English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141854 (78%)
Visitors : 47816325      Online Users : 674
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140236


    Title: 供應商對其潛在客戶發動專利訴訟之影響因素-以動態競合策略的觀點分析
    The Factors Influencing the Initiation of Patent Litigation by Supplier to Its Potential Customer-Analysis from the Perspective of the Dynamic Coopetition Strategy
    Authors: 楊翰
    Yang, Han
    Contributors: 許牧彥
    Hsu, Mu-Yen
    楊翰
    Yang, Han
    Keywords: 專利訴訟
    競合策略
    動態競爭
    工業行銷
    Patent litigation
    Co-opetition
    Competitive dynamics
    Industrial marketing
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2022-06-01 16:41:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 儘管台灣企業在專利佈局上已經挹注了不少資源,但每每在專利訴訟的戰場上卻還是處於相對弱勢的地位。2013年光學鏡頭廠商大立光對其潛在客戶三星發動專利訴訟,而廠商間的專利訴訟往往是發生在同業競者之間,這種供應商興訟其潛在客戶的案例實為罕見,故本研究極欲探究該現象是否普遍?供應商對其潛在客戶發動專利訴訟的考量、目的與策略為何?兩造雙方競爭與合作的動態關係是如何演变的?本研究以台灣智慧型手機產業為研究對象,於美國聯邦法院電子檔案資料庫系統(PACER)和美國國際貿易委員會訴訟資料庫(EDIS)中對台灣智慧型手機產業之175家上市公司進行專利訴訟案件的檢索並以動態競合策略的觀點對指標性個案進行深入分析。本研究發現供應商興訟其潛在客戶並非是普遍現象;「專利有效性」和「專利品質」是制勝的關鍵;而擁有完備實力的供應商可以通過專利換訂單策略,「以戰逼和」來打入潛在客戶的產品供應鏈,或運用專利訴訟的手段消除其他潛在客戶的侵權疑慮;「時機」對專利訴訟有著重要的影響。此外本研究亦闡明在理論及實務上的貢獻,希望在美國專利戰場中的「台灣經驗」可以供華人高科技企業去學習與借鑒。
    Although Taiwanese enterprises have injected a lot of resource into Patent Portfolio, they are still in a relatively weak position in the field of patent litigation. An optical lens manufacturer called LARGAN launched a patent infringement lawsuit against its potential customer Samsung in 2013. However, the patent litigation among enterprises always occurs in the competitors of the same industry. Is it common for suppliers to initiate patent litigation against their potential customer and what are the considerations, purposes and strategies? How did the dynamic relationship between the both parties in competition and cooperation evolve? The Taiwanese smartphone industry is taken as the research object to retrieve patent litigation cases about 175 listed companies of the Taiwanese smartphone industry in PACER and EDIS. Analyze index cases from the perspective of the dynamic coopetition strategy. Based on the findings,it is uncommon for suppliers to initiate patent litigation against their potential customer. "Patent Validity" and "Patent Quality" are the key to success. The suppliers with full strength can enter the product supply chain by exchanging patents into orders or eliminate the infringement doubt of other potential clients through patent litigation. "Timing" has an important impact on patent litigation. In addition, the theoretical and practical contribution is clarified and It is hoped that the "Taiwanese experience" accumulated in the U.S. patent battlefield can provide some reference for Chinese high-tech enterprises.
    Reference: 1.许牧彦. (2016). 加己減異、加異減己-專利佈署的全方位競爭策略. 2016中華民國科技管理研討會論文集.
    2.余朝權. (2005). 现代行銷學. 台北市: 五南圖書出版社.
    3.吳思華. (2000). 策略九說. 台北市: 臉譜出版社.
    4.李雅靖. (2016). 競合策略. 中華傳播學刊, 第二十九期.
    5.侯勝宗, & 連婉茜. (2017). 研發聯盟的動態競合管理:以中鋼為例. 科技管理學刊, 22(1), 29-65.
    6.陳明哲. (2009). 預測競爭對手的回應:AMC三環透視法.
    7.陳明哲. (2013). 競爭者分析:「市場共同性-資源相似性」架構. 哈佛商業評論, 2013年4月號(A+企業的3個簡單法則).
    8.黃炳龍. (2017). 台灣B2B驗證服務產業服務品質、品牌信任、關係行銷對顧客滿意度與忠誠度影響之研究.
    9.劉水深, 王又鵬, 陳振燧, 趙琪, & 陳松柏. (2002). 工業市場行銷. 新北市: 國立空中大學.
    10.Anderson, J. J. (2015). Court Competition for Patent Cases. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163(3), 631-698.
    11.Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-Opetition: 1. A Revolutionary Mindset That Redefines Competition and Cooperation; 2. the Game Theory Strategy That’s Changing: Crown Business.
    12.Caves, R. E. (1984). Economic-Analysis and The Quest For Competitive Advantage. American Economic Review, 74(2), 127-132.
    13.Charlesworth, A. (2014). An Introduction to Social Media Marketing. London: Routledge.
    14.Chen, M. J. (1996). Competitor Analysis and Inter-firm Rivalry: Toward a Theoretical Integration. The Academy of Management Review, 21, No. 1 100-134.
    15.Chen, M. J. (2009). Competitive dynamics research: An insider`s odyssey. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1), 5-25. doi:10.1007/s10490-008-9110-7
    16.Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. (1994). Competitive Attack, Retaliation and Performance - An Expectancy-Valence Framework. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 85-102. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150202
    17.Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive Dynamics: Themes, Trends, and A Prospective Research Platform. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 135-210. doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.660762
    18.Chen, M. J., & Wilson, T. (2003). Indirect Competition: Resource Diversion. Darden Case No. UVA-S-0102.
    19.Choffray, J.-M., & Lilien, G. L. (1978). Assessing Response to Industrial Marketing Strategy: An Operational Structure for Use in Making Decisions on Product Design and Communication Programs. Journal of Marketing, 42, 20-31.
    20.Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3).
    21.Dwye, F. R., & Tanner, J. (2002). Business Marketing: Connecting Strategy, Relationships, and Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    22.Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.
    23.E, F., & Webster, J. (1992). The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation. Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 1-17.
    24.Eliashberg, J., & Chatterjee, R. (1985). Analytical Models of Competition With Implications for Marketing - Issues, Findings, and Outlook. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(3), 237-261. doi:10.2307/3151423
    25.Ferrier, W. J. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 858-877. doi:10.2307/3069419
    26.Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. NBER Working Paper, w7741.
    27.Hsu, M.-Y., & Chen, M.-J. (2006). Competitor Analysis and Inter-Firm Rivalry: by integrating market commonality and resource similarity. Academy of Management(AOM) Annual Meeting, No.13266.
    28.Katila, R., & Chen, E. L. (2008). Effects of Search Timing on Innovation: The Value of Not Being in Sync with Rivals. Administrative Science Quarterly.
    29.Klerman, D., & Reilly, G. (2016). Forum Selling. Southern California Law Review, 89(2), 241-316.
    30.Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (1976). Marketing Management:Analysis, Planing and Control. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.,.
    31.Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. A. (1999). The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators. NBER Working Paper, w7345.
    32.Leonardbarton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities - A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009
    33.Love, B. J., & Yoon, J. (2017). Predictably Expensive: A Critical Look at Patent Litigation in the Eastern District of Texas. Stanford Technology Law Review, 20(1).
    34.McGrath, R. G., Chen, M. J., & MacMillan, I. C. (1998). Multimarket maneuvering in uncertain spheres of influence: Resource diversion strategies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 724-740. doi:10.2307/259059
    35.Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
    36.Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competition. New York: Free Press.
    37.Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors: Free Press.
    38.Robertson, T. S., Eliashberg, J., & Rymon, T. (1995). New Product Announcement Signals and Incumbent Reactions. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 1-15. doi:10.2307/1252115
    39.Robinson, P. J., Faris, C. W., & Wind, Y. (1967). Industrial Buying And Creative Marketing (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Sloan Management Review Assoc,Mit Sloan School Management.
    40.Sag, M. (2016). IP Litigation in US District Courts: 1994-2014. Iowa Law Review, 101(3), 1065-1112.
    41.Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Ndofor, H. A. (2001). Competitive dynamics research : critique and future directions. The Blackwell handbook of strategic management., 315-361.
    42.Weitz, B. A. (1985). Special Issue on Competition in Marketing - Introduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(3), 229-236.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    107364135
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107364135
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200454
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    413501.pdf3350KbAdobe PDF2133View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback