English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109950/140901 (78%)
Visitors : 46003213      Online Users : 855
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/138589
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138589


    Title: 標準必要專利權行使之國際規範發展與比較分析──FRAND承諾法律性質、禁制令、權利金與競爭法規制
    International Regulatory Development and Comparative Analysis of the Enforcement of Standard Essential Patents-Legal Status of FRAND Commitment, Injunction, Reasonable Royalty, and Application of Competition Law
    Authors: 王立達
    Wang, Richard L.
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 利益第三人契約;預約;締約上過失;權利金總額分配法;獨占濫用;聯合行為;最小可銷售專利實施單元
    Contract with Third Party Beneficiaries;Priliminary Contract;Culpa in Contrahendo;Total Aggregate Royalty Approach;Monopolization (Abuse of Dominant Position);Horizontal Agreement;Smallest Saleable Patent Practicing Unit (SSPPU)
    Date: 2018-04
    Issue Date: 2022-01-05 13:42:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 如何避免類似高通公司(Qualcomm)之標準關鍵專利權人加諸不當授權條件或拒絕授權,乃是目前各國熱烈討論的重要議題。標準制定組織經常要求標準必要專利權人必須承諾以公平合理無歧視(FRAND)之方式,授權予有意接受之被授權人,此一承諾現已成為相關法律規範之發展核心。本文針對與此相關之三大法律領域:契約法、專利法與競爭法,逐一分析比較各國實務重要案例與關鍵困難點之學理探討,並且提出本文研究發現,期能完整掌握國際間目前相關規範發展之最新狀況與較妥當立場。
    Major countries have triggered a heated debate on the way to restrain standard essentialpatent (SEP) holders such as Qualcomm from imposing unreasonable licensing terms or refusal to license.Oftentimes standard-setting organizations request SEP holders to commit to license out with fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) termsto licenseeswilling to accept the same. Those commitments have become the kernel of relevant regulations on SEP enforcement. This paper covers three major fields on this issue, that is, contract law, patent law, and competition law, analyzing and comparing important casesso far and scholarly discussions on specific difficulties among major countries, and proffering author’s findings in certain aspects, in the hope of providing a comprehensive overview ofthe contemporary development in the world.
    Relation: 月旦法學, No.275, pp.87-110
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102559312018040275007
    DOI: 10.3966/102559312018040275007
    Appears in Collections:[法學院] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML299View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback