities from Web sites: An evaluation methodology development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
    Hung, W. H., Hung, C. L., & Chang, L.M. (2014,12). Aligning Information Technology Capabilities with Organizational Critical Activities. Proceedings of Information Systems and International Management Forum, National Cheng Kung University.
    Hung, W. H., McQueen, R. J., Ku, C. Y., & Chang, L. M. (2012). Aligning websites with enterprise success: An evaluative approach. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(4), 49-58.
    Jazdi, N. (2014, May). Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. In 2014 IEEE international conference on automation, quality and testing, robotics (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
    Kagermann, Helbig, Hellinger, and Wahlster, (2013). Securing of Future of German Manufacturing Industry. Recommendations for implementing the strategic intiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Germany:Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
    Kannabiran, G., & Dharmalingam, P. (2012). Enablers and inhibitors of advanced information technologies adoption by SMEs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
    Kotni, V. D. P., & Karumuri, V. (2018). Application of Herzberg two-factor theory model for motivating retail salesforce. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(1), 24-42.
    Leavitt, H. J. Managerial Psychology. The University of Chicago Press, Ltd, Chicago, 1964.
    Leavitt, H. J., & Bahrami, H. Managerial psychology: Managing behavior in organization (5th Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
    Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing letters, 3, 18-23.
    Lee, J., Kao, H. A., & Yang, S. (2014). Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia Cirp, 16(1), 3-8.
    Levy, M., Powell, P., & Worrall, L. (2005). Strategic intent and e-business in SMEs: enablers and inhibitors. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 18(4), 1-20.
    Lewicki, R. J., D. J. Mcallister, and R. J. Bies (1998) "Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities", Academy of Management Review, (23)3, pp. 438-458.
    Luftman, J., Papp, R., & Brier, T. (1995). " The Strategic Alignment Model: Assessment and Validation," In Proceedings of the Information Technology Management Group of the Association of Management (AoM) 13th Annual International Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 2-5,1995, pp. 57-66.
    Luftman, J., Papp, R., & Brier, T. (1999). Enablers and inhibitors of business-IT alignment. Communications of the Association for information Systems, 1(1), 11.
    Müller, J. M., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). Sustainable industrial value creation in SMEs: A comparison between industry 4.0 and made in China 2025. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 5(5), 659-670.
    Navale, M. M. P., & Navale, M. R. G. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (AIoT): Opportunities and Challenges. CLIO An Annual Interdisciplinary Journal of History, 6(5), 199-206.
    Odiorne, G. S. (1975). Management and the activity trap. London: Heinemann.
    Park, S. C., & Ryoo, S. Y. (2013). An empirical investigation of end-users’ switching toward cloud computing: A two factor theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 160-170.
    Parr, A. and Shanks, G.“A Model of ERP Project Implementation,"Journal of Information Technology (15:3), 2000, pp. 289-303
    Radziwon, A., Bilberg, A., Bogers, M., & Madsen, E. S. (2014). The smart factory: exploring adaptive and flexible manufacturing solutions. Procedia engineering, 69, 1184-1190.
    Ravichandran, T., & Liu, Y. (2011). Environmental factors, managerial processes, and information technology investment strategies. Decision Sciences, 42(3), 537-574.
    Rosenberg, Nathan. 1963. “Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910.” The Journal of Economic History 23(04):414-43.
    Rozin, P. and E. B. Royzman (2001) "Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion", Personality & Social Psychology Review, (5)4, pp. 296-320.
    Samuel, R. A., & Scott Morton, M. S.“Information technology and major organizational change: Results from the management in the 1990s program”. MIT Management, 1989, pp. 2-9.
    Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Sahaym, A., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2012). Exploring Value Cocreation in Relationships Between an ERP Vendor and its Partners: A Revelatory Case Study. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 317-338.
    Scott, W. R. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1987.
    Sendler, U. (2014). Industry 4.0: The Challenge Coming from the Forth Industrial Revolution [M].
    Snow, C. C., & Hambrick, D. C. (1980). Measuring organizational strategies: Some theoretical and methodological problems. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 527-538.
    Son, J. H., & Kim, M. H. (2001). Improving the performance of time-constrained workflow processing. Journal of Systems and Software, 58(3), 211-219.
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research Grounded Theory Procedures and Technique. London: Sage.
    Svensson, G. (2002). Beyond global marketing and the globalisation of marketing activities. Management Decision, 40(6), 574-583.
    Turney, P. B. (1994). Emerging Practices in Cost Management: Activity-Based Management, Special Edition, Barry J. Brinker Editor: Boston: Warren, Gorham & Lamont.
    Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2010). Putting the ‘theory’back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357-381.
    Wigand, D. (2007). Building on Leavitt`s diamond model of organizations: the organizational interaction diamond model and the impact of information technology on structure, people, and tasks. AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 287.
    Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962.
    Yao, X., Zhou, J., Lin, Y., Li, Y., Yu, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Smart manufacturing based on cyber-physical systems and beyond. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(8), 2805-2817.
    Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. California: Sage.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    107356027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107356027
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000855
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    602701.pdf3688KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback