English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141854 (78%)
Visitors : 47787206      Online Users : 646
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137570


    Title: 奉主耶穌聖名禱告:回應蔡麗貞〈真耶穌教會的聖靈觀〉
    Authors: 葉先秦
    Iap, SianGchin
    Contributors: 華人文化主體性研究中心
    Keywords: 自立教會; 獨一神論五旬節派; 基督中心論; 真耶穌教會; 聖靈
     independent church; oneness pentecostals; christocentric; the True Jesus Church; Holy Spirit
    Date: 2017-06
    Issue Date: 2021-10-27 14:26:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 由華人自立的真耶穌教會創立已屆百年,然而對漢語基督教界而言,該會至今仍是個他者性十足的信仰團體,並且常成為護教學或「別異教派」議題的研討對象。真耶穌教會在教義上備受質疑之處,無非是方言為救恩憑據以及對傳統三一神論的拒斥態度。蔡麗貞教授多年前的〈真耶穌教會的聖靈論〉一文,是少數較為聚焦於該會神論問題予以回應的論著。然而對五旬節派和真耶穌教會的刻板印象,以及護教學進路的前設,另一方面對該會初創時的歷史脈絡認識不夠完整,使得蔡文無法跳脫既有論述真耶穌教會的框架。因而會從「型態神格唯一論」的舊範式去批判該會神論,又作出該會為「聖靈中心論」的片面理解。本文擬藉回應蔡文,嘗試按對話和理解的角度,評析真耶穌教會的神論。從當年影響該會神論的獨一神論五旬節派的起源,及其教義論述著手,避免某種去脈絡化的認識。
    The True Jesus Church (TJC), which is an independent denomination established by Chinese has celebrated its centenary. Yet, TJC has appeared to be "the other" in Chinese Christianity, thus becoming an object that is being discussed in Apologetics or studies of heresy. There are some controversial issues in TJC, of which the most debated include speaking in tongues as one of the requisites for salvation and the negative attitude towards the traditional trinitarian doctrine. Anne Tsai, a female theologian from China Evangelical Seminary, worked on the related issues in her essay titled "On Pneumatology of the True Jesus Church," which could be considered to be one of only a few works that brought focus onto the doctrine of Godhead of the TJC. However, that her essay is still positioned within the framework TJC has been discussed. This is mainly due to the stereotype perspective of TJC and Pentecostalism, and the understanding from an Apologetic view, plus her inadequate knowledge of the historical context of the TJC`s earliest days. Therefore, she carried out her criticism of the TJC`s doctrine of God from within an old paradigm of "monarchianism," which led to a one-sided understanding that the TJC holds a pneumacentric view. This essay will try to review the TJC`s oneness doctrine in accordance with the context of the origins of oneness pentecostalism that once influenced the former, and also try to engage in a dialogue with its doctrine of Godhead rather than being apologetic.
    Relation: 台灣神學論刊, 44, 135-160
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[華人文化主體性研究中心] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    26.pdf2380KbAdobe PDF2305View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback