政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/138673
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 111316/142225 (78%)
造访人次 : 48390130      在线人数 : 879
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138673


    题名: 個案教學是公共管理專業訓練的未來嗎? 一個來自實驗研究的循證論述
    作者: 陳敦源
    Chen, Don-yun
    許弘毅
    Hsu, Hung-Yi
    史美強
    Mei-Chiang Shih
    李翠萍
    Tsuey-Ping Lee
    陳序廷
    Chen, Shiu-Ting
    贡献者: 公行系
    关键词: 文官培訓;個案教學;實驗設計;循證基礎的政策;公共管理
    civil service training;case method;experimental design;evidence-based public policy;public management
    日期: 2019-09
    上传时间: 2022-01-06 11:25:37 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 自2000年以來臺灣公共事務的學界與實務界開始轉向美國哈佛大學商學院發展出來的個案教學，尋求教育訓練方法上的突破，個案教學儼然成為公務機關專業「訓練教學法的新希望」（pedagogical hope）。然而，「個案教學比起傳統教學成效真的比較好嗎？」的關鍵問題，有賴於「循證基礎」（evidence-based）的支撐。本研究藉由行政院人事行政局地方研習中心（現為公務人力發展學院南投院區）第一次推動個案教學的機會，針對3種不同層級的班別各一期的學員，進行教學方法的實驗設計（experimental design），使用傳統教學法為「對照組」，應用個案教學法是「實驗組」，藉由實施前後測的問卷調查，來確定個案教學法從學員前後測及跨組之差異。本研究結果顯示，兩組學員對上課的評價並無明顯差異，更重要的，如果就實驗與對照組在前後測都有的知識面的測試中，兩組中對照組的知識增加較多，變異較小，但是兩組前後差異的差異檢測，卻沒有統計上的顯著性。本研究除顯示公部門推動個案教學的成效，在知識上並未比傳統教學差，並就進行相關議題的討論。
    Since 2000, the civil service training in Taiwan has entered into an era of case-based learning method. Leaders of training facilities have been trying to change their teaching method from traditional lecturing into case-based learning. The case-based learning has become the “pedagogical hope” of civil service training in Taiwan. However, based on the idea of “evidence-based public policy,” the key practical question should be “whether the case-based learning is more effective than the traditional lecturing?” In this paper, the authors utilize experimental design to evaluate a training course offered by the RCSD, C. P. A. in 2009. In this design, registered civil servants were randomly assigned to “treatment” or “control” groups. Different teaching methods were administrated in different groups. The result shows that there is no significant statistical difference of course evaluation between the two groups. Also, there is no statistical difference of “knowledge acquiring” in both methods. This paper suggests in terms of knowledge acquiring, the performance of the case method is not inferior to traditional teaching. Other issues were also discussed in this paper.
    關聯: 文官制度季刊, Vol.11, No.4, pp.21-71
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[公共行政學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2180检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈