Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131164
|
| Title: | 農地產權複雜化之影響因素探討 -以嘉義縣農地重劃區為例
The Determinants of Farmland Fragmentation in Ownership and Size -The Case Study of Chiayi County |
| Authors: | 劉佳欣
Liu, Chia-Hsin |
| Contributors: | 林子欽
丁秀吟
Lin, Tzu-Chin
Ding, Hsiu Yin
劉佳欣
Liu, Chia-Hsin |
| Keywords: | 農地重劃
農地細碎化
產權複雜化
農地利用
Farmland Consolidation
Farmland Fragmentation
Ownership Fragmentation
Farmland Utilization |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-08-03 18:08:25 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 農地細碎化(land fragmentation)之研究可被分成「面積」與「產權」兩面向。歐美國家著重探討「面積」細碎化可能導致的農地利用議題，如土地畸零狹小，無生產效率，甚至阻礙農業機械化，故「產權」細碎化面向則相對較少被研究所重視。然而，台灣之農地，因「有土斯有財」之觀念深根，加上多子均分之繼承制度，世代相襲下，土地的共有產權情形嚴重，其不僅會降低地主對於土地的耕作意願，也會增加土地轉變為非農使用的風險，因此急須被重視，而上述土地共有人數增加之現象，本研究將其定義為「產權複雜化」。
農地重劃能夠減少農地上的共有人數，使產權型態回歸單純，但農地重劃後產權型態會隨著繼承及各種社會、地理因素逐漸複雜化，導致土地再度回到產權複雜之情況。「產權複雜化」逐年的發生的過程，隱含完成重劃當時之效益被高估。因此，本文期望探討影響農地產權複雜化之因子，以作農地重劃政策參考。
本研究選定嘉義縣為研究主體，並採用嘉義縣農地重劃區內之農牧用地為樣本，導入二階段估計方法，來改良一般線性迴歸模型一次性估計，無法解決之結構性群體效果(structural group effects)。模型1主要欲探討產權複雜化因子，並以「HHI」做為產權複雜程度之指標；模型2則期望了解面積細碎化因子。由實證結果可得，重劃區之土地呈現：「HHI值逐年變高，且土地面積逐年變小」之趨勢，隱含土地在此過程中不斷發生分割。另一個值得注意的是，土地位於不同重劃區會顯著影響土地細碎化程度。最後，由實證結果亦可得，農發條例第22條之規範，有助於減緩民國62年後完成之重劃區的產權複雜化情形，但是卻無法有效改善重劃區內農地面積之細分。
Farmland fragmentation can be classified into two phenomena: decreasing parcel size and increasing co-owners. Western countries focus on parcel size dispersion, which influences farmland utilization. Some Asian countries suffer from land ownership fragmentation because of the traditional belief that “to have land is to have wealth.” Inheritance practices also require equal land division among the heirs. In this study, “ownership fragmentation” refers to an increase in single land parcel co-owners. This condition increases the risk of change of land use for non-agricultural use. Moreover, land division decreases farmland size. Farmland consolidation may improve fragmentation problems. However, co-owners may rise again through generations. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the determinants of ownership fragmentation.
This study uses a sample of farmland parcels that have undergone farmland consolidation in Chiayi County, Taiwan. In addition, a two-stage technique is applied to solve structural group effects problems. Model 1 is constructed to analyze farmland ownership fragmentation factors. Model 2 aims to determine the factors that influence farmland size.
Empirical evidence shows that annually HHI increases whereas parcel size decreases; this implies land division. Furthermore, the characteristics of the farmland consolidation site significantly affect ownership fragmentation. Lastly, the amendment of the Agriculture Development Act has slowed down the ownership fragmentation process but failed to stop the land parcel size from becoming smaller. |
| Reference: | 中文參考文獻
1.王玉真，2000，「耕地分割相關規定簡介」，『農政與農情』，99。
2.邱鈺婷，2014，「農地重劃能阻止農地細碎化與違規使用嗎？ —台南市八老爺重劃區之實證分析」，政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
3.林子欽，2012，「行政院農業委員會101 年度科技計畫研究報告(期末報告)」，台北。
4.林志謙，2018，「農地細碎化課題之研究-以宜蘭縣冬山鄉為例」，中國文化大學碩士論文：台北。
5.周昱賢，2016，「影響台北住宅供給之因素探討−土地細碎與開發政策的觀點」，政治大學地政研究所、私立中國地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
6.陳明燦，1998，「我國開放農地自由買賣問題與因應對策之研究」，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
7.陳意昌，2004，「農地重劃地區土地利用與景觀變遷之研究」，中興大學水土保持學系研究所博士論文：台中。
8.莊谷中，2019，「臺灣農地經營規模之探討—以衝突型農村與傳統農業型農村農地產權實證 —以衝突型農村與傳統農業型農村農地產權實證分析為例」，『土地經濟年刊』，30：1-63。
9.張維一、張桂霖，1984，「實施農地重劃」，『地政十年叢書』7，台北：內政部。
10.黃方欣，2012，「反共有財是悲劇嗎？—土地產權的實證結果」，政治大學地政研究所、私立中國地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
11.曾禹瑄，2014，「土地開發的產權僵局-以松山二期重劃區為例」，政治大學地政研究所、私立中國地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
12.詹立宇、林惠玲，2013，「產業地理與市場集中度之相關性：台灣製造業之分析」，『經濟研究』，49(2)：167-205。
13.楊松齡，2017，「引導農地產權與使用權單純化並達到規模化及有效利用之研究」，行政院農業委員會106年度科技計畫研究報告：台北
14.楊珮欣，2007，「住商混合使用對房價之影響-台北市經驗」，政治大學地政研究所、私立中國地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
15.趙岡，2008，「中國傳統農村的地權分配」，『漢學研究』，26(4)：311-320。
16.臺灣省地政局，1964，「台灣農地重劃」，台中：臺灣省地政局。
17.劉瑞煌，2002，「台灣之農地重劃」，『土地問題研究季刊』，1(4)：24-32。
外文參考文獻
1.Allen, M., Springer, T. and Waller, N., 1995, “Implicit Pricing across Residential Submarkets”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 11(2): 137-151.
2.Adams, D. and Hutchison, N., 2000, “The Urban Task Force Report: Reviewing Land Ownership Constraints to Brownfield Redevelopment”, Regional Studies, 34(8)：777-792.
3.Bentley, W., 1987, “Economic and Ecological Approaches to Land Fragmentation: In Defense of a Much-Maligned Phenomenon”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 16： 31-67.
4.Bentley, J., 1990, “Wouldn`t You Like to Have All of Your Land in One Place? Land Fragmentation in Northwest Portugal, Human Ecology”, 18(1)：52-79.
5.Bird, P., 2007,“Landownership and Settlement Change in South-West Cheshire from 1750 to 2000”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
6.Borjas, G. J. and Sueyoshi, G.T., 1994, “A Two-stage Estimator for Probit Models With Structural Group Effects”, Journal of Econometrics, 64： 165-182.
7.Croux, C., Dhaene, G. and Hoorelbeke, D.,2004,“Robust Standard Errors for Robust Estimator”, open access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, original source: https://feb.kuleuven.be/public/u0017833/PDF-FILES/robse.pdf( Retrieved July 3rd, 2020).
8.Demetriou, D., Stillwell, J. and See, L.M., 2013, “A New Methodology for Measuring Land Fragmentation”, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 39: 71-80.
9.Farmer, B. H., 1960,” On Not Controlling Subdivision in Paddy-Lands”, The Royal Geographical Society, 28：225-235.
10.Kawasaki, K., 2010, “The Costs and Benefits of Land Fragmentation of Rice Farms in Japan”, The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54：509–526.
11.Gujarati, D. N., 2003, “Basic econometrics”, Boston, Mass.: McGraw Hill.
12.King, R. and Burton, S., 1982, “Land Fragmentation: Notes on a Fundamental Rural Spatial Problem”, Progress in Human Geography, 6(4)：475-494.
13.Lin, T.C. and Evans, A.W., 2000. “The Relationship Between the Price of Land and Size of Plot When Plots are Small”, Land Economics, 76(3)：386-394.
14.Niroula, G.S.and Thapa, G. B., 2005, “Impacts and Causes of Land Fragmentation, and Lessons Learned From Land Consolidation in South Asia”, Land Use Policy, 22(4)：358-372.
15.Simmoms, A. J.,1964,“ An Index of Farm Structure, with a Nottinghamshire Example”, East Midlands Geographer, 3：255-261.
16.Simion, G., 2008, “Geographical Analysis of the Land Fragmentation Process Based on Participatory Mapping and Satellite Images. Case Studies of Ciorogârla and Vănătorii Mici From the Bucharest Metropolitan Area”, Human Geographies, 2 (1): 83-94.
17.Sklenicka, P., Zouhar, J., Trpáková, I. and Vlasák, J., 2017, “Trends in Land Ownership Fragmentation During the Last 230 years in Czechia, and a Projection of Future Developments”, Land Use Policy, 67：640-615.
18.Sklenicka, P., Janovska, V., Salek, M., Vlasak, J. and Molnarova, K., 2014, “The Farmland Rental Paradox: Extreme Land Ownership Fragmentation as a New Form of Land Degradation”, Land Use Policy, 38：587-593.
19.Vander Meer, P., 1975, “Land Consolidation through Land Fragmentation: Case Studies from Taiwan”, Land Economics, 51 (3): 275-283. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
107257005 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107257005 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000774 |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 700501.pdf | | 3968Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 13 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
