English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110387/141319 (78%)
Visitors : 46912822      Online Users : 224
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143336


    Title: 經濟平等與免於屈從之自由:論洛克財產權理論中的慈善與勞動
    Economic Equality and the Freedom From Subjection: The Concepts of Charity and Labor in Locke`s Theory of Property Rights
    Authors: 黃天輿
    Huang, Tien-Yu
    Contributors: 周家瑜
    Chou, Chia-Yu
    黃天輿
    Huang, Tien-Yu
    Keywords: 約翰.洛克
    財產權
    經濟平等
    免於屈從之自由
    John Locke
    Property Rights
    Economic Equality
    Freedom From Subjection
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2023-02-08 15:27:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文分析約翰.洛克的財產權理論,並從洛克《政府論》的整體關懷出發,主張一種新的觀點:對於免於屈從之自由保障有其必要性。傳統詮釋認為洛克式的政府應是盡量減少干預的小政府(minimalist government)才能保障財產權,與之相反的是,本文主張在政治社會中政府有必要適當的透過政治權力介入經濟的安排,以緩解貨幣化後的經濟不平等與隨之而來對人們免於屈從之自由及自我保存的威脅,本文所提出經濟不平等的政治解方,即是政府應藉由慈善義務的履行與勞動制度的改革促進經濟平等,以更全面的在政治社會中保障免於屈從之自由。
    In this thesis, I analyze Locke`s theory of property rights, and the whole concern in John Locke`s Two Treatises of Government. I argue for a new perspective: the need for protection of freedom from subjection. Contrary to the traditional interpretation that Lockean government should be a minimalist government in order to protect property rights, I argue that in a Lockean political society, the government is obliged to intervene in economic arrangements through political power in order to alleviate the economic inequality after monetization to avoid the consequent threat to the freedom from subjection and self-preservation. To comprehensively protect the freedom from subjection in the political society, I argue that Locke proposes political solutions to economic inequality: the government should facilitate economic equality by fulfilling the obligation of charity and reforming the labor system.
    Reference: 一、中文參考文獻
    周家瑜
    2021 〈自由主義陰影下的洛克:洛克論財產的道德問題〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》75期,頁1-53。(Chou, Chia-Yu, 2021, “In the Shadow of Liberalism: Locke on the Moral Problem of Property Right,” A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs, 75:1-53.)
    陳禹仲
    2022 〈洛克:反奴隸的政治社會〉,見曾國祥、劉佳昊(編),《帝國與文明:政治思想的全球轉向》,頁125-152。新北:聯經。
    二、外文參考文獻
    Appleby, Joyce Oldham
    1976 “Locke, Liberalism and the Natural Law of Money,” Past & Present, 71: 43–69.
    Benjamin,Walter
    1996 Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 1: 1913-1926. Marcus Bullock& Michael W. Jennings (eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Buckle, Stephen
    1987 “Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Australian National University.
    Caffentzis, George
    2021 Clipped Coins, Abused Words, and Civil Government: John Locke’s Philosophy of Money. P. Rekret (ed.). London: Pluto Press.
    Dunn, John
    1968 “Justice and the Interpretation of Locke’s Political Theory,” Political Studies, 16(1): 68–87.
    1996 The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Fagiani, Francesco
    1983 “Natural law and history in Locke`s theory of distributive justice,” Topoi, 2: 163–185.
    Friedman, Milton
    2002 Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Guest, Chris
    2016 “The Role of Government in the Political Economy of John Locke,” History of Economics Review, 18(1): 19-33.
    Halldenius, Lena
    2003 “Locke and the Non-Arbitrary,” European Journal of Political Theory, 2(3): 261–279.
    Hayek, Friedrich
    1960 The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    1982 Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy: The Political Order of a Free People. London: Routledge.
    Holmes, Stephen
    1995 Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago :University of Chicago Press.
    Hume, David
    1985 Essays: Moral, Political, Literary. Eugene F. Miller (ed.). Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Fund.
    Hundert, E. J.
    1972 “The Making of Homo Faber: John Locke between Ideology and History,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 33(1): 3–22.
    1977 “Market Society and Meaning in Locke`s Political Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 15(1): 33-44.
    Ince, Onur Ulas
    2011 “Enclosing in God’s Name, Accumulating for Mankind: Money, Morality, and Accumulation in John Locke’s Theory of Property,” The Review of Politics, 73(1): 29-54.
    Kelly, Patrick Hyde
    1991 “General Introduction: Locke on Money,” pp. 1-109 in Parick H. Kelly (ed.), Locke on Money. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
    Lamb, Robert and Thompson, Benjamin
    2009 “The Meaning of Charity in Locke’s Political Thought,” European Journal of Political Theory, 8(2): 229–252.
    Locke, John
    1823 The Works of John Locke, vol. 10. London: Thomas Tegg.
    1824 The Works of John Locke, vol. 4. London: Rivington.
    1988 Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    1963 A Letter Concerning Toleration. Latin and English texts, Mario Montuori (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Niijhoff.
    1997 Locke: Political Essays. Mark Goldie (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    2010 A Letter Concerning Toleration and Other Writings. Mark Goldie & David Womersley (eds.). Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Fund.
    Mack, Eric
    2009 John Locke. New York: Continuum.
    MacPherson, C.B.
    1962 The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    2012 Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval. Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
    Nozick, Robert
    1974 Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
    Olivecrona, Karl
    1974 “Appropriation in the State of Nature: Locke on the Origin of Property,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 35(2): 211-230.
    Pettit, Philip
    1997 Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Rawls, John.
    1999 A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    Ryan, Alan.
    1965 “Locke and the Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie,” Political Studies, 13(2): 219–30.
    Scanlon, Thomas
    1976 “Nozick on Rights, Liberty, and Property,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(1): 3-25.
    Seagrave, S. Adam
    2016 “Locke on the Law of Nature and Natural Rights,” pp. 371-393 in Matthew Stuart (ed.), A companion to Locke. Chichester, West Sussex, UK : Wiley Blackwell.
    Sharon, Assaf
    2022 “Locke, liberty, and law: Legalism and extra-legal powers in the Second Treatise,” European Journal of Political Theory, 21(2): 230–252.
    Skinner, Quentin
    1998 Liberty Before Liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Strauss, Leo
    1965 Natural Right and History. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
    Theobald, Paul and Ronald S. Rochon
    2006 “Enclosure Then and Now: Rural Schools and Communities in the Wake of Market-Driven Agriculture,” Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(12): 1-8.
    Tully, James
    1980 A Discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    1993 An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Uberti, Luca J.
    2013 “By “fancy or agreement”: Locke’s theory of money and the justice of the global monetary system,” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 6(1): 49-81.
    Waldron, Jeremy
    1979 “Enough and as Good Left for Others,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 29(117): 319-328.
    1988 The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    2002 God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke`s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ward, Lee
    2009 “A Note on a Note on Locke’s ‘Great Art of Government’,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42(2): 521–523.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治學系
    109252019
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109252019
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    201901.pdf1271KbAdobe PDF267View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback