English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141859 (78%)
Visitors : 47680814      Online Users : 888
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140741


    Title: 人格特質、自我呈現策略與幸福感:以社會支持觀點看Instagram情侶放閃貼文為例
    Personality, Self-presentation Tactics and Subjective Well-being: From a Social Supportive Perspective to View the Couple`s PDA Posts on Instagram
    Authors: 楊佩庭
    Yang, Pei-Ting
    Contributors: 陳憶寧
    Chen, Yi-Ning
    楊佩庭
    Yang, Pei-Ting
    Keywords: 放閃
    人格特質
    自我呈現策略
    情感社會支持
    幸福感
    Public display of affections(PDA)
    Personality traits
    Self-presentation tactics
    Emotional social support
    Subjective well-being
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-07-01 16:37:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以Instagram情侶放閃貼文為例,從社會支持論探討人格特質、自我呈現策略與幸福感間的關係進行討論,觀察開放性人格特質、外向性人格特質與神經質人格特質如何影響Instagram用戶的自我呈現策略,以及透過不同自我呈現策略是否透過情感社會支持影響幸福感。
    本研究共回收401份有效樣本,使用線性迴歸分析以及結構方程模型中介效果路徑分析進行資料分析,研究結果發現開放性以及外向性人格特質使用逢迎性與模範性自我呈現策略在Instagram上放閃呈正向相關,在炫耀性與示弱性自我呈現策略上並沒有顯著的相關性,神經質人格特質與所有自我呈現策略上皆沒有顯著的相關性。逢迎性自我呈現策略、炫耀性自我呈現策略與示弱性自我呈現策略皆可透過情感社會支持中介影響幸福感。
    This study uses Instagram couples` Public Display of Affections (PDA) posts as an example to discuss the relationship between personality traits, self-presentation tactics and subjective well-being from the perspective of social support, and to observe how openness, extroversion and neuroticism affect Instagram users. self-presentation tactics, and whether different self-presentation tactics affect well-being through emotional social support.
    A total of 401 valid samples were collected through an online survey, and linear regression analysis and structural equation model mediation effect path analysis were used to conduct data analysis. The results of the study found that openness and extroversion personality traits were positively displayed on Instagram using gratuitous and exemplary self-presentation tactics. There is no significant correlation between conspicuous and weak self-presentation tactics, and neurotic personality trait has no significant correlation with all self-presentation tactics. Pleasing self-presentation tactics, conspicuous self-presentation tactics, and revealing self-presentation tactics can all affect subjective well-being through the mediation of emotional social support.
    Reference: 參考文獻

    中文文獻
    Abraham Maslow (2020)。《動機與人格:馬斯洛的心理學講堂》(梁永安譯)。台北:商周出版社。(原著發表於1954)
    呂浩綱(2020)。《Instagram 使用者人格特質、自我展示策略與幸福感之關聯研究》。台北:國立政治大學傳播碩士學位學程碩士論文。
    呂敏昌(1992)。《國中生的生活壓力、因應方式與心理社會幸福感之關係》。台北:文化大學兒童福利學系研究所碩士論文。
    李素菁(2001)。《青少年家庭支持與幸福感之相關研究-以台中市立國中生為例》。靜宜大學青少年兒童福利學系碩士論文。
    李清茵(2003)。《家庭互動行為、心理需求滿足、關係滿意度與幸福感之相關研究》。國立屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導學系研究所碩士論文。
    谷玲玲(2013)。〈網路親密關係中的自我揭露〉。《資訊社會研究》,24,頁1-26。
    林日璇(2017)。〈你怎麼加臉書「好友」? 連結策略與感知社會支持及心理幸福感的關聯性〉。《資訊社會研究》,32,頁113-149。
    林杏真(2001)。《自傷青少年生活壓力, 社會支持與自我強度的發展及其關係研究》。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文。
    洪譽凌(2018)。《臉書使用者的自我呈現對於主觀幸福感之影響》。國立台灣師範大學管理學院管理研究所碩士論文。
    張萃珉、李怡娟(2000)。〈社會支持介入措施對居家中風個案身心健康之影響—以宜蘭地區為例〉。《護理研究》,8(4),頁423-434。
    梁皖茵、吳岳庭、林容伊、楊采翎(2019)。〈人格特質於Instagram的自我呈現策略及圖像社交研究〉。《2019中華傳播學會年會論文》。國立交通大學。
    陳姿蓓(2010)。《請看我表演!探討網路社交平台的自我展演》。國立臺灣藝術大學應用媒體藝術研究所學位論文。
    楊美雪、朱家瑩(2016)。〈行動社群參與者社交動機與自我呈現策略之研究〉。《藝術學報》,(99),頁89-108。
    劉熒潔、劉嘉珮、王筠雅(2013)。〈以社會支持觀點探討使用者在網路社群的幸福感-以 Facebook 為例〉。《資訊科技國際期刊》,7(2),頁23-33。
    薛鵬達(2017)。《社交媒體中的自我呈現及其影響因素研究》。寧波大學碩士論文。
    謝明華(2002)。《國小學童之父親參與、幸福感及學業成就之相關研究》。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    蘇文郁(2005)。《人格特質、印象管理與組織公民行為關係之探討》。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所學位論文。
    蘇蘅(2019)。《傳播研究方法新論》。台北市:雙葉書廊。

    英文文獻
    Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Oxford, England: Holt, Reinhart &Winston.
    Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Comput. Hum. Behav., 26, 1289-1295.
    Argyle, M. (1987). The Psychology of Happiness. New York: Routedge.
    Arkin, R. M. (1981). Self-presentation styles. Impression management theory and social psychological research, 311, 334.
    Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological bulletin, 91(1), 3.
    Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2016). The relationship between Facebook use and well being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 21 , 265-281.
    Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310.
    Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in human behavior, 26(2), 247-253.
    Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665.
    DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Guidelines in scale development. Scale development: Theory and applications, 51-91.
    Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
    Diener, E., and Larsen, R. J. (1993). The Subjective Experience of Emotional Well-Being. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 98(2):405-415, New york: Guilford Press.
    Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(1), 130.
    Dinner, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3): 542-575.
    Eftekhar, A., Fullwood, C. and Morris, N. (2014), Capturing personality from Facebook photos and photo-related activities: how much exposure do you need? , Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 162-170.
    Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117-140.
    Goffman, E. (1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Harmondsworth.
    Golbeck, J., Robles, C., & Turner, K. (2011). Predicting personality with social media. In CHI`11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 253-262).
    Gulledge, A. K., Gulledge, M. H., & Stahmannn, R. F. (2003). Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31(4), 233-242.
    Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
    J. S. House. (1981). Work Stress and Social Support, Philippines: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
    John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 102-138). Berkeley: University of California.
    Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. Psychological perspectives on the self, 1(1), 231-262.
    Kim, J., & Lee, J. E. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyber Psychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(6), 359-364.
    Krämer, N. C., & Winter, S. (2008). Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. Journal of media psychology, 20(3), 106-116.
    Krueger, K. L., & Forest, A. L. (2020). Communicating commitment: A relationship-protection account of dyadic displays on social media. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1059-1073.
    Miller, D., & Sinanan, J. (2017). Visualising Facebook: a comparative perspective. UCL Press.
    Nick, E. A., Cole, D. A., Cho, S. J., Smith, D. K., Carter, T. G., & Zelkowitz, R. L. (2018). The Online Social Support Scale: Measure development and validation. Psychological assessment, 30(9), 1127.
    Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Social and technological motivations for online photo sharing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(4), 624-642.
    Ong, E. Y., Ang, R. P., Ho, J., Lim, J. C., Goh, D. H., Lee, C. S., & Chua, A. Y.(2011). Narcissism, extraversion and adolescents’ self-presentation on Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 180-185.
    Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students` social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 30(3), 227-238.
    Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in human behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664.
    Seidman, G., Langlais, M., & Havens, A. (2019). Romantic relationship-oriented Facebook activities and the satisfaction of belonging needs. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(1), 52.
    Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of social issues, 40(4), 11-36.
    Sosik, V. S., & Bazarova, N. N. (2014). Relational maintenance on social network sites: How Facebook communication predicts relational escalation. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 124-131.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangulating love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 119–138). Yale University Press.
    Tang, J., Chen, M., Yang, C., Chung, T., & Lee, Y. (2016). Personality traits, interpersonal relationships, online social support, and Facebook addiction. Telematics Informatics, 33, 102-108.
    Tedeschi, J. T., & Lindskold, S. (1976). Social psychology: Interdependence, interaction, and influence. New York: Wiley.
    Toma, C. L., & Choi, M. (2015). The couple who Facebooks together, stays together: Facebook self-presentation and relationship longevity among college-aged dating couples. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 367-372.
    Veenhoven, R. (1989). Is Happienss Relative. In J. P. Forgas and J. M. Innes (Eds.), Recent Advance in Social Psychology: An International Perspective. North Holland: Elsevier.
    Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is Happiness A Relative, Social Indicators Research, 24(1):1-34.

    網路資料
    Brent Barnhart(2021年02月25日)。〈The most important Instagram statistics you need to know for 2021〉,《Sprout Social》。上網日期:2021年07月01日。取自:https://sproutsocial.com/insights/instagram-stats/
    comScore(2010)。全球趨勢:女性較男性更喜歡用社群網站。上網日期:2022年04月15日。取自:https://www.ixresearch.com/web-traffic/%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2-%E5%A5%B3%E6%80%A7%E8%BC%83%E7%94%B7%E6%80%A7%E6%9B%B4%E5%96%9C%E6%AD%A1%E7%94%A8%E7%A4%BE%E7%BE%A4%E7%B6%B2%E7%AB%99/
    Denise Curtin(2019)。〈Apparently, there`s one glaring sign that a relationship won`t go the distance〉,《Her》。上網日期:2021年07月01日。取自:https://www.her.ie/life/apparently-theres-one-glaring-sign-that-a-relationship-wont-go-the-distance-397109
    台灣網路資訊中心(2020)。2020台灣網路報告-網友世代差異報告。上網日期:2021年11月21日。取自:https://report.twnic.tw/2020/
    創市際與comScore(2017)。comScore與創市際回顧2016年台灣網路使用概況。上網日期:2021年08月02日。取自:https://www.cacafly.com/post/comscore%E8%88%87%E5%89%B5%E5%B8%82%E9%9A%9B%E5%9B%9E%E9%A1%A72016%E5%B9%B4%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E7%B6%B2%E8%B7%AF%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    109464011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109464011
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200496
    Appears in Collections:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback