English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 96274/126892 (76%)
Visitors : 32289424      Online Users : 306
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131166


    Title: 建築專案管理對住宿類綠建築規劃設計之影響
    The Influence of Construction Project Management on the Planning and Design of Residential Green Buildings
    Authors: 陳胤光
    Chen, Yin-Guang
    Contributors: 孫振義
    甯方璽

    Sun, Chen-Yi
    Ning, Fang-Shii

    陳胤光
    Chen, Yin-Guang
    Keywords: 綠建築
    建築專案管理
    住宿類
    Green building
    Construction project management
    Residential building
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-08-03 18:08:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國綠建築評估系統EEWH自1999年9月起開始接受申請,至今已推廣20年,然而住宿類綠建築標章案件數仍僅占住宿類總使用執照數量1%以下,住宿類標章案之總樓地板面積占住宿類使用執照總樓地板面積20%以下,整體而言綠建築之採用情形仍有進步空間。探究申請率低的原因,其中之一為大眾認為綠建築之成本較高,此外為取得綠建築標章將較一般建築花費較久的時間,且所需提供之資料繁多等,皆是不利綠建築推廣等情形。再者,取得候選綠建築證書之案例最終未必會申請綠建築標章,另亦有同一建築案件之綠建築標章分數,較其於候選綠建築證書低之情形。
    從過往之經驗指出,在建築專案執行過程中,若能對於其生命週期之各項工作項目予以妥善管理,係有助於管控成本與興建時程,並減少專案成果與預期目標的落差。然而前述經驗與相關研究多針對於大型工程與廠辦類建築物,對於住宿類建築物之相關文獻相對較少。故本研究先透過深度訪談,釐清建築專案管理在住宿類綠建築上之差異情形與主要考量項目。後續再以專家問卷探討建築專案管理管控綠建築指標項目之能力,以提出在建築專案管理思維下,住宿類綠建築在設計上之建議。
    研究成果顯示,不同綠建築技術與設施設備之採用情形,對於建築專案的管控能力確實具有差異性。在EEWH-RS版本下之指標項目,共有12個指標項目能透過建築專案管理,相對有效控制成本與時程,再經兩階段法群集分析後,其中共有11個指標項目具有明顯之控管能力,並以日常節能指標與二氧化碳減量指標下之指標項目控管能力普遍較佳。研究成果將有助於建築設計師評估住宿類綠建築之設計方案,進而提升業主採用綠建築技術與設施設備之意願。
    EEWH, green building assessment system which has been accepting applications since September 1999 and has been promoted for 20 years. However, the number of accommodation green building label cases still accounts for less than 1% of the total number of Building Use permit. The floor area of the total building accounts for less than 20% of the floor area of the total Building Use permit. There is still room for improvement in the adoption of green buildings. Explore the reasons for the low application rate. One of the reasons is that the public believes that the cost of green buildings is higher. In addition, it will take longer time to obtain green building marks than general buildings, and the need to provide a lot of information is unfavorable. Construction promotion and other situations. In addition, the case of obtaining the candidate green building certificate may not necessarily apply for the green building seal in the end, and there are also green building seal scores of the same construction case, which is lower than the case of the candidate green building certificate.
    From past experience, it is pointed out that, during the execution of construction projects, if the work items in its life cycle can be properly managed, it will help to control costs and construction schedules, and reduce the gap between project results and expected goals. However, the aforementioned experience and related research are mostly aimed at large-scale projects and factory type buildings, and there is relatively little literature on accommodation buildings. Therefore, in this study, through in-depth interviews, will clarify the differences and main considerations of the construction project management in the accommodation green building. The follow-up questionnaire discusses the ability of the construction project management to control the green building indicator project with an expert questionnaire, to put forward suggestions on the design of residential type green buildings under the construction project management thinking.
    The research results show that the adoption of different green building technologies and facilities has indeed different management and control capabilities for construction projects. In the indicator project under the EEWH-RS version, a total of 12 indicator projects can be managed through construction projects to control costs and schedules relatively effectively. After two-stage cluster analysis, a total of 11 indicator projects have obvious control capabilities, And the indicators under the daily energy saving indicators and CO2 reduction indicators are generally better at controlling. The research results will help the architects to evaluate the design scheme of the residential type green building, thereby enhancing the owners' willingness to adopt green building technology and facilities.
    Reference: 一、中文參考文獻
    (一)專書
    Everett M Rogers著、唐錦超譯,2016,『創新的擴散』,臺北市:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
    內政部建築研究所,2012,『綠建築評估手冊2012版』第一版,新北市:內政部建築研究所。
    內政部建築研究所,2014,『綠建築評估手冊2015版』第二版,新北市:內政部建築研究所。
    王文科,1986,『教育研究法』初版,臺灣:五南圖書出版有限公司。
    經濟部標準檢驗局,2016,『CNS21500:2016』:經濟部標準檢驗局。

    (二)期刊
    沈勁利、葉根、林樹豪,2007,「營建工程專案管理(PM)與專業營建管理(PCM)之研究」,『德霖學報』,第二十一期:P301–309。
    徐東,2007,「我國古代職業技術教育的發展歷程及其特點分析書名」,『遼東學院學報』,第九卷第二期:P88–91。
    孫大明、邵文晞,2010年,「當前中國綠色建築增量成本統計研究」,『生態城市與綠色建築』,第四期:P43-49。
    陳淵博、戴期甦,2001,「工程專案管理執行實務」,『中華技術期刊』,第五十一期(2)。
    康思敏、莫仁維、曾雅愉,2014,「BIM 於建物全生命週期各階段之導入與應用」,『中國土木水利工程學會會刊』,第四十一卷第三期:P35–41。

    (三)碩博士學位論文
    王英賢,2009,「小型住宅綠建築設計之應用研究」,樹德科技大學建築與環境設計研究所碩士學位論文:高雄市。
    江炳祈,2019,『公共住宅導入建築資訊模型(BIM)於專案管理之應用探討-以「臺北市內湖區瑞光公共住宅」為例』,國立宜蘭大學綠色科技學程碩士在職專班碩士學位論文:宜蘭縣。
    李怡青,2016,「國內營建產業應用BIM技術現況調查與分析」,國立中央大學營建管理研究所在職專班碩士學位論文:桃園市。
    陳正宜,2011,「應用BIM 及電腦模擬於結構工程之工期估算」,國立交通大學土木工程學系碩士學位論文:桃園市。
    張金輝,2002,「承包商執行專案工程績效評估之研究」,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系碩士學位論文:臺北市。
    郭奉宜,2005,「統包工程之進度規劃模式」,國立交通大學土木工程系碩士學位論文:桃園市。
    黃振東,2009,「中小學校綠建築之日常節能、基地保水、綠化量及水資源成本效能分析」,逢甲大學建築學系碩士學位論文:臺中市。
    鄭振安,2008,「營建工程趕工之案例研究」,國立交通大學工學院碩士在職專班工程技術與管理組碩士學位論文:桃園市。
    潘清吉,1997,「建築工程設計對施工性影響之研究,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系碩士學位論文:臺北市。
    簡國峯,2014,「台灣營建專案導入BIM 技術專案管理常見執行窒礙之研究」,國立交通大學土木工程系所博士學位論文:桃園市。

    (四)研究案與調查報告
    內政部建築研究所,2016,「國內外推動BIM之策略與成效比較研究」,協同研究案,新北市:內政部建築研究所。
    內政部建築研究所,2018,「綠建築之造價成本分析比較研究」,委託研究案,新北市:內政部建築研究所。
    內政部建築研究所,2019,「都市更新案例申請綠建築標章指標項目與成本之分析」,委託研究案,新北市:內政部建築研究所。
    王隆昌,2005,「公共工程規劃設計品質管理之研究」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,臺北市: 行政院國家科學委員會。
    監察院,2019,「調查報告報告字號108內調0098」,臺北市:監察院。
    臺大 BIM 研究中心,2015,「業主導入BIM之現況、意願與需求調查」。

    (五)法令與相關規範
    《公共工程訂定工期參考原則》
    《政府採購法》
    《建築法》
    《施工綱要規範》
    《機關辦理工程委託專案管理廠商評選及計費辦法》
    《營建工程空氣污染防制設施管理辦法》
    《營建剩餘土石方處理方案》

    (六)報章雜誌
    方炳超(2020年2月29日)「柯文哲社宅目標一路縮水卸任前恐不到1萬戶」,風傳媒,https://www.storm.mg/article/2323286
    工商時報2019/01/11,高雄去年推案爆量破千億
    住展雜誌2019年7月號,租售報導雜誌社

    二、外文參考文獻
    (一)專書
    Building Research Establishment., 2016, BREEAM International New Construction 2016, : Building Research Establishment.
    Chiu, Y. C., 1985, An Introduction to the History of Project Management: From the Earliest Times to A.D.1900, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij Eburon.
    Drury, H. B., 1918, Scientific management; a history and criticism, New York: Columbia university.
    Fayol, H., 1918, Administration Industrielle et Générale; Prévoyance, Organisation, Commandement, Coordination, Controle. , Paris: H. Dunod et E. Pinat, .
    Fulkerson, D. R., 1962 , Expected Critical Path Lengths in PERT Networks, Santa Monica, California :The rand coporation
    George, D., and Mallery, P., 2003, SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    International Organization for Standardization., 2017, ISO10006:2017: International Organization for Standardization.
    International Organization for Standardization., 2017, ISO21500:2012: International Organization for Standardization.
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change - Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, U.S.A.: Cambridge University.
    Kats, G., 2010, Greening Our Built World Costs, Benefits and Strategies, U.S.A.: Island Press.
    Mathiessen, L. F., and Morris, P., 2007, “Cost of Green Revisited Reexamining the Feasibility and Cost Impact of Sustainable Design in the Light of Increased Market Adoption: Davis Langdon
    Project Management Institute Standards Committee, 2008, Construction Extension to the PMBOK Guide, Third Edition, Newtiwb Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.
    Project Management Institute., 2016, Construction Extension to the PMBOK Guide, Newtiwb Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.
    Project Management Institute., 2017, Project Management Body of Knowledge, Newtiwb Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.
    U.S. Green Building Council., 2019, LEED v4.1 RESIDENTIAL BD+C MULTIFAMILY HOMES, : U.S. Green Building Council

    (二)期刊與研討會論文
    Arayici, Y and Aouad, G 2010, 'Building information modelling (BIM) for construction lifecycle management' , in: Construction and Building: Design, Materials, and Techniques, Nova Science Publishers, NY, USA, pp. 99-118.
    Gabay, H., Meir, I.A., Schwartz, M., and, Werzberger, E., 2014, “Cost-benefit analysis of green buildings: An Israeli office buildings case study", Energy and Buildings, 76(2014) : 558-564.
    Greg J. Hoffman; Alfred E. Thal Jr.; Timothy S. Webb; and Jeffery D. Weir “Estimating Performance Time for Construction Projects ”, Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(4), p. 193-199, 2007.
    Jarkas Abdulaziz, M., “Predicting Contract Duration for Building Construction: Is Bromilow’s Time-Cost Model a Panacea? ”, Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(1), p. 05015004, 2016.
    Jin, X., and Dewancker, B., 2017, “Analysis of the Ecological Ideas in Chinese Traditional Dwelling Houses and Its Inspiration to Green Buildings”, JAILCD, 1-6.
    Kelley Jr. J.E., 1961 , “Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling: Mathematical Basis Operations Research", INFORMS, 9(3) : 296-320.
    Lique, C., and Thomas, M., 2018, “Latitudinal shift of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation source regions under a warming climate”, Nature Climate Change, 8: 1013–1020.
    Mapp, C., Nobe, M C., and Dunbar, B., 2011, “The Cost of LEED —An Analysis of the Construction Costs of LEED and Non-LEED Banks”, JOSRE, l: 254-273.
    Mathiessen, L. F, Morris, P. , 2005, “Budgeting Green: A Comprehensive Methodolog”, AACE International Transactions: 49th AACE International Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, June 26- June 29.
    Seymour, T., and Hussein,S., 2014, “The History Of Project Management”, International Journal of Management & Information Systems – Third Fourth 2014, 18 : 233–240.
    Snyder, J. R., 1987, “Modern project management: how did we get here—where do we go? ”, Project Management Journal, 18(1), 28–29.
    Tahir, M. M., Haron, N. A., Alias, A. H., Harun, A. N., Muhammad, I. B., & Baba, D. L. (2018). Improving Cost and Time Control in Construction Using Building Information Model (BIM): A Review. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 26(1).
    Tamsitt,V., 2018, “Moving windows to the deep ocean, Nature Climate Change, 8: 941–942.
    Weaver, p., 2007 , “A Brief History of Project Management", apm, 19 :1-,4.
    Weaver, P. , 2007, “The Origins of Modern Project Management”, Paper presented at Fourth Annual PMI College of Scheduling Conference, Marriott Pinnacle Downtown , Vancouver, Canada, April 15 - April 18.
    Wren,D.A., Bedeian, A.G., and Breeze, J.D., 2002 , “The foundations of Henri Fayol's administrative theory", Management Decision, 40 (9) : 906 – 918.

    三、網頁參考文獻
    內政統計查詢網,http://statis.moi.gov.tw/micst/stmain.jsp?sys=100。
    財團法人台灣建築中心綠建築標章核可案件公告,
    http://gb.tabc.org.tw/modules/filelist/index.php/main/flist/15。
    許雅筑,2011,「綠建築高貴不貴 成本接近傳統」,中央社,8月13日的採訪報導,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/11/8/13/n3343066.htm。
    National Institute of Building Sciences,https://www.nationalbimstandard.org/about。
    Pearson, S. , TALLYFY ,https://tallyfy.com/pert/。
    Shuttleworth Consulting Services Ltd, Project Risk Manager,https://www.project-risk-manager.com/blog/pert-vs-cpm/。
    U.S. Green Building Council,http://leed.usgbc.org/leed.html。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    107257008
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107257008
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000762
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    700801.pdf4646KbAdobe PDF34View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback