Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135902
|
Title: | 不同遊戲化行銷策略與消費者態度效果之研究 – 以行動支付及行動下單產品為例 A Study on Effects of Different Gamification Strategies on Consumers’ Attitudes – Using Mobile Payment and Mobile Trading Products as Examples |
Authors: | 孔昱棠 Kung, Yu-Tang |
Contributors: | 邱志聖 Chiou, Jyh-Shen 孔昱棠 Kung, Yu-Tang |
Keywords: | 遊戲化 意義型 獎勵型 行動下單 行動支付 金融商品 態度 認知 情感 行為 gamification meaningful gamification reward-based gamification attitude mobile payment mobile trading system |
Date: | 2021 |
Issue Date: | 2021-07-01 16:15:24 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 數位化的浪潮來襲,許多產品及服務在推動上,皆紛紛的往數位進行發展。尤其2020年以來的COVID-19疫情,大大的加速了數位化產品及服務的需求及發展。因此,在數位化產品的推出,對於企業來說是越來越重要。而在推出產品之外,要如何用該產品的內容做為行銷設計?許多企業紛紛的在數位服務的推廣上,以遊戲化的方式進行推動。而遊戲化的方式及策略相當廣泛,該運用何種遊戲化方式才能達到更好的效益,是行銷人員會需要注意的。本研究根據不同產品內容,與不同遊戲化的方式,進行2x2的實驗設計研究,希望能夠對於企業進行產品設計時能夠有更清楚的想法及進行的方式。 而在變數選擇上,本研究從文獻回顧中了解到遊戲化方向有不同內容,有人將遊戲化歸類為獎勵型遊戲化及意義型遊戲化的內容。而在產品上,由於本研究觀察到現在數位世代對於金融產品的服務使用越發頻繁,因此針對金融服務的行動支付及行動下單服務進行探討,並期以從分析中了解到不同商品是否會適用不同遊戲化內容。此外,本研究則針對消費者的態度進行分析,從文獻回顧中了解到態度由認知、情感及行為組成。因此,本研究總共以2(獎勵型遊戲化及意義型遊戲化) x 2(行動下單及行動支付)進行實驗設計,並針對態度的認知、情感及行為進行探討。 而本研究也在假設驗證中部份得到驗證,實驗結果如下:在行動下單時,在態度上,意義型遊戲化相較於獎勵型遊戲化,能夠帶來更多讓消費者的想法提升;而行動支付則沒有顯著哪一種遊戲化策略較好。因此,未來金控若想針對金融商品進行遊戲化內容進行設計,也可以參考本研究之結果,思考不同遊戲化方向是否會帶來給消費者不同的效果。 After COVID-19 starting in 2020, demands and product development forms are transferred into digital versions. Therefore, as a product manager, utilizing digital marketing has been critical and important in this era. Many digital products has been used with gamification recently. However, are the gamifications used correctly? This research is examining the effect of the gamifications across different product and to realize how different product react to different gamification strategies. For the gamification variables, we examined past researches and chose to use the “meaningful gamification” and “reward-based gamification” as our variable; and for the product variables, we used the mobile payment and mobile trading system products as financial services are transforming into digital versions and are highly required by people in Taiwan. At last, we used attitude as our dependent variable, so that we can see if customers react different when the circumstances are different. Therefore, our 2 (meaningful gamification & reward-based gamification) x 2(mobile payment & mobile trading system) are decided. After our experiments, we can see that users are actually more attracted to meaningful gamification when they are using mobile trading systems, and as in mobile payment, there’s nothing of a difference in regards to customers’ attitude. To develop a successful gamification design, product managers ought to know how to approach to customers so as to attract them with least resources. Hopefully this research helped product managers be more clear about how to develop a gamification strategy. |
Reference: | 中文部分 1. 王妍文(2017)。20~35歲千禧世代 數位新金融全解析。遠見雜誌,8-26。 2. 邱志聖(2016)。行銷研究:實務與理論應用。台北市:智勝文化。 3. 高敬原(2020A)。全台瘋股市!30歲以下投資人數創新高,券商如何搶賺數位商機?https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/60899/broker-dealer-digital-transformation-strategy。搜尋日期:2021年5月3日。 4. 高敬原(2020B)。連線銀行秒變「斷線銀行」?LINE BANK開業第一天人潮塞爆系統大當機。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/62441/line-bank-opening。搜尋日期:2021年5月3日。
英文部分 1. Ahn, J., & Back, K. J. (2018). Influence of brand relationship on customer attitude toward integrated resort brands: a cognitive, affective, and conative perspective. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(4), 449-460 2. Ajzen, I., and B. L. Driver (1992). “Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Leisure Choice.” Journal of Leisure Research, 24 (3): 207-24. 3. Allport, G. W. (1933). 1. Attitudes. terminology, 219. 4. Arrasvuori, J., Boberg, M., Holopainen, J., Korhonen, H., Lucero, A., & Montola, M. (2011, June). Applying the PLEX framework in designing for playfulness. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 1-8). 5. Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2017). Why so serious? Gamification impact in the acceptance of mobile banking services. Internet Research. 6. Cacioppo, J. T., Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1981). The nature of attitudes and cognitive responses and their relationships to behavior. Cognitive responses in persuasion, 31-54. 7. Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play, and games. University of Illinois Press. 8. Chong, L. L., Ong, H. B., & Tan, S. H. (2021). Acceptability of mobile stock trading application: A study of young investors in Malaysia. Technology in Society, 64, 101497. 9. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. 10. Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Ondrus, J., & Zmijewska, A. (2008). Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review. Electronic commerce research and applications, 7(2), 165-181. 11. Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75-88. 12. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105. 13. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of educational research, 71(1), 1-27. 14. Derbaix, C., & Pham, M. T. (1991). Affective reactions to consumption situations: A pilot investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12(2), 325-355. 15. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining" gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9-15). 16. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt brace Jovanovich college publishers. 17. El-Khuffash, A. (2013). Gamification. Ryerson University, Torondo, Canada. 18. Elangovan, N. (2016). Design quality of Mobile trading system application software for Smartphones. Asian Journal of Management, 7(3), 207-212. 19. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014, January). Does gamification work?--a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 3025-3034). Ieee. 20. Hillman, S., Neustaedter, C., Oduor, E., & Pang, C. (2014, September). User challenges and successes with mobile payment services in North America. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services (pp. 253-262). 21. Hopia, H., & Raitio, K. (2016). Gamification in healthcare: perspectives of mental health service users and health professionals. Issues in mental health nursing, 37(12), 894-902. 22. Huang, W. H. Y., & Soman, D. (2013). Gamification of education. Report Series: Behavioural Economics in Action, 29. 23. Bogost, I. (2014). Why gamification is bullshit. The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications, 65-80. 24. Kwon, J., & Vogt, C. A. (2010). Identifying the role of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components in understanding residents’ attitudes toward place marketing. Journal of Travel Research, 49(4), 423-435. 25. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin. 26. McKinsey (2020). How COVID-19 has pushed companies over the technology tipping point—and transformed business forever. Retrieved from May 22, 2021. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/how-covid-19-has-pushed-companies-over-the-technology-tipping-point-and-transformed-business-forever 27. Moon, M. A., Khalid, M. J., Awan, H. M., Attiq, S., Rasool, H., & Kiran, M. (2017). Consumer`s perceptions of website`s utilitarian and hedonic attributes and online purchase intentions: A cognitive–affective attitude approach. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 21(2), 73-88. 28. Nicholson, S. (2013). Two paths to motivation through game design elements: Reward-based gamification and meaningful gamification. 29. Nicholson, S. (2015). A recipe for meaningful gamification. In Gamification in education and business (pp. 1-20). Springer, Cham. 30. Palazn-Vidal, M., & Delgado-Ballester, E. (2005). Sales promotions effects on consumer-based brand equity. International Journal of Market Research, 47(2), 179-204. 31. Rodrigues, L. F., Costa, C. J., & Oliveira, A. (2013, July). The adoption of gamification in e-banking. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication (pp. 47-55). 32. Rodrigues, L. F., Oliveira, A., & Costa, C. J. (2016). Does ease-of-use contributes to the perception of enjoyment? A case of gamification in e-banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 114-126. 33. Tauni, M. Z., Fang, H. X., & Iqbal, A. (2017). The role of financial advice and word-of-mouth communication on the association between investor personality and stock trading behavior: Evidence from Chinese stock market. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 55-65. 34. Thiel, S. K. (2016, October). Reward-based vs. social gamification: Exploring effectiveness of gamefulness in public participation. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1-6). 35. Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton digital press. 36. Xu, F., Tian, F., Buhalis, D., Weber, J., & Zhang, H. (2016). Tourists as mobile gamers: Gamification for tourism marketing. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 33(8), 1124-1142. 37. Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. " O`Reilly Media, Inc.". |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 國際經營與貿易學系 108351030 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108351030 |
Data Type: | thesis |
DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100605 |
Appears in Collections: | [國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
103001.pdf | | 3234Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|