政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/133452
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 96163/126772 (76%)
Visitors : 32209433      Online Users : 302
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133452


    Title: 群眾路線 2.0: 數位治理與中國政權的正當性
    Mass Line 2.0: How China’s Mass Line Governance in Cyberspace Enhances Regime Legitimacy
    Authors: 桂凱瑞
    Griffin, Kyle Martin
    Contributors: 冷則剛
    Leng, Tse-Kang
    桂凱瑞
    Kyle Martin Griffin
    Keywords: 中國
    威權彈性
    政府回應
    群眾路線
    電子政務
    數位政治
    在線國家
    社會關係
    政權合法性
    政治參與
    系統理論
    China
    authoritarian resilience
    responsiveness
    Mass Line
    e-governance
    digital politics
    online state-society relations
    e-government
    legitimacy
    political participation
    systems theory
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2021-01-04 11:29:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 群眾路線是中國的治理思想,其特點是政治精英和群眾之間的高度直接接觸。 群眾向精英們提出他們的要求,而精英們則有義務將之內部化並藉由國家行動滿足這些要求。 群眾路線治理力圖加強這些互動,從而建立一種響應公眾需求的制度。 現有的群眾路線相關研究顯示,該意識形態與中國(現實世界)的國內政治社會學具有長遠的關聯。 文獻中為被討論的是該意識形態是否影響線上的國家與社會關係。 因此,值得探究的是,網絡空間中是否存在「群眾路線」? 鑑於一般公民大部分閒暇時間都在使用網路,網絡空間可謂中國社會生活的主要場域,更凸顯了前述問題的重要性。 本文通過通用系統理論構建了「群眾路線」概念,以解釋中國的電子政務和線上的國家與社會關係。 本研究主張現今中國社會存在著「數位」群眾路線,它透過中國政府的電子政務被奉行與實現,亦可於政府經營的線上機構中觀察到此數位群眾路線的現行情況。本文審視了電子政務案例,並針對各種案例數據進行了定性檢驗,包括政策文件,個人陳述,在線機構的設計和功能,網民行為以及數值調查和索引。 本文支持以下觀點:(1)政權設計其在線機構,以提供管道促進精英與群眾的直接互動; (2)這些互動可以使社會需求從民眾端流向政府端,從而激發響應性的國家行動; (3)社會需求是由大眾政治參與形成的,政府的回應是經由溝通後的決議而產生的; (4)政權提供的溝通管道繞過次級當局,直接面對民眾,以破壞地方官員的阻撓行為; (5)機構透過宣傳「政府賦監督權於民」的消息以動員網民監督機構; (6)「群眾參與,政府回應」的模式增強了大眾對政治效能的意識,進而支持了政權的合法性; (7)此溝通制度的設計在於鼓勵網民使用國家偏愛的溝通管道參與政治; (8)「道德權威」提供了社會契約,界定了數位群眾路線中政治精英與公眾的互動模式。 該研究具有重要的理論意義,因為與現有文獻不同,現有的文獻定調政權回應的動機為防禦性的,是群眾需求趨動被動產生的反應。本論文表明,在網絡空間中,類似的社會過程是由政權主動推行且具目標導向的國家行動。
    The Mass Line is a Chinese governance ideology. It is characterized by a high rate of direct engagement between political elites and the masses. The masses engage elites with their demands, while elites are obligated to internalize and meet those demands through state action. Mass Line governance seeks to strengthen these interactions, thereby cultivating a regime responsive to the public’s needs. Existing research into the Mass Line shows the ideology’s enduring relevance to China’s (real-world) domestic political sociology. Yet to be examined is whether the ideology affects online state-society relations. Thus, it is worthwhile to ask, does the Mass Line exist in cyberspace? This is especially important given that the average citizen spends most of their discretionary time online making cyberspace a major sphere of Chinese social life. This paper frame’s the Mass Line concept through general systems theory to explain Chinese e-governance and online state-society relations. It argues that there exists a digital Mass Line. The digital Mass Line is pursued and realized through Chinese e-governance and can be observed functioning through state-operated online institutions. This paper examines the e-government case. The argument is qualitatively tested against a diversity of case data, including policy documents, personal statements, the design and function of online institutions, netizen behavior, and numerical surveys and indexes. This paper supports the view that: (1) the regime designs its online institutions to enable and foster elite-mass direct engagement; (2) that engagement allows social demands to flow from society to state, stimulating responsive state action; (3) demands are generated through mass political participation and responsiveness through communicated resolutions; (4) channels for direct engagement bypasses subordinate authorities undermining obstructive behavior from local officials; (5) the institutions mobilize netizen watchdogs by disseminating oversight enabling information; (6) the participation-responsiveness dynamic supports regime legitimacy by enhancing the public’s sense of political efficacy; (7) institutional design features mobilize netizens to participate through state-preferred communication channels; and (8) “moral authority” provides the social contract that circumscribes online Mass Line modes of elite-mass interactions. The research is theoretically significant because, unlike in the existing literature that characterizes the regime’s responsiveness as defensively motivated and a reaction to the masses’ demands, this paper shows that, in cyberspace, analogous social processes result from a proactive regime and goal-oriented state action.
    Reference: Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (2015). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton university press.

    Åström, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., & Pirannejad, A. (2012). “Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies: Domestic and international factors”, Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 142–150.

    Balch, G. I. (1974). “Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept ‘Sense of Political Efficacy’”, Political Methodology, 1(2), 1–43.

    Bandurski, D. (2020, January 6) Mass Line Internet Control. China Media Project. Retrieved February 10, 2020, from http://chinamediaproject.org

    Boix, C., & Svolik, M. W. (2013). “The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships”, The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 300–316.

    Bondes, M., & Schucher, G. (2014). “Derailed emotions: The transformation of claims and targets during the Wenzhou online incident”, Information, Communication & Society, 17(1), 45–65.

    Cai, Y. (2008). “Power structure and regime resilience: contentious politics in China”, British Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 411-432.

    Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Oxford, England: Row, Peterson, and Co..

    Chen, Y. N., Chen, H. M., Huang, W., & Ching, R. K. (2006). “E-government strategies in developed and developing countries: An implementation framework and case study”, Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 14(1), 23-46.

    Chen, J., Pan, J., & Xu, Y. (2016). “Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China”, American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 383-400.

    Chen, J., & Xu, Y. (2017). “Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Allow Citizens to Voice Opinions Publicly?”, The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 792–803.

    China and the Internet: A Giant Cage – Special Report. (2013, April 6). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com

    CIIC - China internet Information Center. (2012, November 1). Wang Chen tan wenhua qiangguo jianshe: Cheng zhengfu guanyuan yao zhongshi weib zuoyong (Wang Chen on strengthening cultural construction, calling government officials to value the role of weibo). China Internet Information Center. Retrieved from http://www.china.com.cn/policy/txt/2011-11/01/content_23783947.html

    CIW – China Internet Watch. (2019, April 9). China internet users snapshot 2019. China Internet Watch. Retrieved from https://www.chinainternetwatch.com.

    CIW – China Internet Watch. (2020, February 27) Weibo MAU grew to 516M in Dec 2019; revenues to decrease by 15% in Q1 2020 . China Internet Watch. Retrieved from https://www.chinainternetwatch.com.

    Collier, D. (2011). “Understanding Process Tracing”, PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(04), 823–830.
    Congressional Management Foundation. (2011). Communicating with congress: Perceptions of citizen advocacy on Capitol Hill. Washington, DC: Author.

    Cook, S. (2019, June 24). China’s Long, Hot Summer of Censorship. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/

    Dawes, S. S. (2008). “The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance”. Public Administration Review, 68, S86–S102.

    Denyer, S. (2013, August 2) In China, Communist Party takes unprecedented step: It is listening. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/

    Distelhorst, G., & Fu, D. (2019). “Performing Authoritarian Citizenship: Public Transcripts in China”, Perspectives on Politics, 17(1), 106–121.

    Distelhorst, G., & Hou, Y. (2014). “Ingroup Bias in Official Behavior: A National Field Experiment in China”. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 9(2), 203–230.

    Distelhorst, G., & Hou, Y. (2017). “Constituency Service under Nondemocratic Rule: Evidence from China”, The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 1024–1040.

    Eltantawy, N., & Wiest, J. B. (2011). “The Arab spring| Social media in the Egyptian revolution: reconsidering resource mobilization theory”, International journal of communication, 5, 18.

    Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    EPL - Environmental Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China. (2014). Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People Republic of China.

    Fedorenko, I., & Sun, Y. (2016). “Microblogging-Based Civic Participation on Environment in China: A Case Study of the PM 2.5 Campaign”, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2077–2105.

    Feldstein, S. (2019). “The Road to Digital Unfreedom: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Repression”, Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 40-52.

    Fewsmith, J., & Nathan, A. J. (2019). “Authoritarian Resilience Revisited: Joseph Fewsmith with Response from Andrew J. Nathan”, Journal of Contemporary China, 28(116), 167-179.

    Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2015). “Accountability and Transparency: A Nuanced Response to Etzioni”, Public Administration Review, 75(1), 11–12.

    GOSC - General Office of the State Council. (2002). Decree No. 17. August 5. Retrieved from http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/zhuanti/283233.html

    Guan, P. (2013). “Analysis on Network Opinion Leaders in Public Emergencies——A Case Study of YANG Dacai Event”, Journal of Intelligence, 32(5), 20–24.

    Gulati, G. J., Jeff, Yates, D. J., & Williams, C. B. (2012). “Understanding the Impact of Political Structure, Governance and Public Policy on E-Government”, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2541–2550.

    Gilley, B. (2003). “China's Changing of the Guard: The Limits of Authoritarian Resilience”, Journal of Democracy, 14(1), 18-26.

    Kay, S., Zhao, B., & Sui, D. (2015). “Can Social Media Clear the Air? A Case Study of the Air Pollution Problem in Chinese Cities”, The Professional Geographer, 67(3), 351–363.

    Han, R. (2018). Contesting Cyberspace in China: Online expression and authoritarian resilience. Columbia University Press.

    Hartford, K. (2005). “Dear Mayor: Online Communications with Local Governments in Hangzhou and Nanjing”, China Information, 19(2), 217–260.

    He, H., & Zhang, J. (2002). “Wangluo Shidai de Zhengfu Guanli Biange [Government innovation in the network age]”, China Soft Science, 136, 71-73.

    Huang, H., Boranbay-Akan, S., & Huang, L. (2019). Media, Protest Diffusion, and Authoritarian Resilience. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(1), 23–42.

    Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.

    IOSC - The Information Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2010) White paper on the Internet in China. Retrieved from https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-06/08/content_9950198.html

    Jiang, M., & Xu, H. (2009). “Exploring online structures on Chinese government portals: Citizen political participation and government legitimation”, Social Science Computer Review, 27(2), 174-195.

    Jun, K.-N., Wang, F., & Wang, D. (2014). “E-Government Use and Perceived Government Transparency and Service Capacity: Evidence from a Chinese Local Government”, Public Performance & Management Review, 38(1), 125–151.

    Kay, S., Zhao, B., & Sui, D. (2015). “Can Social Media Clear the Air? A Case Study of the Air Pollution Problem in Chinese Cities”, The Professional Geographer, 67(3), 351–363.

    King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). “How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression”, American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326-343.

    King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2017). “How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument”, American Political Science Review, 111(3), 484-501.

    Koh, C. E., Ryan, S., & Prybutok, V. R. (2005). “Creating value through managing knowledge in an e-government to constituency (G2C) environment”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 32–41.

    Li, C. (2012). “The end of the CCP's resilient authoritarianism? A tripartite assessment of shifting power in China”, The China Quarterly, 211, 595-623.

    Li, K. (2015). Report on the Work of the Government (2015) [Transcript]. Retrieved from http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/publications/2015/03/05/content_281475066179954.htm

    Lipset, S. (1959). “Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy”, American Political Science Review, 53, 69-105.

    Lorentzen, P. L. (2013). “Regularizing Rioting: Permitting Public Protest in an Authoritarian Regime”, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8(2), 127–158.

    Lorentzen, P. (2014). “China's strategic censorship”, American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 402-414.

    Lorentzen, P. (2017). “Designing Contentious Politics in Post-1989 China”, Modern China, 43(5), 459–493.

    Lorentzen, P., Fravel, M. T., & Paine, J. (2017). “Qualitative investigation of theoretical models: The value of process tracing”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 29(3), 467–491.

    Ma, L. (2013). “The Diffusion of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese municipal police bureaus”, Public Management Review, 15(2), 288–309.

    Ma, L. (2014). “Diffusion and Assimilation of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese cities”, Public Management Review, 16(2), 274–295.

    MacKinnon, R. (2009). “China’s Censorship 2.0: How companies censor bloggers”, First Monday, 14(2).

    Mao, Zedong. 1967. “Some Questions Concerning Methods of Leadership”, Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. 3. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.

    Maus, G. (2015). Eye in the Skynet: How Regimes Can Quell Social Movements Before they Begin. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/

    Meng, T., Pan, J., & Yang, P. (2017). “Conditional receptivity to citizen participation: Evidence from a survey experiment in China”, Comparative Political Studies, 50(4), 399-433.

    MEP – Ministry of Environmental Protection, Information Center of the. (2008-2013). Provincial EPB websites evaluation 2007–2012.

    Minzner, C. F. (2006). “Xinfang: An alternative to formal chinese legal institutions”, Stanford Journal of International Law, 42(1), 103-180.

    Minzner, C. F. (2009). “Riots and cover-ups: counterproductive control of local agents in China”, U. Pa. J. Int'l L., 31, 53.

    Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.

    Nathan, A. J. (2003). “China's Changing of the Guard: Authoritarian Resilience”, Journal of Democracy, 14(1), 6-17.
    North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Noesselt, N. (2014). “Microblogs and the Adaptation of the Chinese Party‐State's Governance Strategy”, Governance, 27(3), 449-468.

    Parent, M., Vandebeek, C. A., & Gemino, A. C. (2005). “Building Citizen Trust Through E-government”, Government Information Quarterly, 22(4), 720–736.

    Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.

    O’Brien, K. J. & Li, L. (2006). Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge University Press.

    OECD - Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (Ed.). (2005). Governance in China. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Pan, J. (2019). “How Chinese Officials Use the Internet to Construct Their Public Image”, Political Science Research and Methods, 7(2), 197–213.

    Perry, E. J., & Selden, M. (Eds.). (2010). Chinese society: Change, conflict and resistance (3rd ed). London ; New York: Routledge.

    Qiang, X. (2019). “The Road to Digital Unfreedom: President Xi's Surveillance State”, Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 53-67.

    Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y. (2017). “Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 117–140.

    Roberts, M. E. (2018). Censored: distraction and diversion inside China's Great Firewall. Princeton University Press.

    Ruan, L., Knockel, J., & Crete-Nishihata, M. (2020, March 3). Censored Contagion: How Information on the Coronavirus is Managed on Chinese Social Media. The Citizen Lab. Retrieved from https://citizenlab.ca

    Schlæger, J., & Jiang, M. (2014). “Official microblogging and social management by local governments in China”, China Information, 28(2), 189–213.

    Schneider, F. (2018). China's Digital Nationalism. Oxford University Press.

    Schneider, S. M., & Foot, K. (2002). “Online structure for political action: Exploring presidential campaign web sites from the 2000 American election”, The Public, 9, 1-17.

    Seifert, J. W., & Chung, J. (2009). “Using E-Government to Reinforce Government—Citizen Relationships: Comparing Government Reform in the United States and China”, Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 3–23.

    Segal, A. (2015). When China Rules the Web: Technology in Service of the State. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://foreignaffairs.com/

    Shahbaz, A., & Funk A. (2020) Freedom of the Net 2019: The Crisis of Social Media. Freedom House. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/

    Shi, W., Wang, H., & He, S. (2013). Sentiment analysis of Chinese microblogging based on sentiment ontology: A case study of ‘7.23 Wenzhou Train Collision.’ Connection Science, 25(4), 161–178.

    Shirk, S. L. (2007). “Changing Media, Changing Foreign Policy in China”, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 8(1), 43–70.

    Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). “Synthesizing e-government stage models – a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 443–458.

    Stier, S. (2015). “Political determinants of e-government performance revisited: Comparing democracies and autocracies”, Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 270-278.

    Su, Z., & Meng, T. (2016). “Selective responsiveness: Online public demands and government responsiveness in authoritarian China”, Social Science Research, 59, 52–67.

    Tang, W. (2016). Populist authoritarianism: Chinese political culture and regime sustainability. Oxford University Press.

    Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). “The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government”, Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369.

    Tong, Y., & Lei, S. (2010). “Large-scale mass incidents and government responses in China”, International Journal of China Studies, 1(2), 487-508.

    United Nations (UN). (2008-2018). United E-Government Survey. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government.

    Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Vance, A., Lowry, P. B., & Eggett, D. L. (2015). “Increasing accountability through the user interface design artifacts: A new approach to addressing the problem of access-policy violations”, Mis Quarterly, 39(2), 345-366.

    Wang, W., & Liu, W. (2015). “Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reports on China’s Bullet-Train Crash”, Studies in Literature and Language, 10(2), 1–8.

    Wang, L., & Qiu, H. (2002, October 25). Shenhua Xingzheng Guanli Gaige Renzhong Daoyuan [A long way to deepen administrative reform in China]. Xinhua News Agency. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://ahrst.ah.gov.cn/rsbzxx20021025jggg1.html

    Wang, Z. (2013). “Instruction in Chinese academic libraries”, In Academic Libraries in the US and China (pp. 51-85). Chandos Publishing.

    Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1). Univ of California Press.

    Wertime, D. (2013, August 7). Why China Has Suddenly Embraced Online Polling: It's about political capital, not democracy. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/

    World Bank. (2006). Advancing E-Government [in China]. World Bank.

    Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). “Social Media and the Arab Spring: Politics Comes First”, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137.

    Wright, N. (2018). How Artificial Intelligence Will Reshape the Global Order. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/

    Weiss, J. C. (2015). “Popular Protest, Nationalism, and Domestic-International Linkages in Chinese Politics”, In R. A. Scott & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 1–15).

    Wen, J. B. (2010), 2010 Annual Government Performance Report to the National People’s Congress. Xinhua News Agency.

    Wu, Y. (2012). “Micro-blogging as a Rapid Response News Service in Crisis Reporting: The 2011 Wenzhou Train Crash”, JOMEC Journal, 0(1).

    Wu, Y., & Bauer, J. M. (2010). “E-government in China: Deployment and driving forces of provincial government portals”, Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(3), 290–310.

    Xi, K. (2012). Xi Jinping's report at 19th CPC National Congress [Transcript]. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-20338586

    Yan, X. (2016). “Patrolling Harmony: Pre-emptive authoritarianism and the preservation of stability in W County”, Journal of Contemporary China, 25(99), 406–421.

    Yang, G. (2009). The power of the Internet in China: Citizen activism online. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Yang, P., & Meng, T. (2014). “Exploring the consensus and difference of political values of youth public servants in China [qingnian gongwuyuan jiazhiguan de gongshi he chayi yanjiu]”, China Youth Study [Zhongguo Qingnian Yanjiu], 6, 66-70.

    Zeng, J. (2015). The Chinese Communist Party's capacity to rule: ideology, legitimacy, and party cohesion. Springer.

    Zeng, J. (2016). “China's date with big data: will it strengthen or threaten authoritarian rule?”, International Affairs, 92(6), 1443-1462.

    Zenz, A. (2015). Reeducation Returns to China: Will the Repression in Xinjiang Influence Beijing’s Social Credit System?. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/

    Zhang, Q., & Chan, J. L. (2013). “New development: Fiscal transparency in China—government policy and the role of social media”, Public Money & Management, 33(1), 71–75.

    Zhang, L., Mol, A. P., & He, G. (2016). “Transparency and information disclosure in China’s environmental governance”, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 17–24.

    Zheng, S., Kahn, M. E., Sun, W., & Luo, D. (2014). “Incentives for China’s urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: The role of the central government and public environmentalism”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 47, 61–71.

    Zhou, X. (2004). “E-government in China: A content analysis of national and provincial web sites”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(4).

    Zhu, Huaxin, Xuegang Dan, and Jiangchun Hu 2011. “2011 nian Zhongguo hulianwang yuqing fenxi baogao” [“2011 Report on Public Opinion on the Chinese Internet”]. Retrieved from http://yuqing.people.com.cn/GB/16698341.html

    Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
    106926023
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106926023
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001813
    Appears in Collections:[International Doctoral /Master’s Program in Asia Pacific Studies ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    602301.pdf2181KbAdobe PDF31View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback