English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46269861      Online Users : 1464
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/133576


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133576


    Title: 刑法第190條之1的釋義思考
    Authors: 李聖傑
    Lee, Sheng-chieh
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 刑法第 190 條之 1;環境刑法;環境法益;污染結果;危險結果
    Article 190-1 of the Criminal Code;Environmental Criminal Law;Legal Interest of the Environment;Result of Pollution;Result of Danger
    Date: 2019-07
    Issue Date: 2021-01-18 15:28:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 刑法第 190 條之 1 修法後最核心的問題在於，當立法刑事政策以舊法時期實務對於該條適用之具體危險判斷採嚴格解釋，使得相關環境污染行為不易以刑罰制裁，而刪除「致生公共危險」的成罪要件，不再呈現其「具體危險犯」的犯罪性質時，在規範的釋義操作中，相關構成要件要素應該如何涵攝在具體案例的適用，才不會出現刑罰過度前置現象。本文認為刑法笫 190 條之 1 有其特殊的修法背景與修法所要克服之實務適用困境，但為了避免刑罰過度前置的發動，必須在規範適用時以污染狀態強調為抽象危險犯的危險結果，並不需要拘泥在固有意義之實害結果的概念框架。
    The core issue after the amendment of Article 190-1 under the Criminal Code is how to avoid the penalty prerequisite problem when applying rules in actual cases while the said offense is no longer a concrete offense as the “endangering public safety” element is deleted according to the legislative criminal policy, which states that judicial practice under the old laws took a strict interpretation approach that prevented the polluting behavior from criminal charges.This article opines that Article 190-1 has its own unique law-amending background and obstacles for judicial practice’s application, however, to avoid the penalty prerequisite problem, it`s necessary to emphasize the pollution status as the offender of abstract danger’s result of danger without being restricted by the conceptual framework of actual damages.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, Vol.290, pp.69-82
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    27.pdf9001KbAdobe PDF2134View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback