Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142166
|
| Title: | 隱私的哲學探究
Privacy and Ethics: A Philosophical Study |
| Authors: | 游宜庭
Yu, Yi-Ting |
| Contributors: | 鄭光明
游宜庭
Yu, Yi-Ting |
| Keywords: | 隱私
倫理
隱私權
描述義隱私
規範義隱私
Privacy
Privacy rights
Ethics
Morals |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2022-10-05 09:25:15 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 「隱私」和個人在社會中的生活息息相關，是一個經常被使用於劃清個人或是小團體與大群體間的界限的詞彙。然而，無論是在哲學亦或是法學當中，皆沒有一個對隱私的決定性定義。本文旨在探討「隱私」在哲學討論中的不同面向，以釐清此概念在不同情境之下的意義，並試圖提出將「倫理（ethics）」作為隱私權是否適用在特定情境中的依據。
本文對隱私的討論將區分為三大面向：
一、隱私的描述性與規範性意義。
二、隱私在物質與心理層面上的行使。
三、隱私於個人與社會之關係。
透過此一區分，本文試圖論證「隱私」作為一個概念與「隱私權」之間的關聯，以及論證隱私乃個人作為獨立個體而存在不可或缺的要素。同時，本文欲引進「倫理」作為判斷特定情況下個人是否享有隱私權的依據。透過提出此一評判依據，筆者期望能夠對隱私在哲學中的討論以及其應用有所貢獻。
“Privacy” as a term is closely related to our everyday life, often used when one is in need of a space isolated from the larger part of the society. However, when it comes to its discussion, there is yet a consensus as to the definition of privacy and the realm it covers. This thesis aims to draw an outline of privacy in its philosophical discussion, and put forward three aspects that privacy considers, namely:
1. The descriptive and normative interests of privacy
2. The physical and psychological aspect of privacy
3. The social and personal approach to privacy
Through such distinctions, this thesis aims to draw the link between “privacy” and “privacy rights”. Furthermore, this thesis aims to introduce “ethics” into the discussion of privacy in order to set a criterion for privacy-applicable situations. With ethics, this thesis would like to contribute to the application of privacy, both as a philosophical concept and as a legal one. |
| Reference: | Allen, Anita L. (2003). Why Privacy Isn`t Everything. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Cooley, T. M. I. (1879). A Treatise on the Law of Torts: Or the wrongs which arise independently of contract. Chicago: Callaghan and Company.
DeCew, Judith Wagner. (1997). In Pursuit Of Privacy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Levy, K., Schneier, B. (2020). Privacy threats in intimate relationships. Journal of Cybersecurity, 6(1). doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyaa006
Locke, J. (2016). Second Treatise of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration. Goldie, M. (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1988). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1991). Toward A Feminist Theory Of The State. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.
Mill, John Stuart. (2010). On Liberty. London: Penguin Books.
Moore, Adam D. (2010). Privacy Rights: Moral And Legal Foundations. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2000). Is Privacy Bad For Women?. Boston Review.
Parent, W. A. (1983). Privacy, Morality, and the Law. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(4), 269–288. http://www.jstor.org/stable/226537
Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred Dycus Miller, and Jeffrey Paul. (2010). The Right To Privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schoeman, D. (1984). Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, Laurence. (2007). Contemporary Debates In Social Philosophy. (pp. 131-145). Oxford: Blackwell.
Thomson, Judith J. (1975). The Right to Privacy, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4: 295–314
Warren, Samuel D., and Brandeis, Louis D. (1890). The Right To Privacy. Harvard Law Review 4.5 (1890): 193. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
哲學系
105154003 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105154003 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202201528 |
| Appears in Collections: | [哲學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 400301.pdf | | 690Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 119 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
