English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48003537      Online Users : 1024
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141382


    Title: 台灣金融生態圈策略分析之探討-以台新銀行、玉山銀行與Line Bank為例
    A Study on the Strategies of Financial Ecosystem in Taiwan:Cases of Taishin Bank, E. Sun Bank and Line Bank
    Authors: 巫翊璿
    Wu, Yi-Hsuan
    Contributors: 郭曉玲
    Guo, Shiau-Ling
    巫翊璿
    Wu, Yi-Hsuan
    Keywords: 金融業
    金融生態圈
    網絡效應
    商業模式
    平台策略
    Financial Industry
    Financial Ecosystem
    Network Effect
    Business Model
    Platform Strategy
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-08-01 18:57:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 2020年,台灣處於疫情爆發以及純網銀即將開業之際,再加上金融科技的技術逐漸完備,傳統金融業紛紛提出欲發展生態圈之策略,期望透過API的方式將與各種不同的產業相互串連,以貼近客戶的生活場景,帶動金融服務的使用。

    本研究挑選三間在生態圈發展中具有代表性的金融業者,分別為台新銀行、玉山銀行以及Line Bank,並透過個案訪談及次級資料法搜集相關資料,以商業模式圖說明三種不同的生態圈發展模式,並經由分析其優劣勢並給予策略建議。

    由於台新銀行採用銀行即平台的模式,將所有生活和金融相關的功能集於同一平台,客戶無需切換平台就可一次滿足金融與生活的需求,因此客戶體驗較佳;玉山銀行透過全盈支付分散在各種產業的平台上,其優勢為觸點較廣;Line Bank的優勢則在於其社群基礎,未來可期望其透過點數加深與Line生態圈的合作。

    透過本研究可瞭解到傳統金融業者以及純網銀業者在建構金融生態圈上採行策略的差異,由於生態圈仍處於起步階段,筆者期望能夠透過此研究能更夠完善相關的研究內容,並提供未來研究者可行的研究方向。
    In 2020, during the time of the outbreak of Covid-19 and the opening of internet-only bank in Taiwan. Additionally, the technology of FinTech was gradual completing. Therefore, the traditional financial industry has proposed strategies to develop an ecosystem, expecting to interact with various industries through APIs in order to get closer to the customer`s life.

    This study selects three representative financial companies in the development of the ecosystem, including Taishin Bank, Yu-shan Bank and Line Bank. This study collects relevant data through case interviews and secondary data methods, and uses business model diagrams to illustrate three different ecosystems model. Then, I analyzed its pros&cons and gave it strategic recommendations.

    Because Taishin Bank adopts the bank-as-a-platform model, integrating all life and financial services on the same platform, customers can meet all financial and life needs in one stop, so the customer experience is better; Yu-shan Bank is dispersed in various industries through Quan Ying Payment On the platform, its advantage is that it has a wide range of contacts; The advantage of Line Bank lies in its community foundation. In the future, it can be expected to deepen its cooperation with the Line ecosystem through points.

    Through this research, we can understand the differences in the strategies adopted by traditional financial banks and internet-only banks in constructing a financial ecosystem. Since the ecosystem is still in its infancy, the author hopes that through this research, the relevant research content can be further provided and can offer some feasible research directions for future researchers.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    1.方世杰、李慶芳(2016)。平台經濟、共享經濟、價值共創的定義、差異、意義。擷取自網站名稱:http://reskm98.blogspot.com/2016/12/blog-post.html(最後瀏覽:2022年02月01日)。
    2.王宏仁(2020)。【科技金融專題:玉山生態圈戰略】靠AI技術帶頭強化產品力,將金融服務嵌入各種任何場景。擷取自網站名稱: https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/140249(最後瀏覽:2022年04月27日)。
    3.王若樸(2022)。開業1年用戶數破110萬,Line Bank預告4月下旬推出快點生活圈布局3大金融生態圈。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/150509(最後瀏覽:2022年03月10日)。
    4.李文瑞、陳秋宏(1999)。策略群組、製造目標、移動障礙與經營績效之研究-台灣印刷電路板產業之實證分析。管理學報,第16卷,第3期,頁 451-475。
    5.李宏(2018)。平臺經濟新戰略。中國: 中國經濟出版社。
    6.李靜宜(2021)。【數金領先群戰略:玉山銀行】以數據為核心切入剛性場景,玉山銀揭聯手零售布局電支戰略。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/146774(最後瀏覽:2022年04月17日)。
    7.李鴻典(2019)。全家排名威脅龍頭711。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=632533(最後瀏覽:2022年03月30日)。
    8.林顥(2021)。以平台策略觀點探討台灣純網銀發展-以樂天商業銀行與LINE Bank為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    9.邱建齊(2022)。「全盈+PAY」上線,年底前拚至少150萬會員。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.moneydj.com/kmdj/news/newsviewer.aspx?a=3c894116-aa7e-4ae1-bf85-c9b765211e1e(最後瀏覽:2022年04月28日)。
    10.胡瑋佳(2016)。台新金控CEO尚瑞強:敏捷式開發是打造數位銀行架構的關鍵。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/105269(最後瀏覽:2022年06月20日)。
    11.高敬原(2020)。決勝新金融!科技、數據、生態圈,3關鍵揭銀行服務未來式。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/59507/fintech-fight-to-win(最後瀏覽:2022年05月25日)。
    12.高敬原(2021)。迎戰純網銀!玉山銀推純數位銀行e.Fingo拿什麼贏?跟原本的App差在哪。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/61461/e.Fingo-esunbank(最後瀏覽:2022年04月30日)。
    13.高敬原(2021)。攜手全家做電支,玉山金用「互補策略」補上拼圖!如何跨領域誕生新玩法。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/64314/familymart-esun-digital-payment-strategy(最後瀏覽:2022年04月30日)。
    14.陳君毅(2019)。LINE服務通通AI化!LINE BRAIN計劃2020啟動,全面搶吃台灣AI商機。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/55765/line-techpulse-2019(最後瀏覽:2022年06月20日)。
    15.陳威如、余卓軒(2013)。平台革命: 席捲全球社交、購物、遊戲、媒體的商業模式創新。臺北市:商周。
    16.陳美君(2022)。純網銀找利基,搶建生態圈。擷取自網站名稱:https://udn.com/news/story/7239/6254620(最後瀏覽:2022年03月03日)。
    17.陳碧芬(2019)。攻占台、港純網銀 渣打要發揮國際綜效。擷取自網站名稱:https://ctee.com.tw/livenews/aj/ctee/a83205002019073113024337(最後瀏覽:2022年03月01日)。
    18.傅珮晴、蘇柔瑋(2020)。全聯PX Pay滿月紅利奪金獎,玉山銀會員金融生態圈獲銀獎。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/68816/business-innovation-fca2022 (最後瀏覽:2022年04月28日)。
    19.程倚華(2019)。看準807萬無卡族,Pi拍錢包、玉山聯手推簽帳卡拉攏年輕人。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/55961/pchome-pi-debit-card(最後瀏覽:2022年03月28日)。
    20.廖和明(2020)。數位轉型三大模式,共構金融生態圈。擷取自網站名稱:https://www.fisc.com.tw/Upload/ec11fae2-91f9-405f-8ded-24949edfb833/TC/9908.pdf(最後瀏覽:2022年04月30日)。

    二、英文文獻
    1.Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1977). From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 241-261.
    2.Chakravarty, A., Kumar, A., & Grewal, R. (2014). Customer orientation structure for internet-based business-to-business platform firms. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 1-23.
    3.Cool, K. O. (1985). Strategic Group Formation and Strategic Group Shifts: A Longitudinal Analysis of The US Pharmaceutical Industry, 1963-1982. Purdue University.
    4.Cool, K. O., & Schendel, D. (1987). Strategic group formation and performance: The case of the US pharmaceutical industry, 1963–1982. Management Science, 33(9), 1102-1124.
    5.Drucker, P. F., & Maciariello, J. A. (2018). The Daily Drucker: 366 Days of Insight and Motivation for Getting The Right Things Done. Routledge.
    6.Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    7.Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92-103.
    8.Harrigan, K. R. (1985). An application of clustering for strategic group analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 6(1), 55-73.
    9.Hatten, K. J., & Hatten, M. L. (1987). Strategic groups, asymmetrical mobility barriers and contestability. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 329-342.
    10.Hunt, M. S. (1972). Competition in The Major Home Appliance Industry, 1960-1970. Harvard University.
    11.Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.
    12.Mascarenhas, B. (1989). Strategic group dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 333-352.
    13.Mascarenhas, B., & Aaker, D. A. (1989). Mobility barriers and strategic groups. Strategic Management Journal, 475-485.
    14.McGee, J., & Thomas, H. (1986). Strategic groups: theory, research and taxonomy. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 141-160.
    15.Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Oliveira, M. A. Y., & Ferreira, J. J. P. (2011). Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers. African Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 22-30.
    16.Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
    17.Ruíz, F. J. M. (1999). Dynamic analysis of competition in marketing: strategic groups in Spanish banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(5), 233-250.
    18.Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54-62.
    19.Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering The future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283-290.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    108363079
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108363079
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200856
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    307901.pdf2002KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback