English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111300/142216 (78%)
Visitors : 48337187      Online Users : 809
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140570


    Title: 高階經理人星座與投資效率之關聯性
    Managerial Characteristics and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from CEO’s Zodiac
    Authors: 李婉綺
    Lee, Wan-Chi
    Contributors: 潘健民
    李婉綺
    Lee, Wan-Chi
    Keywords: 投資效率
    高階經理人
    星座
    Investment efficiency
    Top managers
    Zodiac
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-07-01 16:03:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Hambrick and Mason (1984)提出高層理論,認為高階管理團隊的人口統計特徵,反映其認知及價值觀等心理因素,進而影響企業策略和績效結果。本研究以過去文獻中未關注的星座,探討高階經理人的星座如何影響企業投資效率。
    本研究以 2005 年至 2021 年在東京證券交易所上市的公司為樣本。實證結果說明,僅高階經理人為處女座、天蠍座時對企業投資效率有 10% 顯著影響,但星座與過度投資或投資不足皆無關聯。在過度投資的樣本中,牡羊座、雙子座的高階經理人所領導的企業過度投資的程度較低;在投資不足的樣本中,射手座的高階經理人所領導的企業投資不足的程度較低。然而大多數星座與投資效率之間並無顯著關聯,與過度投資或投資不足亦然,因此本研究無法證實高階經理人星座對於企業投資效率的影響。
    Hambrick and Mason (1984) propose the upper echelons theory and argue that managerial characteristics of the top management team have consequences on corporate strategies and outcomes. This study examines how CEO zodiac signs affect the corporate investment efficiency using data from firms listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange from 2005 to 2021.
    The empirical results show that only CEOs whose zodiac is Virgos or Scorpios have a slightly significant association with investment efficiency. In the sample of over-investment, the companies led by the CEO of Aries and Gemini are less overinvested. In the sample of under-investment, the companies led by the CEO of Sagittarius are less underinvested. However, there is no significant association between most zodiac signs and investment efficiency. Overall, the results find no association between CEO zodiac signs and corporate investment efficiency.
    Reference: Abel, A. 1983. Optimal Investment under uncertainty. American Economic Review 73 (1): 228-233.
    Bae, G. S., S. U. Choi, D. S. Dhaliwal, and P. T. Lamoreaux. 2017. Auditors and client investment efficiency. Accounting Review 92 (2): 19-40.
    Bamber, L. S., J. Jiang, and I. Y. Wang. 2010. What`s my style? The influence of top managers on voluntary corporate disclosure. Accounting Review 85 (4): 1131-1162.
    Barker III, V. L., and G. C. Mueller. 2002. CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science 48 (6): 782-801.
    Bertrand, M., and A. Schoar. 2003. Managing with style: The effect of manager on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1169-1208.
    Biddle, G. C., and G. Hilary. 2006. Accounting quality and firm-level capital investment. Accounting Review 81 (5): 963-982.
    Biddle, G. C., G. Hilary, and R. S. Verdi. 2009. How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? Journal of Accounting and Economics 48 (2-3): 112-131.
    Blanchard, O. J., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1994. What do firms do with cash windfalls? Journal of Financial Economics 36 (1): 337-360.
    Calori, R., G. Johnson, and P. Sarnin. 1994. CEOs` cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management Journal 15 (6): 437-457.
    Carpenter, M. A., M. A. Geletkanycz, and W. G. Sanders. 2004. Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management 30 (6): 749-778.
    Chatterjee, A., and D. C. Hambrick. 2007. It`s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (3): 351-386.
    Chen, C., D. Young, and Z. Zhuang. 2013. Externalities of mandatory IFRS adoption: Evidence from cross-border spillover effects of financial information on investment efficiency. Accounting Review 88 (3): 881-914.
    Chen, F., O. K. Hope, Q. Li, and X. Wang 2011. Financial reporting quality and investment efficiency of private firms in emerging markets. Accounting Review 86 (4): 1255-1288.
    Chen, T., L. Xie, and Y. Zhang. 2017. How does analysts` forecast quality relate to corporate investment efficiency? Journal of Corporate Finance 43: 217-240.
    Cheng, M., D. Dhaliwal, and Y. Zhang. 2013. Does investment efficiency improve after the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting? Journal of Accounting and Economics 56 (1): 1-18.
    Cheng, S. 2008. Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 87: 157-176.
    Duh, R. R., C. H. Liao, C. M. Pan, and A. Takinshi. 2020. IFRS adoption, earnings quality, and investment efficiency: Evidence from Japan. Taiwan Accounting Review 16 (2): 219-257.
    Finkelstein, S., and D. Hambrick. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. St. Paul, West Educational Publishing.
    Gauquelin, M. 1982. Zodiac and personality: An empirical study. Skeptical Inquirer 6 (3): 57-65.
    Ge, W., D. Matsumoto, and J. L. Zhang. 2011. Do CFOs have style? An empirical investigation of the effect of individual CFOs on accounting practices. Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (4): 1141-1179.
    Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey, and M. Puri. 2013. Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. Journal of Financial Economics. 109 (1): 103-121.
    Ham, C., N. Seybert, and S. Wang. 2018. Narcissism is a bad sign: CEO signature size, investment, and performance. Review of Accounting Studies 23 (1): 234-264.
    Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review 32 (2): 334-343.
    Hambrick, D. C., and P. A. Mason. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9 (2): 193-206.
    Hayashi, F. 1982. Tobin’s marginal Q and average Q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50 (1): 213-224.
    Hitt, M. A., and B. B. Tyler. 1991. Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 12 (5): 327-351.
    Huang, X., and K. Nakagawa. 2017. Top management team characteristics and team processes: A review. Osaka Economic Papers 67 (2-3-4): 1-39.
    Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76 (2): 323-329.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Finance Economics 3 (4): 305-360.
    Kimberly, J. R., and M. J. Evanisko. 1981. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organization, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal 24 (4): 689-713.
    Lambert, R., C. Leuz, and R. E. Verrecchia. 2007. Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (2): 385-420.
    Lara, J. M. G., B. G. Osma, and F. Penalva. 2016. Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61 (1): 221-238.
    Lin, Y. E., Y. W. Li, T. Y. Cheng, and K. Lam. 2021. Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency: Does business strategy matter? International Review of Financial Analysis 73: 101585.
    Maddox, J. 1994. Defending science against anti-science. Nature 368: 185.
    Mahendra, A., S. P. Mohanty, and S. Sudalaimuthu. 2021. Financial Astrology and Behavioral Bias: Evidence from India. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets 28 (1): 3-17.
    Malmendier, U., and G. Tate. 2005. CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance 60 (6): 2661-2700.
    Matta, E., and P. W. Beamish. 2008. The accentuated CEO career horizon problem: Evidence from international acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal 29 (7): 683-700.
    McNichols, M. F., and S. R. Stubben. 2008. Does earnings management affect firms` investment decisions? Accounting Review 83 (6): 1571-1603.
    Nakano, M., and P. Nguyen. 2012. Board size and corporate risk-taking: Further evidence from Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review 20 (4): 369-387.
    Pitcher, P., S. Chreim, and V. Kisfalvi. 2000. CEO succession research: Methodological bridges over troubled waters. Strategic Management Journal 21 (6): 625-648.
    Priem, R. L., D. W. Lyon, and G. G. Dess. 1999. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management 25 (6): 935-953.
    Rajkovic, T. 2020. Lead independent directors and investment efficiency. Journal of Corporate Finance 64: 101690.
    Saklofske, D. H., I. W. Kelly, and D. W. McKerracher 1982. An empirical study of personality and astrological factors. Journal of Psychology 110 (2): 275-280.
    Sanders, W. G., and D. C. Hambrick 2007. Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal 50 (5): 1055-1078.
    Stiglitz, J. E., and A. Weiss. 1981. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review 71 (3): 393-410.
    Yoshikawa, H. 1980. On the “Q” theory of investment. American Economic Review 70 (4): 739-743.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    109353008
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109353008
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200595
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    300801.pdf1268KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback