English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111299/142216 (78%)
Visitors : 48270999      Online Users : 989
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/140988
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140988


    Title: 外國企業在台第一上市櫃(KY)公司審計品質與KY公司查核專家、當地知識之研究
    Audit Quality of Foreign Initial Listed Firms (KY Companies), KY Specialist Audit Firm and Operating Local Knowledge
    Authors: 黃薏芯
    Huang, I-Hsin
    Contributors: 周玲臺
    黃薏芯
    Huang, I-Hsin
    Keywords: 外國企業在台第一上市櫃(KY)公司
    審計品質
    KY公司查核專家
    主要營運地
    當地知識
    KY companies
    Audit quality
    KY specialists
    Main operating region
    Local knowledge
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-08-01 17:08:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究首先探討KY公司與非KY公司間審計品質之差異,接著進一步檢視KY公司查核專家以及主要營運地區在中國對KY公司審計品質之影響。本文以2010年至2020年台灣所有之上市櫃公司為樣本,實證結果顯示KY公司之審計品質整體會較其他非KY公司差。以2010年至2020年之上市櫃KY公司為樣本,顯示當KY公司由KY公司專家事務所查核時,其審計品質較差; 當主要營運地區位於中國時,審計品質也較差。推測可能由於台灣審計公費競爭激烈且較他國為低,KY公司查核專家礙於成本考量,無法聘用中國當地聯盟所協助提供必要之當地知識,以補償該地較弱之市場規範,而導致審計品質降低。
    This research first investigates whether the audit quality of foreign initial listed firms (KY companies) is different from that of the non-KY companies. We further examine if KY company audit specialists and major operating region in China affect the audit quality of KY companies. This study uses the listed companies in Taiwan from 2010 to 2020 as a sample. The empirical results show that the audit quality of KY companies is lower than that of other non-KY companies. Taking KY companies from 2010 to 2020 as a sample, we find that when KY companies are audited by a KY company specialist firm, or when their main operating region is located in China, the audit quality is also lower. Chan, et al. (2021) concluded that audit affiliates’ local knowledge may compensate for a weaker regulatory oversight and reduce audit quality difference of foreign companies. We suspect that KY company auditors, constrained by Taiwan`s low audit fees, could not afford hiring Chinese affiliate firms to provide essential local knowledge for improving audit quality.
    Reference: 王銘杰,2019,台灣證券市場第一上市股票價格形成之探討,證券市場發展季刊,第31卷:39-65。
    周玲臺、邱薏蓉與邱献良,2020,PCAOB國際檢查對會計師及事務所審計品質外溢效果之影響,會計評論,第71期:83-131。
    施文玲,2020,證交所推動KY股上市之挑戰及因應策略,證券服務,第677期:11-15。
    葛俊佑與蔡岳霖,2019,海外來台第一上市櫃企業公司治理與股利政策之關聯,當代會計,第20卷:265-295。

    Asthana, S. C., Raman, K., and Xu, H. 2015. US-listed foreign companies` choice of a US-based versus home country-based Big N principal auditor and the effect on audit fees and earnings quality. Accounting Horizons 29(3): 631-666.
    Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., and Yang, J. S. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: a Journal of Practice & theory 22(2): 71-97.
    Becker, C. L., Defond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., and Subramanyam, K. R. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(1): 1-24.
    Chan, K. H., Guo, Y. W., and Mo, P. L. L. 2021. Can auditors` local knowledge compensate for a weaker regulatory oversight for the audit quality of foreign companies? Accounting and Business Research 51(2): 127-155.
    Chen, L. 2016. Local Institutions, audit quality, and corporate scandals of US-listed foreign firms. Journal of Business Ethics 133(2): 351-373.
    Chi, H.-Y., and Chin, C.-L. 2011. Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: a Journal of Practice & theory 30(2): 201-229.
    Chi, W., and Huang, H. 2005. Discretionary accruals, audit-firm tenure and audit-partner tenure: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 1(1): 65-92.
    Chin, C. L., and Chi, H. Y. 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(3): 729.
    Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Qiu, A. A., and Zang, Y. 2012. Geographic proximity between auditor and client: How does it impact audit quality? Auditing: a Journal of Practice & theory 31(2): 43-72.
    Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., and Taylor, S. L. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting & Economics 20(3): 297-322.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(3): 183-199.
    Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., and Sweeney, A. P. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review: 193-225.
    DeFond, M., and Zhang, J. Y. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting & Economics 58(2-3): 275-326.
    DeFond, M. L., and Jiambalvo, J. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting & Economics 17(1-2): 145-176.
    Francis, J. R., Maydew, E. L., and Sparks, H. C. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: a Journal of Practice & theory 18(2): 17-34.
    Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., and Nelson, K. K. 2002. The relation between auditors` fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77(s-1): 71-105.
    Fung, S. Y. K., Raman, K., and Zhu, X. K. 2017. Does the PCAOB international inspection program improve audit quality for non-US-listed foreign clients? Journal of Accounting and Economics 64(1): 15-36.
    Garcia-Blandon, J., Argiles-Bosch, J. M., and Ravenda, D. 2020. Learning by Doing? Partners Audit Experience and the Quality of Audit Services. Revista De Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review 23(2): 197-209.
    Gaver, J. J., and Utke, S. 2019. Audit quality and specialist tenure. The Accounting Review 94(3): 113-147.
    Ghosh, A., and Moon, D. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review 80(2): 585-612.
    Gunn, & Michas. 2018. Auditor multinational expertise and audit quality. The Accounting Review 93(4): 203-224.
    He, Y., Li, B., Liu, Z., and Pittman, J. 2021. Does the threat of a PCAOB inspection mitigate US institutional investors` home bias? Contemporary Accounting Research.
    Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29(2): 193-228.
    Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., and Wasley, C. E. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting & Economics 39(1): 163-197.
    Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Does Big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting Horizons 17: 1-16.
    Krishnan, J., Krishnan, J., & Song, H. 2017. PCAOB international inspections and audit quality. The Accounting Rreview 92(5): 143-166.
    Lamoreaux, P. T. 2016. Does PCAOB inspection access improve audit quality? An examination of foreign firms listed in the United States. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61(2-3): 313-337.
    Liu, L. L., Xie, X. M., Chang, Y. S., & Forgione, D. A. 2017. New clients, audit quality, and audit partner industry expertise: Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Auditing 21(3): 288-303.
    Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Omer, T. C. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor‐client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Rreview 78(3): 779-799.
    Reichelt, K. J., & Wang, D. C. 2010. National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research 48(3): 647-686.
    Srinivasan, S., Wahid, A. S., & Yu, G. 2015. Admitting mistakes: Home country effect on the reliability of restatement reporting. The Accounting Rreview 90(3): 1201-1240.
    Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. 1986. Positive accounting theory.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    109353030
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109353030
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200986
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    303001.pdf1972KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback