English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46372525      Online Users : 601
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/140773


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140773


    Title: 私人保險保費之前男女平等？從德國法觀點評析歐洲法院Test-Achats ASBL案判決
    Unisex Pricing in Private Insurance?--An Analysis of the ECJ Test-Achats ASBL Judgment from the Perspective of German Law
    Authors: 陳靜慧
    Chen, Ching-hui
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 性別中立定價;禁止性別歧視原則;統計性歧視;刻板印象;契約自由
    Unisex pricing;Prohibition of sex discrimination;Statistical discrimination;Stereotype;Freedom of contract
    Date: 2015-12
    Issue Date: 2022-07-04 13:00:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 歐體2004/113/EG平等待遇指令第5條第2項原規定會員國在能提出最新的保險精算數據為依據的情況下，例外允許男女差別保險費率得繼續存在。歐洲法院於Test-Achats ASBL案，宣告前開允許男女差別保費之例外條款因牴觸歐盟法而失效。本文從性別統計性歧視之容許性著手，分析究竟歐洲法院要求各保險公司必須統一男女保險費率的裁判見解，是否與男女平等原則之意旨相符。其次，禁止私人保險採取男女差別保險費率，限制了私人保險公司的契約自由，本文嘗試就禁止性別歧視原則適用於私法領域之界限提出看法。
    The purpose of this paper is to analyze the 2011 decision of the European Court of Justice in Test-Achats ASBL. The ECJ ruled that the different premiums based purely on the grounds of gender were incompatible with the unisex rule, which is the purpose of the Di-rective 2004/113/EC in the insurance field and therefore, with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The core issue is—Could insurers use sex as a determining risk factor to justify differences in individuals’ premiums? Gender is commonly used as a determining risk-rating factor for certain insurance products because there is statistical data to back it up. This article thus aims to examine the discrimination dis-putes caused by different premiums for men and women in light of the boundary of statistical discrimination on the grounds of sex. Ac-cording to the ECJ’s judgment, from 21 December 2012, insurance companies in the EU are no longer allowed to charge different prices based on a person’s sex. This restricts private company’s freedom of contract. The article hence goes on to discuss the relationship between prohibition of sex discrimination and the principle of freedom of contract.
    Relation: 歐美研究, Vol.45, No.4, pp.571-618
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.7015/JEAS.201512_45(4).0004
    DOI: 10.7015/JEAS.201512_45(4).0004
    Appears in Collections:[法學院] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2150View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback