Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140970
|
| Title: | 三大法人持股比率對投資人情緒之影響
The Influence of Three Major Institutional Holding Ratio on Investors’ Sentiment |
| Authors: | 陳祥方
Chen, Hsiang-Fang |
| Contributors: | 郭維裕
Kuo, Wei-Yu
陳祥方
Chen, Hsiang-Fang |
| Keywords: | 三大法人持股比率
投資人情緒
向量自我迴歸模型
Three Major Institutional Holding Ratio
Investor Sentiment
VAR Model |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2022-08-01 17:04:16 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 台灣股票市場的投資人結構以散戶為主，且考量散戶相較於機構投資人而言較容易受到不理性因素的影響，因此台灣股票市場十分適合研究行為財務學的相關議題。由於散戶在投資台灣股票市場時經常會觀察三大法人的操作，本研究便以台灣股票市場中的投資人情緒作為主題，分析三大法人持股比率是否對投資人情緒造成影響，再進一步依據台灣證券交易所之產業分類進行異質性分析，觀察其影響效果是否會因為產業不同而相異。本研究建構向量自我迴歸模型（VAR）檢視三大法人持股比率、外資持股比率、投信持股比率、自營商持股比率與投資人情緒之間的關係，並藉由含外生變數之向量自我迴歸模型（VARX）控制市場對於主要實證變數的影響並確認其關係是否改變。實證結果顯示：以大盤而言，僅投信持股比率對投資人情緒具有負向顯著影響，其餘法人持股比率皆無影響；以各產業而言，其投資人情緒皆受到三大法人持股比率的影響，其中又以投信持股比率所能影響的產業數量為最多；反映投資人無論觀察整體市場或個別產業時都較關注投信之操作狀況，至於外資及自營商之操作狀況，則是在各產業時才更被投資人所關注。
The structure of the Taiwan stock market is dominated by retail investors, who are more susceptible to irrational factors than institutional investors; therefore, the Taiwan stock market is suitable for studying behavioral finance. Since retail investors often observe the operations of the three major institutional investors when investing in the Taiwan stock market, this study focuses on the influence of the three major institutional holding ratio on investors’ sentiment, and then conducts a heterogeneity analysis based on the industrial classification of Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation (TESE) to see whether the influence varies by industry. This study constructs the Vector Autoregressive Model (VAR) to examine the relationship between the three major institutional holding ratio and investors’ sentiment, and uses the VAR Model with Exogenous Variables (VARX) to control for market influence on main empirical variables to identify whether the relationships change. The empirical results show that for the broad market, only the investment trust holding ratio has a significantly negative impact on investors’ sentiment, while the other institutional holding ratio has no impact. On the other hand, in terms of each industry, three major institutional holding ratio has significant impacts on investors’ sentiment though the amount of influenced industries that investment trust has a significant impact on is the most among the three major institutional investors. In addition, retail investors pay more attention to the operation of foreign institutional investors and domestic dealers in each industry than in the broad market. |
| Reference: | Baker, M., & Stein, J. C. (2004). Market liquidity as a sentiment indicator. Journal of financial Markets, 7(3), 271-299.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2000). The equity share in new issues and aggregate stock returns. the Journal of Finance, 55(5), 2219-2257.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. The review of financial studies, 21(2), 785-818.
Bartov, E., Radhakrishnan, S., & Krinsky, I. (2000). Investor sophistication and patterns in stock returns after earnings announcements. The Accounting Review, 75(1), 43-63.
Bohl, M. T., & Brzeszczyński, J. (2006). Do institutional investors destabilize stock prices? Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 16(4), 370-383.
Brown, G. W., & Cliff, M. T. (2004). Investor sentiment and the near-term stock market. Journal of empirical finance, 11(1), 1-27.
Yin-Wong, C., & Chinn, M. D. (1996). Deterministic, stochastic, and segmented trends in aggregate output: a cross-country analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 48(1), 134-162.
Dahlquist, M., & Robertsson, G. (2001). Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics. Journal of financial economics, 59(3), 413-440.
De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of political Economy, 98(4), 703-738.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1), 3-56.
Faugere, C., & Shawky, H. A. (2003). Volatility and Institutional Investor Holdings in a Declining Market: A Study of Nasdaq during the Year 2000. Journal of Applied Finance, 13(2), 32.
Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. The quarterly journal of Economics, 116(1), 229-259.
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
Grinstein, Y., & Michaely, R. (2005). Institutional holdings and payout policy. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1389-1426.
Hirshleifer, D., & Shumway, T. (2003). Good day sunshine: Stock returns and the weather. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1009-1032.
Howarth, E., & Hoffman, M. S. (1984). A multidimensional approach to the relationship between mood and weather. British Journal of Psychology, 75(1), 15-23.
Jiang, Y., Li, H., & Li, Y. (2021, December). Does Institutional Investor Ownership Influence Corporate Cash Holding?. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021) (pp. 78-85). Atlantis Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
Kamstra, M. J., Kramer, L. A., & Levi, M. D. (2003). Winter blues: A SAD stock market cycle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 324-343.
Lutz, C. (2015). The impact of conventional and unconventional monetary policy on investor sentiment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 61, 89-105.
McCahery, J. A., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. The Journal of Finance, 71(6), 2905-2932.
Saunders, E. M. (1993). Stock prices and Wall Street weather. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1337-1345.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The limits of arbitrage. The Journal of finance, 52(1), 35-55.
Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1-48.
Song, Y., Hao, X., & Lu, Z. (2021). The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Investor Sentiment—Evidence From A-Share Listed Companies in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 3929.
吳文心（2011）。氣候舒適度對投資人情緒與台灣股票市場的影響。碩士論文，國立台灣大學國際企業研究所。
周賓凰、張宇志、林美珍（2007）。投資人情緒與股票報酬互動關係。證券市場發展季刊, 19(2)，153-190。
林育珊（2013）。天氣效應、市場情勢與台灣投資人情緒之研究。碩士論文，國立台中科技大學財務金融研究所。
林穎芬、黃麗津、陳思源（2012）。經理人薪酬, 公司治理與現金股利政策。中山管理評論，20(4)，1213-1251。
洪榮耀、洪彥仲（2011）。外國機構投資人持股比例與市場波動之關聯性分析: 以台灣證券市場為例。真理財經學報，(25)。67-88。
陳香文（2014）。奢侈稅對投資人情緒的影響：以奢侈稅對相關產業的衝擊為例。碩士論文，淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班。
曾琬婷（2011）。國際會計準則對投資人情緒的影響-以十號公報為例。碩士論文，淡江大學會計研究所。
蔡佩蓉、王元章、張眾卓（2009）。投資人情緒、公司特徵與台灣股票報酬之研究。經濟研究，45(2)，273-322。
蔡維哲、翁培師、陳婉甄（2017）。台灣股票市場三大法人持股與公司資本結構的關聯性。管理學報，34(2)，307-329。
盧陽正、翁振益、方豪（2008）。台灣股市三大法人持股調整、群聚效應、回饋交易、串流行為與群聚之動量持續性。管理與系統，15(4)，523-543。
蕭朝興、陳馨蕙、黃俊凱（2011）。台灣機構投資人動態持股偏好之探討。管理學報，28(2)，97-126。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易學系
109351017 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109351017 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202200642 |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101701.pdf | | 5470Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
