Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131913
|
| Title: | 循環經濟下的企業動機與創新連結：以大愛感恩與興采實業為例
Relation Between Corporation Motivation and Innovation through Circular Economy - Case Studies of Daai and Singtex |
| Authors: | 羅崑桂
Lo, Kun-Kuei |
| Contributors: | 侯勝宗
Hou, Sheng-Tsung
羅崑桂
Lo, Kun-Kuei |
| Keywords: | 循環經濟
包容式創新
利害關係人
企業動機
Circular economy
inclusive innovation
stakeholder
corporation motivatiov |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-09-02 13:10:40 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 自工業革命以來，人類不斷進步的科技進步帶給我們生活上許多益處，卻沒有意識到在開採資源的同時，也是在挖空人類的未來。過去使用線性經濟「取用，製造，使用，丟棄」的生產模式雖然簡單且方便，卻容易在過程中製造過多的廢棄物，也讓產品在生命週期的末端直接變成無價值的垃圾，而因為資源循環議題的興起，帶動了循環經濟漸漸在產業上被討論，但其牽扯到產品的重新設計以及回收再造等環節，對於企業而言會是具有挑戰性的新型生產模式。
本研究旨在了解企業透過循環經濟的創新動機與利害關係人之間的影響關係，並聚焦在台灣本土的傳統紡織業者進行研究，所挑選的企業為台灣回收寶特瓶紗的起源：大愛感恩科技，以及咖啡紗的製造者：興采實業作為研究個案，並透過深度訪談了解企業是以何種動機投入循環經濟的生產模式之中，與其利害關係人又是何種互動關係，並探討其所重視之利害關係人的範圍，進而得知不同企業之創新手法。
本研究發現，企業的投入動機會影響整間企業對於創新發展的走向，所重視之利害關係人的範圍更是會深刻的影響其創新手法，進而讓產品產生不同面向的風貌。另外，循環經濟並不是一個既定具有標準流程順序且必須嚴謹遵行的生產模式，它可以說是一種企業在生產上所使用的工具，而不是被創造出來的附加價值，因此，各企業如何解釋、定義以及運用它，會讓它在各個企業中創造出不同的價值，進而影響不同層面的利害關係人。本研究透過企業動機與創新之間的關聯，加上利害關係人之觀點，提供未來想要投入循環經濟議題的企業在自身創新走向上之參考依據。
Since the Industrial Revolution, the continuous advancement of technologies has brought benefits to our lives. However, we didn’t aware of when mining the natural resources, it also hollowing out our future. In the past, the linear economy production model was simple and convenient, but it could produce too much waste in the process, and the product was directly turned into worthless garbage at the end of the life cycle. The rise of the issue of resource recycling has led to the gradual discussion of circular economy in the industry, but it involves product redesign and recycling, which will be a challenging new production model for corporations.
The research aims to find out the relation between corporation motivation and innovation through Circular Economy. Focusing on Taiwan’s textile industry and through in-depth interviews, this research examines the motivation of each company, how they react with their stakeholders and how they define the important stakeholders. In the end, the research will find out the innovation aspects that different companies use.
This research found the motivation of companies affects the direction of the company for innovation and development. The range of stakeholders that it pays attention to will affect its innovation methods, and make products have different aspects. In addition, circular economy is not a production model that has a standard process and must be strictly followed. It can be said to be a tool used by companies in production, rather than added value created. Therefore, how do companies explain, define and use it will make it to create different values, and then affect stakeholders at different levels. This research provides a reference for companies who want to invest in circular economy in the future on their own innovation trends through the association between corporate motivation and innovation, and the perspectives of stakeholders. |
| Reference: | 一、 英文部分
1. Achterberg, E, Hinfelaar, J and Bocken, N. M. (2016) Master Circular Business with the Value Hill. White Paper. Financing Circular Business. Retrieved from https://www.circle-economy.com/financing-circular-business
2. Afuah, A. (2004). Business Model: A Strategic Management Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Ahlstedt, L., & Jahnukainen, I. 1971. Yritysorganisaatio yhteistoiminnan ohjausjaerjestelmaenae.
4. Helsinki: Weilin + Goeoes.
5. Ali. I. & Son, H. H. (2007). Measuring inclusive growth Asian Development Review, 1 (24) , 11-31. Manila: ADB.
6. Ali, I. and Zhuang, J. (2007). Inclusive growth toward a prosperous Asia: Policy implications. ERD Working paper series, (97). Manila: ADB. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28210/wp097.pdf
7. Alkhafaji, A. F. J. D., & Journal, L. i. O. A. I. (2011). Strategic management: formulation, implementation, and control in a dynamic environment.
8. Andrea Genovese, A. A. A., Alejandro Figueroa, S.C. Lenny Koh. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications.
9. Arnstein, S. R. (2007). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 216-224.
10. Boulding, K. E. (1966). E., 1966, The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth Environment Quality Issues in a Growing Economy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Bowie, N. 1988. The moral obligations of multinational corporations. In S. Luper-Foy (Ed.), Problems of international justice: 97-113. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
12. Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Crosby, B. (2002). Managing policy reform: Concepts and tools for decision-makers in developing and transitioning countries: Kumarian Press.
13. Brenner, S. N. 1993. The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: Some propositions and a model. In J. Pasquero & D. Collins (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society: 205-210. San Diego.
14. Brenner, S. N. 1995. Stakeholder theory of the firm: Its consistency with current management techniques. In J. Ndsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking: 75-96. Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy.
15. Brenner, S. N., & Cochran, P. L. 1991. The stakeholder model of the firm: Implications for business and society research. In J. F. Mahon (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society: 449-467. Sundance, UT.
16. Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4: 497-505.
17. Carroll, A. B. 1989. Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati:South-Western.
18. Caroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, July-August: 30-48.
19. Carroll, A. B. 1993. Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (2nd ed.). Cincinnati:South-Western.
20. Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. 1989. Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations:A model and five empirical tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 411-430.
21. Clarkson, M. 1994. A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, University of Toronto.
22. Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92-117.
23. Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator`s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail: Harvard Business Review Press.
24. Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., & Roth E., A. (2004). Seeing what’s next: Using the theories of innovation to predict industry change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
25. Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013). Is K-12 Blended Learning Disruptive? An introduction to the theory of hybrids. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED566878.pdf
26. Christensen, C. M., Kaufman, S. P., & Shih, W. C. (2008, 01). Innovation killers: How financial tools destroy your capacity to do new things. Harvard Business Review, 86(1),98-105
27. Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptinve innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44-53.
28. Clarkson, M. E. J. A. o. m. r. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. 20(1), 92-117.
29. Cohen, K. J., & Rhenman, E. J. M. s. (1961). The role of management games in education and research. 7(2), 131-166.
30. Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. J. F. m. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. 5-14.
31. D.W. Pearce, R. K. T. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 212-218.
32. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. J. A. o. m. R. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. 20(1), 65-91.
33. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015). Delivering the circular Economy: A Toolkit for Policymakers V1.1. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes, United Kingdom.
34. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2012). Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 1: An Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. European Union: Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
35. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013). Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 2: Opportunities for the Consumer Goods Sector. European Union: Ellen MacArthur Foundation
36. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2014). Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 3: Accelerating the Scale-up across Global Supply Chains. European Union: Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
37. EU (2012). Manifesto for a Resource-Efficient Europe. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-989_en.htm
38. EU (2015). An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Retrieved from http://eur- lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015DC0614
39. EU (2015). The EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015DC0614
40. European Commission. (2014). Scoping study to identify potential circular economy actions, priority sectors, material flows and value chains. DG Environment, Luxembourg.
41. Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. 1988. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business: 75-84. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
42. Fassin, Y. (2008). THE STAKEHOLDER MODEL REFINED.
43. Fontrodona, J., & Sison, A. J. G. J. J. o. B. E. (2006). The nature of the firm, agency theory and shareholder theory: A critique from philosophical anthropology. 66(1), 33-42.
44. Foster, C., & Heeks, R. J. T. E. J. o. D. R. (2013). Conceptualising inclusive innovation: Modifying systems of innovation frameworks to understand diffusion of new technology to low-income consumers. 25(3), 333-355.
45. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
46. Freeman, R. E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 409-421.
47. Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. 1990. Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19: 337-359.
48. Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. 1987. Managing stakeholder relationships. In S. P. Sethi & C. M. Falbe (Eds.), Business and society: Dimensions of conflict and cooperation, 397-423. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
49. Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3): 93-94.
50. Frosch, R. A., & Gallopoulos, N. E. (1989). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(3), pp.144-152.
51. Government of the Netherlans. (2016). A Circular Economy in the Netherlands by 2050. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/environment/ministerial/whatsnew/2016-ENV-Ministerial-Netherlands-Circular-economy-in-the-Netherlands-by-2050.pdf
52. Gerard George, A. M. M. a. J. P. (2012). Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 661-683.
53. Gunter Pauli. (2010). The Blue Economy, Our Planet. The magazine of the United Nations Environmental Programme.
54. Heeks, C. F. a. R. (2013). Conceptualising Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low-Income Consumers. European Journal of Development Research.
55. Heeks, R., Foster, C., & Nugroho, Y. (2014). New models of inclusive innovation for development. In: Taylor & Francis.
56. Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2014). Strategic management: Theory & cases: An integrated approach: Cengage Learning.
57. Kim, S., Karlesky, M. J., Myers, C. G., & Schifeling, T. J. H. B. R. (2016). Why companies are becoming B corporations. 17.
58. Langtry, B. 1994. Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 431-443.
59. McDonough, W. and Braungart, M.(2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the way we make things. United States, North Point Press.
60. McVea, R. E. F. a. J. (2001). A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. SSRN Electronic Journal.
61. Menter, F. R., Kuntz, M., Langtry, R. J. T., heat, & transfer, m. (2003). Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. 4(1), 625-632.
62. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, Wood, J. D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. 22(4), 853-886.
63. Moore, G. J. B. E. A. E. R. (1999). Tinged shareholder theory: or what’s so special about stakeholders? , 8(2), 117-127.
64. Näsi, J. 1995. What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking: 19-32. Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy.
65. Preston, T. D. a. L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
66. Rauniyar, G. & Kanbur., R. (2010). Inclusive Development: Two papers on conceptualization, application, and the ADB perspective. January draft. Independent Evaluation Department, ADB.
67. Rhenman, E. 1964. Foeretagsdemokrati och foeretagsorganisation. Stockholm: Thule.
68. Richard Heeks, M. A., Robert Kintu & Nishant Shah. (2013). Inclusive Innovation: Definition, Conceptualisation and Future Research Priorities.
69. Savage, G. T., Nix, T. H., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. 1991. Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5: 61-75.
70. Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2003). The theory of economic development. In Joseph Alois Schumpeter (pp. 61-116): Springer.
71. Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process.
72. Starik, M. J. J. o. b. e. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. 14(3), 207-217.
73. Suntae Kim, M. J. K., Christopher G. Myers and Todd Schifeling. (2016). Why Companies Are Becoming B Corporations. Harvard Business Review.
74. Thompson, J. K., Wartick, S. L., & Smith, H. L. 1991. Integrating corporate social performance and stakeholder management: Implications for a research agenda in small business. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12: 207-230.
75. UNEP (2009). A Global Green New Deal for Climate, Energy, and Development.
76. UNEP (2012). Global Environment Outlook 5.
77. Weimer, D. L. and A. R. Vining, 2010, Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice.Prentice Hall.
78. Weimer, David L., 1998, “Policy Analysis and Evidence: A Craft Perspective.” Policy Studies Journal, 26(1): 114-128.
79. Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R., Jr., & Freeman, R. E. 1994. A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 475-497.
80. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
二、 中文部分
1. 王建彬, 林. (2015). 循環經濟創新商業模式探詢. 綠色生產力通訊, 18-21.
2. 但斌, & 劉飛. (2000). 綠色供應鏈及其體系結構研究.
3. 吳盛忠. (2015). 廢棄物管理未來展望 從資源循環至循環經濟. 綠色生產力通訊, 2-7.
4. 李泓毅. (2018). 論B型企業認證與中小企業之關聯. (碩士), 國立政治大學, 台北市.
5. 李芳齡、李田樹譯(2003). 創新者的解答. 台北：天下雜誌
6. 李芳齡譯(2008). 創新者的修練. 台北：天下雜誌
7. 李芳齡譯(2010). 創新者的成長指南. 台北：天下雜誌
8. 李芳齡譯(2016). 創新者的應變. 台北：天下雜誌
9. 李盈嬌. (2017). 歐盟循環經濟進程及啟示. 經濟前瞻, 116-120.
10. 沈明鑑. (2004). 利害關係人對策略、治理機制的影響與績效之關聯性研究. 輔仁管理評論, 11.
11. 林宗昱. (2019). 推動塑膠循環之環境經濟效益初探. 經濟前瞻(186), 119-123.
12. 林宗昱, & 經濟前瞻, 程. (2019). 推動塑膠循環之環境經濟效益初探. (186), 119-123.
13. 林信亨. (2018). 化學品銷售綠色供應鏈管理與經營策略-以E公司為例. (碩士), 國立台南大學,
14. 林淑君. (2019). 淺談包容性成長.
15. 邱碧雲. (2019). 影響資源回收率的動態因素與循環經濟創新商業模式之探討. (碩士), 中華大學,
16. 郎若帆(2017).由廢棄物處理到再利用的德國循環經濟。臺灣經濟研究月刊，40(6)，23-29。
17. 洪佩妤. (2018). 應用循環經濟於社區規畫評估策略之研究. (碩士), 國立台北科技大學,
18. 徐如賓. 包容性成長的意義與政治啟示.
19. 翁敬翔. (2019). 由歐盟聯盟循環經濟法治發展檢討我國廢棄物體管理法制之修正. (碩士), 國立政治大學,
20. 張添晉, 羅. (2015). 台灣循環經濟之策略. 綠色生產力通訊, 8-13.
21. 許祥瑞. 轉動循環經濟的四個關鍵要素. 荒野快報, 288, 10-13.
22. 郭瑞坤, 賴正能, & 共行政學報, 廖. J. 公. (2006). 在地利害關係人對澎湖設置觀光賭場政策影響觀點之研究. 20, 33-68.
23. 陳子穎. (2012). APEC「藍色經濟」議題初探. 4-5.
24. 陳建良、林佑龍. (2012). 台灣促進包容性成長的做法.
25. 陳敦源, 劉宜君, 蕭乃沂, & 林昭吟. (2011). 政策利害關係人指認的理論與實務. In: 國家與社會.
26. 陳德敏. (2004). 循環經濟的核心内涵是資源循環利用. 中國人口資源與環境, 2(5).
27. 湯鵬主. (2013). 科技型小微企業包容性創新研究. 科技型小微企業創新發展論壇, 29-32.
28. 黃育徵. (2017). 循環經濟. 台北市: 天下雜誌.
29. 黃玫曄. (2017). 共享經濟時代下利害關係人管理研究-以Uber通訊叫車服務為例. (碩士), 國立政治大學, 台北市.
30. 楊雅智. (2015). 淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況. 證券暨期貨月刊, 33, 5-15.
31. 鄒倫, 揚. (2015). 資源消耗邁向永續發展－我國的循環經濟轉型之路. 綠色生產力通訊, 14-17.
32. 廖林詮. (2019). 開啟循環經濟之鑰-延長生產者責任. 經濟前瞻, 117-122.
33. 廖婷雩.(2017). 國際企業因應循環經濟之模式與案例研析. 國立台北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所碩士班,台北市.
34. 廖婉鈞, 林月雲, & 管理學報, 虞. J. (2009). 知覺組織利害關係人重要程度與組織績效之關係: 企業責任作為之中介效果. 26(2), 213-232.
35. 廖婉鈞、林月雲、虞邦祥. (2009). 知覺組織利害關係人重要程度與組織績效之關係：企業責任作為之中介效果. 管理學報, 26, 213-232.
36. 褚大建. (1998). 可持續發展呼換循環經濟. 科技導報, 16(9809), 39-42.
37. 趙瑋. (2005). 循環經濟模式下的供應鏈管理. 科研管理, 26, 50-54.
38. 劉麗惠. (2014). 從穿衣、飲食到美容 小資金創造綠色生活大商機. Trade Magazine, 14-19.
39. 蕭元哲. (2009). 利害關係人對互動管理的了解與應用. 文官制度季刊, 145-158.
40. 謝思曼. (2017). 從包容性成長觀點探討台灣農場運用智能障礙人力個案研究. (碩士), 國立中興大學
三、 網路資源
1. DIGITIMES企劃. (2018). 廢棄PCB是寶藏 回收黃金價值高. Retrieved from https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?Cnlid=13&id=0000544520_B7N6UTNP1X59CM1I43PM0
2. 大愛感恩科技2018年CSR報告書
3. 大愛感恩科技新聞網
4. 王尚博, 陳. (2018). 循環經濟:零廢棄的循環經濟時代. Retrieved from https://scitechvista.nat.gov.tw/c/sgGv.htm
5. 行政院環境保護署。Retrieved from
https://www.epa.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=34805&CtUnit=2609&BaseDSD=7&mp=ep a
6. 行政院主計總處。 Retrieved from https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
7. 張子清.(2020). 「快時尚」加劇暖化 環保穿衣愛護地球 Retrieved from https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2048131
8. 理查. (2018). 目標 2050 年：解讀荷蘭政府眼中的循環經濟. Retrieved from https://www.oranjeexpress.com/2018/07/06/%E7%9B%AE%E6%A8%99-2050-%E5%B9%B4%EF%BC%9A%E8%A7%A3%E8%AE%80%E8%8D%B7%E8%98%AD%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E7%9C%BC%E4%B8%AD%E7%9A%84%E5%BE%AA%E7%92%B0%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F/
9. 理查. (2018/10/22). 目標 2050 年：荷蘭循環經濟政策工具解析. Retrieved from https://www.oranjeexpress.com/2018/10/22/%E7%9B%AE%E6%A8%99-2050-%E5%B9%B4%EF%BC%9A%E8%8D%B7%E8%98%AD%E5%BE%AA%E7%92%B0%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E5%B7%A5%E5%85%B7%E8%A7%A3%E6%9E%90/
10. 詹子嫻. (2017). 你聽過循環經濟嗎？看戴爾如何讓電子垃圾變有價. Retrieved from https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/43186/dell-closed-loop-recycling
11. 陳炳宏. (2018). 不僅主機板金屬回收 戴爾還回收海洋塑膠垃圾製包材. Retrieved from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2366822
12. 彭子豪. (2018). Dell TDC 台灣ICT產業茁壯助力. Retrieved from https://money.udn.com/money/story/5640/3386850
13. 循環台灣基金會 Retrieved from https://www.circular-taiwan.org/
14. 循環經濟與臺灣廢棄物法規之現況探討
15. 楊又肇. (2018). Dell攜手Nikki Reed將回收舊電腦煉金變珠寶. Retrieved from https://mashdigi.com/dell%E6%94%9C%E6%89%8Bnikki-reed%E5%B0%87%E5%9B%9E%E6%94%B6%E8%88%8A%E9%9B%BB%E8%85%A6%E7%85%89%E9%87%91%E8%AE%8A%E7%8F%A0%E5%AF%B6/
16. 楊舜堯.(2020). 循環經濟與臺灣廢棄物法規之現況探討. Retrieved from https://agtech.coa.gov.tw/Topic/topic_more?id=91de46ed608d4232aee40d3c12d08d2c
17. 綠色頭腦 Retrieved from https://hetgroenebrein.nl/
18. 興采實業 2018年年報 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
106364118 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106364118 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202001652 |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 411801.pdf | | 3239Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 46 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
