政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/140977
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 111253/142169 (78%)
造访人次 : 48150783      在线人数 : 455
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/140977


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140977


    题名: 非擔任主管職務之全時員工薪資與企業揭露員工薪資調整情形之關聯性研究
    無
    作者: 林芯妤
    Lin, Hsin-Yu
    贡献者: 梁嘉紋
    Liang, Jia-Wen
    林芯妤
    Lin, Hsin-Yu
    关键词: 自願性揭露
    員工薪酬
    非擔任主管職務之全時員工
    薪資調整
    公司治理
    企業社會責任
    Voluntary disclosure
    Employee compensation
    Non-executive full-time employee
    Pay adjustment
    Corporate governance
    Corporate social responsibility
    日期: 2021
    上传时间: 2022-08-01 17:05:53 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 過去研究多探討企業社會責任環境層面的自願性揭露，卻較少探討社會層面的自願性揭露，本研究以2018年至2019年台灣上市櫃公司為樣本，探討非擔任主管職務之全時員工（以下簡稱非主管員工）薪資水準與公司自願揭露非主管員工薪資調整情形之關聯性，並進一步探討在自願性揭露下，非主管員工薪資水準與公司調整非主管員工薪資之關聯性。研究結果發現當非主管員工平均薪資愈高、非主管員工平均薪資高於同業水準或是高於同業水準愈多，公司較會自願揭露非主管員工薪資調整情形。此外，在有揭露非主管員工薪資調整情形的公司中，當非主管員工平均薪資愈高、非主管員工平均薪資高於同業水準或是高於同業水準愈多，公司較會調整非主管員工薪資，且當非主管員工平均薪資愈高，非主管員工的平均薪資調整幅度愈大，整體而言，實證結果支持自願性揭露理論。
    Previous studies mostly focused on the environmental voluntary disclosure of corporate social responsibility but rarely examined social aspect of voluntary disclosure. Using a sample of Taiwan listed companies from 2018 to 2019, this study examines the relation between the pay level of non-executive full-time employees (non-executive employees) and the voluntary disclosure of non-executive employee pay adjustments, and further examines the relation between the pay level of non-executive employees and the pay adjustment of non-executive employees for firms voluntarily disclosing their pay adjustments. The results suggest that when the pay level of non-executive employees is higher, companies are more likely to voluntarily disclose pay adjustments of non-executive employees. In addition, based on the sub-sample of companies that voluntarily disclose pay adjustments for non-executive employees, the results show that the pay level of non-executive employees is positively associated with the likelihood and the magnitude of pay adjustments for non-executive employees. Overall, the results are consistent with the voluntary disclosure theory.
    參考文獻: 行政院主計總處國勢普查處薪資調查科，2020，109年2月職位空缺統計及108年經常性薪資調升情形，國勢普查處新聞稿。
    行政院主計總處國勢普查處薪資調查科，2021，受僱員工薪資與生產力，國勢普查處新聞稿。
    吳幸蓁、陳漢鐘與戚務君，2017，誠信經營與企業社會責任報告書之揭露與確信， 中華會計學刊，第12卷：423-470。
    吳幸蓁與廖蕙儀，2017，自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果. 中山管理評論，第25 卷第1期：13-62。
    吳復新，1996，人力資源管理，台北：國立空中大學。
    林文政，2006，薪資制度與管理，台北：國立空中大學。
    陳瑞斌與許崇源，2007，公司治理結構與資訊揭露之關聯性研究，交大管理學報第27卷第2期：55-109。
    黃英忠，1889，現代人力資源管理，台北:華泰。
    黃振豐與許志豪，2007，利害關係人與環境資訊揭露關聯性之探討，管理學域學術研討會論文集：A-45-A-64。
    葉銀華、李存修與柯承恩，2002，公司治理與評等系統，台北：商智文化。
    諸承明，2001，薪酬設計理論與實務之整合性模式－台灣大型企業實證分析，人力資源管理學報第1卷第1期：1-25。
    諸承明、戚樹誠與李長貴，1996，薪資設計之文獻回顧與評論－建立「薪資設計四要素模式」，人力資源學報第6期：57-85。
    諸承明、戚樹誠與李長貴，1998，我國大型企業薪資設計現況及其成效之研究－以「薪資設計四要素模式」為分析架構，輔仁管理評論第5卷第1期：97-116。
    歐進士、陳博舜與李貴富，2004，台灣資訊電子業之訓練活動的企業價值分析， 人力資源管理學報第4卷第4期：51-72。
    Adams, J. S. 1963. Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67 (5): 422-436.
    Akhtaruddin, M., M. A. Hossain, M. Hossain, and Y. Lee. 2009. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research 7 (1): 1-19.
    Ali Fekrat, M., C. Inclan, and D. Petroni. 1996. Corporate environmental disclosures: Competitive disclosure hypothesis using 1991 annual report data. The International Journal of Accounting 31 (2): 175-195.
    Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., T. E. Christensen, and K. E. Hughes. 2004. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 (5): 447-471.
    Barako, D. G., P. Hancock, and H. Izan. 2006. Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 (2): 107-125.
    Bewley, K., and Y. Li. 2000. Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: a voluntary disclosure perspective. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management 1: 201–226.
    Bird, A., and S. A. Karolyi. 2016. Do institutional investors demand public disclosure? The Review of Financial Studies 29 (12): 3245-3277.
    Bizjak, J. M., M. L. Lemmon, and L. Naveen. 2008. Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation? Journal of Financial Economics 90 (2): 152-168.
    Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, G. D. Richardson, and F. P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (4): 303-327.
    Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. 2013. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review 86 (1): 59-100.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., S. Radhakrishnan, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2012. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review 87 (3): 723-759.
    Dye, R. A. 1985. Disclosure of nonproprietary information. Journal of Accounting Research: 123-145.
    Freedman, M., and C. Wasley. 1990. The association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure in annual reports and 10Ks. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3 (2): 183-193.
    Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management : A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
    Gray, R., R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8 (2): 47-77.
    Gul, F. A., and S. Leung. 2004. Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23 (5): 351-379.
    Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3): 405-440.
    Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 153-161.
    Henderson, R. I., and R. I. Henderson. 1997. Compensation Management in a Knowledge-Based World. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
    Heneman, R. L. 1992. Merit Pay : Linking Pay Increases to Performance Ratings. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
    Herzberg, F., B. Mausner, and B. B. Synderman. 1959. The Motivation to Work. New York: Wiley.
    Ho, S. S., and K. S. Wong. 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 10 (2): 139-156.
    Hummel, K., and C. Schlick. 2016. The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure– Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 35 (5): 455-476.
    Ingram, R. W., and K. B. Frazier. 1980. Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (2): 614-622.
    Iskander, M. R., and N. Chamlou. 1999. Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360.
    Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 1993. Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2): 246-271.
    Lawler III, E. E., G. E. Ledford Jr, and L. Chang. 1993. Who uses skill-based pay, and why. Compensation & Benefits Review 25 (2): 22-26.
    Ledford Jr, G. E. 1991. Three case studies on skill-based pay: An overview. Compensation & Benefits Review 23 (2): 11-23.
    Lindblom, C. K. 1994. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper read at Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York.
    Lytle, C. W. 1954. Job Evaluation Methods. New York: Ronald Press Co.
    Mahoney, T. A. 1989. Multiple pay contingencies: Strategic design of compensation. Human Resource Management 28 (3): 337-347.
    Mahoney, T. A. 1991. Job evaluation: Endangered species or anachronism? Human Resource Management Review 1 (2): 155-162.
    McKinnon, J. L., and L. Dalimunthe. 1993. Voluntary disclosure of segment information by Australian diversified companies. Accounting & Finance 33 (1): 33-50.
    Meek, G. K., C. B. Roberts, and S. J. Gray. 1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by U.S., U.K. and continental european multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (3): 555-572.
    Miles, R. E., and C. C. Snow. 1984. Designing strategic human resources systems. Organizational Dynamics 13 (1): 36-52.
    Milkovich, G. T., and J. M. Newman. 1984. Compensation. Plano, Tex.: Business Publications.
    Moskowitz, M. 1972. Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review 1 (1): 71-75.
    OECD. 2015. G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    Patten, D. M. 1991. Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10 (4): 297-308.
    Patten, D. M. 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (8): 763-773.
    Pfeffer, J., and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations : A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
    Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 237-265.
    Richardson, A. J., and M. Welker. 2001. Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26 (7-8): 597-616.
    Robbins, S. P. 1978. Personnel : The Management of Human Resources. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    Roberts, R. W. 1992. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (6): 595-612.
    Sethi, S. P. 1975. Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review 17 (3): 58-64.
    Sethi, S. P. 1979. A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Academy of Management Review 4 (1): 63-74.
    Shocker, A. D., and S. P. Sethi. 1973. An approach to incorporating societal preferences in developing corporate action strategies. California Management Review 15 (4): 97-105.
    Strand, R. 1983. A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the social environment. Academy of Management Review 8 (1): 90-96.
    Ullmann, A. A. 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review 10 (3): 540-557.
    Verrecchia, R. E. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 179-194.
    Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and Motivation. NY: Wiley.
    Wallace, M. J., and C. H. Fay. 1988. Compensation Theory and Practice. Boston, Mass: PWS-Kent.
    Wiseman, J. 1982. An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 7 (1): 53-63.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    108353015
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108353015
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201099
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    301501.pdf2983KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈