English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46300986      Online Users : 1912
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/133888
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133888


    Title: 利用ERP探討社交焦慮者解釋性偏誤的認知歷程
    Exploring Social Anxiety on Interpretation Bias using ERP
    Authors: 黃孟涵
    Huang, Meng-Han
    Contributors: 許文耀
    Hsu, Wen-Yau
    黃孟涵
    Huang, Meng-Han
    Keywords: 社交焦慮
    解釋性偏誤
    句詞關聯作業
    事件關聯電位
    N400
    P600
    Social anxiety
    Interpretation bias
    Sentence Word Association Paradigm
    Event-Related potential
    N400
    P600
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-02-01 14:09:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究希望以事件關聯電位的資料蒐集方式,透過句詞關聯作業的實驗派典,了解社交焦慮者在模糊情境下,面對不同價性解釋詞彙的認知歷程及解釋偏誤型態,並探討事件關聯電位的腦波資料與句詞關聯作業的行為資料之關聯性。研究選取政治大學的學生,利用李氏社交焦慮量表(LSAS)作為社交焦慮傾向的篩選工具,前25%為高社交焦慮組,共77人;後25%為低社交焦慮組,共39人,施以社交焦慮與情緒相關量表、句詞關聯作業、以及解釋性偏誤相關問卷,在進行句詞關聯作業的同時,利用事件關聯電位測量受試者腦波狀況,其中,利用N400、P600作為ERP的違反預期性指標。事件關聯電位資料結果顯示,相較於低社交焦慮組,高社交焦慮組在非威脅詞彙出現時有顯著的N400效果,顯示對非威脅詞彙的非預期性;兩組別在威脅詞彙並無出現顯著差異性,於組內比較中也未有其他顯著發現,因此ERP的結果僅部分符合研究預期,支持高社交焦慮組有低程度的非威脅解釋偏誤。本研究亦關注ERP及行為指標間的關聯性,確認行為資料符合過去的研究結果後,將兩種資料型態進行相關分析,然兩者並無任何顯著相關性,支持大腦機制及行為機制可能屬於不同認知歷程,本文會提供更加詳細的討論。綜合來說,本研究支持缺乏非威脅解釋偏誤是高社交焦慮傾向者的重要認知特性之一,這可能發生於認知歷程的早期階段。
    The purpose of the study is to understand the social anxious individual’s cognitive processes and interpretative bias types when facing different valence interpretation words in ambitious situations. This study uses sentence word association paradigm(SWAP) combining with event-related potential(ERP) as study method. The relatedness of ERP data and the behavioral data will also be explored. This study targets on the students in National Chengchi University, including high social anxious and low social anxious participants. They will all complete seven questionnaires(three social anxious related scales, two emotional related scales, and two interpretation bias related scales)and do the SWAP task with ERP simultaneously. N4, P6 can serve as the ERP index of violations of expectancy. ERP results revealed that compared to low social anxious group, high social anxious individuals were characterized by an increased N400 to benign words, showing the low expectation of benign words. No significant results were found in threat words, as well as in between-group comparison. Hence, the ERP results only meet the research expectation partly, suggesting the high social anxious group has the low level of benign interpretation bias. Our research also concerns the correlation between ERP and behavioral data. Confirming the behavioral data indeed corresponded with pass research results, we made the correlation analysis. No significant result has shown. This outcome may indicate the different cognition mechanism between brain and behavior. In summary, our research suggests that the lack of benign interpretation bias may be the important cognitive characteristic of high social anxious individuals. And it’s more likely to occur in the early stage of cognitive processes.
    Reference: Amin, N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. E. (1998). Negative interpretation bias in social phobia. Behaviour research and therapy, 36(10), 945-957.
    Amir, N., Prouvost, C., & Kuckertz, J. M. (2012). Lack of a benign interpretation bias in social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 41(2), 119-129.
    Association, A. P. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®): American Psychiatric Pub.
    Beard, C., & Amir, N. (2009). Interpretation in social anxiety: When meaning precedes ambiguity. Cognitive therapy and research, 33(4), 406-415.
    Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety:
    Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour research and therapy, 35(1), 49-58.
    Brouwer, H., & Crocker, M. W. (2017). On the proper treatment of the N400 and
    P600 in language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1327.
    Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive approach. Basic, New York.
    Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., & Glickman, S. (2005). Attentional bias in anxiety: A
    behavioral and ERP study. Brain and cognition, 59(1), 11-22.
    Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, 78(2), 490-498.
    Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in behaviour research and therapy, 5(1), 51-62.
    Coulson, S. (1998). ERPs and domain specificity: Beating a straw horse. Language
    and cognitive processes, 13(6), 653-672.
    Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Öst, L.-G., Breitholtz, E., Koehler, K. A., Westling, B. E., . . . Gelder, M. (1997). Misinterpretation of body sensations in panic disorder. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 65(2), 203.
    Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment, 41(68), 00022-00023.
    Constans, J. I., Penn, D. L., Ihen, G. H., & Hope, D. A. (1999). Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. Behaviour research and therapy, 37(7), 643-651.
    Coulson, S. (1998). ERPs and domain specificity: Beating a straw horse. Language and cognitive processes, 13(6), 653-672.
    Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language
    processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and language, 50(3), 259-281.
    Frenkel, T. I., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2011). Neural activation during the processing of
    ambiguous fearful facial expressions: an ERP study in anxious and nonanxious individuals. Biological Psychology, 88(2-3), 188-195.
    Frisch, S., Schlesewsky, M., Saddy, D., & Alpermann, A. (2002). The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity. Cognition, 85(3), B83-B92.
    Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Presburger, G., Marom, S., & Hermesh, H. (2005). The effects of social anxiety and depression on the evaluation of facial crowds. Behaviour research and therapy, 43(4), 467-474.
    Harvey, J. M., Richards, J. C., Dziadosz, T., & Swindell, A. (1993). Misinterpretation of ambiguous stimuli in panic disorder. Cognitive therapy and research, 17(3), 235-248.
    Hirsch, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events. Behaviour research and therapy, 35(12), 1123-1132.
    Hirsch, C. R., & Mathews, A. (2000). Impaired positive inferential bias in social phobia. Journal of Abnormal psychology, 109(4), 705.
    Huppert, J. D., Pasupuleti, R. V., Foa, E. B., & Mathews, A. (2007). Interpretation biases in social anxiety: Response generation, response selection, and self-appraisals. Behaviour research and therapy, 45(7), 1505-1515.
    Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges
    to syntax. Brain research, 1146, 23-49.
    Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and cognitive processes, 15(2), 159-201.
    Kanai, Y., Sasagawa, S., Chen, J., Shimada, H., & Sakano, Y. (2010). Interpretation bias for ambiguous social behavior among individuals with high and low levels of social anxiety. Cognitive therapy and research, 34(3), 229-240.
    Kashdan, T. B., Weeks, J. W., & Savostyanova, A. A. (2011). Whether, how, and when social anxiety shapes positive experiences and events: A self-regulatory framework and treatment implications. Clinical psychology review, 31(5), 786-799.
    Kolk, H. H., Chwilla, D. J., Van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and language, 85(1), 1-36.
    Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual review of psychology, 62, 621-647.
    Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. In Anxiety (Vol. 22, pp. 141-173): Karger Publishers.
    Lee, J. S., Mathews, A., Shergill, S., & Yiend, J. (2016). Magnitude of negative
    interpretation bias depends on severity of depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 83, 26-34.
    Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998). A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive therapy and research, 22(6), 539-560.
    Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual review of psychology, 45(1), 25-50.
    Mohlman, J., Carmin, C. N., & Price, R. B. (2007). Jumping to interpretations: Social anxiety disorder and the identification of emotional facial expressions. Behaviour research and therapy, 45(3), 591-599.
    Moser, J. S., Hajcak, G., Huppert, J. D., Foa, E. B., & Simons, R. F. (2008). Interpretation bias in social anxiety as detected by event-related brain potentials. Emotion, 8(5), 693.
    Moser, J. S., Huppert, J. D., Foa, E. B., & Simons, R. F. (2012). Interpretation of ambiguous social scenarios in social phobia and depression: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 89(2), 387-397.
    Perowne, S., & Mansell, W. (2002). Social anxiety, self-focused attention, and the discrimination of negative, neutral and positive audience members by their non-verbal behaviours. Behavioural and cognitive Psychotherapy, 30(1), 11-23.
    Proverbio, A. M., & Riva, F. (2009). RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions. Neuroscience Letters, 459(3), 142-146.
    Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour research and therapy, 35(8), 741-756.
    Richards, Richards, A., French, C., Calder, A., Webb, B., Fox, R., & Young, A. (2002). Anxiety-related bias in the classification of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions. Emotion, 2(3), 273-287.
    Richards, Richards, A., French, C., Calder, A., Webb, B., Fox, R., & Young, A. (2002). Anxiety-related bias in the classification of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions. Emotion, 2(3), 273-287.
    Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). STAI. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Self Evaluation Questionnaire). Palo Alto California: Consulting Psychologist, 22, 1-24.
    Stopa, L., & Clark, D. M. (2000). Social phobia and interpretation of social events. Behaviour research and therapy, 38(3), 273-283.
    Thornhill, D. E., & Van Petten, C. (2012). Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: Frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(3), 382-392.
    Voncken, M. J., Bögels, S. M., & Peeters, F. (2007). Specificity of interpretation and
    judgemental biases in social phobia versus depression. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80(3), 443-453.
    Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., Parks, M. J. J. o. E. P. L., Memory,, & Cognition. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. 25(2), 394.
    Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension:
    Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176-190.
    Voncken, M., Bögels, S., & Peeters, F. (2007). Specificity of interpretation and judgemental biases in social phobia versus depression. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80(3), 443-453.
    Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 33(4), 448.
    Wenzel, A., Finstrom, N., Jordan, J., & Brendle, J. R. (2005). Memory and interpretation of visual representations of threat in socially anxious and nonanxious individuals. Behaviour research and therapy, 43(8), 1029-1044.
    Wilson, Wilson, E., MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Rutherford, E. (2006). The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(1), 103-111.
    Yoon, & Yoon, K. L. (2007). Threat is in the eye of the beholder: social anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions. Behaviour research and therapy, 45(4), 839-847.
    Yuan, J., Zhang, Q., & Cui, L. (2020). Social anxiety and attention to dynamic disgust
    facial expression: No more attention captured from evidence of N2pc. Neuroscience Letters, 736, 135269.
    陳心怡(2000)。貝克憂鬱量表第二版指導手冊。臺北:中國行為科學社。
    楊宜音、張志學、彭泗清(1997)。性格與社會心理測量總覽。台北市:遠流。
    劉瑞楨(1999)。憂鬱者與社會焦慮者的自我關注特性--偏好性、持續性與彈性的探討。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,台北,台灣。
    賴怡臻(2017)。社交焦慮者的解釋性偏誤改善療效探討。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文,台北,台灣。
    盧孟良、車先蕙、張尚文、沈武典(2002)。中文版貝克憂鬱量表第二版之信度和效度。台灣精神醫學,16,301-310。
    鍾思嘉、龍長風(1984)。修訂情境與特質焦慮量表之研究。測驗年刊,31,27-36。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    106752025
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106752025
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100129
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    202501.pdf1681KbAdobe PDF2157View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback