English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47923450      Online Users : 991
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/136058
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136058


    Title: 乳癌疾病參與論質計酬之醫療資源與醫療支出分析
    Medical Resources and Medical Expense Analysis of the Pay-for-Performance Program for Breast Cancer
    Authors: 劉宇程
    Liu, Yu-Cheng
    Contributors: 周行一
    Chow, Edward H.
    劉宇程
    Liu, Yu-Cheng
    Keywords: 乳癌
    論質計酬
    醫療資源
    醫療費用
    Breast cancer
    Pay-for-performance
    Medical resource
    Medical expense
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-07-03 00:49:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 研究背景與動機:癌症連續36年高居全國十大死因的第一名,說明癌症對於國人的健康具有極大的威脅;此外,乳癌的高發生率與高死亡率,亦說明乳癌對於婦女的健康具有極大的威脅。同時,伴隨台灣人口的高齡化、醫療科學持續進步的過程,延長人民的壽命,醫療科學的創新與人口結構轉變漸漸築高中央健康保險署的財務成本,健康保險之可持續性亦備受質疑。醫療資源耗用與醫療資源浪費亦迫使健康保險之財務負擔愈加沉重。儘管調整健保費率與補充保費費率,健康保險的永續不僅須依靠費率之調整,亦須配合良好的預算規劃與支付制度;同時,好的支付制度須考量成本的控制與醫療照護的品質。鑒於乳癌對於婦女的健康具有極大的威脅與支付制度的重要性,中央健康保險局於2001年建立「全民健康保險乳癌醫療給付改善方案」,目標係提升乳癌病患之醫療照護品質與建立醫療品質導向的支付方式;然而,多數醫療院所無參與乳癌醫療給付改善方案,且相關國內研究與文獻探討乳癌醫療給付改善方案較為缺乏。此外,鮮少研究探討論質計酬制度與全民健康保險財務成本之關聯。故此研究欲探討乳癌醫療給付改善方案之參與與否對於醫療資源耗用與醫療費用支出之影響。

    研究材料與方法:此研究參考Wang et al. (2017)之研究架構進行設計,藉衛生福利資料科學中心之衛生福利資料檔案,挑選2001至2013年初次診斷罹患乳癌疾病之病患作為研究對象,藉資料篩選流程獲得實驗組—參與論質計酬方案之乳癌病患,與對照組—無參與論質計酬方案之乳癌病患,同時運用描述性統計與推論性統計,探討乳癌醫療給付改善方案之參與與否對於醫療資源耗用與醫療費用支出之影響。

    研究結果:藉相關研究與文獻的分析和回顧,進行研究結果之相關推論。預期實驗組之病患集中多數診斷與治療於第一年,且預期藉完整之診斷與治療,有望降低病患之復發率,減少第一年後續的醫療資源耗用,進而有效減少追蹤期間之整體醫療資源耗用;此外,預期實驗組之整體重要醫療處置次數低於對照組,係因乳癌論質計酬制度藉診療指引,預期有效控制整體重要醫療處置次數。

    結論與建議:伴隨台灣人口的高齡化、醫療科學持續進步的過程,延長人民的壽命,醫療科學的創新與人口結構轉變漸漸築高中央健康保險署的財務成本,健康保險之可持續性亦備受質疑。醫療資源耗用與醫療資源浪費亦迫使健康保險之財務負擔愈加沉重。論量計酬係依據醫療服務之提供者提供多少「醫療服務量」,即可獲得相應之費用支付,多數醫療服務提供者於醫療費用支付單價變動不大的情況,須仰賴醫療院所提供之醫療服務量,確保其能夠獲得一定之收入;此時容易造成過度耗用檢驗、治療或藥品等相關資源;此外,論量計酬方式未直接鼓勵病患進行整合性之照護,亦無標準化之診療與照護流程,醫療服務提供者過度重視醫療且缺乏關注預防或衛教,容易造就醫病非醫人的情況,可見論量計酬支付制度衍生的隱憂,亦顯示論質計酬支付制度時代的來臨。
    Background and purpose: Cancer has been ranked first among the top ten causes of death in Taiwan for 36 consecutive years, indicating that cancer poses a great threat to the health of Taiwanese people. In addition, the high incidence and high mortality of breast cancer also indicate that breast cancer poses a great threat to women`s health. Meanwhile, with the aging of Taiwan’s population and the continuous advancement of medical sciences, people’s lifespans have been extended. Innovations of medical sciences and demographic changes have gradually increased the financial cost of the National Health Insurance Administration, and the sustainability of health insurance has also been questioned. The consumption of medical resources and the waste of medical resources have also forced the financial burden of health insurance to be heavier. Although the premium has been adjusted, the sustainability of health insurance must not only rely on the adjustment of the premium, but also good budget planning and payment system. Meanwhile, a good payment system should consider both cost control and quality of medical care. Given that breast cancer poses a great threat to women’s health and the sustainability of the payment system, the National Health Insurance Administration launched the pay-for-performance program for breast cancer in 2001. The goal of the program is to improve the quality of medical care for breast cancer patients and establish a payment system based on quality-oriented medical treatment. However, most medical institutions do not participate in the pay-for-performance program for breast cancer. At the same time, there is a lack of domestic research and literature on the pay-for-performance program for breast cancer. In addition, few researches discuss the relationship between the pay-for-performance program and the financial cost of health insurance. Thus, this study aims to analyze the consumption of medical resources and medical expense of the pay-for-performance program for breast cancer.

    Materials and methods: The study was designed with reference to the research framework of Wang et al. (2017). Data of the study is obtained from the Health and Welfare Data Science Center (HWDC). Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer from 2001 to 2013 were selected as the research subjects. Screening process was used to obtain the experimental group—breast cancer patients who participated in the pay-for-performance program, and the control group—breast cancer patients who did not participate in the pay-for-performance program. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used to analyze the consumption of medical resources and medical expense of the pay-for-performance program for breast cancer.

    Results: By analyzing and reviewing related researches and literature, the study make relevant inferences about the results. We expect that the patients in the experimental group will receive the majority of diagnosis and treatment in the first year. By receiving comprehensive diagnosis and treatment, we expect that the recurrence rate of patients in the experimental group will declined, and the medical resource consumption will be reduced in the following years, which will result in a decrease of the overall medical resources consumption. In addition, the total number of medical treatments of the experimental group is expected to be lower than that of the control group, due to the fact that the pay-for-performance program for breast cancer is based on the diagnosis and treatment guidelines, which is expected to effectively control the number of medical treatments.

    Conclusion and suggestions: With the aging of Taiwan’s population and the continuous advancement of medical sciences, people’s lifespans have been extended. Innovations of medical sciences and demographic changes have gradually increased the financial cost of the National Health Insurance Administration and the sustainability of health insurance has also been questioned. The consumption of medical resources and the waste of medical resources have also forced the financial burden of health insurance to be heavier. The fee-for-service payment system is based on the amount of "medical service" provided by the medical institutions, and the corresponding fee payment can be obtained. Most medical service providers have to rely on the amount of medical services provided by themselves to ensure that they can obtain a certain income when the unit price of medical expenses does not change significantly, which will easily lead to excessive consumption of related resources such as testing, treatment or medicine. In addition, fee-for-service does not directly encourage patients to take integrated care, and there is no standardized diagnosis, treatment and care process. Meanwhile, medical service providers pay too much attention to medical care and lack attention to prevention or health education can easily lead to curing the disease but not curing the patient. It can be seen that the hidden worries derived from the pay-for-performance payment system, and also show that the era of pay-for-performance payment system is coming.
    Reference: 方俞尹(2009)。全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案長期影響評估。國立臺灣大學臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所學位論文。
    王淇俐(2008)。乳癌論質計酬試辦計畫初期成效分析-以南區醫療利用為例。未出版之碩士論文,長榮大學醫務管理學研究所,台南市。
    全民健康保險會(2020)。全民健康保險會108年年報。取自 https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-61720-9c3c3e32-3172-4966-af70-184c85f53bc6.html.
    行政院衛生署全民健康保險醫療品質委員會(2007)。二代健保論質計酬。醫療品質雜誌,1(1),頁54-56。doi: 10.30160/JHQ.200701.0017
    行政院衛生署國民健康局(2013)。中華民國99年癌症登記報告。取自 https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/6519/File_6183.pdf.
    宋銘展(2009)。全民健康保險糖尿病醫療給付改善方案五年影響評估。國立臺灣大學臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所學位論文。
    李玉春、黃昱瞳、黃光華、葉玲玲、陳珮青(2014)。全民健保支付制度改革之回顧與展望。台灣醫學,18(1),頁53-66。doi: 10.6320/FJM.2014.18(1).07
    李承昌(2014)。C型肝炎病人論質計酬之整體成本效果評估。高雄醫學大學高雄醫學大學醫務管理暨醫療資訊學系碩士班學位論文。
    李俊秀、李光申、黃勝堅、郭麗琳(2017)。醫療費用支付制度趨勢-論量計酬轉變為以價值為支付基礎。北市醫學雜誌,14,頁50-58。doi: 10.6200/tcmj.2017.14.Sp.05
    李政益(2015)。全民健保論質計酬制度及都治計畫對結核病防治之成效評估。國立臺灣大學臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所學位論文。
    李政益、江亭誼、羅秀雲、莊人祥、吳怡君、楊祥麟(2012)。台灣健保論質計酬支付制度之發展-以結核病為例。疫情報導,28(19),頁311-322。doi: 10.6524/EB.201210_28(19).0001
    李昭瑩(2014)。全民健保論質計酬之效益--以追蹤五年之乳癌病患為例。未出版之碩士論文,逢甲大學統計學系統計與精算碩士班,台中市。
    冼裕程(2011)。糖尿病論質計酬對醫療利用與照護成效之影響。長榮大學長榮大學醫務管理學系(所)學位論文。
    林宜柏、徐敏芳、鄭世隆、王鶴健(2008)。“氣喘醫療給付改善方案”實施成效之探討。亞東學報(28_S),頁57-64。doi: 10.30167/JOIT.200812.0007
    張玉立(2019)。糖尿病論質計酬之成果與成本分析-系統性回顧與統合分析。高雄醫學大學高雄醫學大學醫務管理暨醫療資訊學系碩士在職專班學位論文。
    張孟源、劉俊宏(2011)。「全民健康保險初期慢性腎臟病醫療給付改善方案」簡介。臺灣醫界,54(2),頁83-86。doi: 10.30044/TMJ.201102.0004
    陳宗泰、鍾國彪、賴美淑(2007)。另一種流行趨勢-論成效計酬的趨勢與展望。台灣公共衛生雜誌,26(5),頁353-370。doi: 10.6288/tjph2007-26-05-02
    陳怡靜(2015)。論質計酬對糖尿病患存活之影響及相關因素探討。中國醫藥大學中國醫藥大學醫務管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文。
    陳明君、陳啟禎、錢慶文(2003)。論質計酬制度對糖尿病患門診醫療費用之可能影響評估。醫務管理期刊,4(4),頁14-26。doi: 10.6174/JHM2003.4(4).14
    陳俐樺、張鳳琴、簡以嘉、戴桂英(2016)。「思覺失調症醫療給付改善方案」成效探討-以台灣北部某精神專科醫院為例。台灣公共衛生雜誌,35(2),頁173-186。doi: 10.6288/TJPH201635104058
    陳麗尼、龔佩珍、張鏸云、蔡文正(2017)。論質計酬對於思覺失調症患者急診及急性再住院的影響。台灣公共衛生雜誌,36(2),頁148-160。doi: 10.6288/TJPH201736105089
    黃光華(2010)。評論:以傾向分數配對法評估糖尿病論質計酬方案之成效。台灣公共衛生雜誌,29(1),頁64-64。doi: 10.6288/TJPH2010-29-01-07
    葉信含(2014)。成人氣喘病患論質計酬之整體成本效果評估。高雄醫學大學高雄醫學大學醫務管理暨醫療資訊學系碩士班學位論文。
    董淑萍(2012)。乳癌論質計酬之成本效性分析。未出版之碩士論文,長榮大學醫務管理學系(所),台南市。
    廖慧娟(2012)。論質計酬之健保制度。醫療品質雜誌,6(5),頁44-49。doi: 10.30160/JHQ.201209.0010
    趙大中(2021)。乳癌治療準則。取自 https://wd.vghtpe.gov.tw/hemaonco/files/Guide_BreastCA.pdf
    蔡育真、戴芳楟、李文宏、高婷婷(2008)。糖尿病醫療給付改善方案對第二型糖尿病病患之照護成效。秀傳醫學雜誌,8(3&4),頁93-99。
    蔡昌宏(2012)。論質計酬制度是否降低氣喘病人相關急診利用。中國醫藥大學中國醫藥大學醫務管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文。
    衛生福利部國民健康署(2021)。婦女乳房攝影檢查服務利用率。取自 https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/GecDB/Common/FileDownload.ashx?sn=u%24VIj1KGTj9fI7uBKDEwVQ%40%40&ext=.pdf.
    衛生福利部國民健康署(2019)。中華民國107年癌症登記報告。取自 https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/13498/File_15611.pdf.
    賴思妤(2006)。認識“以購買健康爲導向的健保醫療給付改善方案”。領導護理, 7(2),頁98-99。doi: 10.29494/LN.200612.0011
    謝釭婷、管中閔、蔡蕙安、謝釭偉(2010)。評估健保制度中肺結核的論質計酬專案。人文及社會科學集刊,22(4),頁485-519。doi: 10.6350/JSSP.201012.0485
    謝慧敏、林怡潔、邱亨嘉(2014)。論質計酬支付制度與慢性疾病照護品質成效。醫療品質雜誌,8(2),頁28-31。
    簡怡祥(2017)。加入論質計酬對照護過程與照護結果之影響─以氣喘為例。國立臺灣大學臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所學位論文。
    醫院總額醫院醫療服務審查執行會(2020)。108年醫院總額部門執行成果報告。取自 https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-62670-fe60e76b-89e5-4224-a470-fe51cd450eaf.html.

    Ayabakan, S., Bardhan, I., & Zheng, Z. E. (2021). Triple Aim and the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. Health services research and managerial epidemiology, 8, 2333392821993704-2333392821993704. doi: 10.1177/2333392821993704
    Chee, T. T., Ryan, A. M., Wasfy, J. H., & Borden, W. B. (2016). Current State of Value-Based Purchasing Programs. Circulation, 133(22), 2197-2205. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.010268
    Chen, T.-T., Yang, J.-J., Hsueh, Y.-s., & Wang, V. (2019). The effects of a schizophrenia pay-for-performance program on patient outcomes in Taiwan. Health Services Research, 54(5), 1119-1125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13174
    Cheng, A. H. Y., & Sutherland, J. M. (2013). British Columbia`s pay-for-performance experiment: Part of the solution to reduce emergency department crowding? Health Policy, 113(1), 86-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.010
    Close, J., Fosh, B., Wheat, H., Horrell, J., Lee, W., Byng, R., . . . Lloyd, H. (2019). Longitudinal evaluation of a countywide alternative to the Quality and Outcomes Framework in UK General Practice aimed at improving Person Centred Coordinated Care. BMJ open, 9(7), e029721-e029721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029721
    Egdom, L. S. E. v., Lagendijk, M., Kemp, M. H. v. d., Dam, J. v., Mureau, M., Hazelzet, J., & Koppert, L. (2019). Implementation of Value Based Breast Cancer Care. European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 45 7, 1163-1170.
    Epstein, A. M., Lee, T. H., & Hamel, M. B. (2004). Paying Physicians for High-Quality Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 350(4), 406-410. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb035374
    Gillam, S. J., Siriwardena, A. N., & Steel, N. (2012). Pay-for-Performance in the United Kingdom: Impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework—A Systematic Review. The Annals of Family Medicine, 10(5), 461. doi: 10.1370/afm.1377
    Haas, D. A., & Chang, J. (2021). How One Hospital Has Succeeded in a World of Bundled Payments. Retrieved 2021/05/23, from https://hbr.org/2021/03/how-one-hospital-has-succeeded-in-a-world-of-bundled-payments
    Hollenbeak, C. S., Spencer, M., Schilling, A. L., Kirschman, D., Warye, K. L., & Parvizi, J. (2020). Reimbursement Penalties and 30-Day Readmissions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty. JB & JS open access, 5(3), e19.00072. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00072
    Hong, Y.-R., Nguyen, O., Yadav, S., Etzold, E., Song, J., Duncan, R., & Turner, K. (2020). Early Performance of Hospital Value-based Purchasing Program in Medicare: A Systematic Review. Medical Care, 58, 734-743. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001354
    Kahn, J. M., Scales, D. C., Au, D. H., Carson, S. S., Curtis, J. R., Dudley, R. A., . . . American Thoracic Society Pay-for-Performance Working, G. (2010). An official American Thoracic Society policy statement: pay-for-performance in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 181(7), 752-761. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200903-0450st
    Kuo, R. N. C., Chung, K.-P., & Lai, M.-S. (2011). Effect of the Pay-for-Performance Program for Breast Cancer Care in Taiwan. Journal of Oncology Practice, 7(3S), e8s-e15s. doi: 10.1200/jop.2011.000314
    Pandya, A., Doran, T., Zhu, J., Walker, S., Arntson, E., & Ryan, A. M. (2018). Modelling the cost-effectiveness of pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK. BMC Medicine, 16(1), 135. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1126-3
    Rosenthal, M. B., Frank, R. G., Li, Z., & Epstein, A. M. (2005). Early Experience With Pay-for-PerformanceFrom Concept to Practice. JAMA, 294(14), 1788-1793. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.14.1788
    Soylu, T. G., Goldberg, D. G., Cuellar, A. E., & Kuzel, A. J. (2020). Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act in Small to Medium-Sized Primary Care Practices. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 33(6), 942. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200142
    Walker, S., Mason, A. R., Claxton, K., Cookson, R., Fenwick, E., Fleetcroft, R., & Sculpher, M. (2010). Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS. The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 60(574), e213-e220. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X501859
    Wang, C. J., Cheng, S. H., Wu, J.-Y., Lin, Y.-P., Kao, W.-H., Lin, C.-L., . . . Huang, A. T. (2017). Association of a Bundled-Payment Program With Cost and Outcomes in Full-Cycle Breast Cancer Care. JAMA Oncology, 3(3), 327-334. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4549
    Young, G. J., & Conrad, D. A. (2007). Practical Issues in the Design and Implementation of Pay-for-Quality Programs. Journal of Healthcare Management, 52(1), 10-18.
    Young, G. J., White, B., Burgess, J. F., Berlowitz, D., Meterko, M., Guldin, M. R., & Bokhour, B. G. (2005). Conceptual Issues in the Design and Implementation of Pay-for-Quality Programs. American Journal of Medical Quality, 20(3), 144-150. doi: 10.1177/1062860605275222
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    108357020
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108357020
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100624
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    702001.pdf2287KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback